&w=3840&q=100)
2 slabs, no GST on life & health insurance — what PM Modi's promised tax reforms may offer you
Under proposed reforms, the Narendra Modi government is expected to replace the current four slabs of goods and services tax (GST) with just two new slabs, according to CNBC-TV 18.
The government is also expected to exempt more services from the GST.
The development comes days after Prime Minister Modi announced 'next generation GST reforms' in his Independence Day speech on Friday. He announced the creation of a taskforce to evaluate all current laws, rules, and procedures related to economic activities to reduce compliance costs for startups, micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and entrepreneurs, provide freedom from fear of arbitrary legal actions, and ensure laws are streamlined for ease of doing business.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The government will bring Next Generation GST reforms, which will bring down tax burden on the common man. It will be a Diwali gift for you,' said Modi.
These will be new GST slabs
The CNBC-TV 18 has reported the government will reduce the four slabs that exist today (5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent, and 28 per cent) to two slabs of 5 per cent and 18 per cent. The 0 per cent slab will also exist for several goods and services.
A third slab of 40 per cent 'sin tax' is also proposed for a narrow category of goods and services like tobacco and tobacco products, aerated and carbonated beverages with added sugar, and online betting, as per the report.
Separately, Moneycontrol reported that term life insurance premiums and health insurance premiums for senior citizens are expected to be exempted from GST.
Here is how these changes will affect you
Under the 5 per cent slab, everyday essentials will come, government sources told CNBC-TV 18.
All other goods will be in the 18 per cent slab except for 'sin goods' that will face 40 per cent tax.
This would mean that many household goods and insurance premiums that might currently be in the 12 per cent slab will fall in the 5 per cent slab. This would include packaged food, clothes, footwear, cycle, eyewear, and everyday essentials like toothpowder and snacks.
Similarly, all goods in the 28 per cent slab will fall in the 18 per cent slab, such as televisions, fridges, refrigerators, air-conditioners, two-wheelers and four-wheelers.
Medicines and medical equipment are also expected to fall from the 12 per cent slab to 5 per cent or even 0 per cent, the report said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This would mean that most of the things for the middle class are bound to see GST rates fall. This is expected to result in lower costs of products and lower spending on these goods.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 minutes ago
- Business Standard
GST reforms could help India's fiscal revenues, says S&P Global Ratings
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) rationalisation reforms announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Independence Day could boost fiscal revenues over the longer term due to easier implementation and clearer accounting processes through the proposed two-rate system, S&P Global Ratings analysts said on Tuesday. 'The current GST regime is quite complex, with four different rates, which makes accounting and implementation sometimes quite difficult,' an S&P analyst said during a webinar on the agency's recent upgrade to India's sovereign credit rating. Answering a question on whether a lower GST slab could impact fiscal revenue, S&P analysts said it was still early days to assess the fiscal impact. 'If the rates come down, it could impact fiscal revenue, but it might not... It's still very early days to see the actual fiscal impact, but we don't think the government will reform this system to the point that it will hit fiscal revenues,' YeeFarn Phua, Director, Sovereign & International Public Finance Rating at S&P Global Ratings, said. In the past five to six years, S&P analysts noted that the GST reform had proven to be a successful anchor driver of a major component for the government's fiscal revenue. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the much-awaited GST rate rationalisation reform, which corporate India believes could alter the trajectory of uneven consumption demand trends, from the ramparts of the Red Fort in his Independence Day speech. 'This Diwali, I am going to make it a double Diwali for you,' he said. 'We have discussed with states, and we are bringing next-generation GST reforms that will reduce the tax burden across the country. Tax on items for the common man will be reduced substantially. Our MSMEs [micro, small and medium enterprises], our small entrepreneurs, will get a huge benefit. Everyday items will become much cheaper, giving a new boost to the economy,' Modi said. S&P Global Ratings, on 14 August, lifted India's long-term sovereign credit rating by a notch to 'BBB' from the lowest investment grade of 'BBB-', with a stable outlook. The rating upgrade came after a gap of 18 years, citing the country's economic resilience, sustained fiscal consolidation, and improved quality of public spending. This places India in the same rating category as countries like Mexico, Indonesia, and Greece. S&P Global Ratings expects private capital expenditure to double over the next five years compared to the previous five-year period, driven by a significant focus on infrastructure from government policy and newer areas such as aviation. The rating agency also noted that AI in the near term would be a swing factor, as there will be less demand for certain types of jobs. Over the medium term, however, S&P said that given India's tendency for technology adoption, it is likely to improve productivity. S&P said that India's rating upgrade was not due to any single event but rather the result of observing economic factors over the last decade.
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
GST reboot: Will bold changes prove to be a silver bullet for India?
In his Independence Day speech, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a major revamp of the goods and services tax (GST) structure by Diwali. Towards this, the government has proposed scrapping the 12% and 28% GST slabs, among other reforms. While this could address a long-pending demand for a simpler indirect tax structure, the jury is still out on whether the proposed changes will provide much-needed fillip to consumption. Mint explores the impact of the proposed GST restructuring. Revamp strategy The Centre's proposed indirect tax framework aims for a dramatic simplification for the first time since its launch in 2017. It includes collapsing the multi-slab GST system into two primary rates by moving items in the 28% slab largely to 18% and those in 12% under 5%. There is also a proposal to introduce a 40% 'sin rate" for select luxury and addictive goods and services, and a plan to abolish all forms of cess beyond the standard GST rates—a move designed to boost consumption. A Mint analysis of category-wise GST data shows that the number of items in the 28% and 12% categories is fewer compared to those in the 18% and 5% categories. Their share in total collections is also significantly smaller compared to the 18% category. This should make the elimination of the two rates easier. Buoyancy blues India's GST collections have stabilized over the past eight years, averaging nearly ₹2 trillion every month now. However, the consumption tax has failed to maintain a strong momentum vis-à-vis economic growth, suggesting anaemic consumption trends, tax evasion, or both. Over the past few years, while buoyancy—ratio of tax collections growth and GDP growth—in income tax has proved to be healthy, that of GST has shown a steady decline since FY23. A buoyancy above 1 indicates an efficient tax system, while below 1 suggests the need for improvement. The GST regime has undergone several rate rationalisation and simplification processes in the past eight years. However, the demand for a bold restructuring to boost revenue through increased consumption remained. The current proposal addresses some of those demands. 'Rate rationalization has been going on for some time, but the latest measures are in line with what other countries follow—fewer tax slabs," said Sakshi Gupta, economist at HDFC Bank. 'It goes to the whole idea of tax efficiency." Revenue-rate balance The proposed GST revamp is expected to benefit certain consumer durable segments, especially passenger vehicles and air conditioners, which are currently taxed at 28-29%. However, these segments are also likely to lead to a massive revenue loss to the exchequer, which may be offset in the medium term by increased consumption. The government may potentially forgo ₹25,600 crore and ₹19,900 crore on AC and passenger vehicles (hatchbacks, sedans, and compact SUVs), an estimate by Kotak Institutional Equities showed. These two segments alone are likely to account for over a third of the ₹1.3 trillion total revenue loss from the automobile and consumer durable segments following the GST revamp. Consumers, however, are likely to benefit from the lower taxes (from 12% to 5%) expected on everyday items such as fruit juices, namkeens, and sanitary napkins. According to Emkay Global, the proposed changes could ease inflation by 50-60 basis points, or 0.5-0.6 percentage points, on an annualized basis, with the largest impact to come from the food and beverage category. State resistance? While the prime minister announced the GST revamp as a Diwali gift, the ball lies in the GST Council's court. The GST Council, comprising the Union finance minister and finance ministers of all states and union territories, is required to finalized changes in the indirect tax through at least 75% of the votes. Analysts expect states to take a disproportionate hit to their revenues due to the proposed GST changes. A Mint analysis of state-wise finances shows that nearly all states get at least a third of their own revenue from state GST collections. India's northeastern and eastern states—Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Bihar—have over half of their tax revenue flowing from state GST collections. Economically larger states Maharashtra and Karnataka draw 44-45% of their tax revenue from state GST. 'The promise of price cuts for consumers should reduce political pushback from states," Axis Bank said in a report. 'However, some states may lose more revenue than others and are likely to resist." Consumption boost? The main reason behind any rate rationalization is usually to give a fillip to consumption and widen the tax base. In India, private consumption, after seeing a post-covid spurt, has remained weak. First, it emerged in rural areas, and now urban areas are seeing subdued demand. Private final consumption expenditure data showed a volatile trend the past two years, suggesting a lack of sustainable momentum in consumption. Against this economic backdrop, the government announced income tax cuts in the Budget. The GST revamp is also likely to help, but only in the medium term. According to HDFC Bank's Gupta, there may even be a moderation in consumption demand due to deferred purchases in anticipation of rate cuts. 'But over the medium term, on certain consumer durable products, or the auto segment, this is clearly a positive." Gupta said. Gaura Sengupta, chief economist at IDFC FIRST Bank, estimates the cuts could increase nominal GDP by 60 basis points over 12 months.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump admin turns up the heat as Treasury secretary calls India's Russian oil purchase ‘unacceptable'
Ratcheting up pressure on India, another Trump administration official has criticised the country for its ties with Russia. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC in an interview that 'Indian arbitrage of Russian oil is unacceptable,' underlining Washington's stand that New Delhi was fuelling Moscow's 'war machine,' Reuters reported. 'This … Indian arbitrage – buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war – which is unacceptable,' he said. The US earlier this month slapped 50 per cent tariffs on India, half of them for buying Russian oil, catapulting the country to one facing the highest import duties among Washington's trade partners. New Delhi called the tariff action 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', and said it would take 'all actions necessary' to 'protect its national interests'. India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and meets 88 per cent of its oil demand from imports. Before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Moscow's share in New Delhi's oil imports was less than 2 per cent. That has now risen to nearly 40 per cent. Higher tariff revenue to be used to pay down federal debt Bessent said that he expected a substantial increase in tariff revenues from the $300 billion he forecast earlier this year, with the money to be used to start paying down the US federal debt, Reuters reported. He declined to give a specific new revenue forecast, but said he and President Donald Trump were 'laser-focused' on paying down the debt. 'I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially,' he said. India should start 'acting' like strategic partner: Trump aide Bessent's comments came close on the heels of White House trade advisor Peter Navarro saying that India needed to start acting like a strategic partner of the US if it wanted to be treated like one. 'India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs,' he wrote. Navarro also claimed in an opinion piece in the Financial Times that India was 'now cozying up to both Russia and China'. Navarro wrote: 'Here's how the India-Russia oil mathematics works. American consumers buy Indian goods. India uses those dollars to buy discounted Russian crude. That Russian crude is refined and resold around the world by Indian profiteers in league with silent Russian partners — while Russia pockets hard currency to fund its war machine in Ukraine. As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence.'
