KZN education and health departments struggle with supplier payments as financial challenges mount
This comes as most of the departments, includingthe frontline departments of health and education, are falling behind in their financial commitments to service providers.
This week, unpaid service providers staged sit-ins in the provincial offices of both departments in Pietermaritzburg as they sought answers.
The provincial executive council met on Wednesday to discuss these and other governance and service delivery challenges.
The education department confirmed that it owed 22% of its suppliers payments for the National Schools Nutrition Programme for March and April, while the health department owes R1.7bn to its service providers.
Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka confirmed that the failure to make payments on time was mainly due to technical difficulties linked to the new financial system, a migration from BAS version 5 to BAS Version 6.
That has since been resolved, and the department said it made the payment to the affected suppliers on Tuesday, which will reflect on Friday.
However, he added that some of the suppliers were at fault for the payment delays through noncompliance with the submission standards.
'So far, we have paid all service providers that have complied with contracts in terms of submitting invoices with the supporting documents... We are certain that before May 10, as we're working with [National] Treasury, all the outstanding service providers that have submitted proper invoices will be paid.'
Some of the invoices were submitted without signatures from the schools, which is required as proof that the correct items were submitted. As a result, there are service providers who have not been paid for October and November, but the department is working with them to resolve that, Hlomuka said.
Health MEC Nomagugu Simelane said the upgrade to the new payment system was a factor but admitted that their challenges centre mainly around the financial limitations, which meant they couldn't pay all the service providers on time in this financial year.
She said they indicated as far back as November 2024 to both the provincial cabinet and the portfolio committee that they would not be able to pay all the service providers on time in this financial year because of the financial challenges facing the department.
She said they presented a plan to negotiate with the bigger suppliers whose invoices exceed R500,000 a month to spread their payments over 60 days, instead of paying within 30 days
'Spreading the payment over 60 days doesn't mean you write off the debt, it means at some point you will have to pay that amount, and that point was April 1 when we were expecting our full allocation to come in.'
'As soon as we were able to get the allocation in April we started the process of paying the service providers, but we were not able to pay in the manner that we should have for the last three weeks because of challenges with BAS.'
Finance MEC Francois Rodgers said the frontline departments have been the worst affected by budget cuts, which is why he tried to focus on them in his budget allocation.
The new administration inherited budget cuts of R70bn over four years, which is almost 50% of their current allocation of R158bn.
With economic growth projected at just over 1%, Rodgers said it will take a long time to reverse the situation if they don't change their approach to budgeting and spending.
'It's reprioritisation: while we're getting through this economic crises, we have to do business unusual when it comes to finance... We have to change (and) that is what we're going to do in 2026/27; our frontline departments must be our priority and then we have to look at the balance of the funding for the province,' he said.
'We've been given permission by National Treasury for a procurement system which is going to align the supply chain with BAS and payments and departments will no longer be able to procure if they don't have the cash to back it, which is also going to address some of the challenges that we have.'
Premier Thami Ntuli said they have always been transparent with their financial limitations, and what is happening now is what their analysis and projections warned about, which they have communicated to the public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Is buying a car with a balloon payment a debt trap?
A new shiny car is not in everybody's budget these days and car financers are trying to help them with balloon payments. It is so tempting. That lovely shiny car will cost so much less per month and by the time the balloon payment comes around, you can always trade it in and pay off the balloon payment. And buy another new shiny car with its own balloon payment. How could this be a debt trap? If you consider choosing a balloon payment when financing a new car, you are not alone. South African banks report that as many as a third of car loan customers choose the maximum balloon payment to reduce their monthly repayments. However, Ernest North, co-founder of car and home insurance platform Naked, says it is wise to consider the long-term impact before committing to a balloon payment for your new car. 'Balloon payments have become increasingly popular in South Africa due to the rising costs of living, including the higher costs of car purchases and ownership. However, many consumers go for a balloon payment without understanding that they could get caught in a debt trap four or five years down the line.' ALSO READ: Why balloon payments can become a burden – and how to manage them Lower monthly instalments – that balloon at the end of the term… North says although lowering your monthly repayments can help you to stretch your salary a bit further and potentially afford a better car, the lump sum at the end of the loan term is the sting in the tail. 'While a balloon payment can be a useful financial planning tool, many people find that they struggle to afford the final repayment.' A balloon payment is a large amount that you agree to repay at the end of your car finance term, usually between 20% and 35% of the car's value, with 40% being the maximum most banks would allow. During the term, you pay lower monthly instalments, but it is because you are not paying off the full loan, just a portion of it. North says this might feel like a win, but warns consumers to consider the total costs of buying a R500 000 car on a six-year loan (assuming no deposit and an interest rate of 10.5%): ALSO READ: Don't get caught! Look out for these balloon payment traps when buying a car What happens when the final car payment is due? When the balloon payment is due, your options will be to: Pay it off in cash and own the car outright. Refinance the outstanding balloon payment by entering a new loan agreement and face another few years of making monthly payments and interest charges. You will also have to qualify for financing to take this option. Extend the loan term. Some lenders might allow you to stretch out your repayment period further, although this could mean paying even more interest. Again, this is only possible if you are creditworthy. Sell or trade in your car, leaving you without an asset after forking out cash for months. But remember, you must still settle the balloon payment. ALSO READ: Need a new car? These are the payment options available to you Risks of choosing a balloon car payment North also reminds consumers about the risks of balloon payments. 'These numbers and options make the significant risks and costs of balloon payments clear.' He says the monthly benefit is actually very small compared to these future risk you take: Significant financial risk because you will either need to have cash to pay the balloon payment at the end or you will need to finance it. The bigger the balloon payment, the higher the interest you pay over the full term of the loan. After depreciation, your car might not be worth as much as the balloon payment at the end of the loan. You may never own a car outright if you get caught in a loop of refinancing via a balloon payment plan every five or six years. If you want to exit the loan early, you must be prepared for early settlement penalties and the outstanding balloon payment. Even worse, if your car is stolen or written off in an accident, you will be forced into an early settlement and will need to pay a massive shortfall. If you cannot afford the final payment, you could face consequences, such as repossession of the car under the National Credit Act. 'In theory, a balloon payment gives you the option to pay a large cash amount at the end of your finance term and then you can keep the car. But the reality is that most people do not have that kind of cash lying around and end up having to sell the car. 'And if the car's value is less than the outstanding balloon amount, it becomes a very serious problem, one that many people are unfortunately facing.' ALSO READ: Is it still worth buying a car? Are balloon car payments really a good thing? Do balloon payments then ever make sense? North says despite the costs and risks, there are some instances where balloon payments can be a helpful tool in your financial planning: You like to trade your car in for a new model every few years and are confident you can afford the balloon payment when it is due. You can realistically expect your income and savings to increase over the loan term. You want a reliable new car with a warranty, rather than risking potentially higher and unpredictable maintenance costs with an older one. You are paying for the car through a business and can claim tax deductions on depreciation, interest, fuel, maintenance and potentially the balloon payment to help with cash flow. You do not anticipate needing to exit the loan early and are committed to keeping the car for the full loan term. ALSO READ: The best way to finance your car If you do, choose the right kind of balloon payment Should you choose a balloon payment for your car, you will have to choose between guaranteed future value and traditional balloon payments. North says a Guaranteed Future Value (GFV) finance option could be a safer alternative. 'GFV agreements add a layer of financial security by guaranteeing the value of your car at the end of the finance term, regardless of how much it has depreciated. This guaranteed amount functions as your balloon payment (also known as the 'optional final payment') and is agreed upon upfront. 'When the finance term ends, you will have three choices: Make the final payment and keep the car, trade it in for a new car, or give the car back with nothing more to pay, even if its actual market value is lower than the GFV. This offers peace of mind and avoids the burden of being left with a car that is worth less than the lump sum you still owe.' North also warns against using balloon payments to buy a car you cannot actually afford in the long term. 'Rather put down a larger deposit or choose a more affordable car. Remember, a more expensive car will also have higher maintenance and insurance costs. While it can make sense in some circumstances, the downside of a balloon payment is very seldom worth the benefit.'
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Inside SA's multi-million rand plan to fill US funding void
The current tranche of money comes from Treasury's contingency reserve. Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi recently announced that National Treasury had released roughly R753 million to help plug the gap left by US funding cuts to South Africa's health system. Another R268 million is also being released in the following two years for researchers that lost their US grants. But this may only constitute the first round of emergency funds from government, according to sources we spoke to. ALSO READ: Treasury allocates R750m to offset Pepfar funding withdrawal as Motsoaledi tables health budget The health department is planning to submit a bid for an additional allocation later on, which will be considered by Treasury. But this will likely only be approved if the first tranche of funding is appropriately used. So how is the money supposed to be used? To find out, we spoke with officials from the National Treasury, the National Department of Health and the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC). Money for provinces is for saving jobs at government clinics The current tranche of money comes from Treasury's contingency reserve, which exists partially to deal with unforeseen funding shortfalls. It was released in terms of Section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act. Of the R753 million that's been announced for this year, Motsoaledi stated that R590 million would be going to provincial health departments via the District Health Programme Grant – a conditional grant for funding the country's public health efforts, particularly HIV, TB, and other communicable diseases. Such conditional grants typically give the National Health Department more say over how provincial departments spend money than is the case with most other health funding in provinces.. To explain how government officials arrived at this figure, it's worth recapping what services the US previously supported within provinces. Prior to Donald Trump becoming US president on 20 January, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) had financed health programmes in specific districts with high rates of HIV. These districts were scattered across all South Africa's provinces, save for the Northern Cape. The funds were typically channelled by USAID to non-governmental organisations (NGOs), which used the money to assist the districts in two ways. The first is that NGOs would hire and deploy health workers at government clinics. The second is that the NGOs would run independent mobile clinics and drop-in centres, which assisted so-called key populations, such as men who have sex with men, sex workers, transgender people, and people who inject drugs. Following the US funding cuts, thousands of NGO-funded health workers lost their jobs at government clinics, while many of the health centres catering to key populations were forced to close. In response, the health department began negotiations with Treasury to get emergency funding to restore some of these services. As part of its application, the health department submitted proposals for each province, which specified how much money was needed and how it would be used. (Though this only took place after significant delay and confusion). Since Treasury couldn't afford to plug the entire gap left by the US funding cuts, the provincial-level proposals only requested money for some of the services that had been terminated. For instance, funding was not requested for the key populations health centres. Instead, the priority was to secure the jobs that had been lost at government health facilities. READ MORE: Over 8 000 SA healthcare jobs lost – and more could follow – after US Pepfar aid cuts As such, the total amount that was requested from Treasury for each province was largely calculated by taking the total number of health workers that NGOs had hired at clinics and working out how much it would cost to rehire them for 12 months. Rather than paying the NGOs a grant to deploy these workers as was done by USAID, the health department proposed hiring them directly. This meant that they calculated their wages according to standard government pay scales which is less than what these workers would have earned from the NGOs. The total came to just under R1.2 billion for all the provinces combined. Treasury awarded roughly half of this on the basis that the money would be used to finance these wages for six months, rather than 12. This amounts to the R590 million for provinces that was announced by Motsoaledi. If all goes smoothly and this money is used effectively to hire these staff over the next six months, then a new tranche of Section 16 funding could be released in order to continue hiring them. Funds might also be released to fund the key populations health sites. A concern, however, is that the money may just be used by provinces to augment their ordinary budgets. If the funds aren't actually earmarked to respond to the US cuts, then it is much less likely that more emergency funding will be released. At this stage, it is too early to tell how provinces will use the money, particularly given that it appears that at least some of them haven't gotten it yet. Spotlight and GroundUp sent questions to several provincial health departments. Only the Western Cape responded. The province's MEC for Health and Wellness, Mireille Wenger, said that the funds have not yet been received by her department, but that once they were, they would be directed to several key priority areas, including digitisation of health records, and the strengthening of the primary healthcare system. It's thus not clear whether the province will be earmarking any of the funds to employ health staff axed by US-funded NGOs. In response to a question about this, Wenger stated that 'further clarity is still required from the National Department of Health and National Treasury regarding the precise provincial allocations and conditions tied to the additional funding'. What about research? Of the R753 million that's been released for this year, R132 million has been allocated to mitigate the funding cuts for research by US federal institutions, primarily the National Institutes for Health (NIH). Unlike USAID, the NIH is not an aid body. It provides grants to researchers who are testing new treatments and medical interventions that ultimately benefit everyone. These grants can be awarded to researchers in the US or abroad as part of a highly competitive application process. Researchers in South Africa are awarded a few billion rands worth of grants from the NIH each year, largely due to their expertise in HIV and TB. But over the last few months, much of this funding has been terminated or left in limbo. (See a detailed explanation of the situation here). The R132 million issued by Treasury is supposed to assist some of these researchers. It will be followed by another R268 million over the following two years. The Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust are chipping in an additional R100 million each – though in their case, the funds are being provided upfront. All of this money – R600 million in total – is being channelled to the SAMRC, which will release it to researchers via a competitive grant allocation system. According to SAMRC spokesperson Tendani Tsedu, they have already received the R132 million from Treasury, though they are still 'finalising the processes with the Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust for receipt of [their donations]'. The SAMRC is also in negotiation with a French research body about securing more funds, though these talks are ongoing. In the meantime, the SAMRC has sent out a request for grant applications from researchers who have lost their US money. The memo states: 'Applicants may apply for funding support for up to 12 months to continue, wind down or complete critical research activities and sustain the projects until U.S. funding is resumed or alternative funds are sourced.' 'The plan,' Tsedu said, 'is to award these grants as soon as possible this year.' READ MORE: Health experts warn of 'huge disaster' as USAID terminates Pepfar HIV funding in SA Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, CEO of the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, told us that the hope is that the grants could fill some of the gaps. 'This is a bridge and it is certainly going to save some people's jobs, and some research,' she said, but 'it isn't going to completely fill the gap'. Indeed, the SAMRC has made clear that its grants aren't intended to replace the US funding awards entirely. This is unsurprising given that the money that's being made available is a tiny fraction of the total grant funding awarded by the NIH. It's unlikely that research projects will continue to operate as before, and will instead be pared down, said Bekker. 'It's going to be about getting the absolute minimum done so you either save the outcome, or get an outcome rather than no outcome,' she said. In other cases, the funds may simply 'allow you to more ethically close [the research project] down,' Bekker added. For some, this funding may also have come too late. Many researchers have already had to lay off staff. Additionally, patients who had been on experimental treatments may have already been transitioned back into routine care. It's unclear how such projects could be resumed months later. In response, Tsedu stated: 'For projects that have already closed as a result of the funding cuts, the principal investigator will need to motivate whether the study can be appropriately resurrected if new funds are secured.' The SAMRC has established a steering committee which will adjudicate bids. They will be considering a range of criteria, Tsedu said, including how beneficial the research might be for the South African health system, and how heavily the project was impacted by the US funding cuts. They will also consider how an SAMRC grant could 'be leveraged for future sustainability of the project, personnel or unit,' he said. An endless back and forth The job of the SAMRC steering committee will likely be made a lot more complicated by the erratic policy changes within the NIH. On 25 March, the body sent a memo to staff, – leaked to Nature and Bhekisisa – instructing them to hold all funding awards to researchers in South Africa. After this, numerous researchers in the country said they couldn't renew their grants. However, last month, Science reported that a new memo had been sent to NIH staff which said that while South African researchers still couldn't get new grants, active awards could be resumed. Since then, some funds appear to be trickling back into the country, but certainly not all. For instance, Spotlight and GroundUp spoke to one researcher who had two active NIH awards before the cuts. He stated that one of these was resumed last month, while the other is still paused. READ MORE: SA funds 90% of its HIV/Aids ARV programme, Motsoaledi reveals amid Pepfar uncertainty Bekker also told us that she had heard of one or two research grants being resumed in the last week, though she said the bulk of active awards to South Africa are still pending. 'Where people are the prime recipients [of an NIH grant] without a subawardee, there seems to be a queue and backlog but some [of those awards] are coming through,' said Bekker. 'But how long this is going to take and when it might come through we're waiting to hear.' She said a strategy might be to apply for the SAMRC bridging funding and 'if by some miracle the [NIH funding is resumed]' then researchers could then presumably retract their SAMRC application. In the meantime, health researchers will have to continue spending their time working out how to respond to the abrupt and increasingly confusing changes to funding guidelines that have dogged them since Trump assumed office. 'It's such a dreadful waste of energy,' said Bekker. 'If we were just getting on with the research, it would be so much better.' This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Fixed electricity charge suspension fails to ease financial strain
Residents say they remain under financial strain despite the CoE's decision to suspend a controversial fixed electricity charge. Following protests in Tembisa, Mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza announced the suspension of the R126 fixed tariff fee (including VAT) that came into effect on July 1. But some residents believe the suspension offers little relief. Resident Pontsho Ramatsoma said, 'It feels like a tactic to calm the community. Once we've forgotten, they might bring it back. If they wanted to help, they would scrap the increases completely.' Ramatsoma said his monthly electricity bill has more than doubled from R500 to over R1 000, forcing him to cut expenses and change his usage habits. He also criticised the city's communication efforts. He also touched on the CoE's (CoE) communication rollout before the tariff increases came into effect. 'There are elderly people who are not on social media or don't have the comprehension skills to understand the language used to communicate the tariff increases. The city should prioritise sending their employees to engage with the community in a manner that allows them to enquire if they need clarity,' he said. Another resident, Dimakatso Motsoenening, added that the cost of electricity had made it difficult to get by daily. 'Life is unaffordable. We're already struggling to put butter on expensive bread. Add these increases, and we might as well starve. What we need is relief, not increases. Electricity has become a luxury,' she said. This issue has not only affected the working class but also the unemployed. Unemployed resident James Lombard wrote to the Springs Advertiser, explaining that his R350 monthly electricity budget now buys 75kWh instead of 131kWh, an effective hike of 75%. 'If I still wanted 131kWh, it would cost me around R612. How can they justify this?' Responding to enquiries, CoE spokesperson Zweli Dlamini said the sharp increases for low-use households were primarily due to a new fixed R109.78 monthly charge for Tariff A2 prepaid users. Tariff A1 has no fixed charge and is aimed at indigent households. 'Tariff A1 does not have fixed charges and is suitable for indigent consumers. This charge applies regardless of how little electricity is used, thus pushing up the effective price per unit cost for small consumers. This structure was introduced to ensure fair recovery of infrastructure maintenance costs, which are independent of use levels,' Dlamini said. He addressed Lombard's concerns over the unit prices by explaining that an increase of 11.32% was implemented for prepaid users (tariffs A1 and A2) with an additional fixed charge of R109.78 for Tariff A2 customers. Therefore, 131kWh will now cost R240.90 for Tariff A1 and R515.8 for Tariff A2 customers. Dlamini added there are measures in place to protect the vulnerable households, such as the provision of Free Basic Electricity 50kWh to customers on Tariff A1 (registered indigent households), the Indigent Policy, which provides relief on municipal services including electricity, for which households must be registered, and lastly, the phased implementation of fixed charges that was used to ease the transition. The city acknowledged the concerns raised about the recent tariff adjustments. 'Formal notices were published through official channels, including the city's website, newspapers and council presentations. Going forward, the city is committed to improving the clarity of tariff announcements, using relatable examples that reflect real household scenarios, enhancing engagement through ward councillor briefings, public meetings, digital platforms and issuing simplified tariff guides, showing the total monthly cost under different consumption levels,' Dlamini concluded.
