Sena's Priyanka Chaturvedi demands inquiry into ‘leak' of AAIB's report on Air India Ahmedabad plane crash
For the sake of transparency with regard to the authorship of the preliminary report, Ms. Chaturvedi said the names of all members of the investigation panel should be made public, and the report should bear the signatures of each panel member.
'I write to you to express serious concerns regarding the manner in which the recent interim investigation report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau [AAIB] was handled and disseminated, particularly in light of media reports surfacing in international publications before the report was officially made public in India,' Ms. Chaturvedi said, adding that it has serious implications for 'public safety, pilot morale, and India's global aviation standing'.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday released its preliminary report on the crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 plane that killed 260 people, including 241 people onboard. The aircraft, which was operating the flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed into a building soon after takeoff.
The Shiva Sena (UBT) MP said that one cannot be a mute spectator with regard to the narrative being built around the AI 171 crash and the interim report. 'It is deeply troubling that sensitive details of the AAIB report were available to foreign news agencies and published in outlets such as The Wall Street Journal before any official release in India. This raises urgent questions about how the contents of the report were accessed by foreign entities prior to their dissemination to the Indian public and concerned stakeholders,'she added.
Ms. Chaturvedi claimed that the non-stop insinuations being made against the deceased pilots through implication and selective leaks of the interim report through the international media were 'absolutely reprehensible'.
'Such motivated speculation via broadcast, print and digital platforms shows a more sinister attempt to malign our pilots who aren't alive to put their case, even pilot associations have raised their objections,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
14 minutes ago
- NDTV
Can 'Blood Money' Save Kerala Nurse Nimisha Priya? Has It Saved Indians Before?
New Delhi: Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya - sentenced to death by Yemen for killing a man harassing her - will likely be executed Wednesday unless her lawyers can persuade his family to accept ' blood money ' of $1 million (i.e., Rs 8.6 crore) as financial compensation for his unintended death. On Monday the Indian government told the Supreme Court 'blood money' is likely Nimisha Priya's last hope of escaping the death sentence. Attorney General R Venkataramani said the government could not do much more - at this time - to ensure the Kerala nurse's release from Yemen. "It is unfortunate... there is a point till which we can go. We have reached it," he said. 'Blood Money' In The Koran It is money paid to the family of the person killed in exchange for a pardon. In Sharia law - followed by Yemen and (to varying degrees) other Islamic countries, including Saudia Arabia, Iran, and Pakistan - the murdered person's legal heirs have the right to demand and/or accept this compensation. Under Sharia law if 'blood money' is offered and accepted, then the offender - Nimisha Priya, in this case - can't be executed. In most cases s/he, or they, are also pardoned by the government. 'Blood money' is not a new concept. It was widely practiced as far back as the sixth and seventh centuries CE, primarily by warring tribes to end cycles of violence and bloodshed. Back then payments would have ranged from gold and silver to trade goods like camels and furs. The concept was later formalised in the Koran. In chapter 4, verse 92, it says "... whoever kills a believer by mistake must free a believing slave and pay blood money (diyah, set at 100 camels by the Prophet Mohammed) to the deceased's family". It also says "... if one cannot afford that, let them fast two consecutive months..." An offer to fast for two months, though, will not save Ms Priya in this case. 'Blood Money' Cases Over the years the 'blood money' concept has been exercised in quite a few instances, both by Indians looking to escape death sentences, including a 2017 case in which a Saudi businessman-philanthropist paid around Rs 1.8 crore to free a Telangana man on death row. There have been cases in the United Arab Emirates too and others in which compensation was offered but refused, or delayed, leading to prolonged incarceration or even death. There have also been cases where Indians received compensation from local residents, such as in April 2023, when 20-year-old Mohd Mirza was badly hurt - he suffered 50 per cent damage to his brain - in a bus accident that killed 17 people, and was paid Rs 11 crore in exchange This, however, is the first time 'blood money' is being offered in a case in Yemen. 'Blood Money' Cases Involving Indians In 2017 a Kerala man, AS Sankaranarayanan, was freed after spending eight years in a UAE prison for the accidental death of an electrician (a Bangladeshi worker) at his home. Sankaranarayanan had been directed to pay 200,000 dirhams (now worth Rs 47 lakh) but did not have that much money. It was not till a newspaper report about his plight that he began to receive help. Amazingly, the Emirates Islamic Bank then paid the full amount. That same year a Telangana man, Limbadri, returned home after spending nearly a decade on death row for the accidental murder of a Saudi national. His cause was championed by Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha, who eventually got a local businessman to pay the diyah. In 2014 three Indians on death row in Saudi Arabia for six years - for the murder of their compatriot - were released after a businessman paid around Rs 1.12 crore to the fourth man's family. There was also a remarkable case from 2013, when the late King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia paid 'blood money' - approximately Rs 1.5 crore - for Saleem Basha, an Indian truck driver from Bengaluru, who had been convicted of killing nine people in a road accident in 2006. A far more recent case involves Abdul Rahim, also from Kerala, who was accused of accidentally killing the minor son of his employer in Riyadh. This was in 2006 when Rahim was 26 years old. He escaped the death sentence after the boy's family accepted diyah of Rs 34 crore - the amount was secured via a massive fundraising effort by the Malayali community. He was, however, handed a 20-year jail term that included time already served, meaning the sentence ends in December 2026.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
National sports governance bill set to be tabled in monsoon session
The much-anticipated National Sports Governance Bill is likely to be introduced in Parliament during the upcoming Monsoon session starting July 21, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya confirmed on Monday. Speaking at a media briefing following the announcement of the 'Youth Spiritual Summit', an anti-drug initiative launching on July 18 in Varanasi, the minister shed light on key developments in Indian sports governance. Mandaviya emphasized the government's intent to move forward with reformative legislation aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in sports administration. 'The bill will be presented in Parliament this session. I'll be sharing further details in the next few days,' he stated. What the Bill Proposes The National Sports Governance Bill aims to bring significant reforms to how sports bodies in India are run. Central to the bill is the establishment of a regulatory board tasked with recognizing National Sports Federations (NSFs) and allocating funding based on their adherence to principles of good governance. The regulatory authority will also ensure that all NSFs comply with ethical, financial, and governance standards. In line with this, the draft also calls for the creation of Ethics Commissions and Dispute Resolution Commissions to promote transparency and resolve conflicts efficiently. Addressing international participation, Minister Mandaviya clarified India's position regarding Pakistani athletes competing in multi-nation tournaments hosted in India. 'We have assured Pakistan that their athletes will be granted visas for upcoming events like the Asia Cup and the Junior Hockey World Cup. It is now up to their government to decide on participation. From our side, there are no restrictions,' he confirmed. He added that India remains committed to ensuring equal treatment for all nations taking part in international competitions on its soil. These developments underline the government's push toward a more structured and transparent sports ecosystem while maintaining an open-door policy for international sporting collaboration.
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Experts decode private sector's growing influence in Indian education at The University of Melbourne
BusinessWire India New Delhi [India], July 15: Experts from across India met in Delhi last week to examine the increasing involvement of non-state actors in the country's education sector, raising critical questions about governance, equity, and the future of learning. The workshop, Education and the Network State: Redefining the state and education in an era of public-private partnerships was held at the University of Melbourne's Global Centre - Delhi, in collaboration with OP Jindal Global University and Manipal Academy of Higher Education. The event brought together 26 experts who highlighted the accelerating role of private foundations, ed-tech firms, and NGOs in shaping India's education policies. Discussions revealed concerns about transparency, accountability, and whether commercialisation risks sidelining marginalised students. Dr Amanda Gilbertson, Senior Lecturer in Anthropology and Development at the University of Melbourne and one of the co-convenors of the workshop, said: "This workshop provides a unique platform to critically examine the changing dynamics of education governance in contemporary India. "By bringing together diverse perspectives, we hope to generate new insights into the implications of public-private partnerships in education." The workshop included a panel discussion that explored new forms of private-public collaboration in policy formulation and implementation. The panellists discussed the shifts and transitions in how the State engages with non-state actors and organisations, how data collection by State and non-state organisations enhance or complicate processes of policy development, and the implications of these changes for researchers. Yamini Aiyar, Former President and Chief Executive at the Centre for Policy Research, discussed her recent book, Lessons in State Capacity from Delhi Schools. The book provides an in-depth look at efforts to improve the quality of government schools and build state capacity in Delhi by focusing on the voices and experiences of frontline workers like teachers, principals, and bureaucrats. Dr Vidya Subramanian, Associate Professor, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, said: "The workshop offers an exciting platform to leverage expertise and foster engagement among scholars in India and Australia, providing new opportunities for academic and policy-related partnerships." This gathering marks an important contribution to the ongoing discourse on education policy and governance in India, offering new ideas about the evolving relationship between the state, private sector, and civil society in shaping the future of Indian education.
