Two New Jersey lottery players split $816,218 Jersey Cash 5 jackpot. Here's where
It's the 31st time the Jersey Cash 5 so far this year.
The New Jersey Lottery announced on June 16 that the winning tickets, each worth $408,109, were sold in Middlesex County and through the third-party app Jackpocket.
The winning Middlesex ticket was sold at a ShopRite on Summerhill Road in Spotswood. Each retailer will receive a $2,000 bonus for selling the winning tickets.
Ten other lottery players matched four balls, the Bullseye and Xtra to win $1,500 a piece.
The Jersey Cash 5 winning numbers for Saturday, June 14 were: 22, 35, 37, 40 and 42. The XTRA was 04 and Bulleseye: 35.
The NJ Lottery estimates the next Jersey Cash 5 jackpot at $166,000 for the June 16 drawing.
Jersey Cash 5 is a daily lottery draw game from the New Jersey Lottery. Players pick five numbers between 1 and 45 and can add the Xtra for a chance to increase non-jackpot prizes by up to five times. The Bullseye gives players another chance to win. Drawings are held seven days a week at 10:57 p.m.
Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. Must be 18+, 21+ in AZ and 19+ in NE. Not affiliated with any State Lottery. Gambling Problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY); 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-GAMBLER (all others). Visit jackpocket.com/tos for full terms and conditions.
This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: Two NJ lottery players split $816,218 Jersey Cash 5 jackpot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
European drugmakers fall after Trump raises stakes over US drug price cuts
By Ankur Banerjee SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Shares of European drugmakers slipped on Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump sent letters to major pharmaceutical firms to cut drug prices in the United States, months after signing a sweeping executive order aimed at lowering prices. The letters were the latest setback for a sector still grappling with the prospect of tariffs outlined in the U.S.-EU trade deal that could cost the pharmaceutical industry between $13 billion and $19 billion. Trump called on 17 drugmakers to provide so-called most-favoured-nation prices to every patient enrolled in the government Medicaid health programme for low-income people, and to guarantee such pricing for new drugs. Shares of European drugmakers Sanofi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Merck KGaA and Novo Nordisk slipped between around 1% and 4% in early trading on Friday. Novo's 4% fall extends a selloff this week that started on Tuesday with a 28% plunge, wiping out $70 billion of its market value after the maker of weight-loss drug Wegovy issued a profit warning and named a new CEO. The companies were all sent letters by Trump, who gave them until September 29 to respond with binding commitments to those terms. U.S. drugmakers including Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly and Merck were also sent the letters. The European healthcare index was down 1.4% by 0731 GMT, its lowest since April. "Trump's directive to the pharma companies will put them on the defensive and adds yet another layer of uncertainty for the sector which could also face import tariffs in time to come," said Vasu Menon, managing director of investment strategy at OCBC. "While Trump has set a deadline for these companies to comply, it remains to be seen if this is hard coded or if he will roll back some of his threats if these companies make an effort to engage him and soften his stance." Analysts, lobbyists and drug pricing experts though said it seemed unlikely that the pharmaceutical companies would comply with Trump's demand to lower U.S. prices. The companies including Pfizer, AbbVie, and German Merck KGaA's U.S. division, EMD Serono, said they were open to working with the Trump administration. Trump's executive order in May directed drugmakers to lower medicine prices to align with what other countries pay, leading to some shift in how drugmakers look to sell their medicines. Swiss drugmaker Roche said last week it was considering selling its prescription medicines in the United States directly to consumers to lower costs for patients as part of talks with the U.S. government. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After Years of Unpaid Loans, Woman Tells Sister 'No More Money Without a Written Agreement'
The woman wants to help — but not without a written agreement after years of lending money with little paybackNEED TO KNOW A woman says she'll only lend her sister more money if she signs a repayment plan The sister is offended and claims she's being treated like a stranger, not family Their parents say to let it go, but the woman is tired of being the fallback planA woman turns to the Reddit community for advice following an emotional clash with her older sister over a financial boundary she says she can no longer ignore. After years of lending money with little repayment, she's reached a breaking point. 'I have loaned my older sister money a few times over the past few years,' she explains, adding, 'Nothing huge, usually a few hundred here, maybe a thousand once, but it's added up.' Despite those repeated efforts to help, she says her sister has never really paid her back, only sending small amounts at random and offering ongoing excuses. From lost jobs to bad breakups and car trouble, the sister's reasons vary, but the result is the same: the money rarely comes back. 'I never made a big deal out of it,' she writes. 'She's my sister, I love her, and I know she's had a rough few years.' But this time, when her sister asked for $2,000 to help with rent after a roommate suddenly moved out, she felt something shift. 'And honestly I snapped a little,' she admits. Instead of just sending the money, she offered a compromise. 'I told her I could help but only if she signs a basic agreement this time saying she'll pay it back within a year.' She emphasizes it isn't anything formal or legal, just a simple document outlining a clear repayment timeline. But her sister doesn't take it well. 'She got super offended,' the poster reveals. 'Said I'm treating her like some random borrower, not family.' The older sister insists she would never take advantage of her, despite what the poster sees as a long history of exactly that. 'She would never screw me over,' the sister says, but the poster quickly adds, 'Even though... she kind of already has.' The tension rises as the poster stands firm, trying to explain that it's not about lacking trust but about needing boundaries. 'I told her this isn't about trust, it's about boundaries,' she shares. 'I'm not a bank.' She also points out the strain these loans place on her own finances, saying, 'I'm not exactly rich, I'm just better at budgeting and don't live paycheck to paycheck like she does.' But the disagreement soon expands beyond the two sisters. Now, their parents are involved, urging her to give in for the sake of family. 'They're telling me to just let it go, that family helps family,' she writes, clearly frustrated by the added pressure. Still, she stands by her conditions. 'I'm just tired of being the fallback plan with no accountability,' she says. Though willing to help if her sister agrees to the terms, she doesn't want to continue giving with no expectations. 'If she was just paying all the loans I gave to her, I would not mind giving it,' she adds. As she opens up to the Reddit community under the 'Advice Needed' tag, she's not just asking about the money. She's asking if setting limits makes her the bad guy. One commenter offers a validating response: 'You're not a bank. Setting limits doesn't make you the bad guy.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In the end, she's left wondering if drawing a line with family is fair — or if it turns her into something she never wanted to be. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Tariff Blitz Unleashes Delayed Shock to Global Economy
(Bloomberg) -- Four months after Donald Trump shocked the world and roiled markets by unveiling a placard full of tariff rates at the White House Rose Garden, his revisions unveiled Thursday generated a more subdued response among investors. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus But at an average of 15%, the world is still facing some of the steepest US tariffs since the 1930s, roughly six times higher than they were a year ago. Trump's latest volley outlined minimum 10% baseline levies, with rates of 15% or more for countries with trade surpluses with the US. So far, the global economy has held up better than many economists expected after Trump's initial tariff blitz. A rush to beat the elevated rates spurred a front-loading of exports, aiding many Asian economies and shielding US consumers from price spikes. That could all be about to change. 'For the rest of the world, this is a serious demand shock,' Raghuram Rajan, former India central bank governor and chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, who is now a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, told Bloomberg TV on Friday. 'You will see a lot of central banks contemplating cutting as the rest of the world slows somewhat in the face of these tariffs.' The months of negotiations, marked by Trump's social-media threats against US allies and foes alike, ended with new rates that were largely in line or lower than those on April 2, which were paused after stocks plummeted and bond yields surged. Still, there were some shocks, such as a punitive 39% rate for imports from Switzerland and an increase on some Canadian goods to 35%. On Friday, Asian shares fell 0.7%, futures on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 slipped about 0.5% and those for Europe declined 0.6% — all declines that were far more muted than in the aftermath of April 2. While Trump's new rates provide some certainty to manufacturers, plenty of tariff uncertainty remains. The US president is expected to unveil separate tariffs on imports of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals and other key industrial products in the coming weeks. And US courts are still assessing the legality of the 'reciprocal' tariffs. The past four months have also shown an increased willingness by Trump to use tariffs to settle geopolitical scores. While the 'Liberation Day' rates followed a crude formula linked broadly to a nation's trade deficit, the ensuing numbers appeared more arbitrary. Trump threatened Brazil over domestic politics, India over its ties with Russia and Canada over plans to recognize a Palestinian state. If the new levies go ahead in seven days as planned and if deals on car tariffs with the European Union, Japan and South Korea stick, Bloomberg Economics estimates the average US tariff rate will rise to 15.2% from 13.3% — up significantly from just 2.3% before Trump took office. 'It's a very high tariff wall,' said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. 'The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will respond surely by buying less.' Applying model results used by the Federal Reserve in the first trade war, Bloomberg Economics calculates the 12.8-percentage-point hike in the average tariff since Trump came back into office could cut US GDP by 1.8% and lift core prices by 1.1% over a period of two to three years. That'll create downside risks for exporters that rely on US demand too. Bloomberg Economics reckon Canada and Mexico, which has an additional 90 days to negotiate, are 'well placed to weather the storm' thanks to carve outs for compliant goods compliant with the USMCA trade deal. The EU, Japan and South Korea — all with 15% rates — also come off better than feared. Switzerland, by contrast, was hit hard with a tariff of 39% on its products. The Swiss franc edged lower. Thursday's tariff news didn't apply to China. Trump is set to make a call on whether to extend a tariff truce after talks wrapped in Stockholm this week. A Chinese official earlier said the two sides agreed to keep levies at their current levels for now, part of a trade truce after President Xi Jinping's government cut off the US from rare earth magnets in the wake of the April 2 levies. Trump did include a provision to impose a 40% additional tariff on goods deemed to be transshipped, a measure that appeared aimed at China, but it lacked clarity on how such a ruling will be made. 'This provides a bit more clarity but there remains substantial uncertainty for manufacturers,' said Jonathan Kearns, Sydney-based chief economist at money manager Challenger Ltd. 'We've seen numerous changes in the US tariff regime to date and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains.' Kearns, a former central bank official, said he expects greater pass through to the US consumer in the months ahead. The Trump administration is hoping the new tariff regime will bring in revenue, shrink the trade deficit and spur companies to set up factories on US shores — all without driving up prices or cratering demand. 'Global trade is now being organized around the principles of fair and balanced trade – all pursued in support of countries' economic and national security,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer wrote in a statement. 'This new trading system will lower the US trade deficit and lead to better outcomes for American workers, their families, and their communities.' Still, since Trump's Rose Garden rollout in April, he's faced criticism for over promising on trade deals after he and aides vowed to broker numerous agreements, with at least one pledging '90 deals in 90 days.' Economists are also warning US households will pay a price — with the blow depending on how the burden is split between exporters prepared to eat slimmer margins to retain sales and their US importers. Fed Dilemma 'Unlike Trade War 1.0, when Chinese exporters and the RMB bore the brunt of the adjustment, this time round since tariffs are universal with minimum rate of 10%, there would likely be some pass-through to the US consumers,' said Selena Ling, an economist at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. in Singapore. 'This may complicate the picture for the Fed.' Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell this week shrugged off pressure from the White House and rejected arguments for an interest-rate cut from two dissenting officials, maintaining that the central bank needed to stay on guard against inflation risk. 'A reasonable base case is that the effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level, but it is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent — and that is a risk to be assessed and managed,' Powell said Wednesday. Also to be seen is whether the US levies spur more tariff barriers around the globe. While the EU has placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and others have mulled similar curbs on cheap Chinese goods, most have eschewed Trump's protectionist push. 'While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. 'Don't assume this is the end of the story,' he added. 'Trump regards this as an ongoing reality show. More 'deals' or further tariff increases are almost certain to follow.' --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Anup Roy. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
