KLH Global Business School Launches Certificate Program in Digital Marketing with AI
The one-month, hybrid-format program is set to commence on June 15, 2025. It features 30 intensive online sessions, complemented by a unique 4-day immersive campus experience at the modern KLH GBS campus in Kondapur, Hyderabad. The comprehensive course fee is ₹30,000, and the program is open to individuals aged 18 and above, including students, entrepreneurs, freelancers, content creators, and marketing professionals looking to significantly upgrade their digital marketing capabilities with advanced AI tools.
Er. Koneru Lakshman Havish, Vice President of KLEF Deemed to be University, commented on the strategic importance of this new offering, "In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, practical skills augmented by artificial intelligence are no longer an advantage, but a necessity. This program is a testament to our commitment to bridge the industry-academia gap, ensuring our learners emerge as leaders in the AI-driven digital economy."
Dr. Anand Bethapudi, Dean of KLH Global Business School further elaborated on the program's immediate impact, stating that it will enable learners with real-world, AI-enhanced marketing skills that are absolutely critical for success. This initiative aligns with the school's broader vision to foster global business leaders equipped with both sharp technological insight and strategic creativity.
The rich and hands-on curriculum covers a wide array of crucial topics, including website building, SEO (Search Engine Optimization), email and social media marketing, influencer outreach, meme marketing, and campaign automation. Participants will gain practical experience using cutting-edge tools such as ChatGPT, Canva, Google Keyword Planner, and Meta Ads Manager. A distinctive feature of this program is its strong focus on AI integration, enabling learners to efficiently generate content, design smarter campaigns, target audiences more effectively, and make data-driven decisions that impact real-world results.
Registrations for this pioneering program are now open and are being accepted on a rolling basis. Interested candidates are strongly encouraged to apply early to secure their seats in this high-demand program. KLH GBS of #KLEF Deemed to be University, committed to fostering global business leaders equipped with technological insight and strategic creativity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off
Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence. According to recent research from McKinsey & Company, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using generative AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots like ChatGPT, fueled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and superrich start-ups and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind — but it could be years before the technology delivers an economywide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'the generative AI paradox,' as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in generative AI by businesses are expected to increase 94 per cent this year to $61.9 billion, according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42 per cent by the end of 2024, up from 17 per cent the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said Alexander Johnston, a senior analyst at S&P Global. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles,' predicts that AI is sliding toward a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment.' The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said John-David Lovelock, the chief forecaster at Gartner. That was the pattern with past technologies like personal computers and the internet — early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own work forces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Jim Farley, the chief executive of Ford Motor, said, 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI — although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call center software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centers field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more — a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time everyone will use it,' said Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant — essentially a business chatbot — from their work computers for tasks like retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialized AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Ms. Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' McAfee, the M.I.T. research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI-consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...
Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed Musk, who left OpenAI after his failed attempt to take over the company in 2018, has long been critical of the firm. Image Credit: Reuters Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs, according to the Financial Times. The venture is said to be seeking funding at a potential $850 million valuation, with some capital possibly coming from OpenAI's own ventures arm. Sources told TechCrunch that talks remain early and OpenAI has not committed to participating, meaning the terms could still change. Merge Labs is reportedly collaborating with Alex Blania, head of Tools for Humanity, the company behind Altman's iris-scanning digital ID project. The new company would compete directly with Elon Musk's Neuralink, which is developing brain implants to help people with severe paralysis control devices using thought alone. Neuralink, founded in 2016 and valued at $9 billion after a June fundraising round, is currently running human trials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The concept of 'the merge'— humans integrating with technology— has long fascinated both Musk and Altman. In a 2017 blog post, Altman wrote that the merge 'has already begun' and predicted humans would become 'the first species ever to design our own descendants.' The idea predates Silicon Valley's current fixation on artificial general intelligence and ties back to earlier visions of 'the singularity.' The two tech leaders, once OpenAI co-founders, have since become open rivals. Musk left the organisation in 2018, and the relationship has soured, with the pair trading public barbs on X this week. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed, and a new front in their escalating competition. Elon Musk vs Sam Altman Elon Musk and Sam Altman were once co-founders of OpenAI, but their relationship broke down after Musk left in 2018. Since then, they have become rivals, running competing AI companies: Musk's xAI and Altman's OpenAI. The feud has played out both in business and in public spats. Musk has criticised OpenAI's direction and tried to buy it back, while Altman has pushed ahead with commercial growth. This week, tensions escalated when Musk accused Apple of favouring OpenAI's ChatGPT in the App Store. Altman responded by accusing Musk of manipulating X to benefit his own ventures. Their rivalry now spans technology, influence, and personal reputation, with both positioning themselves as leaders in the race to shape the future of AI. With inputs from agencies
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Apple denies favouring ChatGPT after partnership claims, rejects Elon Musk's allegation that App Store hinders rivals
Apple has rejected allegations from Elon Musk that its App Store discriminates against competitors, insisting the platform is free and fair of bias, according to a BBC report. The remarks come after the Tesla and X chief threatened legal action, accusing Apple of making it 'impossible' for apps to rival ChatGPT-maker OpenAI in the store. Musk's criticism followed his renewed clash with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, whom he labelled a 'liar' after Altman accused him of using X to 'benefit himself and his own companies'. The dispute marks the latest escalation in a long-running feud between the two tech leaders, who co-founded OpenAI before Musk's departure from the firm. In a statement to the BBC, Apple said: 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.' Apple entered into a partnership with ChatGPT in June 2024 but has denied any preferential treatment. The company noted that other AI tools, including DeepSeek and Perplexity, have reached top positions in App Store rankings since then. Musk, however, continued to criticise the company online, questioning why neither X nor its AI chatbot Grok featured in the App Store's 'Must Have' section. He pointed out that X ranked as the number one news app globally and Grok was fifth among all apps, while ChatGPT topped the UK's free app chart. Official rankings show Grok in third place and X absent from the top 40. Meanwhile, tensions between the xAI chief and Sam Altman escalated further, as the public spat unfolded against the backdrop of legal proceedings in the United States. This week, District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers allowed OpenAI's claims against Musk to proceed to trial, including accusations of a 'years-long harassment campaign' involving public remarks, social media activity, court filings, and what the company describes as a 'sham bid' for its assets. The trial is expected to intensify tensions in a rivalry that has persisted for over a decade, stemming from Musk's belief that OpenAI abandoned its original founding principles.
