Labour-led council bans pensioner from parking on his own driveway
Bob Howes, 73, parked outside his home in Southampton, Hampshire, for 20 years until receiving a letter that told him to stop.
Southampton city council officials informed him that he could no longer park on his driveway because it had no dropped kerb.
But after spending £160 on an application to have the kerb installed, which would cost him another £3,000, he was told no.
Instead, Mr Howes has to pay £30-a-year for a permit to park on the other side of the 'busy' street.
Mr Howes and his wife Dawn, who have lived in the house since 1984, have 'parked on the drive for at least 20 years', he said.
The pensioner described his 'embarrassment' at having to park on the street. He said: 'We have off-road parking and we've had to explain to neighbours why we're no longer parking there'.
Motorists can be fined if parking across a pavement or verge without a dropped edge.
Enforcement action differs across councils but fines can be as high as £1,000, according to Waltham Forest council.
Mr Howes said he was 'willing to pay to have the work done'. However, the application was rejected because the 4.3-metre space was just below the required 4.8 metres, despite Mr Howes' Hyundai i10 being only 3.6 metres long.
Mr Howes said 'it would take decades before they (the council) receive £3,000' at the rate of £30-a-year.
Cllr Eamonn Keogh, the cabinet member for environment and transport, said: 'The minimum space requirements ensure that we meet our duty, as the Highway Authority, to ensure that all users of the highway can use the footway'.
The measurements are 'enough to accommodate the average estate car at 4.7m long and the overall average car length of 4.4m,' he said.
He added overhanging vehicles can make it 'difficult for some users such as parents with buggies or people with a mobility aid '.
The retired civil servant is not the first to be affected by the rule.
In August last year Ed Fisher, 78, was banned from using his driveway after 50 years.
Speaking to the MailOnline, Mr Fisher said: 'We have to be responsible for paying for the dropped kerb ourselves. It smacks of 'we haven't got much to do, so we'll go and get em''.
Earlier this month, Lambeth Council, another majority Labour council in South London, identified more than 200 properties where motorists were illegally parked.
Residents were told they would have to pay an estimated £7,000 to add a dropped kerb, including £4,000 for the application.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Labour renews 'war on motorists' as it quietly ditches plans to limit new LTNs and 20mph zones
Labour has quietly dropped plans to limit the roll out of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and 20mph zones in what has been dubbed a 'secret war on drivers'. The reforms, which were drawn up by the Tories, would have curbed locals councils' powers to restrict traffic and impose 'unfair' fines and parking charges. Labour ministers, however, dismissed the proposals, saying they 'would have made no positive difference for drivers'. It comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has faced repeated accusations that Labour is launching a 'war on motorists' in England and Wales. Just this week, Labour-run Southwark council was forced to admit it would refund thousands of people after they were unfairly fined for driving in bus lanes. On Saturday, shadow transport secretary Richard Holden branded the decision to scrap the limits on councils' powers over traffic measures a 'secret war on drivers'. The Conservatives also raised fears that increased limits on car use would hit already struggling high streets across the UK. Mr Holden told The Telegraph: 'Labour has been caught red-handed as it steps up its targeted war on motorists. 'Conservatives led the charge against unfair and over-zealous enforcement but our work has been ripped up in underhand attacks without any public consultation or manifesto pledge. 'This is a kick in the teeth to motorists, set to punish beleaguered local high streets and will slam the brakes on the economy even more than Rachel Reeves has done so far.' Back in October 2023, Rishi Sunak announced his party would be introducing a 'Plan for Drivers' to make it harder for local authorities to implement anti-car schemes. The proposals would have forced councils to place more emphasis on the views of local residents and businesses when considering the introduction of LTNs. As a minimum, authorities would have had to hold a series of public meetings, with locals in the affected areas also made aware of the plans through leaflets. However according to the Telegraph's report, ministers have now confirmed that the plans - which were yet to be formalised - have now been shelved. Lilian Greenwood, the roads minister, said the government was considering its 'next steps' and that the work had been 'put on hold'. She added that there are no 'current plans' to change the guidance on the rolling out of 20mph speed limits in England. The minister reiterated that it was up to local authorities to decide where lower speed thresholds would be appropriate in their areas. A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'The Government is absolutely on the side of drivers, focusing on making journeys safer and smoother, and saving motorists money. 'Over the past year alone, we invested an extra £500m to help local authorities resurface roads and fix seven million potholes, reducing congestion and saving drivers up to £600 a year in repairs. 'We've also committed £1bn to repair bridges, flyovers and tunnels, and greenlit over 30 road schemes to improve journeys. 'Meanwhile, we are making our roads safer to drive on and will set out the next steps for the first road safety strategy in over a decade in due course.'
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'
Labour has renewed its ' war on motorists ' by dropping plans to limit new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and 20mph zones. Ministers have quietly ditched reforms that would have curbed council powers to restrict traffic and levy 'unfair' fines and parking charges. The Conservatives, which drew up the changes, branded the move 'a kick in the teeth to motorists' and warned it would hit struggling high streets. But Labour ministers dismissed the proposals as 'speculative suggestions' and said they 'would have made no positive difference for drivers'. Sir Keir Starmer has been repeatedly accused of pursuing heavy-handed policies against motorists, most notably in London and Wales. In the latest example, Labour-run Southwark council on Sunday was forced to admit it illegally fined thousands of people for driving in bus lanes. Richard Holden, the shadow transport secretary, said scrapping the Tory plans represented a 'secret war on drivers' that was not in Labour's manifesto. 'Labour has been caught red handed as it steps up its targeted war on motorists,' he said. 'Conservatives led the charge against unfair and over-zealous enforcement but our work has been ripped up in underhand attacks without any public consultation or manifesto pledge. 'This is a kick in the teeth to motorists, set to punish beleaguered local high streets and will slam the brakes on the economy even more than Rachel Reeves has done so far.' Rishi Sunak announced a 'Plan for Drivers' in October 2023, which would have made it harder for local councils to introduce anti-car schemes. It included draft guidance on the introduction of LTNs, which would have forced councils to focus more on the views of local residents and businesses. As a 'minimum' authorities would have had to hold a series of public meetings with residents and to leaflet every household in the affected area. The changes were planned over concerns councils have been railroading through LTNs on the back of support by green and pro-cycling groups. Ministers have now confirmed that the draft guidance, which was not formalised in time for last year's general election, has been effectively shelved. Lilian Greenwood, the roads minister, said that as a result, work had been 'put on hold and the Government is now considering appropriate next steps'. 'As has always been the case, local authorities are responsible for managing their roads and are accountable to their communities,' she said. Lord Hendy, a transport minister, also suggested that the Government does not plan to change the current guidance in force on LTNs. 'Traffic management measures such as low traffic neighbourhoods are a matter for local authorities as they know their areas best,' he said. The last Tory government had planned a series of pro-driver reforms, including new guidance to 'prevent inappropriate blanket use of 20mph zones'. The Tories sought to roll out more pro-driver policies in the wake of the Labour administration in Wales controversially enforcing a default 20mph zone across all formerly 30mph areas in 2023. Following a huge outcry the Senedd is now reviewing the policy, with the architect of the scheme admitting 'more common sense' should have been deployed. Ms Greenwood said the Government has 'no current plans' to review the guidance around the setting of 20mph speed limits in England. 'We believe that traffic authorities are best placed to decide where lower limits will be effective on the roads for which they are responsible, and that consultation and community support should be at the heart of the process,' she added. Other planned Tory measures that would have limited the use of '15-minute cities' have also been ditched. Under those measures, Conservative ministers would have revoked council's access to DVLA data, which they use to enforce traffic filters. The 15-minute city concept were designed so residents could access all basic services within a quarter of an hour walk or bike ride from home. It has become controversial with some on the Right who see the car as pivotal to freedom and attempts to curb driving as the spread of state control. 'No positive difference' Mr Sunak also pledged to reduce 'unfair' traffic fines, such as yellow box penalties, including by restricting councils' ability to raise revenue from them. Under the measures new guidance would have been brought forward giving residents the formal right to challenge their council's parking policies. Labour ministers confirmed that all three proposals had been dropped. 'Those policies in 'The Plan for Drivers' that would have made no positive difference for drivers have been discontinued,' Ms Greenwood said. Mr Holden said that Sir Sadiq Khan would be 'licking his lips now he has been given the green light to hammer drivers even more'. The Mayor of London has overseen a rapid expansion of LTNs in the capital and the introduction of blanket 20mph limits across the city. The Department for Transport was approached for comment.
Metro
3 days ago
- Metro
'Killer kerb' becomes Google Maps attraction after damaging cars daily
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Angry drivers have expressed their fury over a 13-inch high kerb which has caused thousands of pounds worth of damage to cars. The new installation, near Salisbury railway station in Wiltshire, was designed to be 'more welcoming environment for pedestrians'. But it's led to some people scraping the sides of their cars while trying to navigate around it. The Liberal Democrat-led Wiltshire Council raised the kerb in October 2024 as part of its £3.2 million project. But it has become so notorious that it has been listed as a tourist attraction on Google Maps. Furious motorists have also set up a Facebook group called 'Killer Kerb Salisbury', which has over 4,300 members, to highlight the damage it has caused. A video on social media showing an incident than one million views, while photos reveal dents and scratches as a result of cars struggling to drive around the foot-high construction. It lies just 390ft away from Salisbury railway station on a mini roundabout between Fisherton Street and South Western Road. Tom Curtress, 34, from Berkshire, is one of several people who have damaged their cars on the kerb. He said: 'It will be two new doors and some panel work. It's not exactly a bit of varnish and some paint work. 'Other people will do the same thing; they will have a great weekend, drop someone off at the station and then prang their car.' Mr Curtress damaged his Ford Focus in March and just 15 minutes after he said he noticed a BMW driver experience a similar incident. He added: 'That BMW car door's going to cost more than a Ford Focus one. 'It was an identical issue, coming from the station. It's not just causing a little scuff. It's causing dents. 'If you drive from the station, you can't see the kerb from the driver's side. It's a tight turn and you don't want to go into the oncoming traffic. 'I took one video where around 50 percent of the cars, to avoid it, had their driver's side on the other side of the road.' The high installation has divided people online. The raised 'trief' design was used to prevent cars from mounting the pavement and was installed as part of a 15-month infrastructure project. It was 'renewed' last year under a scheme the county council said would 'create a more welcoming environment for pedestrians' when they walk towards the city centre from the railway station. But since opening in October 2024 eight compensation claims relating to it have been made compared to zero in the three previous years. Meanwhile, Anthony D'Arcy-Irvine, 82, a retired military pilot, caused £4,000 worth of damage after hitting his Volkswagen on the kerb in June. He claimed he was the 'third car that day' to visit the local garage for repair. Mr D'Arcy-Irvine, from Enford, Wiltshire, said: 'I was going to get crushed. If I had stayed where I was, I would have been hit by the vehicle coming the other way. 'I have lived in Salisbury for 50 years and I have used that roundabout regularly, I think it is very badly marked. 'When you pull out of the way of a truck coming the other way, there's not sign of where it is. You cannot see it. Other people have rung me and said the same thing. 'Wiltshire Council and Highways have a responsibility to make sure it is safe for driers as well, and it isn't. They have a duty of care for road users.' Heather Armstrong, who owns nearby Gullicks Florists, said: 'Literally everyday a vehicle will go into the kerb and people get stuck on it. 'If someone gets stuck on there it does cause problems with traffic building up. 'I know it's there, so I know to pull out further. For some people, it's not that visible. 'When there was a railing there it gave some more guidance. You have to swing out the other way, and sometimes with traffic coming the other way, that's not possible.' Wiltshire Council said it will be carrying out remedial works at the junction of Fisherton Street and South Western Road between August 18 and 26. It said an audit identified the kerb was too steep and work is now taking place to reduce its gradient. More Trending However, the council highlighted in a statement the audit 'did not raise any concerns regarding the positioning or use of the Trief kerb at this junction, nor did it identify any issues with vehicle movements in this area'. But it recognised cars have been damaged in this area. Councillor Martin Smith, Wiltshire Council Cabinet Member for Highways, said: 'This is a key junction providing access to the railway station and city centre, with approximately 11,000 vehicles passing under the Fisherton Street railway bridge each day. 'It is important that the infrastructure installed at this location supports pedestrian safety, especially with the recent opening of Fisherton Car Park for SWR customers, which has increased footfall in the area.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Ex-PE teacher admits sexual communication with teenage girl MORE: Full list of where UK hosepipe ban is taking place in 2025 MORE: Manhunt on for naked dog walker traumatising Salisbury village
