
Musk spotlighted US govt spending, but cut less than he wanted
Elon Musk's effort to dramatically cut US government spending is expected to fall far short of his grand early pronouncements, and perhaps even his most modest goals. It didn't have to be that way.
According to experts across the ideological spectrum, a major problem was a failure to deploy people who understood the inner workings of government to work alongside his team of software engineers and other high-wattage technology talent.
Even that might not have achieved Musk's original target of US$2 trillion, which is roughly the size of the entire federal deficit.
Musk, whose last day spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency is Friday, slashed his goal for savings from US$2 trillion to $1 trillion to finally only $150 billion.
The current DOGE results put Musk's efforts well short of US president Bill Clinton's initiative to streamline the federal bureaucracy, which saved the equivalent of US $240 billion by the time his second term ended.
ADVERTISEMENT
Clinton's effort reduced the federal workforce by more than 400,000 employees.
According to government estimates, the total civilian federal workforce — not counting military personnel or postal workers — reaches 2.4 million people.
It also seems clear that Musk was unable to change the overall trajectory of federal spending, despite eliminating thousands of jobs. The Yale Budget Lab, in an analysis of Treasury data, shows money is flowing out of government coffers at an even faster pace than the previous two years.
'It was an impossible goal they were trying to achieve. They kept lowering the standards of success," said Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
"A more knowledgeable DOGE team wouldn't have made insane promises that would be impossible to keep. They set themselves up for failure.'
At a White House event with Trump on Friday, Musk said his team would stay in place and renewed the goal of reaching at least US $1 trillion in cost savings.
'This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning. The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time. It's permeating throughout the government,' Musk said in the Oval Office, wearing a black blazer over a T-shirt emblazoned with 'The Dogefather.'
ADVERTISEMENT
'We do expect over time to achieve the $1 trillion.'
The early evidence suggests that the goal will be exceedingly difficult to reach.
Elon Musk speaks during a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (Source: Associated Press)
By relying chiefly on IT experts, Musk ended up stumbling through Washington and sometimes cutting employees vital to US President Donald Trump's own agenda.
Immigration judges were targeted at the same time the administration was trying to accelerate deportations of people in the US illegally.
Likewise, technologists with the Bureau of Land Management were purged from the Department of Interior, despite their significance to clearing the way for petroleum exploration, a Trump administration priority.
In many cases, fired employees were rehired, adding administrative costs to an effort aimed at cutting expenditures.
ADVERTISEMENT
Had Musk's team been staffed with experts on what positions are required under federal law to continue efforts such as drilling and immigration enforcement, it could have avoided similar mistakes across multiple departments, Nowrasteh said.
'I just think there were a lot of unforced errors that a more knowledgeable DOGE team would have avoided,' Nowrasteh said.
Grover Norquist, president and founder of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, had a more favorable perspective on Musk's work, saying it should be judged not only by the total dollars saved but his ability to spotlight the issues.
'When you find the problem, you don't know how far the cancer has spread. You just found a cancer cell,' he said.
Norquist said it's up to Congress to take the baton and set up a permanent structure to continue where Musk is leaving off.
'I just think it's going to be seen five to 10 years from now as something very big and very permanent,' Norquist said, 'and that was done only because of a guy like Musk, who can come in and shake things up.'
Elaine Kamarck, a key figure in Clinton's government efficiency push, said their efforts were guided by more modest fiscal targets than DOGE.
ADVERTISEMENT
The initiative was led by Vice President Al Gore, and it was aimed at making the government more responsive to people who used it, and focused heavily on updating antiquated hiring and purchasing procedures.
It took years and carried into Clinton's second term.
'We went about it methodically, department by department and, yes, used some outside analysts, but they were seasoned government civil servants who knew about government in general,' Kamarck said.
Clinton's effort saved US$136 billion by the end of Clinton's second term, the equivalent of more than $240 billion today, and contributed to budget surpluses for each of the final four fiscal years he was in office.
Kamarck said she expects what she called Musk's 'chaotic' approach will reveal mistakes or oversights that could create crises down the road, such as a transportation problem, response to a natural disaster, or delivery of entitlement benefits.
'These are the things that really hurt presidents, and they are increasing the probability that something is going to happen,' Kamarck said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Musk spotlighted US govt spending, but cut less than he wanted
Elon Musk's effort to dramatically cut US government spending is expected to fall far short of his grand early pronouncements, and perhaps even his most modest goals. It didn't have to be that way. According to experts across the ideological spectrum, a major problem was a failure to deploy people who understood the inner workings of government to work alongside his team of software engineers and other high-wattage technology talent. Even that might not have achieved Musk's original target of US$2 trillion, which is roughly the size of the entire federal deficit. Musk, whose last day spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency is Friday, slashed his goal for savings from US$2 trillion to $1 trillion to finally only $150 billion. The current DOGE results put Musk's efforts well short of US president Bill Clinton's initiative to streamline the federal bureaucracy, which saved the equivalent of US $240 billion by the time his second term ended. ADVERTISEMENT Clinton's effort reduced the federal workforce by more than 400,000 employees. According to government estimates, the total civilian federal workforce — not counting military personnel or postal workers — reaches 2.4 million people. It also seems clear that Musk was unable to change the overall trajectory of federal spending, despite eliminating thousands of jobs. The Yale Budget Lab, in an analysis of Treasury data, shows money is flowing out of government coffers at an even faster pace than the previous two years. 'It was an impossible goal they were trying to achieve. They kept lowering the standards of success," said Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. "A more knowledgeable DOGE team wouldn't have made insane promises that would be impossible to keep. They set themselves up for failure.' At a White House event with Trump on Friday, Musk said his team would stay in place and renewed the goal of reaching at least US $1 trillion in cost savings. 'This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning. The DOGE team will only grow stronger over time. It's permeating throughout the government,' Musk said in the Oval Office, wearing a black blazer over a T-shirt emblazoned with 'The Dogefather.' ADVERTISEMENT 'We do expect over time to achieve the $1 trillion.' The early evidence suggests that the goal will be exceedingly difficult to reach. Elon Musk speaks during a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (Source: Associated Press) By relying chiefly on IT experts, Musk ended up stumbling through Washington and sometimes cutting employees vital to US President Donald Trump's own agenda. Immigration judges were targeted at the same time the administration was trying to accelerate deportations of people in the US illegally. Likewise, technologists with the Bureau of Land Management were purged from the Department of Interior, despite their significance to clearing the way for petroleum exploration, a Trump administration priority. In many cases, fired employees were rehired, adding administrative costs to an effort aimed at cutting expenditures. ADVERTISEMENT Had Musk's team been staffed with experts on what positions are required under federal law to continue efforts such as drilling and immigration enforcement, it could have avoided similar mistakes across multiple departments, Nowrasteh said. 'I just think there were a lot of unforced errors that a more knowledgeable DOGE team would have avoided,' Nowrasteh said. Grover Norquist, president and founder of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, had a more favorable perspective on Musk's work, saying it should be judged not only by the total dollars saved but his ability to spotlight the issues. 'When you find the problem, you don't know how far the cancer has spread. You just found a cancer cell,' he said. Norquist said it's up to Congress to take the baton and set up a permanent structure to continue where Musk is leaving off. 'I just think it's going to be seen five to 10 years from now as something very big and very permanent,' Norquist said, 'and that was done only because of a guy like Musk, who can come in and shake things up.' Elaine Kamarck, a key figure in Clinton's government efficiency push, said their efforts were guided by more modest fiscal targets than DOGE. ADVERTISEMENT The initiative was led by Vice President Al Gore, and it was aimed at making the government more responsive to people who used it, and focused heavily on updating antiquated hiring and purchasing procedures. It took years and carried into Clinton's second term. 'We went about it methodically, department by department and, yes, used some outside analysts, but they were seasoned government civil servants who knew about government in general,' Kamarck said. Clinton's effort saved US$136 billion by the end of Clinton's second term, the equivalent of more than $240 billion today, and contributed to budget surpluses for each of the final four fiscal years he was in office. Kamarck said she expects what she called Musk's 'chaotic' approach will reveal mistakes or oversights that could create crises down the road, such as a transportation problem, response to a natural disaster, or delivery of entitlement benefits. 'These are the things that really hurt presidents, and they are increasing the probability that something is going to happen,' Kamarck said.

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Think your return to the office was rough? Musk faces big challenges
Elon Musk is leaving Washington after a short but turbulent stint in government and is getting back to his numerous businesses, each with its own set of issues for the billionaire to address. Start with his electric car company Tesla. While how much Musk accomplished in his role as President Donald Trump's chief cost-cutter is up for debate, it's clear his association with right-wing politics damaged Tesla's brand and tanked sales. Musk's social media platform X, formerly Twitter, needs to rebuild its advertising base; his aerospace company SpaceX appears to be financially promising but has seen some recent setbacks; and it's unclear if his satellite business Starlink can keep striking deals without Trump nearby. Here's a look at the state of some key Musk businesses. Profits plunged 71% at Tesla in the first three months of the year right after a Chinese competitor claimed the mantle as the world's biggest electric car seller. The big question now: Will Musk's leaving Washington help lure buyers back? The answer is crucial to reviving profits because so much else is uncertain. Tesla's lineup of cars is ageing, and its foreign rivals have become much more competitive. They would be taking market share from Tesla even in the best of circumstances. Tesla's decision to close down factories as it retooled its best-selling Model Y, among other temporary problems, contributed to its struggles in the first quarter. But the blowback from Musk's time in Washington has some analysts and investors worried. In a note to clients, JP Morgan warned of "unprecedented brand damage". Wedbush Securities said at one point, "This is a full-blown crisis". And a group of smaller investors just Wednesday (local time) wrote to Tesla's board demanding it require Musk to spend at least 40 hours a week repairing its "plummeting global reputation" among other problems. News earlier this week from Europe doesn't bode well: Sales in April plunged by half. Another big test for Musk: Will Tesla's launch of its first-ever driverless taxis prove successful? Musk has been talking about robotaxis for more than a decade, but next month, they may finally hit the road. He has promised to test 10 or 20 robotaxis in Austin, Texas, then ramp that up to hundreds of thousands by the end of next year. "Can you go to sleep in our cars and wake up at your destination?" the billionaire asked investors in a conference call last month, then answered, "I'm confident that will be available in many cities in the US by the end of this year". Investors are convinced Musk will deliver, judging by the 50% jump in Tesla stock since he made that statement. But he faces many challenges, not least is whether technically the taxis will work without hitting things — or people. Federal safety regulators last month requested data from Telsa on how the robotaxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request comes after an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla's last year equipped with Full Self-Driving software after several accidents, including one in which a pedestrian was killed. Even if the Austin test goes off without a hitch, Musk faces another challenge: Waymo. The driverless taxi company owned by Google parent Alphabet just logged its ten-millionth trip and is now operating in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and several other cities. After Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and opened it up to all manner of conspiracy theories, long-time advertisers began to flee. Then Musk made the situation worse when he threatened to "name and shame" them and sued them. Now advertisers are inching back, though maybe not for a good reason. "Some big brands resumed spending on X in part to curry favour with the Trump administration, or to avoid potential retaliation by Musk," said e-marketer analyst Jasmine Enberg. "But fear is not a sustainable motivator, and most were spending less than they were previously." She expects X's ad business will rebound this year but still be smaller than it was before Musk bought the company. It's not clear how well Musk's rocket company SpaceX is faring because the private company doesn't disclose its finances. That said, news headlines point to both troubles and triumphs. First the bad development, which came just this week with a spinning explosion of one of the company's Starship mega rockets over the Indian Ocean. That followed explosions of two other Starships earlier this year that sprayed flaming debris across the Caribbean Ocean. Undeterred, Musk is vowing several more tests soon, but the stakes are high and the clock is ticking. NASA hopes to use Starship for future missions to the moon, including one next year that will attempt a lunar orbit and then send the four astronauts aboard back home. The good news is that investors who have gotten a peek at SpaceX's finances apparently are excited. A private financing round for the company a few months ago, followed by a private sale of shares recently have reportedly valued SpaceX at US$350 billion (NZ$586 billion), a big jump from a US$210 billion (NZ$352 billion) estimated value just a year ago. A SpaceX satellite internet subsidiary called Starlink has also been striking deals to set up in foreign countries. But it's not clear how much is the result of cold business calculation and how much is due to politics, an advantage that could disappear as Musk leaves Washington. Accompanying Trump on his trip to Saudi Arabia earlier this month, Musk announced that the country had approved Starlink service for aviation and maritime use. That followed a decision to grant approval for the service by regulators in Bangladesh, whose garment industry would be devastated by Trump's threatened 37% tariff, along with a string of other deals in India, Pakistan and Lesotho in recent months. Next up: South Africa, maybe. Earlier this month, following Trump's Oval Office dressing down of that country's president, regulators in the country loosened a rule in a way that could help Starlink win a foothold in the country. Musk had called the rule requiring Black partial ownership of any new foreign venture "openly racist". The country denies that politics influenced its decision.

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Elon Musk denies reported drug use
The New York Times has reported Elon Musk used so much ketamine that he developed bladder problems. Photo: AFP Elon Musk has denied a report that he used ketamine and other drugs extensively last year on the 2024 campaign trail. The New York Times reported Friday (local time) that the billionaire adviser to US President Donald Trump used so much ketamine, a powerful anaesthetic, that he developed bladder problems. The newspaper said the world's richest person also took ecstasy and mushrooms and travelled with a pill box last year, adding that it was not known whether Musk also took drugs while heading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Trump took power in January. In a post Saturday (local time) on X, Musk said: "To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their ass off." He added: "I tried 'prescription' ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then." Also, to be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their ass off. I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on , so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then. Musk first dodged a question about his drug use at a bizarre farewell appearance Friday with Trump in the Oval Office in which the Tesla and SpaceX boss sported a noticeable black eye as he formally ended his role as Trump's main cost-cutter at DOGE, which fired tens of thousands of civil servants. News of the injury drew substantial attention as it came right after the Times report on his alleged drug use. The daily recalled erratic behaviour such as Musk giving an enthusiastic Nazi-style salute last year. Musk said he got the injury while horsing around with his young son, named X, when he told the child to hit him in the face. "And he did. Turns out even a five-year-old punching you in the face actually is..." he added, before tailing off. Elon Musk gestures to his eye during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 30 May. 2025. Photo: ALLISON ROBBERT / AFP Later Friday, when a reporter asked Trump if he was aware of Musk's "regular drug use," Trump responded: "I wasn't." "I think Elon is a fantastic guy," he added. Musk has previously admitted to taking ketamine, saying he was prescribed it to treat a "negative frame of mind" and suggesting his use of drugs benefited his work. - AFP Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.