'Puteri Reformasi' Nurul Izzah pledges to strengthen party
JOHOR BARU: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) deputy president Nurul Izzah Anwar is committed to focusing on developing strategies to strengthen the party together with the new leadership team.
Speaking to reporters following the announcement of her new role, Nurul Izzah said she also plans to implement internal reforms while preparing for the upcoming general election.
She said she would share the plans after the conclusion of the Keadilan National Congress 2024/2025.
"I ask for your prayers as my husband and I will be departing for Makkah to perform the haj soon," she said last night.
Nurul Izzah garnered 9,803 votes, defeating incumbent Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, who is also the economy minister, in yesterday's party election.
The success of the 'Puteri Reformasi' in securing the post from the sole contender and incumbent, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, reflects the grassroots' confidence in her role and ideals that she has championed since PKR was founded nearly three decades ago.
Rising from the vice presidency, the 44-year-old Nurul Izzah has now ascended to the party's second-highest position and is regarded as a leading figure of PKR's new generation of leadership ahead of the 16th general election (GE16).
Nurul Izzah, the eldest daughter of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is also PKR president, and Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, held the vice-president post from 2010 until her resignation in 2018.
– Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
34 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
How political musical chairs empties Malaysian pockets
From Ismat Qayum Depending on who you asked in 2018, Malaysia either enjoyed or endured six prime ministers in six decades. With another four prime ministers in the ensuing four years, some have argued that this is the lagging effect of a maturing democracy. Others, however, bemoan that such musical-chairs politics will damage our country's standing. When Anwar Ibrahim cajoled his motley crew into forming the unity government, there was an implicit promise to all of us. With a supermajority in Parliament, they would have the political stability to enact overdue reforms. Ever since the six state elections in 2023, the overarching view has been that while the government's performance is underwhelming, the stalemate result was expected. Unfortunately, it also meant that any inkling of reformist sails had to be curbed by a don't-rock-the-boat mentality. The government has, all but in name, implemented a Ming vase strategy. Govern in caution, preserve the status quo, and this should result in success for the 16th general election. However, in this balancing act, there is a blind spot brewing within party politics. Recently, we saw two of the biggest sins committed in coalition politics. First, the ruling governing party, PKR, failed to take care of its own house. The party polls led to the unprecedented resignations of Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad from their ministerial posts. Rafizi has stepped down as the economy minister, and Nik Nazmi as the natural resources and environmental sustainability minister. Historically, it has never boded well for Malaysia to see an incumbent deputy president ousted in such a manner – the current prime minister could tell you that firsthand. The second sin was arguably the tipping point: enabling ministers to shift houses. The impending entry of the investment, trade and industry minister, Tengku Zafrul Aziz, who quit Umno and wants to join PKR, marks a worrying development in the story of this government. Already, the ever-opportunistic Dr Akmal Saleh, the Umno Youth chief, has challenged Tengku Zafrul to resign as a minister. If this rift between the two houses continues to widen, it will bring the question of stability to the forefront. If there's one thing I have learnt from fund managers, sovereign wealth funds, and development banks, it is the art of managing optics and expectations. Government is a test of credible commitments. That credibility boils down to a few key ingredients: sound macroeconomic fundamentals, a healthy business environment, and robust governance. In other words, credible commitments are a test of predictability. You need predictability in your policies. But, more importantly, you need predictability in your politicians. In 2011, an IMF working paper demonstrated that political instability negatively affects economic growth. This is unsurprising: can we name a single high-growth economic policy from the lame-duck period of 2020-2022? What's more shocking is that for every additional Cabinet change, a country's annual growth rate decreases by 2.39 percentage points! If even Malaysians are unsure about the policy priorities (or lack thereof) of incoming ministers, how are foreign investors supposed to feel comfortable about deploying capital? More pressing is the question of the people's pockets. For every ringgit we are being taxed, how much are we getting in the quality of public infrastructure and services? Governments have to increase their revenues to increase the amount being redistributed to public goods. There are fundamentally two ways to do that: either increase taxes or have sustainably high growth rates. As the pie (read: economy) continues to grow, a bigger amount can be given to build better schools and hospitals. And make no mistake, the Madani government has performed well on most economic indicators. Inflation has dropped to 1.4%, 2024's GDP growth was a robust 5.1%, and FDI is at the highest in the nation's history. The trouble is, this performance is confined to a single year. For the wave to cascade equitably across society, one must patiently build it over several years. Yet, we are already seeing the wave slow down: Malaysia's Q1 GDP 2025 performance was below expectation at 4.4% – the third straight quarter of slower growth. Factor in the disruption of US president Donald Trump's tariffs, and political instability becomes something the government cannot afford. It would dry the taps of FDI inflows, reduce high-value job creation, and impede wage growth. Just think about how Malaysia's wages have barely inched since the fallout of the Asian Financial Crisis. Without a predictable environment, the government would fail in its test of credible commitments. History would repeat itself: the pockets of everyday Malaysians will feel the same, or even worse, 25 years from now. There is a caveat to the Ming vase strategy: it rarely works for incumbents. When US vice-president Kamala Harris campaigned on a platform against alienation, her message failed to resonate with everyone. Contrast that to the decisiveness of the Canadian Liberals, who in the final stretch, ousted Justin Trudeau with Mark Carney, resulting in a general election victory. The unity government must heed this lesson. Incumbents only win if they are willing to be bold. If they stand any chance of stopping their sliding popularity, they must restore stability and enact their implicit promise of reforms. The worry is that even then, it might be too late. Ismat Qayum is an FMT reader. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Rakyat Post
an hour ago
- Rakyat Post
Tengku Zafrul Shoots Down By-Election Rumours, Says This Wasn't Why He Switched Parties
Subscribe to our FREE Tengku Zafrul, who's still currently the Investment, Trade, and Ministry Minister, released a statement on his official Instagram to address rumours of a Selangor by-election following his decision to leave Umno and join PKR. He was referring to the speculation alleging that this by-election will pave the way for him to become Selangor menteri besar after joining PKR. He added that he doesn't agree with holding a by-election without a good reason because it uses the people's time and money. Tengku Zafrul also shared that he will continue to serve his term as minister until December 2025 and leaves the decision of his ministership in the hands of the prime minister. He stressed that no discussions had taken place with regard to triggering a by-election in Selangor and that it was never among the factors that led to his decision to leave Umno. I'm always ready to serve the country in any capacity. I left the corporate world with the intention to serve and as long as my services are needed, I'm ready to continue contributing without needing a position. Tengku Zafrul, Investment, Trade, and Ministry Minister In his statement, he reiterated that the decision to leave Umno was done on his own accord and a personal choice. He admitted it wasn't an easy decision and has deeply considered all views and opinions given. He also thanked his peers in Umno, including the leadership, for supporting him throughut his time in the party. On 30 May, Tengku Zafrul surprised many when he announced his decision to resign as an Umno member and voiced his intention to join Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). READ MORE: His shocking announcement came a few days after Rafizi Ramli resigning as the Economic Minister and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad stepping down as the Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Minister after they both lost a contest for the deputy president in PKR. The highly contested role went to Nurul Izzah Anwar. Both news of resignation also happened during the Asean Summit week. READ MORE: READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Vanguard or victim? Rafizi closing the door on himself
From Jeffri Saling I read Terence Netto's defence of outgoing economy minister Rafizi Ramli with some amusement. He has gone to lengths to portray Rafizi as a gallant hero who stepped down in a valiant effort to stem the tide against those who would compromise the principles of 'reformasi'. While I would never challenge Rafizi's great contributions to the party and the country, I am also equally sure that they are being exaggerated. How visible was he as economy minister these past two and a half years? What did he really do? Is he really that approachable, because the feedback, even from his supporters, is often that he is aloof. How come his 'reformasi' principles weren't offended until he himself tasted defeat in the party polls? This isn't even the first time he reacted in a churlish manner, taking a step back when his contributions are needed. I wonder how staff members feel about his move, given that he has left them jobless. Given that he is an acclaimed vanguard of the reform movement, is it not immature and irresponsible of him to walk away when he is most needed? Let's not forget that the party leaders attempted to work with him after the polls. Now he is standing in the corner playing the victim. Does this really help the cause he professes to be fighting for? I fear that Rafizi is closing the door on himself. Jeffri Saling is an FMT reader. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
