logo
Nicola Sturgeon: My miscarriage, sexuality and the day I was arrested

Nicola Sturgeon: My miscarriage, sexuality and the day I was arrested

Timesa day ago
Eight days out of office, the novelty of a long lie-in hadn't worn off. At 7am on April 5, 2023, I was still in bed, half-asleep and only vaguely aware that my husband Peter had gone downstairs to answer the door. It was with a sense of utter disbelief that I realised the police were in my home, that they had a warrant to arrest my husband and search the house.
I was in despair, struggling to comprehend what had happened. It didn't help that a few hours later what seemed like the entirety of the UK's media was camped outside. For days, I didn't step out the front door. I had only just started to recover a sense of equilibrium when another bombshell dropped. On April 19, the SNP's Treasurer, Colin Beattie, was also arrested. The media was full of speculation that, as party leader, I would be next.
I felt like I had fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel. I tried to live my life as normally as I could, reminding myself that I had done nothing wrong. But I woke up at the crack of dawn every day, having barely slept, with my stomach in knots, wondering if this would be the day it happened. When it eventually did happen, I was horrified and devastated, though also relieved in a strange sort of way. At least the ordeal of waiting was over. Arrangements were made for me to attend a police station on Sunday, June 11.
At that point, a depth of resilience I didn't know I had kicked in. The day before attending at the police station, I passed the theory section of my driving test. My first instinct had been to cancel, but, in deciding not to, I did what has helped pull me through ever since. Passing my driving test has to be one of my proudest achievements, and not just because I did it at 53. The circumstances I did it in bordered on surreal. My early lessons took place with the media still outside my house. My brilliant instructor was unflappable. He would arrive to pick me up in the full glare of media scrutiny. I would steel myself to open my front door, get into the car and drive away, with the cameras recording my every move.
Sunday, June 11, was the worst day of my life. Being arrested and questioned by the police is an experience I'm not sure I will ever get over. When I eventually left the police station, late that afternoon, I was in a bad state mentally. I went to a friend's house in the northeast of Scotland and stayed for a week. It was during a heatwave, and yet I was stuck inside, terrified that the media would find me. I badly needed peace and quiet, time to piece myself back together. I spent hours, looking out across the North Sea. At first, I wanted to somehow disappear into its vastness. Slowly but surely, though, the sea calmed me. As I watched the tide go in and out, I thought about the people who might have sat there a century ago, watching the same tides, feeling that they too had the weight of the world on their shoulders, and of those who would do so again, decades from now. It gave me some perspective.
When I eventually returned home, a new normality kicked in. It was obviously impossible to put it all out of my mind. I carried a sense of dread and anxiety about what might lie ahead. For almost a year, aside from stories about the investigation appearing in the media (sourced from where, I don't know), nothing happened. And then, in April 2024, almost exactly one year on from the search of our home, Peter was re-arrested and, this time, charged. It was another dark moment in what felt like a nightmare with no end.
Even so, it did bring me a brief glimmer of hope. Would I now be formally cleared? It took only a few hours for that possibility to be extinguished. A statement issued by the Crown Office confirmed that the investigation into me was ongoing. I was distraught. I couldn't understand why it was taking so long for the justice system to accept what I knew beyond doubt to be true. I had not committed any crime. I also didn't know how much longer I could cope.
The investigation was the first thing I thought about when I woke up in the morning and the last thing in my mind before I fell asleep (if I fell asleep) at night. On some days, I could lock it away and carry on, almost as if everything was normal. On others, it paralysed me.
I was frightened. The rational part of my brain told me that as I had done nothing wrong, there could, by definition, be no evidence to the contrary. But the longer it dragged on, the more scared and paranoid I became. I worried that the 'system' might reach the conclusion that I was guilty of something. Or, at the very least, that I would be forced to prove my innocence in court.
I felt embarrassed, ashamed even. Not because of anything I had actually done, but because of what many people would suspect I had done. I accept that the police and Crown Office were doing their jobs. I retain both faith in and respect for our country's criminal justice system. However, none of that changes this fact: being the subject of a high-profile criminal investigation for almost two years, especially having committed no crime, was like a form of mental torture.
The moment of exoneration arrived, finally, on March 20, 2025. It was a day of deeply mixed emotions. Peter appeared in court, and, of course, nothing I say here is meant as commentary on the situation he is in. However, around the middle of the day, my lawyer called with confirmation that the investigation was over and I would face no further action. I came off the phone and burst into tears. The feeling of relief, and release, was overwhelming.
My husband Peter never put pressure on me, but I knew how much he wanted to be a dad. I was more ambivalent. All through my thirties, I waited for an uncontrollable biological urge to kick in, but it never happened. What kicked in, instead, was an awareness that I was reaching the 'now or never' stage of my life; a creeping anxiety that I would wake up one morning when it was too late to do anything about it and find myself full of regret.
For me, then, it was a case of wanting to be able to tell myself that we had tried, even if it turned out that it wasn't meant to be. What actually happened is that I got pregnant very quickly. By mid-October 2010, we found ourselves in an Edinburgh hotel room, looking at a positive pregnancy test. Peter was ecstatic. I wanted to be. I told him I was. But — and I still feel so guilty about this — I was deeply conflicted.
In truth, as a woman of 40, I had assumed that if I got pregnant at all, it would take much longer. In my stupid, work-obsessed mind the timing couldn't have been worse. By the Scottish election, I would be six months pregnant. It may seem hard to believe now, but even in 2010 it wasn't obvious how voters would react to a heavily pregnant candidate. Was I jeopardising my chances of re-election? Worse, given my position as Deputy First Minister, was I risking the party's chances? I was riven by practical worries too. How would I cope? Elections are exhausting. Would I be able to do my job, never mind help lead an election campaign?
These thoughts obliterated any sense of happiness that I might have felt. I was overwhelmed by guilt. I felt guilty about being pregnant, about not feeling happier about being pregnant, about not being as happy as Peter was, about hiding that from him. Later, what I would feel most guilty about were the days I had wished I wasn't pregnant. There's still a part of me that sees what happened as my punishment for that.
We decided we would tell our families on Christmas Day. Naturally, they were over the moon, and their excitement rubbed off. I started to feel better, happier. The nausea also abated. I didn't realise then, of course, that this was because the pregnancy had already ended.
On the morning of December 30, I noticed some spots of blood. I'd probably have ignored it but for an appointment I had that day with the GP for my flu jab. Since I was there anyway, I decided to mention it to her. I was expecting her to tell me it was nothing to worry about. Instead, she made an urgent appointment at the early pregnancy clinic at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, and that is where Peter and I spent the morning of Hogmanay 2010.
I think I'd known in my heart what the outcome would be, but I was still hoping for the best. It seemed that suddenly, belatedly, I wanted to be pregnant after all. The nurse who did the scan was lovely. I didn't really know what I was looking for on the screen, but her face told me what I needed to know. The baby was gone.
We were taken into a side room and the nurse explained what we should expect. It was all very matter of fact. For four days I was in constant agony, the most excruciating pain I have ever experienced. And yet still, amidst it all, I went to work. On January 3, I attended a memorial service at Rangers Football Club in my constituency, to mark the 40th anniversary of the Ibrox disaster, and went from there to visit the NHS24 call centre to thank staff for their efforts over the festive period. There is a photo of me from that day that I find impossible to look at, the pain and anguish etched on my face.
Eventually, four days later, during the evening of January 4, 2011, the pregnancy 'passed'. I had the presence of mind to call Peter into the bathroom and, together, we flushed our 'baby' down the toilet. We later resolved to try again, but I knew then that we had lost our one chance.
I was desolate and heartbroken for myself, but more so for Peter. I was consumed by guilt all over again, convinced that it was all my fault, that the stress of worrying about the impact on the election had caused the miscarriage; that I was being punished for not wanting the baby badly enough, for having even wished it away. These feelings have never quite left me.
I have always believed our baby would have been a girl. We would have called her Isla. Her middle name would have been Margaret, after my gran and Peter's mum. She would be in her early teens now, possibly causing us all sorts of trouble.
I don't want to give the impression that I am full of regret at not having children. I'm not. If I could turn the clock back and make it so, I would choose to have a child, but only if I could still do the other things I've been able to do too. I don't feel that my life is worth less.
But I do deeply regret not getting the chance to be Isla's mum. It might not make sense, but she feels real to me. And I know that I will mourn her for the rest of my life.
In the early weeks of 2020, there was an issue gnawing away in the background. I was starting to get under my skin. For some time, social media had been awash with 'rumours' that I was having a secret relationship with a woman. There were slightly different versions of the story, but the consistent theme seemed to be that I was having a torrid lesbian affair with the woman who was at that time the French ambassador to the UK, and who would later become the French Foreign Minister, Catherine Colonna.
In one of the variants of the story, there had been a violent encounter between us, involving an iron, in Edinburgh's Balmoral Hotel. We had also supposedly set up a love nest, in a house in Bridge of Allan, that I had bought from Andy Murray's mum, Judy. Normally, I wouldn't have known nor cared about wild stories from the darker recesses of social media, and, if this one had stayed there, it would have been easy to ignore. But by late 2019 it was being openly talked about. My family and friends were being asked about it by people who'd heard it in their local pub. Colleagues were being asked about it on doorsteps. One of our neighbours in Glasgow mentioned it, obliquely, to Peter, presumably thinking he had a right to know that his wife was having an affair.
It reached a head in February 2020, when the social media site Guido Fawkes tweeted to the effect that a salacious story about my private life was only still secret because I had a superinjunction in place to stop it being reported. I was furious. It was a blatant lie. Not only was there no superinjunction in place, but such a legal remedy isn't even available in Scots law.
Shortly after, the all-consuming focus on Covid put a stop to the rumour, but only for a while. It would resurface a few months later. I had little option but to shrug it off, however irritating it might have been. Catherine, the French ambassador, helped. She was aware of the rumours too and, the first time I saw her after lockdown, at a meeting of EU ambassadors in the Scottish government's London office, we laughed about it. We were photographed together a couple of times after that, at Cop27 in Egypt, for example, and the online frenzy which ensued suggested that we had successfully trolled the trolls.
Although the French ambassador and I could laugh about it, a saga like this does throw up serious issues. How do fake stories like this take root in social media? Did some Russian bot factory concoct a made-up story? Who knows? Then, of course, there is the blatant homophobia at the heart of the 'story'. For many of those peddling it, 'lesbian' and 'gay' are meant as insults. However, while the fact I was being lied about got under my skin, the nature of the insult itself was water off a duck's back. Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than thirty years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary. Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters.
© Nicola Sturgeon 2025. Extracted from Frankly by Nicola Sturgeon (Macmillan £28), published on Thursday. To order a copy go to timesbookshop.co.uk. Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members.
Nicola Sturgeon discusses her memoir with Cathy Newman at the Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre, London SE1, on August 29; southbankcentre.co.uk
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Euan McColm: Nicola Sturgeon's memoir can't gloss over her divisive legacy
Euan McColm: Nicola Sturgeon's memoir can't gloss over her divisive legacy

Scotsman

time15 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Euan McColm: Nicola Sturgeon's memoir can't gloss over her divisive legacy

Nicola Sturgeon's publishers might well be wondering why they shelled out hundreds of thousands of pounds for the memoir. Picture: Lisa Ferguson More coy than frank, the former First Minister's 'tell-all' book does no such thing Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It arrives with a whimper rather than a bang. After months of speculation about its contents, extracts from Nicola Sturgeon's autobiography have appeared in the press and, after reading, I wish her publishers good luck in earning back the £300,000 advance they paid the former First Minister. Sturgeon's memoir, Frankly, will be in shops on Thursday, but we already know the headlines. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Unsurprisingly, she describes the day she was arrested by police investigating the SNP's finances as the worst of her life. There are affecting passages about a miscarriage, 15 years ago, and righteous anger about rumours of a lesbian relationship with a French diplomat. And there's the revelation that, despite that there being no affair with Catherine Colonna – who would go on to become French Foreign Minister – Sturgeon does not consider her sexuality to be 'binary'. Long-term relationships with men, writes the former FM, have accounted for more than 30 years of her life but she has never considered sexuality – her own included – to be binary. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One can imagine the disappointment of Sturgeon's publishers when, rather than exploring that aspect of her life, she goes on to write that 'sexual relationships should be private matters'. I completely agree with that position but, then, I haven't just shelled out 300 grand for a tell-all memoir that appears to do no such thing. Frankly? Try coyly. Of course, it would have been foolish to expect Sturgeon to tackle the failings of her time in power in Frankly. The ex-leader of the SNP does not do humility or self-reflection terribly well, having a tendency to lash out at critics rather than engage. We can, I suppose, try to join the dots in some of what Sturgeon writes in an attempt to get to the truth. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Does, for example, that 'non-binary' revelation explain why the former First Minister was – and remains – fully committed to the demands of gender ideologues? Was the personal driving the political when she rejected concerns that allowing anyone to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their choosing In an interview to promote her book, last week, Sturgeon said she hoped, next, to turn her hand to the art of fiction. A novel, dear God, is to be attempted. While the MSP – who will step down from Holyrood next year – may consider the publication of Frankly the beginning of a bright new chapter, the sense lingers that the book marks an end. Politics is a brutal old game and, little more than two years after stepping down from office, Nicola Sturgeon is no longer the much-adored heroine of the independence movement. Rather, she divides nationalists, with some former allies now hopeful that she will fade into obscurity. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sturgeon may have succeeded Alex Salmond as leader of the SNP at a time – post independence referendum – when membership was soaring. And she may have led her party to a number of thwocking great victories in elections to both Holyrood and Westminster. But her legacy is a split independence movement and a legal mess around gender self-ID which continues to bog down public bodies and to erode the rights of women. We can, I think, expect things to get rather more fraught in the SNP in the months to come. The announcement, last week, by deputy First Minister Kate Forbes that she will not stand for re-election at next year's Holyrood election, sent a tremor through Scottish politics. Forbes is among the more talented and capable members of the SNP group in the Scottish Parliament and the expectation was that she would stand to succeed John Swinney as leader at some point after next May's election which, despite scandal and plummeting membership, the SNP is expected to win. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Making public her plans, Forbes said she had decided to put motherhood before politics. In making that decision, the MSP for Skye, Lochaber, and Badenoch opened up the prospect of exciting new splits in her party. Within hours of Forbes' announcement, the SNP's former leader at Westminster, Ian Blackford, let it be known that he was considering taking a tilt at the seat next May. Whether this happens or not remains to be seen. For one thing, the SNP would have to change its rules for candidates to allow Blackford to stand at this late stage in the selection process. For another, we must always make room for the suspicion that Blackford – in common with other politicians – simply enjoys being talked about. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While Blackford mulls a run for Holyrood, the man who ousted him as the SNP's Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, has his own ambition to enter Scottish Parliament. Flynn, one of nine SNP MPs to keep his seat in last year's General Election, will contest the Aberdeen South and North Kincardine seat next May and – should he win – he will be considered among the front-runners to succeed John Swinney as First Minister. 'Do you know what we really don't need, right now?' one SNP MSP asked me last week. 'We don't need the Blackford-Flynn f****** psychodrama imported into the Scottish Parliament.' Heavy briefing against Flynn – he's too laddish, say some and too abrasive, say others – marks him out as a serious contender for the top job. If he there was no danger of him taking it, there would be no need for some to try to stop him. There is drama to come. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the former FM succeeded Alex Salmond in 2014, she inherited an SNP in 2014 that had learned from the infighting of the past and become a united and tightly-focused election-winning machine.

Why SNP would want Ian Blackford on the Holyrood frontline
Why SNP would want Ian Blackford on the Holyrood frontline

The Herald Scotland

time25 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Why SNP would want Ian Blackford on the Holyrood frontline

Mr Blackford has been largely out of the public eye since he stood down from his Westminster seat of Ross, Skye and Lochaber at last year's general election. The Ross, Skye and Lochaber constituency ceased to exist at the last election following boundary changes. The successor seat of Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire was won by the Lib Dems' Angus MacDonald with the SNP's Drew Hendry coming second. Mr Blackford was first elected to Westminster in May 2015 - the post 2014 independence referendum election - when the SNP won an astonishing 56 of Scotland's 59 seats. Read more: A former SNP national treasurer, he became the SNP Westminster leader after Angus Robertson lost his seat at the 2017 snap general election. He became known for his love of a stunt after he was expelled from the chamber in 2018 by a flustered John Bercow, the former Speaker, after refusing to sit down in a protest over the failure to debate what he called a Brexit 'power grab' on Scotland which prompted a mass walkout from colleagues. Amid the Westminster votes on EU withdrawal and then the Partygate saga, Mr Blackford came to prominence across the UK for locking horns in fiery exchanges with former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the Commons. Mr Johnson, in turn, liked to rile Mr Blackford, deliberately and repeatedly misnaming the SNP as the Scottish Nationalist Party (not as it is correctly called the Scottish National Party) with the then PM poking fun at Mr Blackford's weight and mocking his claim to be 'a humble crofter'. Ian Blackford questioning Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (Image: PA) Of course, Mr Blackford was anything but 'just a humble crofter", although he does have his own Highland croft. For most of his working life before becoming an MP he enjoyed a lucrative career as an investment banker. During his career in high finance, he ran Deutsche Bank's equity operations in Scotland and the Netherlands for a time. Following 20 years in the financial sector, he left to do independent consultancy work, forming an investor relations company called First Seer in 2002. But despite his robust efforts in the Brexit turmoil to hold a series of Tory Prime Ministers to account – Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak - Mr Blackford had a turbulent time with his own MPs. His handling of sexual harassment claims made against the SNP MP Patrick Grady by a young staffer was widely criticised after a leaked recording showed him urging colleagues to support Mr Grady while failing to mention his victim. Amid discontent and heated arguments among his MPs - including Joanna Cherry and Mhairi Black who were at opposite sides of the debate over gender self-declaration - he was ousted from his role as SNP leader in the Commons in December 2022 in an internal power struggle and replaced by Stephen Flynn. The two men later denied any acrimony with a photograph posted on social media of them happily having a drink together on a Westminster terrace. Mr Blackford is reportedly considering whether to stand now for Holyrood following the shock announcement by the Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes on Monday that she will not stand for re-election to her Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch constituency (which overlaps with parts of Mr Blackford's old Westminster seat) in May next year. It is easy to see why senior figures in the SNP may want their former Westminster leader on the Scottish Parliament frontline. While he has never been in government, he has considerable parliamentary and campaigning experience, as well as of course his experience of finance from his previous career. He is also someone who is very loyal to the legacy of former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and to the current First Minister John Swinney. It was rumoured that Mr Blackford was one of the central figures in the SNP who encouraged Mr Swinney to put himself forward for party leader last year following the sudden resignation of Humza Yousaf. There is also an issue that the SNP benches will be losing many of its senior MSPs and ministers. Ms Forbes is the latest to announce her exit, but she follows in the footsteps of Ms Sturgeon, Mr Yousaf, finance secretary Shona Robison, as well as fellow cabinet members Fiona Hyslop and Mairi Gougeon. A number of junior ministers are also standing down including Richard Lochhead and Graeme Dey. With so many experienced politicians leaving it would be easy to see why the SNP would want to recruit more senior party figures into Holyrood. If Mr Blackford does decide to stand, he is selected by his party as the candidate, and voters elect him, it is likely he would be a contender for a top job in the Cabinet - maybe even finance secretary. And he may well have a sizeable group of former MPs by his side as he sits in Holyrood - including of course his usurper Mr Flynn.

The 2-stage plan to break Scotland free and bypass Holyrood
The 2-stage plan to break Scotland free and bypass Holyrood

The National

time39 minutes ago

  • The National

The 2-stage plan to break Scotland free and bypass Holyrood

Renton, 28 — described by Buzzfeed in 2014 as the "pro-independence Scottish teenager more popular on Facebook than the Labour Party" — is explaining his latest project. He, along with a handful of other activists, are spreading the word about the latest independence project by word-of-mouth and online, "the People's Constitution of Scotland". "I've voted SNP my whole life and I will continue to do so, but recently it's not just me, it's everybody – just seems to be a bit irritated. A bit antsy," he explains. Renton believes "nothing seems to be happening," and explains his upset at the moves made by both former first minister Humza Yousaf and current First Minister John Swinney. "The campaign has never really been restarted. The grassroots seem to be completely splintered. There are all these different groups – Liberation Scotland and Salvo, who are away to the UN. And I don't really see that doing anything. It happened before ," he says. He is referring to the attempts of Liberation Scotland and Salvo to have Scotland 'decolonised' by the United Nations. A Scotland-UN delegation previously visited the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva in 1980. Renton adds: "They actually had binders put in front of them in New York to ask about if they would consider Scotland to be colonised, but nothing ever happened. So this is your answer to it." READ MORE: Dress of Scottish noblewoman who made daring escape after Culloden at auction Renton has set up a website for the public to be involved in writing Scotland's draft constitution and in time, create a preliminary national assembly – a gathering of the people to carry the constitution forward and give it democratic strength. Renton and the group of activists are inviting everyone to join in with creating the constitution, adding: "It isn't optional, it's imperative that it's the people that do this. I'm looking for nationwide contributions and then we will pull together a constitutional convention across the country." The precedent "Everybody floats the Claim of Right all the time – but it is a legitimate thing. The Scottish people are sovereign in Scotland," Renton says and points to MacCormick against Lord Advocate. The case – perhaps the most famous constitutional case in Scottish legal history – saw John MacCormick (below), chairman of the Scottish Covenant Association and Rector of Glasgow University, and Ian Hamilton, one of the four who returned the Stone of Destiny to Scotland in 1954, request an interdict to prevent the UK Government from publishing any proclamation of a title including Elizabeth II. Renton, who is a full-time writer, notes: "The Lord President of the Court of Session, Lord Cooper, actually quoted that 'the principle of the unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle which has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law'. "And that is when the Claim of Right was affirmed by MPs in Westminster, and again in Holyrood, and again recently in Westminster, stating that the people of Scotland have a right to choose whatever form of government they desire, and that the people are fundamentally sovereign. "So in Scotland, the people are not bound by devolution. Holyrood is bound by devolution. There's nothing they can do other than request another referendum. And it's never going to happen. Not now. They've made that clear." Renton sees activists, and all the different Yes groups across Scotland, still active but with no coherent strategy, and lots of different ideas. "We've been separated by party politics and government policy, but the main goal we should all be focusing on and uniting under is that of independence," he says. READ MORE: 'Cathartic': Indigenous Celtic heritage shines in Mairi Campbell's Fringe show "So the idea of a constitution is that the people, being sovereign, not bound by the shackles of devolution, are able to create this constitution. They're able to say, 'this is the Scotland that we want, this is the Scotland that we need as an independent state, this is what we want to see happening'." The group has written a draft and is asking people to read it and suggest edits, retractions and any other points they feel should be included. And once it's finished, it can be given to Holyrood. "We've done the groundwork, this is what the people want," Renton says, adding that they will tell MSPs, and then ask: "Why are we not moving forward?" 'Why don't we create a preliminary people's assembly?' The second stage of Renton's plan comes after the constitution is in place. He wants to create a "completely unofficial" people's assembly made up of the best minds, academics and leaders from all across Scotland, with Yes groups and "your average Joe". "In preparation for independence, pull the grassroots movement back together, reunite everybody," he says. "We'll have a constitution, and if the party – the SNP, Holyrood – tries and tries every single option, then the next option would be for the people to make moves for the people: a people's assembly run by the people, not bound by the shackles of devolution. "We're prisoners in our own land. The people's assembly, with enough backing by the public – with campaign grassroots movements, lectures across the country by the best brains – again, this is after the Holyrood election – can go to Westminster and say, 'Holyrood is bound by these shackles, but we are not. We have created a people's assembly. We have the founding documents. If you're not willing to negotiate with Holyrood, then you can negotiate with us'. "And that is, in my mind, the only way forward unless Holyrood's willing to declare UDI [unilateral declaration of independence], which they're not and they never will be." However, the constitution is currently the focus. This all depends on the political parties in Holyrood gaining a pro-independence majority in 2026, Renton knows. If they don't, he adds, "the vehicle for independence is gone". I ask Renton, being a pessimist, how does he continue to have hope and drive to create this project? And how can the movement, tired and beat up, find that energy again to believe and assist in the project? "There are very few things left that push me along," he laughs. "I've got two kids, I love my kids to bits — they keep me going. "But the only other thing that keeps me going is my love for this country and my desire to see it unbounded from those shackles, to see an independent Scotland. "And it doesn't matter how it happens – whether it's through Holyrood, Westminster or the will of the people – I just want to see it happen. And if it means I have to put my own time into doing it, then that's fine. "I really created this in hopes that everybody would get involved, everybody would want to be a part of it, and then I could hand it over to everybody else. "I have no desire to front anything anymore. I just wanted to get the wheels in motion so that the country can pull behind it and make it happen." Scots can get involved here with the project.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store