
Geopolitical risks remain, but domestic fundamentals offer insulation: Ashwini Agarwal
Ashwini Agarwal
, Demeter Advisors.
With the
markets
at an all-time high, there should have been like a garmahat in your good morning.
Ashwini Agarwal:
No, I think markets are nothing to complain about. I mean, valuations are what they are, but flows and the expectations from growth perspective that lower interest rates and government expenditure should lift growth as the year rolls around, those are positives for the market.
And like your colleague was pointing out earlier,
KEC
received some orders, another railway company received orders, I think that is the nature of the beast we are dealing with.
Hopefully, a capex-led recovery that is what we are all hoping to see. So, there is nothing to complain about. Hopefully, the Middle East disturbance also simmers down. We will see how that unfolds because it seems, we have to take each day as it comes. But in the domestic context, barring the valuations which are quite stretched, not much to complain about.
Live Events
While we may talk about valuations which all of us are talking about it, but it is a two-year-old story that valuations mehnge hai, yet markets it keeps on going higher.
Ashwini Agarwal:
See, we are in a closed box environment. I mean, bulk of Indian savings cannot leave India. What has been established beyond doubt to the retail investor over the last 20-25 years is that equities give you better return than bank deposits both on a pre-tax basis and even more on a post-tax basis. So, shift of savings from bank deposits to equities is a continuing trend. Recent
RBI
data is also pointing to a shift in that direction. And this is very similar to what has happened in the US, for example, when the 401K shift happened sometime in the 80s and 90s. So, that is what is driving up the market. I mean, if we were a capital open economy and if the investors had the freedom to invest anywhere in the world, I do not think the valuations would be as rich as they are, but this is how it is and you have to take it as is.
For markets to go higher from here, we need a trigger and we need a surprise. What could be that positive surprise? Could it be earnings? Could it be anything else?
Ashwini Agarwal:
So, there is a lot of scepticism around growth and while the RBI has done a reasonable amount of heavy lifting by cutting the
CRR
and reducing rates and the government continues to push ahead with investments in railways and infrastructure and what have you, the private sector has not responded and that is the positive surprise that can happen since you are asking me for a positive surprise. I am not sure whether it will happen or not. I am hoping.
So, I use the word hope which does not have a lot of certainty behind it. But that would be a real surprise and then you could potentially get into a situation where your earnings trajectory improves from 10% to 12% for
Nifty
, for example, for fiscal 26 that everybody is talking about to maybe 15-17% for the next three years.
Now, if that happens, then valuations can remain expensive for longer because then everybody starts focusing on growth, saying that well, India is growing much faster than anywhere else in the world, there are no major macroeconomic imbalances just yet, so let the party carry on. I mean, that is the narrative that can evolve if you were to look for a positive surprise.
So, financialization of saving is driving the Indian markets higher, that is your take, but how should one take advantage of that in terms of the stock picking because, of late, we have seen all these AMCs, rather some of these brokerage companies on the stock price movement, they have been doing well. But do you believe at this price point the valuations are fairly placed or what is your take how can one take benefit out of this?
Ashwini Agarwal:
The capital market plays are already reasonably well priced. Now, of course, they will give you that 12-15% return which is in line with the growth in aggregate market returns because their business will grow by at least that much if not more. But what I would rather do is look for beneficiaries of a low-interest rate regime. The NBFC stand out in particular because their lending costs are somewhat sticky whereas their borrowing costs are likely to fall.
I mean, just this morning I was reading a newspaper article which spoke about the rush into low-grade bonds or triple B bonds or A minus type of bonds with investors looking for yields. Now, if that starts to happen, then you can see an improvement in the spreads for the NBFC, so that is one area that I would look at. And in a similar vein, I would look at some of the smaller banks.
Now banks have a kind of a dual-edged sword in the sense that their asset book gets repriced faster than their liabilities book in the short run. But I think improvement in net interest income will come from a lower CRR and it will also come from a better loan growth. So, improvement in net interest income come will come from these two factors, from loan growth as well as from lower CRR, so that to me is something that can hold some surprise.
And valuations in this space whether it is banks and NBFCs are still quite reasonable, so this looks to be an area where things are looking good to me and that is how one can play it, at least the liquidity part of it from an equities' perspective.
Banking and financials, they have been the flavour of the season of late, other than this if you adopt a bottom-up approach, what else is looking attractive?
Ashwini Agarwal:
The
healthcare
sector continues to look quite attractive. This is one long-term story that is evolving in India. Healthcare costs are rising. So, whether it is health insurance or whether it is hospitals or healthcare service providers like diagnostics, etc, these will continue to grow at a reasonable rate.
Now, in some cases valuations are expensive, in other cases they are not. So, on a bottom-up basis this is an area where one can hunt for some ideas. There are select opportunities in manufacturing as well in various areas whether it is related to exports or whether it is related to domestic economy, I think defence, railways are quite pricey but some of the core engineering companies are still looking alright.
There are domestic services plays outside of financial services where one can look at. Now, I have to say that across the board valuations are challenging. So, it is not that there are any screaming buys out there, but relative to growth, you might find a few ideas here and there, but it is becoming more and more difficult to find very appealing bottom-up ideas.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Former US ambassador makes massive statement, explains why Donald Trump imposed 50 percent tariff on India, lack of response led to...
Donald Trump- File image New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has imposed a steep 50 percent tariff on India over its purchases of Russian oil. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 August, according to the executive order. A response from India's foreign ministry said Delhi had already made clear its stance on imports from Russia, and reiterated that the tariff is 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. To recall, in May, the Modi government outrightly rejected Trump's so-called role in the ceasefire with Pakistan. Former Indian ambassador and renowned author Vikas Swarup revealed that Trump's displeasure is also linked to India joining the BRICS organisation and refusing to bow to US pressure during trade negotiations. While talking to news agency ANI, the former Indian ambassador said that India–US relations are strategic, whereas US–Pakistan relations are merely a money game. The ambassador also praised India's firm stance. He also warned that Trump's tariffs would lead to a rise in inflation within the United States itself. What Vikas Swarup say: In an interview with ANI, Vikas Swarup, who is a former High Commissioner to Canada, said steps being taken by the US President Donald Trump will eventually lead to ratcheting up inflation in America. 'US called India a 'Tariff King'. But now the 'Tariff King' in the world is the United States because our average tariff is about 15.98%. The US tariff today is 18.4%. So, it is now the 'Tariff King' of the world. But the fact is, tariffs are bringing in money. They will bring in about a 100 billion dollars a year for the US. But the issue is that eventually who will pay for these tariffs? By American consumers. So, what's going to happen is this is going to ratchet up inflation in America, it's going to ratchet up prices in America. I think that's when the chickens will come home to roost,' he said. 'If you cave in to a bully then the bully will increase his demands. Then there will be even more demands. So, I think we have done the right thing. India is too large, too proud a country to become a camp follower of any other country. Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s. I don't think that any Govt in Delhi can compromise on that,' says former diplomat Vikas Swarup on the tariff rift between India and the US,' he added. President Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, over India's imports of Russian oil. On Opposition questioning India's Foreign Policy and diplomacy, Vikas Swarup said India should not cave in to any pressure as India's strategic autonomy is non-negotiable'. Here, I would not blame our diplomats at all. I think what has happened is Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the US President and that is why, two visits by Asim Munir to Washington, the so-called 'deal' with America on so-called 'oil reserves' of Pakistan. More importantly, I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the 'Crypto King' of South Asia and there, through World Liberty Financial in which Trump's family has stakes, Steve Witkoff's family has a stake, through that I think Pakistan has managed to project an image of itself as a reliable partner…All these things have led to Trump having a softer approach towards Pakistan,' he said.


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
India hopes US ties will progress despite tariff tensions: MEA
NEW DELHI: India on Thursday hoped that its relationship with the US will continue to move forward based on mutual respect and shared interests. New Delhi's comments came amid escalating tensions between the two countries after President Donald Trump slapped 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods. "India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties," external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges, he said. "We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and we hope that the relationship will continue to move forward based on mutual respect and shared interests," he said. Jaiswal was asked about the future of India-US ties in the wake of tariff tensions. The MEA spokesperson suggested that the defence ties between the two countries remained robust. "The India-US defence partnership, underpinned by foundational defence agreements, is an important pillar of the bilateral partnership," he said. This robust cooperation has strengthened across all domains, he noted.. "We are expecting a US Defence Policy Team to be in Delhi in mid-August. The 21st edition of the joint military exercise Yudh Abhyas is also expected to take place later this month in Alaska," Jaiswal said. "Both sides remain engaged to convene the 2+2 Intersessional meeting at the working-level towards the end of the month," he added.


Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why many Chinese foreign affairs analysts reacted critically to PM Modi's likely China visit
On June 30, US President Donald Trump first threatened to impose a 25% tariff on Indian imports, over India's oil purchases from Russia amid the Ukraine war. Soon, there were speculations in the Indian media that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was likely to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) leaders' meet in Tianjin, China. The grouping includes nine member nations, including India, China, Pakistan and Russia. A possible reason for the visit, according to some Chinese analysts, was India seemingly hedging its options in global affairs. They called the move, if true, liang tou chi – or, 'to have the cake and eat it too.' Significantly, as soon as Washington escalated the trade offensive with an extra 25% tariff on certain imports, pushing the total levy to 50%, Beijing officially welcomed PM Modi's visit to attend the SCO summit. However, the news has drawn sharp reactions in China over the visit, which could happen after a seven-year gap. The official response in China PM Modi last visited China in 2018 on two occasions. First, in April for the India-China Informal Summit at Wuhan, and later in June for the SCO Heads of State meeting in Qingdao. This time, China's state-run Xinhua news agency and the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson have welcomed the visit, even before an official announcement from New Delhi. The Chinese Communist Party's English tabloid, Global Times, in a recent editorial, even criticised Western media reports interpreting the visit as a 'hedge against' the US, saying the countries had multiple common areas of cooperation. The other view, led by skeptics Those more suspicious of India's 'playing both sides' diplomacy in China have warned their government to remain vigilant. In a rare public defiance of a government decision, a reader wrote on a Chinese news website: 'India's 'allying with the US to resist China' and 'allying with China to deal with the US' — one is for 'resistance' and the other is for 'coping'. Can this be called 'maintaining a balance between China and the United States'?' Scholars in China have offered several explanations for such critical views: First, with economic and trade relations between India and the United States at a low point, India's readjustment of its relationship with China is seen as a key counterbalancing measure. For years, the US has also sought to develop closer ties with India, in part to counter China in Asia. But Chinese analysts are questioning how far India can truly go in improving relations with China in this context. Second, they are questioning that if the visit is not just a result of the US factor, will India a) agree to hold a summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the SCO meeting sidelines; and b) display a genuine commitment to go an extra mile in readjusting its 'leaning on one side' foreign policy towards the US. Third, on the same day as Trump's tariffs and news of the SCO visit came out, Trump announced a 'major breakthrough' in US-Russia negotiations. He is also now scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin. China's strategic affairs community, doubtful of India's commitment, is asking if Trump and Putin strike a 'deal' on Ukraine, India buying Russian oil may no longer be a problem. Will PM Modi still travel to China for the SCO summit? Simply, there remains a significant sense of distrust in China towards India, which is not exactly a new development. From the days of the Cold War, the Chinese establishment has found India's non-alignment policy to be suspicious, often believing that it is acting on behalf of the US under the guise of an autonomous foreign policy. With the collapse of the USSR and India's economic liberalisation, its deepening engagement with the US has added to this view in China. View of limited gains from PM Modi's visit Scholars in China have also questioned India's commitments in both the SCO and BRICS (including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), stating that PM Modi attended just three of the last ten SCO leaders' meetings. They have also pointed to the June meeting in Qingdao for the SCO Defence Ministers, where Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh accused Pakistan of supporting cross-border terrorism, and refused to sign the SCO joint statement. Wang Yiwei, an influential International Relations scholar and professor at Beijing's People's University, has gone as far as to say that New Delhi actually did violate Western sanctions on Russia. 'The nature of China and India is different. China-Russia economic and trade relations have lasted for many years, but India has significantly increased its production of Russian oil after the outbreak of the Russo-Ukrainian war, which is regarded as a violation of Western sanctions. Moreover, India also resells Russian oil to Europe,' he wrote. Shift under Trump An overwhelming sense in China is that India has always pursued a policy of playing both sides. For example, on India being a member of the SCO and the US-led QUAD security dialogue (with Australia and Japan), a Chinese scholar cited PM Modi's previous remarks: 'India has never considered itself bound to a single security alliance.' Some scholars now believe that under Trump 2.0, this will change. Today, the relationship between New Delhi and Washington is undergoing major adjustments, with significant differences on many issues, including trade, diplomacy, and energy. Likewise, there are many pressing issues between China and India which not only limit the depth of China-India economic and trade cooperation but also damage mutual understanding and trust. Some of these include tensions at the border, 'reviewing' and suppressing Chinese capital, restricting visas for Chinese technical personnel, no direct flights between the two countries, India imposing numerous barriers on Chinese investments, etc. Reflecting the Chinese government's view, the GT editorial puts a condition for Modi's visit translating into improved bilateral relations, saying 'We welcome Prime Minister Modi to visit China with genuine intentions to improve bilateral ties…' At the same time, a WeChat social media commentary declared India a 'joke,' saying Trump's 'tariff terrorism' has left the country 'powerless' and without bargaining chips, reflecting the divergent views. Hemant Adlakha teaches Chinese at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. He is also Vice Chairperson and an Honorary Fellow, Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS), Delhi.