Tripura CPM flays vandalism over Congress leader Roy Barman's remark about BJP: ‘What kind of rule of law is this?'
'I have seen Sudip Roy Barman's statement…The photo had gone viral. We don't know whether any action has been taken against them. Did he (Sudip Roy Barman) commit any mistake by saying this? If it is a mistake, then you reply either through a press conference or a public meeting, or reply to him or his party,' the CPM MLA said.
Citing incidents of CPM workers being attacked, Chaudhury said his party's office was attacked at Bishalgarh on June 17 and that an attempt had been made to 'foil' a CPM conference at Takarjala in Sepahijala district on Tuesday.
'What kind of democracy is this? What kind of rule of law is this? It's unfortunate,' he said.
'If a party has some flaws, naturally another party will criticise it. If a statement is untrue, the other party will make this clear or condemn the statement. This is our country's political culture. Our democracy and our Constitution allow this,' the CPM leader added.
Chaudhury emphasised that the state must protect constitutional rights, human rights, and natural rights.
Sudip Roy Barman's controversial remark referred to an incident in Madhya Pradesh's Sidhi district where a purported BJP activist, Pravesh Shukla, urinated on a member of the Kol tribe last year.
Defending his remark, Barman said on Wednesday that he had merely stated a fact. 'The reality is that the BJP hates Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, OBC, minorities, etc. How else can someone urinate on another person?' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
India's population is its strength, will tap new markets: Agriculture Minister Shivraj Chouhan on Trump tariffs
Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Tuesday lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his determination to protect the interests of farmers despite tariff pressure from the Donald Trump administration in the US. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader said it has been decided that there will be no compromise with the interests of the farming community. Speaking at an event in Subrahmanyam Hall in New Delhi, Chouhan emphasised that India's population is its strength and the country will also find new markets. In a veiled reference to the Trump administration imposing 50 per cent tariff on India and apparent pressure in trade talks for greater access to India's agriculture and dairy sectors, Chouhan said there is vast difference in the size of landholdings and agricultural practices and cost of production in the two countries. "The whole country was apprehensive, know how much land they hold: 10,000 hectares, 15,000 hectares. Meanwhile, our farmers have land ranging from one acre to three acres, with many having just half an acre. We have a little land. Is this competition fair? You use GM seeds. There are different kinds of perceptions about our GM. The whole country was apprehensive, what will happen? They want their soybean to come here, their wheat, maize, rice," the Agriculture Minister said. "The cost of production per hectare is less there because GM seeds and other things are used, so the yield is more and the cost is less. The cost of production per hectare here is much higher than there, and if it had come openly, the prices of the crops here would have fallen further in our country. Where would the farmer go? Therefore, it was decided that no matter what happens, there will be no compromise with the interests of the farmer," he added. Chouhan referred to PM Modi's remarks that he will not compromise the interests of farmers no matter how much loss he personally incurs. 'Prime Minister Narendra Modi said recently that no matter how much loss I personally incur, but the interests of farmers will not be compromised. This is the voice of India, the voice of farmers,' the minister said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday, 7 August, that India will never compromise on the interests of farmers and fishermen, even if that means personally paying a heavy price for it. PM Narendra Modi's remarks are seen as a veiled response to US President Donald Trump's tariff threats on India. Farmer brothers, be assured, Chouhan said. "If there is some difficutly, we will see. We will find new markets, and India itself is such a big market that our things will be consumed here. The population of the whole of Europe is 50 crore, America's is 30 crore, our population of 144 crore is not our weakness; it is our strength. That is why this decision was taken. It is also testing time, we don't have budge, bow..." he said. The US imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods last month and increased them to 50 per cent on the import of Russian oil. Chouhan also said the government would soon introduce a new law to punish those producing fake fertilisers and chemicals. He said various schemes for farmers' welfare are being advanced on priority and digital payment of insurance amounts was made to farmers on Monday from Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. No matter what happens, there will be no compromise with the interests of the farmer. The Union Minister highlighted PM Modi's 'Nation First' resolve and emphasised that the Prime Minister has always taken strong, bold, nation-centric decisions, for which the country will forever remain indebted.
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
We are real SAD, will soon get EC stamp, says Giani Harpreet Singh
A day after getting unanimously elected as president of the breakaway Shiromani Akali Dal faction, Giani Harpreet Singh, 52, on Tuesday sharpened his attack on Akali Dal chief Sukhbir Singh Badal and dubbed the recruitment and presidential polls conducted by the group as 'bogus'. In an interview with Hindustan Times, the former Akal Takht acting jathedar said his faction will soon approach the Election Commission of India (ECI) with a claim over party nomenclature, election symbol and office. Edited excerpts: Giani Harpreet Singh How is your group different from SAD led by Sukhbir Singh Badal? What is the need for a separate outfit? They (Sukhbir camp) did not follow the party principles. We will do so. We are real Akali Dal. They buried the traditions for which the Akali Dal was formed over 100 years ago. We will revive that tradition and implement the principles. They discarded the panth and issues of Sikhs and Punjab. They did not address issues of Punjab and the panth and paid no heed to getting them resolved during the 15 years of power from 1997 onwards. Despite being a partner in the ruling BJP-led NDA at the Centre, they made no efforts to get the issues resolved. They don't care about the interests of Sikhs and Punjab. The Sukhbir group has alleged that this entire exercise was pre-planned, and you always harboured the ambition to lead SAD. Your response? It would have been pre-planned if I knew that I would be sacked as jathedar of Takht Damdama Sahib. I am a student of religious studies, and preaching religious ethos is my duty. Had I not been removed, I would have remained on that post, and panth would not have chosen me for the political post. It would have been pre-planned if I, as a jathedar, had resigned to become the president. Their allegations could have still made sense if I had resigned from the post after the December 2 decree. The decision to remove me was theirs. How can they say that it was pre-planned? How do you respond to their allegations that a person, who was part of the decree that called for Akali unity, is now leading a breakaway group? The dissident group 'Akali Dal Sudhar Lehar' was dissolved on the same day that the decree was pronounced. However, it was the Badal camp that never wanted reconciliation and did not accept the dissident leaders. Sukhbir camp also did not accept a 7-member committee constituted by the Akal Takht to reorganise the party. Instead, dissident leaders cooperated with the 7-member committee by dissolving their group. Sukhbir camp leaders should have cooperated with the committee, but instead conducted their recruitment drive and elected their president. It violated the decree, which had stated that present leadership had no moral right to give political patronage to the panth. What is the ground to claim SAD's election symbol and head office? The biggest ground of our claim is that the Badal camp conducted a bogus recruitment and made a bogus president. On the other hand, our recruitment drive is genuine and mentions Aadhaar card numbers and contact numbers. Anyone from the Election Commission of India (ECI) can check and investigate the documents. We will approach the ECI over this. If need arises, we will also move to the court. Is the merger of both factions possible in future? Yes, if the leaders of the Sukhbir faction express commitment to protect the principles and traditions which they have discarded. If they give up their ego and get ready to dissolve their faction, the merger is possible. There are allegations that you have the BJP/Centre's backing. Are you going to ally with them in future? Such decisions can only be taken when a working committee of the party is formed. My personal opinion is that the party principles and issues of Punjab and the panth should be of priority. No alliance will take shape with any party just to get ministerial berths. The party is new, and an alliance is not possible at this stage. We will sit and discuss what should be done or not. Linking dissident leaders to rival parties is an old business of the Sukhbir camp. They did not even spare former SGPC president Gurcharan Singh Tohra when he parted ways with Parkash Singh Badal in 1999, and dubbed him as 'agent of Congress'. How will you compete with the Sukhbir-led SAD, which has a lot of resources, office and controls SGPC? We are not bothered and don't care about these things. Our party is run by ordinary people. When ordinary people start backing and running political parties, then money or resources do not matter. The example of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is there. Ordinary people became MLAs without any money or muscle power. Commitment, confidence and dedication is needed to run the parties. If Sukhbir has a lot of resources and money, how come the party is facing an existential crisis and was reduced to just three seats in the last assembly elections?
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
TG govt alleges Centre's 'bias'
Hyderabad: The BJP-led government at the Centre has been 'blatantly discriminating' against Telangana in approving semiconductor projects despite strong investor interest, the state government alleged on Tuesday. While Telangana has a highly favourable environment for semiconductor manufacturing, the central government continues to maintain "intentional bias" against the state, an official release said. 'Despite multiple requests and representations by Chief Minister Revanth Reddy for approval of semiconductor projects in Telangana, the Union government continues to show blatant discrimination against the state,' the release said. The central government's intervention is leading to a concentrated semiconductor ecosystem in BJP-favoured states, 'unfairly outweighing' Telangana's policy attractiveness, infrastructure robustness and political stability, it added
