Duffy: No plans to privatize air traffic controllers
'I could spend my time the next three and a half years fighting over privatization. I'm not gonna do that,' Duffy said during a Wednesday appearance on NewsNation's 'On Balance.'
'What I'm gonna do is put every resource into training up more air traffic controllers to get them certified in their airspace in which they're gonna work, but also getting those experienced controllers to stay on the job, paying them a little more to not retire and continue to work for us,' he added.
Duffy noted that lawmakers previously looked into privatizing the agency in 2018, after Trump the previous year announced a plan to privatize the U.S. air traffic control system, which he called 'stuck, painfully, in the past.'
'Today we're proposing to take American air travel into the future, finally,' Trump said in June 2017. But the effort never took off.
Conversations about the country's air traffic control system quickly reignited during Trump's second term, due to a January mid-air collision with an American Airlines flight and an Army Blackhawk helicopter over D.C. resulting in more than 60 deaths.
Since then, near-miss accidents have occurred at airports across the country.
Some officials have blamed the issue on understaffing, as air traffic controller numbers remain at an all-time low for the FAA. Duffy has made recruiting a priority, along with efforts to increase investment in modern technology.
'We want the best and the brightest to be our air traffic controllers,' he told host Leland Vittert.
Trump and Duffy have both blamed the January crash in part on hiring practices under former President Biden.
Duffy blamed the Biden administration for allegedly allowing air traffic controllers to be approved for work at a 'lowered' standard.
'What we've done is said, listen, if you're 90-100 percent, you're best qualified. If you're 80-89 percent, you are well qualified…,' Duffy is referring to new qualification measurements.
'We have a 35 percent washout rate at the academy. So I'm in the business of getting the best minds, the best people, the best scores in the academy first.'
Canada is among multiple countries that have privatized their air traffic control system.
Other countries with at least partially privatized systems include the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Germany, according to NPR.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Warning Over Changes Issued by Bernie Sanders
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Bernie Sanders issued a warning about potential changes to Social Security implemented by the Trump administration on the program's 90th anniversary this week. A Social Security Administration (SSA) spokesperson told Newsweek on Friday: " As Commissioner Bisignano has repeatedly emphasized, ensuring the long-term financial health of these trust funds remains a top priority. The Social Security Administration is committed to working with Congress and other stakeholders to protect and strengthen these vital programs, ensuring that millions of Americans can continue to rely on Social Security for a secure retirement and support in times of disability—both now and in the future." Why It Matters August 14 marked the 90th anniversary of Social Security, relied on by millions of Americans who receive retirement, survivor and disability benefits. About 74 million people receive benefits administered by the SSA, the agency said in July. While the program remains broadly popular among Americans, the program has faced questions about whether it could become insolvent as soon as the 2030s without significant reform. Many Americans are concerned about potential cuts to the program or that individuals who are paying into Social Security may not receive benefits when they reach the age of retirement. Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, speaks during the Democratic National Convention on August 20, 2024. Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, speaks during the Democratic National Convention on August 20, 2024. CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with Democrats, sounded the alarm about changes to the program in a video posted to X on Thursday. He warned that individuals like President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire who led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before his falling out with Trump, have been "working overtime to try to dismantle Social Security and undermine the confidence that the American people have in it." "Since Trump took office, his administration has fired at least 7,000 employees at the Social Security Administration, shut down Social Security field offices and made it more difficult for seniors and the disabled to receive the benefits they have earned over the telephone," he said. SSA field offices lost nearly 5 percent of their staffs between March 2024 and March 2025, according to union data from the AFGE Social Security General Committee. Some states, however, saw more than 10 percent of SSA workers leave in that time. Sanders also ripped claims by DOGE that millions of Americans who had been marked deceased, some up to 360 years old, were still receiving benefits as an "unmitigated lie." "Our job today is to stop any and all efforts to destroy Social Security," Sanders said, touting new legislation that would reverse Trump administration cuts to the SSA and prevent the closure of field offices. Trump released a statement Thursday pledging to defend Social Security, "rewarding the men and women who make our country prosperous, and taking care of our own workers, families, seniors, and citizens first." He wrote that his efforts to "aggressively" root out waste and abuse, which includes "stopping payments to the deceased and eliminating benefits for those who do not legally qualify," will strengthen the program. "These measures will save American taxpayers billions of dollars every year and ensure that future generations receive the benefits they spent their lives paying into. At the same time, I am making the Social Security Administration more efficient, more responsive and more effective than ever before—reducing wait times and delivering the payments the American people worked hard to earn," Trump wrote. A YouGov poll released in March found that 54 percent of Americans believed Social Security cuts would have a negative effect on their financial security. Only 13 percent said it would have a positive effect, while 16 percent said it would have no effect. The poll surveyed 3,567 adults on March 12. What People Are Saying Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent: "In a world of complexity and uncertainty, Social Security has done exactly what its name implies. It has provided rock bottom security for our nation's elderly and disabled." Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, on X: "Right now, the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are quietly creating problems for Social Security so they can later hand it off to their private equity buddies." Elon Musk told Fox News in March: "What we're doing will help their benefits. Legitimate people, as a result of the work of DOGE, will receive more Social Security, not less." What Happens Next Social Security remains a challenge that Americans will face over the coming years as lawmakers work to prevent the program from going insolvent.
Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Trump administration deepens crackdown on solar and wind tax credits
The GOP law terminated existing investment and production tax credits for solar and wind projects that start producing electricity after 2027, but provided more time for projects that begin construction within a year. Trump then directed Treasury to 'strictly enforce' the end of the credits for wind and solar facilities, including by issuing new guidance concerning when a project is deemed to have begun construction. Traditionally, that longstanding metric has allowed projects to qualify by taking steps such as incurring 5 percent of a project's total cost or beginning physical construction activities. Tax lawyers and clean energy developers have warned the guidance could mark an unprecedented and legally dubious attempt to rewrite congressional intent, and could be challenged in court. Grassley has also said he would object to consideration of the Treasury nominees until he can be 'certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent.' But the guidance will have immediate impact for hundreds of planned solar and wind projects across the country. Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, said the new guidance will 'pull the rug out from under the entire pipeline of wind and solar projects that are in development.' Deveny, who helped craft the clean energy credits as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer, said Trump is 'determined to jack up American energy bills.' Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a statement called it a 'blatant rejection' of what Congress passed in the tax law. In the weeks following Trump's directive, the administration has undertaken a host of actions across agencies to further imperil wind and solar development, including major actions at the Interior Department that have received pushback from some Senate Republicans. The new Treasury guidance — which is not open to public comment — will apply to projects after Sept. 2.
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump Is Testing D.C.'s Home Rule. What Is It?
President Trump's rapidly escalating push to exert control over law enforcement in Washington, D.C., has posed one of the biggest threats to the city's self-governance since it was granted limited home rule by Congress in 1973. The fight, which has now moved to the courts, could affect not just who gives orders to the city's police officers in the coming days, but what becomes of the District's tenuous autonomy. What is home rule? The District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973 gave residents of the capital a limited form of self-governance for the first time since the 1800s. Before it, Congress and commissioners appointed by the president governed the city. And District residents — who had no representation in Congress — basically had no local elections to vote in, either. Home rule gave D.C. residents the power to elect a mayor, a District of Columbia Council and local neighborhood commissioners. But it also imposed extensive congressional oversight over how those officials govern the city, including the laws and budgets they adopt. As a result, the federal government hovers over how local officials govern just about every aspect of life in the city. The arrangement — unique to any city in America and originating in the Constitution's provision for a federal 'District' — has shifted some over time. For a period starting in the mid-1990s, a financial control board established by Congress managed the city's finances. And the federal government has taken back control of some functions the city struggled to fund (given the limitations Congress itself put on revenue the city could raise). But the basic contours of government in D.C. have been set for half a century by home rule — or 'limited home rule,' as locals more often describe it. Who controls the police department under home rule? The Metropolitan Police Department is controlled by Mayor Muriel Bowser of the District of Columbia, a Democrat, who appoints its police chief. The agency primarily functions as other municipal police departments do, although it also regularly supports the federal government. When the president travels around town in his motorcade, M.P.D. manages traffic. When large protests or events like inaugurations happen, M.P.D. officers help secure them (they also responded to the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol). Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
