Less than half of Mass. housing voucher holders can consistently afford rent
The report, which studied the efficacy of the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program (MRVP), revealed that 44% of voucher holders were always able to afford rent, while 33% said they could afford it most of the time and 16% said they could only afford it sometimes.
Researchers determined through surveys and interviews with tenants and landlords that while the program is a lifeline for the people it helps, it also has significant shortcomings. Those shortfalls make it difficult for people to access rental assistance and/or build long-term financial security.
'While safe, stable housing is a vast improvement on the alternative, [tenants] aspire to geographic and economic mobility,' the researchers wrote in the report. 'Voucher holders want to have a choice of decent places to live, to be able to save and someday to be able to afford homeownership.'
What is the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program?
The state rental assistance program is the oldest housing voucher program in the U.S. and serves more than 10,000 low-income households, according to the report.
The state budgeted $219 million for the program in the current fiscal year. Gov. Maura Healey calls for raising that to $253 million in her proposed fiscal 2026 budget.
To be eligible for the program, a household must make 80% or less of the area median income for their city or town.
Voucher holders pay 30% of their monthly income toward rent, and the voucher covers the rest.
Tenants who use state-funded vouchers told the researchers the program has allowed them to improve their lives. Seventy-eight percent of tenants said it was easier to find and keep a job because of the housing stability a voucher provides, and 86% of parents said their children were doing better in school.
'My kids aren't living in a shelter apartment. My kids are with me. I'm not in fear that my children are going to be taken by DCF [Department of Children & Family] because I can't provide a stable living,' one tenant told the researchers.
Voucher recipients are generally able to access higher-quality housing. Tenants in focus groups said their homes are better, and appliances and utilities work better than in previous apartments. Sixty-four percent of survey respondents said their current home is in excellent or good condition.
Landlords who rented to MRVP tenants broadly said the program also benefits them. A large majority — 81% — cited the guarantee of consistent rent payments as one of the most helpful aspects, while 38% mentioned reduced turnover rates and 20% mentioned access to a wider pool of tenants.
Seventy percent said they were very or somewhat satisfied with the program, and 47% said they were 'very likely' to seek out voucher-holding tenants in the future, in addition to 22% who said they were 'somewhat likely' to do so.
What challenges exist for tenants with rental vouchers?
The state program currently has a waitlist of 168,000 people hoping to receive a voucher, according to the report. Of voucher holders surveyed, 45% said it took more than a year to receive a voucher after they applied.
However, even those with vouchers said they faced challenges affording basic necessities and saving money.
This was particularly true for households at both ends of the eligible income spectrum. For the lowest-income tenants, even with some of their rent covered, their remaining funds may not stretch far enough to cover bills. Participants with the highest eligible incomes experience 'cliff effects,' or the drop-off of assistance programs if their income exceeds the eligible level.
Another issue discussed by tenants and landlords is that of communication and transparency on the part of the state.
'Tenants and landlords both emphasized how much smoother their experiences were when dealing with a representative who they felt was competent and communicative,' the researchers wrote.
'They also described frustrating situations with uncommunicative representatives, long hold times on the phone, missing information or feeling lost when contact dropped off after move-in.'
What improvements can be made to the program?
The report outlines several recommendations for improving the state rental voucher program, including creating more vouchers and providing more opportunities for tenants to build wealth.
The researchers suggested providing 'bridge' financial assistance to households that lose their eligibility due to an increase in income, to offset cliff effects, and giving waitlist priority to previous voucher holders if their income drops back down below the threshold.
They suggested expanding the existing Self-Sufficiency Program within MRVP, which helps tenants develop career skills and access employment, and if their income increases, the extra funds are placed in an escrow account until they complete the program. Only some of the organizations that administer vouchers offer this program.
The report also emphasizes the need for better education for tenants and landlords about the requirements and process of the voucher program and communication with the agency.
The researchers acknowledged that most of these improvements would require more funding for the program, but did not say how much more funding would be needed.
To help provide more resources and stability to the program, they recommended that MRVP be codified into state law. Currently, money for the program is renewed annually in the state budget passed by the Legislature, which leaves tenants without a guarantee that the funds will be allocated each year.
'Codifying the program is a simple step that would give everyone who relies on it confidence that it will remain in place and continue to serve a critical function in the housing ecosystem,' they wrote.
You can read the full report on The Boston Foundation's website.
More on housing
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Another New Feadship Superyacht Is Delivered In 2025
Larger and more innovative superyachts seem to be delivered to new owners with more regularity than ever before. But there are several good reasons for that. One of the simplest is that many of the large yachts that are being launched now were conceived when all of us were locked down at home—dreaming of blue water and wide-open horizons—during the Covid pandemic. And I believe so many yachts were conceived during the Covid is simply because people realized that being able to safely, privately, and yes, comfortably escape the stress of everyday life with their family and friends may be the greatest luxury in the world. Now, I may be a bit biased but, I think there's no better way to escape the stress of the everyday life than onboard a superyacht that's been meticulously designed and built by teams of creative and talented naval architects, artists, technicians, carpenters, and all the other experts that contribute to building these spectacularly unique vessels. The newly launched Feadship Stella M that was designed by Studio De Voogt (and previously only known by her code name Project 827) is a perfect example. She features clean exterior lines and numerous decks designed to provide lots of wide-open, light-filled interior space. A dedicated owner's deck offers a panoramic and secluded master stateroom with wrap-around glass, direct access to a private breakfast area, and my personal favorite—a hot tub. This secluded level is made possible by the raised pilothouse. On the main deck aft, the saloon is wrapped in floor-to-ceiling glass, and opens onto an large aft deck area with a 23-foot-long pool and lots of comfortable places to lounge in the sun. The guest accommodation areas are located on the main deck too. Four staterooms and two VIP suites offer flexible comfort, with the VIPs able to combine into a full-beam suite. Beneath the aft deck, a wellness space sits just steps from the swim platform and is easily accessible to everyone on board. Since the project was developed in close collaboration with Burgess, who represented the owner throughout the build, and Hugo-Morgan Harris as technical representative, Feadship Sales Director Maarten Janssen was understandably proud at the launch. 'The successful delivery of Stella M reflects seamless collaboration between the owner, the yard, design teams, technical experts, and broker,' he said. 'Every detail was shaped by a shared ambition to create something exceptional. The owner brought a clear vision and personal touch to the project, contributing thoughtfully throughout. Stella M is a refined and distinctive yacht, ready to begin her first Mediterranean season.' And Stella M is not the only new Feadship to be launched this year. The distinctly-styled Valor that's well over 300-feet long made her entrance earlier this spring too. Watch this space.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Technology One Limited (ASX:TNE) Shares Could Be 27% Below Their Intrinsic Value Estimate
Explore Technology One's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Key Insights Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, Technology One fair value estimate is AU$52.71 Current share price of AU$38.31 suggests Technology One is potentially 27% undervalued Analyst price target for TNE is AU$36.92 which is 30% below our fair value estimate How far off is Technology One Limited (ASX:TNE) from its intrinsic value? Using the most recent financial data, we'll take a look at whether the stock is fairly priced by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to today's value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Believe it or not, it's not too difficult to follow, as you'll see from our example! We generally believe that a company's value is the present value of all of the cash it will generate in the future. However, a DCF is just one valuation metric among many, and it is not without flaws. For those who are keen learners of equity analysis, the Simply Wall St analysis model here may be something of interest to you. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. The Method We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today's dollars: 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Levered FCF (A$, Millions) AU$166.7m AU$201.9m AU$433.3m AU$588.5m AU$741.6m AU$883.6m AU$1.01b AU$1.12b AU$1.22b AU$1.30b Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x7 Analyst x7 Analyst x1 Est @ 35.82% Est @ 26.01% Est @ 19.14% Est @ 14.33% Est @ 10.96% Est @ 8.61% Est @ 6.96% Present Value (A$, Millions) Discounted @ 8.0% AU$154 AU$173 AU$344 AU$432 AU$504 AU$556 AU$589 AU$605 AU$608 AU$603 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = AU$4.6b After calculating the present value of future cash flows in the initial 10-year period, we need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all future cash flows beyond the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 3.1%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 8.0%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2035 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = AU$1.3b× (1 + 3.1%) ÷ (8.0%– 3.1%) = AU$27b Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= AU$27b÷ ( 1 + 8.0%)10= AU$13b The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is AU$17b. In the final step we divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of AU$38.3, the company appears a touch undervalued at a 27% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Valuations are imprecise instruments though, rather like a telescope - move a few degrees and end up in a different galaxy. Do keep this in mind. Important Assumptions Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Technology One as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 8.0%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.164. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. See our latest analysis for Technology One SWOT Analysis for Technology One Strength Earnings growth over the past year exceeded the industry. Currently debt free. Weakness Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Software market. Opportunity Annual earnings are forecast to grow faster than the Australian market. Trading below our estimate of fair value by more than 20%. Threat Revenue is forecast to grow slower than 20% per year. Next Steps: Although the valuation of a company is important, it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Preferably you'd apply different cases and assumptions and see how they would impact the company's valuation. If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Technology One, there are three essential elements you should further examine: Financial Health: Does TNE have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk. Future Earnings: How does TNE's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart. Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered! PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the ASX every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


News24
a day ago
- News24
Newlyweds Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez want R3,3m in damages from her brother
Fresh from their lavish R900-million Italian wedding, billionaire newlyweds Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez have turned their attention to a far less romantic matter: collecting legal fees from family. The Amazon founder and his wife are demanding R3,3 million in legal costs from Lauren's estranged brother, Michael Sanchez, following years of bitter court battles which have torn the family apart. While R3,3 million might be pocket change for the world's third-richest man, the couple's lawyers aren't letting it slide. They recently filed a motion demanding that Michael pay R3,2 million in attorney's fees as well as R143 594 in legal costs. The motion, which was filed in July, says that these costs came about because of a successful Special Motion to Strike and a later motion for attorney's fees. The filings refer to California's Anti-SLAPP law, which protects people from lawsuits that try to scare or silence them about things that are important to the public. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Lauren Sánchez Bezos (@laurensanchezbezos) The family drama began in early 2019, just as Jeff announced his divorce from MacKenzie Scott after 25 years of marriage. At the time, the tech mogul was rumoured to be romantically involved with Lauren, who had separated from her then-husband, Hollywood agent Patrick Whitesell. Their budding romance took a dramatic turn when American tabloid, The National Enquirer, threatened to publish intimate photos and explicit text messages between the couple. Jeff beat the tabloid to the punch and published descriptions of the images himself, along with his correspondence with the tabloid's owners on Medium. 'I had nothing to do with the leak of the pics,' Michael said previously. 'There are, like, 20 d*ck pics. Lauren likely shared them with multiple girlfriends – not in a malicious way, that's not her style, but when she's in love, she got a kick out of sharing them.' He claims Lauren once tried to show him one of the images. 'I was like, 'What the f**k is wrong with you? I don't want to see that!'' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Lauren Sánchez Bezos (@laurensanchezbezos) In 2020, Michael unsuccessfully sued Jeff for defamation. The following year, Jeff was awarded R3,9 million in legal fees, but the back-and-forth litigation continued. Michael has denied leaking the pictures but it's been reported that he had signed a nondisclosure agreement about the couple's alleged affair. However, Michael claims he worked with the tabloid to help his sister, not harm her. Lauren's version of events paints a different picture. 'Michael secretly provided my most personal information to the National Enquirer – a deep and unforgivable betrayal. My family is hurting over this new baseless and untrue lawsuit, and we truly hope my brother finds peace,' she said in a lawyer's letter. Despite the ongoing family chaos, the newlyweds seem unfazed by the legal drama. They've been spotted partying across Europe, from exclusive Ibiza nightclubs to double dates with Leonardo DiCaprio and his girlfriend Vittoria Ceretti, aboard Jeff's R8,7-billion superyacht.