logo
Amid debate over syllabus change, DU's History dept head quits, cites medical reasons

Amid debate over syllabus change, DU's History dept head quits, cites medical reasons

Indian Express5 days ago
Amid debates over syllabus changes in Delhi University's (DU) History Department, its head, Professor Shalini Shah, has resigned citing medical reasons. This comes days before the new academic session is set to begin at DU and before the university steps into its fourth-year for the first time under the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020. The university on Tuesday announced that the Dean of Faculty of Social Sciences, Professor Sanjoy Roy, will take over the History department's charge for two months starting July 22.
Speaking to The Indian Express on Wednesday, Shah said, 'I am unwell. I resigned on medical grounds.'
The History Department has been navigating contentious syllabus negotiations as well as allegations of procedural violations in PhD admissions over the past few months.
The friction over syllabus changes has deepened in the wake of DU's shift to the FYUP (Four-Year Undergraduate Programme) under NEP. History faculty members have alleged that the syllabus reforms required for the new structure were met with resistance at higher levels, and that courses approved at the departmental level were frequently delayed, altered, or blocked when they reached academic and executive councils.
In March, The Indian Express had reported that Vice-Chancellor Yogesh Singh was opposed to the inclusion of Manusmriti and Tuzuk-i-Baburi (Baburnama) in the revised History (Honours) syllabus (undergraduate). Manusmriti was dropped from the syllabus.
A senior faculty member in the department said, 'It has become difficult to clear courses and modifications. Many long-standing papers, taught by the faculty for decades, were either modified or not cleared at all for teaching. Often, there was no meaningful discussion about these in the statutory bodies.'
Shah, however, said her concerns were personal. 'I was advised to get some tests done even before this whole thing started. As HOD, I had no time, so I had no choice but to resign to take care of myself,' she said.
Concern over the resignation has been compounded by DU's decision to assign charge of the department to the Dean (Social Sciences), rather than the next senior-most professor in the History department.
'They should have given the responsibility, even if temporarily, to the next seniormost faculty member within the department,' said a professor. 'This is a rare case… It sends a message that the administration is not willing to trust or empower the department's own leadership.'
V-C Yogesh Singh, however, said the resignation was not related to the syllabus revamp. 'There was no issue or any pressure… or anything related to the syllabus revamp. We, in fact, tried to convince Professor Shah to stay on until October so that she could take a call in a more stabilised environment once the new session began. But she cited health reasons and requested that she be allowed to step down.'
On why the department's charge was given to the Dean (Social Sciences), Singh acknowledged that the move was 'unusual'. He, however, added, 'There was a paucity of time. Since the head resigned immediately, we needed some time to figure out who to appoint. Giving the charge to the dean seemed like the best move. If it had been given to a faculty member on a temporary basis, it could have hurt the member's emotions if he or she is not chosen as the permanent head later. Since it is easier to transfer the charge from the dean to another faculty member, I had suggested that the Dean of Social Sciences take over for the time being.'
'An effort will definitely be made to appoint a permanent HOD in the next two months,' Dean Sanjoy Roy said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

" Maa Ke Aasu...": Priyanka Gandhi Snaps At Amit Shah's Sonia Gandhi, Batla House Jab
" Maa Ke Aasu...": Priyanka Gandhi Snaps At Amit Shah's Sonia Gandhi, Batla House Jab

NDTV

time15 minutes ago

  • NDTV

" Maa Ke Aasu...": Priyanka Gandhi Snaps At Amit Shah's Sonia Gandhi, Batla House Jab

New Delhi: Who did Congress veteran Sonia Gandhi cry for? And for whom did she not? This was the subject of a barbed exchange between opposition leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and Home Minister Amit Shah of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. The setting - a Lok Sabha debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, India's military response to a terrorist strike that killed 26 people, most of whom were civilians. Mr Shah began the exchange Tuesday afternoon by claiming Mrs Gandhi had cried for the terrorists killed in the 2008 Batla House encounter in Delhi. "I remember one morning... I was eating breakfast and saw (Congress leader) Salman Khurshid crying on TV. He had come out of Sonia Gandhi's residence and said she had been sobbing over the Batla House incident." #WATCH | Union Home Minister Amit Shah says, "I remember one morning during breakfast, I saw Salman Khurshid crying on the TV. He was coming out of Sonia Gandhi's residence... He said that Sonia Gandhi was sobbing at the Batla House incident. She should have cried for Shaheed… — ANI (@ANI) July 29, 2025 "She should have cried for Mohan Sharma (a senior police officer killed by the terrorists) ..." Mr Shah's attack underlined the BJP's strategy during this debate - to attack the Congress over its track record of responding to terror attacks when the party-led UPA was in power. In an earlier section of his speech today Amit Shah also ripped into another senior Congress leader - P Chidambaram - for having asked for proof the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack were from Pakistan. Mr Chidambaram suggested they may have been "homegrown". Mr Shah criticised Mr Chidambaram for trying to 'save Pakistan' and declared, "When he says this, it means they (the Congress) are giving a clean chit (to Pak)." Priyanka Gandhi Vadra - who spoke after DMK MP K Kanimozhi delivered a history-shrouded warning to the BJP before next year's Tamil Nadu election - launched a scathing counterattack, accusing the BJP of intelligence and security failures that compounded the Pahalgam attack. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi delivered a powerful speech for the opposition. On Mr Shah's jab at her mother, she said, "Meri maa ke aasu tab gire jab unke pati ko aatankvadiyo ne shaheed kiya (My mother wept when her husband (former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi) was martyred by terrorists)," she thundered. READ | "Why Wasn't Security Present In Pahalgam," Priyanka Gandhi Asks She also questioned the intelligence failure that led to the Pahalgam attack, asking and why a popular tourist destination had been left completely unguarded. "The Defence Minister (Rajnath Singh) spoke for an hour... everything was spoken about, from Operation Sindoor to terrorism to national security... but one subject was skipped. How did this attack happen? Why did it happen?" she said. "Why wasn't a single soldier deployed? Did the government not know 1,000-1,500 people went there daily? There was no security... no first aid. These people went trusting the government..."

‘Sonia Gandhi was sobbing at Batla House incident': Amit Shah's scathing attack on Congress from Lok Sabha
‘Sonia Gandhi was sobbing at Batla House incident': Amit Shah's scathing attack on Congress from Lok Sabha

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Sonia Gandhi was sobbing at Batla House incident': Amit Shah's scathing attack on Congress from Lok Sabha

Union home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday launched a sharp attack on the Congress in the Lok Sabha, accusing former UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi of sympathising with terrorists killed in the 2008 Batla House encounter, while ignoring the sacrifice of a police officer who died in the line of duty. Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and Union home minister Amit Shah Speaking during the ongoing debate on Operation Sindoor — India's cross-border counterterrorism operation following the Pahalgam terror attack — Shah recounted a controversial episode involving the Congress leadership after the Batla House encounter in Delhi's Jamia Nagar. "I remember one morning during breakfast, I saw Salman Khurshid crying on the TV. He was coming out of Sonia Gandhi's residence... He said that Sonia Gandhi was sobbing at the Batla House incident. She should have cried for Shaheed Mohan Sharma instead of the terrorists of the Batla house..." Shah said in the Lok Sabha. The home minister accused the grand old party of sending the wrong message by expressing grief for the accused terrorists rather than honouring Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma, the Delhi Police officer who was killed during the operation. The Batla House encounter, which took place on September 19, 2008, led to the killing of two Indian Mujahideen operatives and sparked widespread political debate. Shah's remarks came on the second day of the high-voltage discussion in Parliament on Operation Sindoor during the monsoon session as he announced that three terrorists involved in April 22 Pahalgam attack were killed during army's 'Operation Mahadev' on Monday. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also expected to address the Lok Sabha later in the evening today.

‘If they are truly the same terrorists, then this is good': Farooq Abdullah after Amit Shah's declaration
‘If they are truly the same terrorists, then this is good': Farooq Abdullah after Amit Shah's declaration

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘If they are truly the same terrorists, then this is good': Farooq Abdullah after Amit Shah's declaration

Hours after Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that the three terrorists killed on the outskirts of Srinagar on Monday were the same ones who carried out the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack, former J&K chief minister and National Conference president Farooq Abdullah said that 'if they were truly the same terrorists, then this is good, they have been given a lesson that terror can never succeed'. Speaking on the sidelines of an event in Srinagar, Abdullah said, 'I have not seen them, I do not know who they are. Only those who have seen them (the terrorists), can identify them.' Speaking in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Shah identified the three terrorists, who were killed in the Dachigam forest area, as Suleiman alias Faisal, Afghan and Jibran, and said they had come from Pakistan. 'Suleiman was a LeT (Lashkar-e-Taiba) commander and was involved in the Gagangeer attack. Our forces have evidence on it. These three were involved, and all three have been killed. Through this House, I thank the security personnel involved,' said Shah. 'Yesterday's operation saw the death of three who killed our citizens… NIA had kept those who helped these terrorists in custody, and they confirmed that these three were the ones who conducted the terror attack in Pahalgam. We didn't believe this either. Cartridges recovered at the site of attack were analysed, and a ballistic report was prepared. Three rifles were recovered yesterday – one M9 American rifle and two AK-47s. These rifles were sent to Chandigarh, and the cartridges were matched. Then, it was fixed that these three rifles were used to kill our people,' said Shah. He said six experts had verified the ballistic report on the cartridges. 'And they have said that they match 100 per cent'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store