logo
Why You Don't Need To Buy Individual Stocks

Why You Don't Need To Buy Individual Stocks

Forbes30-07-2025
Rory O'Hara, CFP®, CRPC®, is the founder and senior managing partner at Ausperity Private Wealth.
According to a recent report, 65% of actively managed equity funds underperformed their benchmarks after one year; 'across asset classes, underperformance rates typically rose as time horizons lengthened,' and after 15 years, no one outperformed.
Data like this helps illustrate why I don't buy individual stocks. Even so, much of the market-focused media, especially television networks like CNBC, Bloomberg or Fox Business, devote a significant portion of their programming to discussing individual companies. Who's the day's top performer? What's Tesla doing today? What did this CEO say about the earnings?
None of these things matter to me. Still, it's what drives ratings and gets clicks, so that's how the media covers the market. As a result, many investors end up with a distorted view of how to invest for the future and what their portfolios should look like.
This is not to say investing in individual stocks is always a bad idea. Try to convince someone of that who invested in Apple on the day it went public and has never cashed out a dime. However, evidence suggests that consistently getting it right over the long term is extremely unlikely.
Investors, Influencers And FOMO
Over time, many of the catchy names have changed: Nifty Fifty, FANG, FAANG, the Magnificent Seven and the Incredible Eight. And even the mediums have evolved, with influencers today—many of whom have hundreds of thousands of followers on platforms like Instagram, X and TikTok—eager to offer advice.
Their strategy is the same as the legacy media: Grab the most eyes and ears by spotlighting trendy, headline-grabbing companies, and do so with hyperbolic gusto. Of course, none of them knows what the future holds either. But no one will admit that.
The inescapable truth is that, over time, the broad market will outperform most individual stocks, even ones that most feel 'can't miss.'
Consider Cisco. In early 2000, before the dot-com bubble burst, it was the it stock. If you didn't own Cisco back then, you weren't a serious investor—or at least that's how many felt. It was Nvidia before Nvidia, regularly delivering outsized returns.
At the time, it would have seemed inconceivable that it would trade for about five dollars less today than it did then. By comparison, over roughly the same period, the S&P 500 posted an average annual total return of 7.84%, meaning that anyone who put $100,000 in an index fund at the beginning of this century and didn't touch it would have enjoyed a gain of almost $560,000.
Getting Lost In The Weeds (Or Rough?)
Part of the problem is the sheer volume of information that's available. In some ways, getting investment advice online is like a golfer whose Instagram algorithm is nothing but instructors and influencers offering quick, 30-second tips.
Some of the suggestions are good. Many of them are not. Either way, though, the more you watch these clips, the worse you will get. The reason? You won't have a single swing thought, as most golf teachers suggest—you'll have about 25 of them.
Maintain your spine angle. Shallow the club. Keep your arms close to your body. Clear your hips. It's all too much to think about while trying to put a good swing on the ball. The better approach is to focus on doing a couple of things well and keep it simple.
The same general principle applies to investing. The more TV you watch and the more you listen to pundits, the worse you're likely to do. Too much of your attention will go to trying to get in early on the hottest new stock with the most upside. While you might end up investing in the next Apple that way, making mistakes that could harm your long-term financial well-being is the more probable outcome.
Beyond Active Management And Toward Active Engagement
Alpha is great. It's also elusive. When looking for an advisor, therefore, be wary of anyone who says they will actively manage your portfolio.
Instead, prioritize one that will stay actively engaged with you, including everything from shielding you from too much risk to staying on top of your financial, tax and estate planning. That's where the real alpha is.
The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Small caps are having a big week. Is this finally the breakout investors have been waiting for?
Small caps are having a big week. Is this finally the breakout investors have been waiting for?

CNBC

time22 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Small caps are having a big week. Is this finally the breakout investors have been waiting for?

For years, investors have been looking for a big breakout in small-cap stocks. The stars may be aligning for one. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) , which tracks the small-cap benchmark, jumped nearly 1% premarket Thursday. IWM has also had a strong week, up 2.6% — outperforming the S & P 500 . Driving the big gains in small caps this week is increased hope that the Federal Reserve will soon start cutting its benchmark lending rate after recent data showed weakness in the economy. The CME Group's FedWatch tool shows traders are pricing in a 93% chance of a Fed rate cut in September. Smaller companies benefit more than larger ones from easier monetary policy because they rely more on borrowing. If the Fed cuts rates, that lowers the cost of capital for smaller outfits, making it cheaper for these companies to take out loans to expand their businesses. Investors are also starting to find attractive opportunities in small caps. Wolfe Research strategist Rob Ginsberg noted that investors "wasted no time stepping in and buying the dip" in the Russell 2000 after Friday's broad market sell-off. Ginsberg added that the pullback led to more than 50% of Russell 2000 constituents hitting a one-month low, "a short-term indicator that is often met with buying." "The signal more often than not marks a near term bottom and is met with buying," he added. To be sure, investors have been burned many times in recent years by small caps. While the S & P 500 has reached new heights this year, the Russell 2000 is still 8% below its November record. .SPX .RUT YTD mountain SPX vs Russell 2000 year to date The Russell has also lagged the S & P 500 for five straight years. The large-cap S & P has also outperformed its small-cap counterpart in 12 of the past 20 years. "The big names have really led the day, and it's gone on for so long you almost think it will go on forever," Mellody Hobson, co-CEO of Ariel Investments, said in an interview that aired Thursday on " Squawk Box ." However, Hobson noted that a reversion has to take place at some point. "Trees do not grow to the sky," she said.

Warren Buffett has lost $28 billion in net worth since he rocked the business world with his retirement announcement
Warren Buffett has lost $28 billion in net worth since he rocked the business world with his retirement announcement

Business Insider

time22 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Warren Buffett has lost $28 billion in net worth since he rocked the business world with his retirement announcement

Warren Buffett's fortune has shrunk since he announced he'd stand down as Berkshire Hathaway CEO. Berkshire Hathaway stock was up 20% for the year before his mic drop. It has fallen 13% since then. Buffett's wealth has fallen by about $28 billion to $141 billion, dropping him from fifth to 10th on the rich list. The famed investor's fortune fell from $169 billion going into the company's annual meeting on May 3, when he dropped his retirement bombshell, to $141 billion at Wednesday's close. He's fallen from fifth to 10th place on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The fall is partly because of a $6 billion charitable donation but mostly because his company's stock has fallen. Berkshire Class A stock was up 20% year to date ahead of Buffett's surprise announcement, after investors piled into the haven asset amid fears that tariffs would reignite inflation, trigger a recession, and drag down the broader market. But it has dropped 13% since then, as investors have grappled with Berkshire losing its CEO of 60 years, balked at lackluster second-quarter earnings, and shifted back to riskier technology stocks that are driving record highs in the S&P 500. Buffett made his annual donation of about $6 billion of Berkshire stock to the Gates Foundation and four family foundations in late June. This explains why his net worth is down almost $1 billion since January, despite Berkshire's stock being up 3% in the same timeframe. Buffett is one of only four of the 20 richest individuals on Bloomberg's rankings who are in the red this year. Elon Musk and Bernard Arnault are down $68 billion and $25 billion each due to declines in Tesla and LVMH stock. Bill Gates has shed $35 billion after Bloomberg revised his wealth to reflect his charitable giving. The rest are up as their respective companies have jumped in value.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store