logo
J&K government declares 25 books on Kashmir forfeited for exciting secessionism and endangering sovereignty of India

J&K government declares 25 books on Kashmir forfeited for exciting secessionism and endangering sovereignty of India

Time of India2 days ago
The Home Department of the Jammu and
Kashmir
government has issued a notification declaring 25
books on Kashmir
as forfeited for allegedly exciting secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India.
The books have been banned under section 98 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and sections 152, 196,197 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Some of the authors whose books have been banned include A G Noorani, Sumatra Bose, Arundhati Roy, Maulana Maududi, Pankaj Mishra, Victoria Schofield, Stephen P Cohen, Hasan ul Bana, David Devdas, Hafsa Kanjwal and others. The books have been published by some prominent houses including Oxford University Press, Routledge, Stanford University Press, University of Pennsylvania Press, Harper Collins, Cambridge University Press, Penguin India and other publishing houses.
The notification issued by the Home Department, which is under the Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha,stated that it has come to the notice of the government that certain literature propagates false narrative and secessionism in J&K.
'Available evidence based on investigations and credible intelligence unflinchingly indicate that a significant driver behind youth participation in violence and terrorism has been the systematic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature by its persistent internal circulation, often disguised as historical or political commentary, while playing a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against Indian State,' read the notification issued on August, 5, 2025, also the sixth anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370 and 35 (A) and downgrading of the J&K into the two Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh.
The notification states that this literature would 'deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting culture of grievance, victim hood and terrorist heroism.' 'Some of the means by which this literature has contributed to the radicalization of youth in J&K include distortion of historical facts, glorification of terrorists, vilification of security, religious radicalization, promotion of alienation, pathway to violence, terrorism, etc,' read the notification.
The notification mentioned that 25 books have been identified that propagate false narrative and secessionism in J&K and need to be declared as 'forfeited' in terms of Section 98 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023; and whereas; the identified 25 books have been found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India, thereby, attracting the provisions of sections 152, 196 & 197 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
'Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 98 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the Government of Jammu and Kashmir hereby declares publication of 25 books, forming Annexure 'A' to this Notification, and their copies or other documents to be forfeited to the Government', the notification added.
The list of the 25 books banned include, Human Rights Violation in Kashmir by Piotr Balcerowicz and Angnieszka Kuszewka, Kashmir's Fight for Freedom by Muhammad Yusuf Saraf, Colonizing Kashmir by Hafsa Kanjwal, Kashmir Politics and Plebiscite by Dr Abdul Jabbar Gockhami, Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora, by Essar Batool and others, Mujahid Ki Azan by Imam Hasan ul Bana Shaheed, Al Jihad Fil Islam by Maulana Maududi, Independent Kashmir by Christopher Snedden, Resisting Occupation Kashmir by Haley Duschinski, Mona Bhat, Athar Zia and Cynthia Mahmood, Between Democracy and Nation by Seema Kazi, Contested Lands by Sumantra Bose, In Search of Future by David Devadas, Kashmir in Conflict by Victoria Schofield, The Kashmir Dispute by A G Noorani, Kashmir at the Cross Roads by Sumantra Bose, A Dismantled State by Anuradha Bhasin, Resisting Disappearance by Ather Zia, Confronting Terrorism by Stephen P Cohen, Freedom in Captivity by Radhika Gupta, Kashmir by Tariq Ali, Hilal Bhat, Angana P Chatterjee, Pankaj Mishra and Arundhati Roy, Azadi by Arundhati Roy, USA and Kashmir by Dr Shamshad Shan, Law and Conflict Resolution in Kashmir by Piotr Balcerowicz and Angnieszka Kuszewka, Tarikh i Siyasat e Kashmir by Dr Afaq and Kashmir and the future of South Asia by Sugata Bose and Ayesha Jalal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC issues notice on plea challenging validity of BNS Section 152
SC issues notice on plea challenging validity of BNS Section 152

Indian Express

time2 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

SC issues notice on plea challenging validity of BNS Section 152

The Supreme Court Friday issued a notice on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The petition contends that the provision 'reintroduces the colonial sedition law'. A bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria also tagged it with a pending matter challenging the provision. Section 152 of BNS states that 'whoever, purposely or knowingly, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or by electronic communication or by use of financial mean, or otherwise, excites or attempts to excite, secession or armed rebellion or subversive activities, or encourages feelings of separatist activities or endangers sovereignty or unity and integrity of India; or indulges in or commits any such act shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.' The plea, filed by retired Army officer S G Vombatkere, says that the provision, 'in effect, reintroduces the colonial sedition law previously codified as Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, under a new nomenclature. Though the language is altered, its substantive content — criminalising vague and broad categories of speech and expression such as 'subversive activity', 'encouragement of separatist feelings' and acts 'endangering unity or integrity of India' — remains the same or is even more expansive'. Hearing the petitions challenging section 124A of the IPC, the Supreme Court on May 11, 2022, put on hold trial in all sedition cases pending before courts across the country until the Centre completed a promised exercise 'to re-examine and re-consider the provision'. 'All pending trials, appeals and proceedings with respect to the charge framed under Section 124A of IPC be kept in abeyance. Adjudication with respect to other sections, if any, could proceed if the courts are of the opinion that no prejudice would be caused to the accused,' the SC had directed.

Petition alleges Section 152 of BNS reintroduces sedition law, SC seeks Centre's reply
Petition alleges Section 152 of BNS reintroduces sedition law, SC seeks Centre's reply

Scroll.in

time4 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Petition alleges Section 152 of BNS reintroduces sedition law, SC seeks Centre's reply

The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Union government to respond to a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Live Law reported. Section 152 of the criminal law pertains to acts that endanger India's sovereignty, unity and integrity. It criminalises a wide spectrum of expressive conduct, including those who 'purposely or knowingly' use words to 'excite or attempt to excite' secession, rebellion or subversive activities. The petition claimed that the provision effectively reintroduces the colonial-era sedition law. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria issued notice on the petition filed by SG Vombatkere, a retired major general in the Indian Army, and tagged it with another pending matter challenging the same provision. In his petition, Vombatkere said that the court had in May 2022 ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance, The Hindu reported. However, Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024, the petitioner argued. 'The provision, in effect, reintroduces the colonial sedition law previously codified as Section 124A of the IPC, 1860, under a new nomenclature,' the newspaper quoted the petition as having said. 'Though the language is altered, its substantive content – criminalising vague and broad categories of speech and expression such as 'subversive activity', 'encouragement of separatist feelings', and acts 'endangering unity or integrity of India' – remains the same or is even more expansive,' it added. The petition also said that Section 152 was violative of fundamental rights under Article 14, Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21 of the Constitution. While Article 14 pertains to equality, Article 19(1)(a) talks about free speech and Article 21 about right to life and personal liberty. The 'sweeping' language used in Section 152, 'including phrases like encouraging feelings of separatist activities, failed the test of constitutional validity due to vagueness, overbreadth, chilling effect, disproportionate punishment, and absence of proximate nexus to public disorder', it added. New criminal laws Three new criminal laws – the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – came into effect on July 1, 2024. They replaced the British-era Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. When introducing the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had claimed that the new law ' completely repealed ' the sedition law under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. 'Everyone has the right to speak,' the home minister had said at the time. 'We are completely repealing sedition.' However, critics have argued that Section 152 of the BNS is a 'new version' of a colonial-era sedition law, which had been misused to harass, intimidate and persecute human rights defenders, activists, journalists, among others, for exercising their right to freedom of expression.

Devendra Fadnavis felicitates Pune police teams whose probe swiftly exposed false rape allegation by IT professional
Devendra Fadnavis felicitates Pune police teams whose probe swiftly exposed false rape allegation by IT professional

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Devendra Fadnavis felicitates Pune police teams whose probe swiftly exposed false rape allegation by IT professional

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar Friday felicitated the police teams whose investigation had recently revealed that a rape case filed by a 22-year-old IT professional woman in Pune was false. Fadnavis and Pawar were at the Pune police headquarters in Shivajinagar for the inauguration of various projects when they felicitated the teams of Kondhwa police and the Crime Branch of Pune City police that had investigated the case. According to the police, the woman had stated in her complaint that she was raped by a man posing as a courier delivery executive who had come to her home to deliver bank documents when she was alone at around 7.30 pm on July 2. The woman had alleged that the executive asked her to get a pen but he then barged into the house and raped her after spraying a substance on her face which left her unconscious. She had also claimed that the man took a selfie on her phone before she regained consciousness and had left a threatening message on it, saying that he would return. The police said that with the help of the crime branch, they nabbed the suspect within 24 hours after checking footage from around 500 CCTV cameras and probing the call data records of hundreds of mobile phones. The probe revealed that the suspect was not a delivery executive but a 25-year-old man known to the complainant. The police also confirmed that he did not enter her house forcibly or spray any substance on her. The probe also found that the selfie on the woman's phone was taken with her consent and she had herself had edited the threat message on it. Subsequently, the police registered a non-cognisable offence against the woman under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) sections 212 (furnishing false information), 217 (false information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person) and 228 (fabricating false evidence). Ajit Pawar, the Guardian Minister of Pune, said, '….It happens that some incidents take place, but without gathering full knowledge about the incidents, the government and police are defamed widely for it. But after a few hours, it is known that the facts were something different. This case is an example….' He then urged the people to believe that the Mahayuti government under the leadership of Fadnavis was committed to maintaining the law and order situation in the state in such a manner that the common people would feel secure and live peacefully. 'The Mahayuti government has sanctioned Rs 22,000 crore for the District Planning Committee (DPC), of which five per cent is reserved for the police department,' he said. Higher and Technical Education Minister Chandrakant Patil was also present on the occasion along with Director General of Police Rashmi Shukla, Pune City Police Commissioner Amitesh Kumar, and other police officers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store