Trump has all the cards to play with Putin; Europe has none
Image: Peter Zay / AFP
EUROPE's perpetual reliance on the US in global affairs was bound to implode at a certain point. The increasing isolation of Europe from the US-led efforts to broker a peace deal with Russia to end the Ukraine conflict shines a light on an age-old truism, which goes as follows: 'In politics, there are no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests.'
Until recently, Europe fell for Washington's foreign policy during the tenure of former Democratic President Joe Biden hook, line, and sinker. Now, under the Republican incumbent President Donald Trump, the previous collective pro-war Europe hell-bent on Russophobia looks at sixes and sevens.
During the Biden administration, Europe acted self-assuredly, taking turns lambasting President Putin and working hard to isolate Russia in international affairs. Led by Biden's White House, Europe signed up to an unprecedented barrage of economic sanctions against Russia and froze Moscow's riches invested in European banks.
On Biden's say-so, Europe rallied behind Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, a former comedian, turned statesman. The US rallied the West to offer astronomical sums of money and supplied a plethora of sophisticated heavy metal weapons to Ukraine, including air defence and modern missiles.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Additionally, Europe, through its military wing NATO, provided military experts and advisors to Kiev, including field commanders who initially took up their positions surreptitiously. Europe's provision of diplomatic support for Ukraine saw Zelensky treated like royalty across the West as part of international mobilisation against Moscow.
The Global South refused to be dragged into the anti-Russian wave. Now, with the new sheriff in the White House, the pro-war agenda has been abruptly replaced by a pro-peace drive. 'This is a war that would never have started if I were president,' Trump has said repeatedly.
As part of a battle for public opinion, Europe banned Russia's international TV outlet, Russia Today, better known as RT. In this way, the international community could be fed with a one-dimensional subjective narrative that sought to vilify Putin without addressing Moscow's concerns about Nato's expansion eastward.
The Kremlin has claimed that repeated attempts to bring Europe to the negotiation table about the issue were either laughed off or fell on deaf ears. Moscow has argued that when the Soviet Union fell at the turn of the 1990s, the West undertook to never expand Nato to Russia's doorstep, a promise the West reneged on.
According to the Russians, believe them or not, it was when all attempts to discuss geopolitical differences failed that Moscow adopted the view that the best form of defence was attack. Today, three years later and more than 1 million Ukrainian soldiers and Western mercenaries dead, Trump is sticking by his election promise to end the war.
This week, the charge against Europe came from one of its own. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban charged that Europe's approach to Putin and Russia was a hindrance to peace. Writing in his social media handle on X, Orban said: 'That is how we have manoeuvred ourselves into a situation in Europe where we are not in a negotiating position with the Russians, but the Russians and the Americans are negotiating with each other.'
Additionally, Zelensky, too, like his European war-mongers, is not included in the US-Russia discussions about Ukraine. As Orban observed, the train has indeed taken off and left Europeans behind. As the White House was hard at work preparing for the Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska this week, leaders of Europe were scrambling to have their anti-Putin views considered by Trump.
It was a last-ditch scramble for attention by Europe, a pole of power of great significance, which, unfortunately, has long outsourced its responsibilities and duties to Washington, and openly thanking Washington for the opportunity of doing so, to paraphrase Harper Lee.
Since the end of WWII in 1945, the alliance between Europe and the US has been explicitly one-sided, with one US administration after the other happily taking Europe under its arm. Economically, Europe has seemed content to lean on Washington like a weaker sibling seeking protection from its big brother. Europe has been happy to ride on America's apparent military invincibility as the world's only surviving superpower for aeons. In many ways, President Trump and his Vice President, JD Vance's expressed exasperation with Europe's relentless dependency on the US feels like finally, the chickens have come home to roost.
The certain ideological changes in the White House every four years have caught up with Europe. Instead of reading the changing mood in the room that is the White House, Europe attempts to stand up and be counted. Methinks too late. The horse has long bolted — from November 6, 2024, when President Trump won the US election.
Reminiscent of the last kicks of a dying horse, key European leaders cobbled together the so-called Coalition of the Willing on realising that Trump had made it clear the Ukraine war had to stop. Sanctions against Russia had not worked, and Russian forces are gaining more Ukrainian territory by the day, anyway. Additionally, every day scores of men and women lose their lives in the conflict that the majority of the international community agrees with President Trump when he says it should never have erupted.
Europe alone cannot fight Russia militarily, and Trump is the least interested in providing the bloc the so-called backstop that they have been pleading for. As long as Trump remains determined to give peace a chance — at least in Ukraine — Europe will have to abandon its war mentality. The desires of the current White House bear far-reaching consequences for Europe and Nato, which cannot trigger its Article 5 on the principle that an attack on one is an attack on all. This is because Ukraine is neither a member of Nato nor the EU (yet).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit
In their first meeting since 2019, Trump and Putin hold high-risk talks in Alaska with Ukraine's fate hanging in the balance. US President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin meet Friday in Alaska in a high-stakes, high-risk summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine. Putin will step onto Western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and on which Russia has not relented, making rapid gains just before the summit. Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since been defensive and warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Putin does not compromise. Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has publicly refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Trump has called the summit a 'feel-out meeting' to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future,' Trump said Thursday. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa speaks to Putin on Ukraine crisis, bilateral issues He gave the summit a one-in-four chance of failure. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov responded to a question from Russian state TV by saying that Moscow would not make guesses on the outcome of the meeting. 'We never make any predictions ahead of time,' Lavrov said after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with 'USSR' written across it in Cyrillic script. '… our position is clear and unambiguous. We will present it,' he said. Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to 'divvy up' territory. Trump's latest shift Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war and vowed before his return to the White House in January to bring peace within 24 hours. ALSO READ: Ukraine is becoming the wedge driving US and Europe apart But despite repeated calls to Putin, and a stunning February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise. Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned of 'very severe consequences' if he does not accept a ceasefire — but also agreed to see him in Alaska. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1900 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War base for surveillance of the former Soviet Union. Adding to the historical significance, the United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia — a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps. The Kremlin said it expected Putin and Trump to meet alone with interpreters before a working lunch with aides. Neither leader is expected to step off the base into Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where protesters have put up signs of solidarity with Ukraine. ALSO READ: Ukraine war 'existential,' Kremlin says, launching revenge strikes Exiled Russian opposition figure Yulia Navalnaya — whose husband Alexei Navalny died in prison last year — urged the two leaders to strike a deal to 'release Russian political activists and journalists, Ukrainian civilians, (and) those who were imprisoned for anti-war statements and posts on social media.' A 'personal victory' for Putin? The summit marks a sharp shift from the approach of Western European leaders and Biden, who vowed no discussion with Russia on Ukraine's future unless Ukraine was also at the table. Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, leading him to curtail travel sharply since the war began. However, the United States is not party to the Hague tribunal and Trump's Treasury Department temporarily eased sanctions on top Russian officials to allow them to travel and use bank cards in Alaska. Zelensky said on Tuesday that the Alaska summit was a 'personal victory' for Putin. With the trip, Putin 'is coming out of isolation' and he has 'somehow postponed sanctions,' which Trump had vowed to impose on Russia without progress. ALSO READ: Russia signals severe retaliation after Ukraine's strikes Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called for security guarantees for Ukraine — an idea downplayed by Trump at the start of his latest term. Daniel Fried, a former US diplomat now at the Atlantic Council, said Trump had the means to pressure Putin but that the Russian could distract him by seeming to offer something new. Putin, Fried said, 'is a master of the new shiny object which turns out to be meaningless.' – By: © Agence France-Presse
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
French national arrested in Mali over alleged coup plot
On 14 August 2025, Mali's Security Minister General Daoud Aly Mohammedine confirmed the arrest of French national Yann Vezilier. Vezilier is accused of working 'on behalf of the French intelligence service' to destabilise Mali's military-led government. His image was broadcast on national television alongside 11 alleged conspirators. France has not yet issued an official response to the arrest or the espionage allegations. Two senior Malian generals were also arrested in connection with the alleged coup plot. General Abass Dembele, former governor of Mopti, was dismissed in May after demanding an inquiry into army-led civilian killings. General Nema Sagara, previously praised for her role in the 2012 rebel combat, was also detained. Security sources told AFP that at least 55 soldiers have been arrested so far. The junta claims the plot involved 'foreign states' and that Vezilier mobilised political leaders, civil society actors, and military personnel. General Mohammedine asserts that they 'completely foiled' the alleged conspiracy, which started on 1 August 2025. Political tensions have escalated, with former Prime Ministers Moussa Mara and Choguel Maïga arrested for embezzlement and defamation. Mara has been detained since 1 August. Mali has faced a security crisis since 2012, driven by jihadist violence and criminal gangs. Junta leader Assimi Goïta, who seized power in 2020 and 2021, extended his rule until 2030 despite earlier promises of elections. Mali has severed ties with France and aligned with Russia to combat insurgency, though attacks have intensified. Investigations into 'possible accomplices' are ongoing. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Herald
5 hours ago
- The Herald
US weighs refugee cap of 40,000 with most spots for Afrikaners
US President Donald Trump's administration is discussing a refugee admissions cap of about 40,000 for the coming year with most allocated to white South Africans, according to two US officials briefed on the matter and an internal refugee programme email, reflecting a major shift in the US approach to refugees. Angie Salazar, the top refugee programme official at the US health and human services department (HHS), told state-level refugee workers she expected the cap to be 40,000, according to an email summary of an August 1 meeting reviewed by Reuters. The two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said about 30,000 of the 40,000 spaces would be reserved for Afrikaners. The 40,000-person cap would be a sharp drop from the 100,000 refugees brought in by former president Joe Biden in 2024 fiscal year, but higher than the record-low 15,000 person ceiling Trump set for fiscal 2021 before ending his first term. A separate person familiar with the matter said that in addition to the 40,000 figure a cap as low as 12,000 had also been discussed. There are 37-million refugees worldwide, according to a UN estimate. Trump immediately froze refugee admissions after taking office in January, but weeks later launched a programme for Afrikaners, saying the white minority group suffered racial discrimination and violence in majority-black South Africa, claims rejected by South Africa's government. The Trump administration also expects to bring in some Afghans who aided the US government during the conflict in Afghanistan and is weighing whether to resettle Ukrainians, the email said. Some spaces would remain unallocated to potentially be filled by other nationalities, the email and officials said. White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly stressed that no decisions were final until Trump issued his determination for the 2026 fiscal year, which begins on October 1. 'President Trump has a humanitarian heart, which is why he has welcomed these courageous individuals to the US,' Kelly said. 'Refugee admission caps will be determined next month and any numbers discussed now are pure speculation.' A senior state department official pointed to the department's recent human rights report, which raised concerns about 'inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities' in South Africa. The HHS referred questions related to the refugee cap to the White House. Salazar did not respond to requests for comment. The first group of 59 South Africans arrived in May, but only 34 more had arrived by early August, a White House official said. The state department laid off many refugee programme staffers in major workforce reductions in July. To compensate for the fired staff, workers from the HHS who normally deal with domestic refugee assistance have been reassigned to the South Africa programme, one of the officials said. Thirteen HHS staffers were dispatched to Pretoria on Monday though most had no direct experience screening refugees, the official said. An HHS spokesperson said trained staff had been detailed to support refugee resettlement but that they were not conducting interviews to determine whether a refugee had experienced persecution. Some South Africans now in the US with refugee status have reached out to the HHS to raise concerns about a lack of benefits to support them, one of the US officials said. Trump slashed refugee benefits after taking office, including reducing cash assistance and healthcare benefits that normally last a year to four months. One of the initial group of 59 South Africans brought into the US in mid-May sent an email to the HHS' refugee office two weeks later pleading for help getting a social security number (SSN) and access to a work permit. The person, who went to Missoula, Montana, said their family had spent thousands of dollars to cover expenses. 'We have applied for jobs like crazy but to no avail because we found people here are not keen on hiring refugees without an SSN,' one of the family members wrote in a May 27 email to the HHS refugee programme reviewed by Reuters. 'We have spent about $4,000 [R70,307] on Uber, food, cellphone SIM cards which don't work.' The person was concerned the family would not be able to find housing after a government-funded hotel stay ended in early June. Reuters could not reach the family. The HHS spokesperson said the agency takes complaints seriously and refugees placed in temporary housing receive support for essential needs, including food. A person familiar with the matter said some South Africans arrived in the US expecting standard refugee benefits that had been paused or reduced by Trump. Reuters
