Shannon Sharpe Admits Offering $10M To Settle Rape Claims, Now Calls $50M Lawsuit 'A Shakedown'
Both lawyers for Shannon Sharpe and his rape accuser confirm the First Take co-host earlier this year offered to pay $10 million to make the allegations go away, yet the former NFL player also says today the whole thing is just 'a shakedown.'
Perhaps, but it also seems to be a contradiction in terms – to put it politely.
More from Deadline
Shannon Sharpe Accused Of Rape In Civil Suit; NFL Hall Of Famer Responds Via Lawyer Statement
Ernie Hudson Taking Over Carl Weathers' Voice Role Of Combat Carl In 'Toy Story 5'
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Loses Trial Delay Bid In Sex Trafficking Case; Warner Bros Discovery Comes Up Short In Keeping Docuseries Outtakes Out Of Case
In an extremely graphic lawsuit filed in Nevada on April 20, Jane Doe claims the 56-year-old Sharpe sexually assaulted her on multiple occasions during a relationship they had that started in an LA gym in 2023. Alleging assault, sexual assault, battery and sexual battery, as well as intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff is represented by Houston-based Tony Buzbee, who is behind dozens of assault and abuse lawsuits against Sean 'Diddy' Combs.
Asking for a jury trial, the Jane Doe is seeking $50 million in damages.
No stranger to controversy himself, and currently in a bitter battle with Jay-Z over a now dismissed rape case involving the '99 Problems' rapper and Combs, Buzbee took to social media Tuesday to get very specific on his client's behalf as NFL vet Sharpe and his team attacked her credibility.
'On the one hand Mr. Sharpe and his lawyers claim that the case filed by Jane Doe is meritless, yet on the other hand they now have disclosed that Mr. Sharpe offered Jane Doe $10 million in writing not to file her lawsuit,' Buzbee said on Instagram this afternoon. 'That is a true statement. Jane Doe was in fact offered $10 million to settle but rejected that offer, choosing instead to proceed with litigation. Sharpe's team is now trying to discredit and dox her. Sharpe and his team are now, as anticipated, also attacking me. We are not going to be deterred by these tactics.'
Sharpe and his team have denied the allegations and asserted that incidents of rape, choking and more in the 13-page civil suit are being taken out of context and were consensual. To that, they also shattered a rule of such sexual violence cases and blatantly revealed the Jane Doe's real name online.
Stating Sharpe was 'emphatic' in declaring his innocence, Stephen A. Smith said this morning on his own show of what is being alleged of his friend and colleague 'is a sad situation.' Before the $10 million figure came out, First Take host and producer Smith also revealed that he had spoken to ESPN boss (and future Disney CEO contender) Jimmy Pitaro about the Sharpe situation and the exec told him they 'are taking this matter very seriously and we are looking into this very carefully.'
Additionally, before his attorney Lanny Davis gave a virtual press conference of his own Tuesday decrying the suit, Sharpe posted a video online this morning where he said that Buzbee was 'targeting Black men' in reference to the much-accused Combs and Jay-Z. Not addressing the suit on First Take today and calling out Buzbee for trying to 'manipulate the media,' Sharpe also said in his video that he would be suing the Texas lawyer and the accuser (who appears on subscription service OnlyFans) for defamation in the near future.
Noticeably, while stressing 'my career is all about real talk and honesty,' ESPN and Club Shay Shay host Sharpe said nothing about that $10 million offer in his short video.
Sharpe's spin master lawyer Davis, however, did say later in the day that Sharpe had been aiming to pay out 'at least $10 million' for Jane Doe's silence.
Calling the actual lawsuit from the state of Sin City a 'big surprise' after talks with the accuser and Buzbee, ex-Bill Clinton confidante Davis pointed to the timing of the action and a more than $100 million new contract Sharpe is likely to be inking now his deal with The Volume podcast network has expired. Davis said 'in my opinion that this is a classic definition of blackmail. That gives the greatest leverage to blackmail.' Those remarks follow explicit messages allegedly sent by Doe that Davis made public on Monday to illustrate 'a clear picture' of a 'consensual, adult relationship that included role-playing, sexual language, and fantasy scenarios explicitly requested' by the plaintiff.
Declaring that Sharpe 'has chosen to mislead his lawyers and the public' in his denials, Buzbee late Monday put out a long statement predating Davis' virtual press conference today.
Without naming a figure at the time on that potential $10 million agreement Buzbee noted yesterday: 'A little history: Back in early February, our office contacted Mr. Sharpe on behalf of Jane Doe and broached the subject of a meeting. Multiple conversations took place. Ultimately, a mediation occurred. Mr. Sharpe was represented by different lawyers in that mediation. That mediation process went on for more than six weeks, ultimately leading to Mr. Sharpe making an incredibly significant offer to settle. Ultimately, Jane Doe refused the hefty sum offered by Sharpe and instead filed this case last night, April 20, 2025.'
'Mr. Sharpe's aggressive approach will instead have the opposite effect. Ms. Doe is not afraid of the truth — she relies upon it,' Buzbee added. 'I look forward to presenting the evidence in this case through the judicial process, where the truth matters more than a sports icon's desperate public spin.'
Representatives for ESPN-owner Disney did not respond to request for comment on Sharpe and the allegation against him. While not named as a defendant, Sharpe makes numerous appearances in a sexual battery and retaliation suit against his former Undisputed co-host Skip Bayless and Fox Sports that an ex-hairdresser on the now cancelled show filed in January.
Best of Deadline
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
'The Last Of Us': Differences Between HBO Series & Video Game Across Seasons 1 And 2
'Ransom Canyon' Book Vs. Show Differences: From Quinn & Staten's Love Story To Yancy Grey's Plot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Latest Update About ‘Dept. Q' Season 2 On Netflix
Dept Q While the Netflix Top 10 list may be mostly dominated by the likes of Ginny and Georgia and Sirens, one new show is sliding under the radar, even if it never landed a #1 spot. That would be Dept. Q, the new British murder mystery series starring Matthew Goode as a traditionally reckless-but-brilliant cop tasked with solving cold cases. It may sound cliché, but it's quite good, and has racked up an 84% critic score and a very high 94% audience score. Now, fans want answers about a season 2. It's not time to worry…yet. No, the show is not a miniseries which would discourage a season 2 ruling this out, and despite that, no, it has not been renewed yet. But Dept. Q only was released at the very end of May, and it hasn't even been out two weeks yet. That's not particularly long for Netflix, and we often see renewals a month or more after release if we're not talking about blockbuster hits. There are some updates here, namely what the cast thinks of all this. Here's star Matthew Goode via Deadline: And here's actress Chloe Pirrie who plays Merritt Lingard to Cosmo: Deadline said they believe there is 'zero doubts' about a second season, and one point in the show's favor is that it's based on a series of books, and there are ten of them for a sprawling amount of source material. I'm not going to go full Deadline here and say there are 'zero" doubts that Dept. Q gets renewed for season 2, but I am leaning in an optimistic direction. Netflix loves crime series. There's lots of source material to pull from. It has been well-received by critics and viewers. It has a stellar cast but not a wildly expensive one, and the same is true for being a grounded crime series rather than some huge blockbuster. All the signs are there that this is going to work out, but fans should be patient as for most Netflix series, this kind of thing doesn't happen overnight. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Patchy Mix predicts rebound after upset loss to Mario Bautista in debut at UFC 316
Patchy Mix predicts rebound after upset loss to Mario Bautista in debut at UFC 316 Patchy Mix experienced what many other first-time UFC fighters go through Saturday. After UFC 316, the former Bellator bantamweight champion acknowledged the disappointment and said he'll rebound. Mix (20-2 MMA, 0-1 UFC) made his highly anticipated promotional debut at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., as a betting favorite against Mario Bautista (16-2 MMA, 10-2 UFC), but never seemed to get started in a unanimous decision loss (30-27, 30-27, 29-28). "Tough night for me in the office," Mix posted on Facebook. "But I appreciate the people that have supported and been along for the ride. Would have liked to do more and made adjustments. I will come back stronger from this moment." Bautista outstruck Mix every round and won his eighth straight fight. The victory is on the heels of a decision win over former featherweight champion Jose Aldo. Mix, whose fiancee is recent UFC women's flyweight title challenger Tatiana Suarez, had not fought in a little more than a year after an unceremonious exit from the PFL after it bought Bellator and folded the promotion. Mix was about a 2-1 betting favorite in the fight, and the consensus was that he would beat Bautista and might even find himself promptly in the bantamweight title picture. In fact, his manager predicted that might be the case with a win. In the MMA Junkie reader predictions, Mix got nearly 80 percent of the vote, and he was a unanimous pick from MMA Junkie's 11 staff members. The 31-year-old Las Vegas-based Mix hadn't lost since 2020, when he was upset by Juan Archuleta in Bellator's bantamweight tournament. But less than three years later, he won Bellator's belt and a $1 million prize against Raufeon Stots, then had title defenses against Sergio Pettis and Magomed Magomedov before he arrived in the UFC.
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — Two years after approving a tough-on-crime sentencing law, South Dakota is scrambling to deal with the price tag for that legislation: Housing thousands of additional inmates could require up to $2 billion to build new prisons in the next decade. That's a lot of money for a state with one of the lowest populations in the U.S., but a consultant said it's needed to keep pace with an anticipated 34% surge of new inmates in the next decade as a result of South Dakota's tough criminal justice laws. And while officials are grumbling about the cost, they don't seem concerned with the laws that are driving the need even as national crime rates are dropping. 'Crime has been falling everywhere in the country, with historic drops in crime in the last year or two,' said Bob Libal, senior campaign strategist at the criminal justice nonprofit the Sentencing Project. 'It's a particularly unusual time to be investing $2 billion in prisons.' Some Democratic-led states have worked to close prisons and enact changes to lower inmate populations, but that's a tough sell in Republican-majority states such as South Dakota that believe in a tough-on-crime approach, even if that leads to more inmates. For now, state lawmakers have set aside a $600-million fund to replace the overcrowded 144-year-old South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, making it one of the most expensive taxpayer-funded projects in South Dakota history. But South Dakota will likely need more prisons. Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins Architects, which the state hired as a consultant, has said South Dakota will need 3,300 additional beds in coming years, bringing the cost to $2 billion. Driving up costs is the need for facilities with different security levels to accommodate the inmate population. Concerns about South Dakota's prisons first arose four years ago, when the state was flush with COVID-19 relief funds. Lawmakers wanted to replace the penitentiary, but they couldn't agree on where to put the prison and how big it should be. A task force of state lawmakers assembled by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden is expected to decide that in a plan for prison facilities this July. Many lawmakers have questioned the proposed cost, but few have called for criminal justice changes that would make such a large prison unnecessary. 'One thing I'm trying to do as the chairman of this task force is keep us very focused on our mission,' said Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen. 'There are people who want to talk about policies in the prisons or the administration or the criminal justice system more broadly, and that would be a much larger project than the fairly narrow scope that we have.' South Dakota's incarceration rate of 370 per 100,000 people is an outlier in the Upper Midwest. Neighbors Minnesota and North Dakota have rates of under 250 per 100,000 people, according to the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice advocacy nonprofit. Nearly half of South Dakota's projected inmate population growth can be attributed to a law approved in 2023 that requires some violent offenders to serve the full-length of their sentences before parole, according to a report by Arrington Watkins. When South Dakota inmates are paroled, about 40% are ordered to return to prison, the majority of those due to technical violations such as failing a drug test or missing a meeting with a parole officer. Those returning inmates made up nearly half of prison admissions in 2024. Sioux Falls criminal justice attorney Ryan Kolbeck blamed the high number of parolees returning in part on the lack of services in prison for people with drug addictions. 'People are being sent to the penitentiary but there's no programs there for them. There's no way it's going to help them become better people,' he said. 'Essentially we're going to put them out there and house them for a little bit, leave them on parole and expect them to do well.' South Dakota also has the second-greatest disparity of Native Americans in its prisons. While Native Americans make up one-tenth of South Dakota's population, they make up 35% of those in state prisons, according to Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit public policy group. Though legislators in the state capital, Pierre, have been talking about prison overcrowding for years, they're reluctant to dial back on tough-on-crime laws. For example, it took repeated efforts over six years before South Dakota reduced a controlled substance ingestion law to a misdemeanor from a felony for the first offense, aligning with all other states. 'It was a huge, Herculean task to get ingestion to be a misdemeanor,' Kolbeck said. Former penitentiary warden Darin Young said the state needs to upgrade its prisons, but he also thinks it should spend up to $300 million on addiction and mental illness treatment. 'Until we fix the reasons why people come to prison and address that issue, the numbers are not going to stop,' he said. Without policy changes, the new prisons are sure to fill up, criminal justice experts agreed. 'We might be good for a few years, now that we've got more capacity, but in a couple years it'll be full again,' Kolbeck said. 'Under our policies, you're going to reach capacity again soon.' Raza writes for the Associated Press.
