Odds that Trump will release Epstein files surge above 50% for first time
Kalshi, a site that allows people to make a wager on the outcome of almost any event, saw the number of people betting 'yes' on the question skyrocket Wednesday — after news broke that the US Department of Justice told President Trump back in May that his name appeared in the controversial documents.
'We have seen dramatic activity in the Epstein files market,' Jack Such, head of media at Kalshi, told The Post.
Advertisement
The odds jumped Friday to 60%, after news broke Ghislaine Maxwell gave the DOJ info about '100 different people' linked to the sex offender.
The largest trade was $3,000 when the odds were just 21% – if Trump releases the files, the gambler will walk away with close to $15,000, Such said.
Advertisement
Kalshi's won't pay out unless the files contain genuinely new, previously unreleased material — not just a rehash of what's already public.
'Prediction markets are the most accurate tool available to predict future political events,' said Such, who claimed 'Kalshi routinely outperforms polls, expert opinion and other forms of prediction.'
3 A report this week said the DOJ told Trump in May he was in the Epstein files.
Getty Images
Just two weeks ago, the odds that any new files related to the late pedophile would be released was priced at 13%.
Advertisement
Prediction markets were among the few prognosticators to correctly call Zohran Mamdani's June Democratic primary victory in the NYC mayoral race.
Rank-and-file lawmakers are pushing House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to hold a vote to compel the release of the documents, once the House of Representatives returns from its summer recess Sept. 2.
3 The Justice Department has said that more than 1,000 young women and girls were victimized by Epstein.
AP
Johnson sent lawmakers home early Monday, arguing Congress needs to give the Trump administration 'space' to handle the hot-button issue on its own.
Advertisement
A House Oversight subcommittee voted 8-2 Wednesday to subpoena the DOJ for the Epstein files, with Reps. Nancy Mace (R-NC), Scott Perry (R-PA), and Brian Jack (R-GA) crossing party lines to back Democrats.
3 There's been mounting pressure on the Trump administration to release the Epstein files.
AP
Meanwhile a top Justice Department official met with Maxwell Thursday and Friday in Florida, as the GOP-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the convicted madam for testimony, with a deposition tentatively set for Aug. 11.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance to visit Indiana amid push for redistricting. Will Braun call special session?
Vice President JD Vance is visiting Indianapolis on Aug. 7 to speak with Gov. Mike Braun about the possibility of redistricting the state's congressional districts amid the Trump administration's push to increase the GOP majority in the House. Braun didn't rule out calling a special session to redraw the Hoosier State's congressional districts in an attempt to squeeze in another Republican seat ahead of the 2026 midterms. Republicans already hold seven of Indiana's nine U.S. House seats, but Braun's comments come as the Trump administration has encouraged other states to take up mid-decade redistricting to help maintain a GOP majority in the House after next year's elections. The redistricting process is already underway in Republican-led Texas where new congressional maps would give the GOP in that state five additional U.S. House seats. The effort resulted in Texas Democrats fleeing to Illinois on Aug. 3 to disrupt legislative procedures. What would it take to redistrict in Indiana? Braun would have to call a special session for the Indiana General Assembly if Republicans decide they want to redraw Hoosier congressional maps. House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, both Republicans, have not responded to IndyStar questions through spokespeople about whether Trump has contacted them or if they have an appetite to draft new maps. It's likely U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan's 1st District seat in Northwest Indiana would be a signature focus of any redistricting efforts at the Statehouse, although some national outlets have reported longtime Indianapolis U.S. Rep. Andre Carson's 7th District seat could be targeted as well. National Republicans have targeted Mrvan's seat as a flip opportunity for the last two election cycles and are poised to again in 2026, especially as Northwest Indiana's rust belt communities have voted more Republican over the years. 'I think this seat is one that belongs in the Republican column,' House Speaker Mike Johnson told IndyStar in 2024. But Mrvan has still defeated his Republican challengers, winning reelection in 2022 by nearly six percentage points and in 2024 by eight percentage points. When did Indiana last go through redistricting? State lawmakers last went through redistricting in 2021 following the 2020 U.S. Census. At that time, Republicans left Mrvan's seat alone. Instead, they further cemented GOP grip on the 5th Congressional District after now-U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz defeated Democrat Christina Hale by four points in a nationally-watched race in 2020. Since then, Spartz has won general election contests in 2022 and 2024 by double-digit percentage points over her Democratic opponents. The 2021 congressional maps also adjusted the boundaries of the 6th Congressional District, now represented by Republican U.S. Rep. Jefferson Shreve, to include the southern portion of Indianapolis. Some Republicans at the time criticized the move as potentially minimizing the voices of more rural communities in that district. This story will be updated. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at Sign up for our free weekly politics newsletter, Checks & Balances, curated by IndyStar politics and government reporters. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: JD Vance to visit Indiana amid push for redistricting
Atlantic
4 minutes ago
- Atlantic
What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?
Trump's use of pardons may have induced some of his confederates—including Stone and Manafort—to not cooperate with prosecutors, or to only partly cooperate, thus depriving the public of a chance at receiving a full accounting. This was a kind of legalized obstruction of justice. Plenty of authorities have pointed out that Trump's claim of a hoax is nonsense. In 2017, PolitiFact named that its lie of the year. In 2018, The Washington Post reported: 'Trump's Russia 'Hoax' Turns Out to Be Real.' In 2019, a report by the Justice Department's inspector general concluded that, as my colleague Adam Serwer put it, 'the 'Russia hoax' defense is itself a hoax, and a highly successful one, aimed at reassuring Trump supporters who might otherwise be troubled by the president's behavior.' Still, the idea that the whole thing was a chimera has taken hold even within some precincts of the mainstream press, where the whole thing is treated as a weird passing obsession. The journalist Ben Smith, who made the decision to publish the Steele dossier, now contends, vaguely and in passive voice, that ' Trump was in retrospect treated unfairly.' Meanwhile, Trump world continues to cook up new iterations of the hoax claim. The most recent ones are driven by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has a history of weaponizing intelligence, to use a term he's a fan of, and Gabbard, who has for years repeated Kremlin talking points. Last month, Ratcliffe alleged that in 2016, three of the nation's top intelligence officials 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals—all to get Trump,' but as my colleague Shane Harris reported, he didn't have evidence to back that up. Gabbard has released a dribble of documents intended to bolster it, but still nothing that matches the claims. In recent days, MAGA allies have pushed a new and shocking allegation: that emails show Clinton actually approved a plan to smear Trump by claiming he was colluding with Russia. The problem is that, once again, investigations have debunked it. A special counsel appointed by Barr during Trump's first term, with the goal of ferreting out political skulduggery in the Russia investigation, found that messages about Clinton being treated as a smoking gun were, in fact, likely concocted by the Russians. As The New York Times reported, 'The special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.' Durham's finding of a Russian forgery is ironic: Someone has finally turned up a real Russia hoax. Rather than working to fight it, however, Trump's aides are once more colluding with Russia to mislead the American people and further Trump's political fortunes.
New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Molson Coors slashes outlook again, blames Trump tariffs on aluminum
Molson Coors slashed its financial outlook for the second time this year, with the brewing company blaming new tariffs on aluminum for mounting cost pressures that are squeezing the already beleaguered beer industry. The Denver-based brewer said Tuesday it expects net sales to tumble between 3% and 4% this year, a steeper decline than the company's earlier prediction of a 1% drop. Even more concerning for investors, earnings before taxes are projected to plummet 12% to 15%, compared to previous forecasts of only minor decreases. Advertisement Gavin Hattersley, the conglomerate's chief executive, didn't mince words about what's driving the deteriorating numbers. 5 President Trump speaks in Washington on Tuesday — weeks after his administration doubled aluminum tariffs, triggering a wave of cost increases for US manufacturers. Getty Images He cited 'higher-than-expected indirect tariff impacts' on aluminum pricing as a key factor hammering the company's bottom line, particularly through what's known as Midwest Premium pricing for the metal used in beer cans. Advertisement In June, the Trump administration doubled import duties on aluminum from 25% to 50%. Unlike previous trade policies that carved out exemptions for close allies, the new tariff hit virtually everyone, including traditional partners like Canada and Mexico. 5 Coors beer cans lined up on shelves, representing millions of units now subject to higher material costs under new trade rules. REUTERS The policy change has sent aluminum prices soaring, creating a ripple effect that's hitting beverage companies particularly hard. Advertisement Molson Coors, which packages millions of beers in aluminum cans that are sold under brand names such as Coors Light, Miller Lite and Blue Moon, is seeing its margins squeezed by the price hikes. The brewing giant can either absorb the higher expenses, cutting into profits, or pass them along to consumers who are already pulling back from beer purchases. For now, the company appears to be absorbing much of the aluminum cost increase rather than immediately passing it through to consumers, which explains the pressure on profit margins reflected in the latest outlook cuts. 5 Workers at a Canadian aluminum plant in Hamilton, Ontario, one of many suppliers hit hard by expanded US tariffs on key imports. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Beer sales, meanwhile, continue their stubborn decline across key markets, with US volumes — the number of units sold — dropping more than 5% in the second quarter alone. The company is steadily losing market share as Americans increasingly turn to alternatives like hard seltzers, craft cocktails and non-alcoholic options. The overseas picture isn't much brighter. In Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific regions, volumes fell nearly 8% as soft demand collided with intensifying competition. Total volumes in Western Hemisphere markets dropped 6.6% during the quarter, reflecting broad weakness across the beer category. Bank of America recently downgraded Molson Coors, warning about structural headwinds facing the entire beer industry and predicting US beer volumes could fall 4% this year. 5 Aluminum ingots are stacked in Hamilton, Ontario, where rising metal prices are squeezing beverage producers like Molson Coors. Getty Images The latest guidance cut was deeper than most analysts expected, painting what one described as a 'bleak' picture for the remainder of 2025. The aluminum tariff impact represents a particularly frustrating challenge for beer companies because it's largely beyond their control. Unlike demand fluctuations or competitive pressures, tariffs create an immediate cost increase that companies must somehow manage without obvious alternatives. Advertisement US aluminum prices have surged since the tariff increases took effect, with the price gap between American and European aluminum widening by 139%. 5 Miller Lite cans on a production line, with aluminum costs eating into margins across the beer category. AP Companies throughout the supply chain are grappling with higher input costs, from beverage makers to food producers to automakers. The stated goal of the tariffs is to support domestic aluminum production and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers. Advertisement Plants like Century Aluminum have endorsed the policy as essential for keeping US smelters operational. However, boosting domestic capacity takes time, leaving companies like Molson Coors caught in the middle of a trade policy transition. Molson Coors is trying to offset these mounting pressures through several strategies, including a focus on premium brands such as Madri and pursuing partnerships with firms such as Fever-Tree to diversify its portfolio.
