
Noem takes heat on Texas amid doubts over FEMA flood response
'Heck of a job, Secretary Noem,' The Houston Chronicle's editorial board wrote on Monday, riffing on former President George W. Bush's notorious praise of then-Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Director Michael Brown as New Orleans flooded.
The editors joined Democratic members of Congress — including Sens. Ruben Gallego (Ariz.), Chris Murphy (Md.) and Ed Markey (Mass), as well as Texas Reps. Greg Casar and Jasmine Crockett — in calling for investigations into Noem's handling of FEMA, an agency both she and President Trump have previously talked about closing, amid reports of poor response times and local volunteers filling in for federal responders.
On Tuesday, Markey called for Noem's resignation, describing her handling of the floods as 'an absolute disgrace.'
In a video posted on X, Murphy said that FEMA had begun to look like 'a PR agency for the Secretary of Homeland Security, not an actual disaster response agency.'
Rafael Lemaitre, FEMA director of public affairs under former President Obama, said Trump and Noem's vision for FEMA — one where it exists mostly to back up state responses — is largely already reality.
The Trump administration, he said, 'is in denial about the role of FEMA, the improvements that FEMA has made since Hurricane Katrina — not only in its ability to respond better to disasters, but to help communities prepare for them in an era of increased severity and frequency in disasters.'
Since the reforms after Hurricanes Rita and Katrina, FEMA has functioned as a support service for local officials, who must request its aid and run the disaster response themselves.
'If there ever was a federal agency built not to tell states how to handle things but to support them when needed, it's FEMA, which only kicks in when a state's capacity is exceeded, whether in response, recovery, mitigation, or preparedness,' Lemaitre said. 'Governors, red or blue, are in charge. They ask for what they need, and we provide it.'
He argued that the administration is undoing the post-Katrina reforms, starting with its new head, David Richardson, who is under fire for his failure to make any public statements or appearances for more than a week after the floods.
Richardson, who runs FEMA part time, is the first agency head since Brown without any background in disaster response. Under the Post-Katrina law requiring FEMA heads to have at least five years of disaster management experience, he would be disqualified — but as acting head, he's exempt.
On Wednesday, at the inaugural Hill Nation Summit in Washington, Noem told NewsNation's Blake Burman that Trump's 'vision for FEMA is that we would empower states to be able to respond to their constituents much more than what FEMA has done in the past.'
'In Texas,' she told Burman, the agency 'cut through the bureaucratic red tape and the rules and regulations that were left over from the Biden administration so that we immediately pre-deployed millions of dollars to Texas so that they could run their response.'
Over the weekend, Noem attacked the press reports of a poor response in Texas, insisting on 'Fox and Friends' that the reporting of FEMA delays are 'fake news' and 'absolute trash.'
She told NBC News that 'it's discouraging that during this time, when we have such a loss of life, and so many people's lives have turned upside down, that people are playing politics with this, because the response time was immediate.'
Pressed on reports of low response rates at FEMA hotlines, Noem said she didn't believe the numbers and challenged anonymous sources to come forward.
In a statement to The Hill, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin decried reporting that the agency had been slow to deploy teams as 'lies' and 'an unapparelled display of activist journalism.'
'Within moments of the flooding in Texas, DHS [Department of Homeland Security] assets, including the U.S. Coast Guard, tactical Border Patrol units and FEMA personnel surged into unprecedented action alongside Texas first responders,' McLaughlin said.
'By Tuesday, FEMA had deployed 311 staffers, providing support and shelter for hundreds of people,' she added.
McLaughlin argued that calls to dismantle the agency had been metaphorical. Under the new administration, she said, 'It's no secret that FEMA, as it is today, will no longer exist.' In what has now become a mantra of Noem's tenure, she added that the agency 'is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief.'
That message has also been embraced by Trump's Republican allies in Texas. In a press conference on Monday, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) agreed with the administration that FEMA needed to be 'what I call rightsized so that it would be more nimble, quicker in response — understanding it's the locals that know what's best in responding to a disaster.'
But this description of the future course of the agency looks a lot like how it has traditionally looked, former disaster management professionals have told The Hill.
'They try to equate FEMA with red tape, but that's a red herring, because that's not how the disaster response system has been set up, particularly since Katrina,' Lemaitre said.
FEMA has lost 25 percent of staff since Trump took office, cuts worsened after the floods when hundreds of call center contractors were let go, according to The New York Times.
That followed reporting from CNN that Noem waited 72 hours to send FEMA disaster response teams to Kerr County — because under her leadership, the agency has to get her approval for every expenditure over $100,000.
In a statement, a DHS spokesperson called CNN's reporting 'absolute hogwash.'
Given the funds that FEMA works with and the size of Noem's purview at the department, the reported delays are 'really, really upsetting,' said Candace Valenzuela, who ran the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the region that includes Texas under then-President Biden.
'It just reeks of looking at things granularly, and not understanding that this is a massive country, and doing it at that level just does not work — or wanting to pick winners and losers,' Valenzuela said.
One impact of Noem's new mandate seems to be fewer federal personnel on the ground than in past disasters. In far western Travis County, where devastating floods killed more than a dozen people, even Judge Andy Brown, the county's chief executive, isn't clear what role FEMA is playing.
While Brown declared a local disaster the day of the floods, Trump didn't approve it until nearly a week later, and, as of Tuesday, Brown had seen just one uniformed FEMA official on the ground.
'As far as I know, they have not set up that station where people can walk in, ask questions to FEMA and apply for things,' he told The Hill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know
Trump wants a deal to end the war — but expectations are low for a major breakthrough. President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska to discuss a way forward in the Russia-Ukraine war. It will be the first face-to-face sit-down between the two leaders since 2019, and perhaps the most significant since they met alone the following year (alongside interpreters) for more than two hours in Helsinki, Finland. It will also be Putin's first meeting with a U.S. president since the start of his invasion. He previously met with former President Joe Biden in June 2021. Friday's summit comes at what could be a pivotal point in the conflict, which escalated when Putin's forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The fighting has since caused a staggering number of casualties on both sides. Trump has been trying for months to secure a deal to end the war, but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to Friday's summit and foreign-policy experts question Putin's desire for peace. Expectations are low for any sort of major breakthrough. 'This is really a feel-out meeting,' Trump said Monday. 'Probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made.' Here's everything you need to know ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska. Why is Trump meeting Putin now? Trump has a long history of praising Putin, and his relationship with Zelensky is fraught. When campaigning for reelection in 2024, Trump vowed to end the war during his first 24 hours back in office; he later paused U.S. assistance to Ukraine. As a result, experts have questioned whether Trump is positioned to broker a deal that both sides could agree to. Yet in recent weeks, Trump has also expressed frustration with Putin's intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities and civilians and his seeming indifference to peace talks. When Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused Putin of "needlessly killing a lot of people," adding in a social media post: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" "I am very disappointed with President Putin," Trump told reporters on July 13, shortly before announcing a plan to send weapons to Ukraine via NATO. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that." In turn, that disappointment may have 'pushed the president into closer alignment with NATO allies and even Zelensky,' according to Politico. On Wednesday, Trump participated in a video call with Zelensky and other European leaders and reportedly agreed to 'five principles' for the talks with Putin. They include keeping Ukraine 'at the table' for follow-up meetings and refusing to discuss peace terms — like swaps of land between Russia and Ukraine — before a ceasefire is put in place. For his part, Trump has framed Friday's meeting as a preliminary step in a larger process, saying that a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky could follow. 'First, I'll find out where we are,' Trump said Wednesday. 'If the first [meeting] goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately.' At the same time, Trump insisted Putin would face 'severe consequences' if he doesn't seem serious in Alaska about ending the war. 'There may be no second meeting,' the president added, 'because I didn't get the answers that we have to have.' So far, Trump has resisted imposing tariffs or further sanctions on Russia in an effort to bring Putin into negotiations. Last month, Trump told Putin that he would have to agree to a ceasefire by Aug. 8 or face 'very severe tariffs' and a new wave of sanctions. When that deadline passed without a ceasefire deal, Trump instead invited Putin to talk in person. According to Axios, Trump told Zelensky and other European leaders on Wednesday that his goal is to get Putin to agree to a ceasefire at Friday's meeting. Why is Putin meeting Trump now? The international community has largely isolated the Russian leader since the start of the war, with both the U.S. and Europe moving to cut off Moscow's access to western markets and its fossil fuel export revenues. But sanctions have done nothing to curb Putin's aggression in Ukraine. 'I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' Putin told guests at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in June. 'We have an old rule. Wherever a Russian soldier sets foot is ours.' Analysts say that Putin sees Trump as the rare Western leader who, in his desire to make a deal, could pressure Ukraine into accepting major concessions — adding that even Trump's invitation to meet on American soil (despite Putin's international arrest warrant for war crimes) is likely seen by the Russian president as its own reward. Putin's goal Friday, as Politico recently put it, will be to 'try to repair his personal relationship with Trump in a private meeting while convincing him that Ukraine shares the blame for the prolonged conflict.' Trump has repeatedly signaled that he does, in fact, blame Zelensky as well as Putin, most recently on Monday. "I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done — very, very severely, disagree,' the president told reporters. 'This is a war that should have never happened.' Trump has also suggested freezing most current battle lines in place, with additional "land swaps' to be agreed upon by Putin and Zelensky — an idea that Zelensky has rejected, claiming it violates his country's constitution. What does Zelensky have to say about the meeting? Zelensky has long claimed that by continuing to insist on maximalist objectives — international recognition of seized areas of Ukraine as part of 'new Russia'; promises that Ukraine will be forever barred from NATO — Putin is deliberately making demands that he knows Ukraine cannot accept in order to convince Trump that Zelensky is the problem. 'We understand the Russians' intention to try to deceive America,' Zelensky said in his evening address on Sunday night. 'We will not allow this.' Zelensky has long called for a complete ceasefire as a precondition for negotiations; he has also said he would talk directly with Putin in any format. Putin has rejected both offers. In the meantime, the two sides are intensifying their efforts on the battlefield in order to bolster their negotiation positions. Russia's troops recently 'broke through a segment of Ukraine's defensive line near the city of Pokrovsk, a longtime stronghold,' according to the New York Times — a move that shows, in Zelensky's words, that Putin is 'redeploying [his] troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations.' Putin is 'not preparing for a cease-fire or an end to the war,' Zelensky claimed. Similarly, Kyiv has 'ramped up attacks on Russian oil refineries, doubling down on its strategy of pressuring Russia … by targeting the Kremlin's main revenue source to fund the war,' according to the Times.


Buzz Feed
28 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Gavin Newsom Just Dragged Ted Cruz For His Embarrassing Math Skills
Gavin Newsom has been speaking Donald Trump on social media the past few days! The California Governor has threatened to redraw the state's districts unless Trump steps in to stop Texas's redistricting. After hitting his 24-hour deadline with no response from Trump, it looks like the redistricting is on. On Thursday morning, Gov. Newsom tweeted, "Donald Trump and Greg Abbott are going to have a very bad day today." Welllll, ol' Teddy Cruz decided to insert himself into the drama. In a now-deleted tweet, the Texas Senator said, "If California gerrymanders from its current 43-9 Dem advantage (83%) to a 51-0 Dem advantage (100%)... then Texas should go from a 24-14 GOP advantage (63%) to 38-0 (100%). The only problem with that 43+9 isn't 51... It's 52. Newsom jumped on this, correcting him and saying, "Please learn math." He doubled down with another tweet: "Ted Cruz treating his posts like Cancun: Gets caught, then disappears." I guess we'll see what news he has in store for us today!


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
DeSantis planning second Florida immigration detention facility
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) on Thursday teased plans to open a second migrant detention facility in the Sunshine State despite pushback over ' Alligator Alcatraz.' DeSantis said the Baker Correctional Institution, a state prison about 43 miles west of downtown Jacksonville, Fla., will now hold migrants awaiting deportation, according to The Associated Press. The move comes just weeks after the state opened its 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility in the Everglades. Its construction was spurred by President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Trump, along with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, visited the center last month. 'There is a demand for this. I'm confident that it will be filled,' DeSantis said in his announcement Thursday, referring to the new center as 'Deportation Depot.' Development of the new facility could cost up to $6 million, despite the preexisting structure, he added. It currently features 1,300 beds but officials in the state are looking to add at least 700 more. The proposal comes as federal judges weigh legal challenges to 'Alligator Alcatraz,' including whether a government agency or private contractor has the legal authority to detain people or act as an immigration enforcement officer and if its construction complies with federal environmental laws. Last month, the governor said he hoped Florida would be used as the 'force multiplier' for deportations. 'I don't want it to be where illegals are just stored there, and then just kind of sitting. I want it to be where illegals are here, there's an aggressive processing and an aggressive deportation schedule,' he said. The Trump administration has also been in contact with other GOP governors about similar construction projects in other states, according to Noem. While a list of potential states has not been provided, DHS announced a partnership with Indiana to build the ' Speedway Slammer,' a facility that would be located about 65 miles north of Indianapolis. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) just last month launched grant program that will offer funding to states to build detention centers.