AI is peeling back the layers of 'low-value' work - NZ may be well-placed to adapt
AI can easily replicate large swaths of professional output.
Photo:
123RF
Analysis
- As generative artificial intelligence (AI) advances at breakneck speed, it is upending assumptions about which jobs are "safe" from automation.
Disruption now extends well beyond manual or routine work into white-collar roles once considered untouchable. Tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Midjourney can produce policy briefs, analytical reports, software code, design assets and marketing copy in seconds.
Even in specialised domains, systems such as
PolicyPulse
can generate structured briefs and thematic syntheses - tasks that once required teams of experts.
If AI can so easily replicate large swaths of professional output, how much of the economy rests on work that creates the appearance of value rather than tangible impact?
And could New Zealand - anchored in sectors rooted in physical work, human judgement and essential services - be structurally better placed to thrive?
A
2023 Goldman Sachs report
estimated generative AI could automate work equivalent to 300 million full-time jobs globally. The highest exposure is in administrative, legal and other information-heavy sectors.
In 2024, the
International Monetary Fund warned
that economies reliant on high-skilled services - such as education, law and finance - face both job losses and rising inequality.
This echoes author David Graeber's concept of "
bullshit jobs
" - roles that add little genuine value. Between 2000 and 2018,
most net job growth
came from low productivity service sectors such as marketing, consulting and corporate administration. These are precisely the kinds of tasks AI can now perform in seconds.
Consultancy firm
McKinsey estimates
60-70 percent of activities in office support, customer service and professional services can be automated. The
OECD has noted
routine information processing jobs face the greatest risk. AI is not only replacing roles - it is revealing how insubstantial many of them were.
Some argue finance illustrates this reality starkly: intended to allocate capital efficiently, the sector has expanded beyond its productive purpose.
Businessman Adair Turner famously called much of it "
socially useless
", while
research
from the Bank for International Settlements found oversized financial sectors can stifle innovation by diverting talent from more productive areas.
Now,
AI is automating functions
such as risk modelling, compliance and equity research, prompting a reassessment of the sector's true economic value.
New Zealand - often caricatured as a remote, agrarian outpost - may be structurally insulated from the worst of the AI shock.
Photo:
Adam Simpson
New Zealand - often caricatured as a remote, agrarian outpost - may be structurally insulated from the worst of the AI shock.
Roughly 70 percent of its exports
come from agriculture, horticulture, seafood and forestry.
Domestically,
leading employment sectors
include aged care, physiotherapy, plumbing, childcare and early childhood education.
These roles require physical dexterity, sensory judgement and human empathy - skills AI cannot yet credibly replicate.
In an era when many advanced economies are over-invested in finance, bureaucracy and "bullshit jobs", New Zealand's focus on tangible, value-producing work could be a strategic strength.
Innovation in these sectors is happening too
. Robotic milking systems have improved dairy efficiency and animal welfare, biosecurity monitoring safeguards exports, and forestry research is targeting carbon neutral timber.
If finance reveals how AI strips away illusions, higher education shows its disruptive power. Generative AI
can now produce essays
credible enough to pass as human work.
The humanities tend to reward theoretical fluency and stylistic polish - areas where AI excels. By contrast, science, technology, engineering and mathematics - the so-called STEM subjects - demand precision, formal logic and testable hypotheses, which are harder for AI to mimic. [ https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-employment-outlook-2023_08785bba-en/full-report/artificial-intelligence-and-jobs-no-signs-of-slowing-labour-demand-yet_5aebe670.html] has shown STEM-related occupations face the lowest automation risk.
New Zealand's
recent investment in STEM education
is timely. But it must be matched by support for primary and secondary teachers - roles grounded in mentorship and adaptive instruction, which remain beyond AI's reach.
Service-heavy economies such as Singapore, Britain and parts of the United States
face growing pressure to adapt
.
Researchers
warn that reliance on low-productivity, routine service work risks long-term stagnation unless economies pivot to innovation-led sectors.
New Zealand's base in agriculture, manufacturing, trades and essential services offers comparative resilience - but only if reinforced by investment in measurable innovation and productivity.
New Zealand's advantage lies not in chasing abstract, easily automated work, but in deepening its strengths in sectors AI cannot yet touch - food production, care and infrastructure.
These are industries where value is measured in what is grown, built, repaired and cared for - not in presentation slides.
As AI redraws the contours of global labour markets, every country must ask: if a job can be done by an algorithm, was it ever as significant as we believed?
For New Zealand, the answer may be to double down on the work that cannot be coded - turning what once looked like a structural constraint into a defining strength.
* Kenny Ching is a Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau.
-
This story originally appeared on The Conversation
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
A copyright game of chicken
Opinion: If you have the right tools, generative AI has made it easy to create high-quality images, simply through providing it with textual prompts – commonly called Text To Image. This raises numerous ethical and legal issues, including whether images generated this way are protected by copyright and who owns the copyright in those images. The GenAI models – such as Midjourney, Gemini, and DALL-E 3 – are not creating works out of thin air. They rely on training data, which are often works found online and copied without the permission of the copyright owners. Artists and other creatives are understandably concerned about the copying of their works, and some are starting to sue the owners of these models for copyright infringement in the US, the EU, the UK, and elsewhere. It may come as a surprise for readers that under copyright law if a GenAI image has drawn inspiration from hundreds or thousands of works but has not copied a substantial part of an identifiable work protected by copyright, the GenAI image will not infringe copyright. Can the GenAI images that do not infringe copyright be protected by copyright? I investigated this question for an article in the New Zealand Business Law Quarterly. In the US and some other countries, the answer is currently no: GenAI images created with prompts are not protected by copyright. However, New Zealand's copyright law is different. It may be possible for such works to be protected by copyright. However, there is no automatic protection. The image must be 'original'. Before looking at what 'original' means in copyright law, another of copyright law's oddities is that artists do not have copyright of their artistic style. For instance, if a user prompts a GenAI model to create a red chicken in the style of Roy Lichtenstein, if Lichtenstein did not create a similar red chicken in his distinctive style, there will be no copyright infringement. You could demonstrate originality though, if you used skill and judgment in your prompt. Simple prompts such as 'red chicken' or even 'red chicken in a garden with the sun shining, with trees and flowers' would not show sufficient skill or judgment. But you might be able to get copyright of an image produced from detailed prompt such as the following: 'create a close-up photograph of a red shaver chicken in profile view in a lush garden with the sun's crepuscular rays showing, the chicken is centred in the image, to its right and slightly behind the chicken are apple trees, to its left and slightly behind the chicken are large sunflowers, the background is out of focus creating a bokeh effect, the overall appearance is interesting with detailed texture of the birds' feathers, there is no text or additional objects in the image'. (I wrote this prompt. The 'bokeh effect' is a term in photography, which describes the aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of an image.) Alternatively, a work may be considered original if enough time and effort was spent in creating it. If a user created an image using GenAI and then spent a long time modifying that image through a series of prompts, that could make the image original and protected by copyright. If an image is sufficiently original and therefore protected by copyright, who owns the copyright? The AI user or the owner of the GenAI model, or someone else? The answer depends on which country the user is attempting to claim copyright in. Under New Zealand's Copyright Act, because the user provided the prompt (or prompts), the user is likely to be treated as the first owner of the copyright. However, because GenAI images are treated as computer-generated works, these images won't be protected to the same extent as more traditionally created works, such as a painting painted by an artist. The copyright in a traditional painting will last for 50 years after the artist's death. In contrast, copyright in computer-generated works lasts for 50 years from the end of the year in which it was created. Also, while painters will have moral rights in relation to their own painting, users do not gain moral rights of images created with AI. One type of moral right is the right of integrity, when artists can complain if a change to their work harms their reputation or integrity. Another difference in the copyright of an original artwork, compared with an AI-created image, is that with the latter, the level of protection depends on the level of originality. The level of skill and judgment when using prompts is lower than that of an artist painting a painting; therefore, a person 'copying' the GenAI image would have to copy the GenAI image almost exactly to infringe copyright. For the painting, infringement could occur if a substantial part had been copied, even if there were large differences. Copyright is complicated, and AI makes it even more so. Because the level of protection for AI images will be lower than for traditional created works, I argue that GenAI images need to be marked as such and the Copyright Act 1994 amended so that the copyright owner of a GenAI image is unable to sue for copyright infringement if they have not sufficiently watermarked the image.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council investigating how it could implement AI
The Dunedin City Council (DCC) is exploring in detail how it can incorporate artificial intelligence into its operation. Staff were using the technology in limited but practical ways, such as for transcribing meetings and managing documents, council chief information officer Graeme Riley said. "We will also be exploring the many wider opportunities presented by AI in a careful and responsible way," he said. "We recognise AI offers the potential to transform the way DCC staff work and the quality of the projects and services we deliver for our community, so we are taking a detailed look at the exciting potential applications across our organisation." He had completed formal AI training, Mr Riley said. He was involved in working out how AI might be governed at the council. "This will help guide discussions about where AI could make the biggest differences in what we do," he said. "As we identify new possibilities, we'll consider the best way to put them into practice, whether as everyday improvements or larger projects." Cr Lee Vandervis mentioned in a meeting at the end of June that the council was looking into the ways AI might be used. He also included a segment about AI in a blog last month about his mayoral plans, suggesting staff costs could be reduced. There was potential for much-reduced workloads for staff of the council and its group of companies, he said. The Otago Daily Times asked the council if a review, or some other process, was under way. Mr Riley said there was not a formal review. It was too soon to discuss cost implications, but its focus was on "improving the quality" of what it did.
Techday NZ
19 hours ago
- Techday NZ
MiQ integrates Lifesight data to boost Sigma ad platform insights
MiQ and Lifesight have announced a partnership that will see Lifesight's location-based data integrated into MiQ's Sigma platform for use in cross-channel media planning, audience targeting, and measurement. The collaboration allows Sigma users to benefit from Lifesight's movement data, thereby supporting more granular audience segmentation and enhancing understanding of shopper behaviour. Sigma, which was launched as an AI-powered programmatic advertising platform, combines data from over 300 sources and analyses some 700 trillion consumer signals, ranging from television viewing and online browsing behaviours to in-store purchasing activity. According to MiQ, the new data flows will enable technology users to derive deeper insights into both in-store and online behaviours. The Sigma platform is designed to unify and activate data across the programmatic ecosystem, supporting multiple advertising channels within a single environment. Sigma aims to aid media planners and traders in harnessing complex datasets and optimising campaign outcomes for advertisers and agencies. Fiona Roberts, MiQ's Managing Director for ANZ, said the partnership with Lifesight would advance the company's ambition for its Sigma platform within the JAPAC region. "Our partnership with Lifesight is a major step in enhancing our Sigma platform across JAPAC - bringing together context, commerce, and audience intelligence under one roof. With this integration, we're unlocking deeper visibility into both browsing and buying behaviours, enabling more precise and actionable insights for brands." The combined dataset promises to deliver new capabilities in analytics, segmentation, and campaign measurement. Vishal Shah, Head of Product JAPAC at MiQ, outlined some of the practical advances made possible by the agreement. "We're now able to unify browsing and buying signals to power commerce analytics, behavioural segmentation, and offline attribution across key channels like display, CTV, YouTube, social, and DOOH. I am especially excited about the operational control this partnership with Lifesight gives us across the region - enabling proprietary IP development, faster troubleshooting, and addressable audience activation across all major DSPs. It gives MiQ a measurable edge in precision, agility, and campaign intelligence." Lifesight's approach comprises consent-based data collection, supported by advanced AI modelling for measurement and attribution. The company's platform centralises diverse data sources and provides tools for marketing mix modelling, incrementality testing, and attribution analysis. This provides marketers with real-time insights for evidence-based decision making. Peter Madani, Director of Sales and Partnerships APAC at Lifesight, commented on the value of the partnership for clients seeking to merge online and offline behaviours in their marketing analytics. "Our strategic partnership with MiQ connects Lifesight's high-quality, software development kit-sourced location data directly into Sigma - unlocking access to over 300 million monthly consented devices across the region. It's a powerful step forward in unifying online and offline behaviours, while also solving for data fragmentation. Together, we're enabling more cohesive planning, precise targeting, and outcome-based measurement across every major channel, including CTV." The arrangement follows MiQ's recent data partnership with OzTAM, which saw OzTAM's VOZ television viewership data incorporated into another MiQ tool, TVi, to provide cross-platform measurement capability spanning linear TV, BVOD, streaming services, and YouTube. Lifesight provides marketing measurement tools to brands, integrating predictive analytics and real-time optimisation, while MiQ offers programmatic media and data-driven services to agencies and advertisers across several international markets. Follow us on: Share on:
