Comment: A cautionary tale for Asean from the Middle East
As the Middle East remains in a state of dangerous instability, Asean presented with an opportunity to examine the causes of these conflicts and draw valuable lessons.
While taking pride in its longstanding neutrality and consensus-building, which have underpinned its regional stability, Asean must adapt to emerging geopolitical realities.
For the grouping to maintain its relevance and agency in a contested multipolar world, it must avoid the strategic fragmentation that has plagued the Middle East and strengthen its own framework for collective security.
Asean's fragile consensus
Asean, in contrast, has often been lauded for its cautious but sustainable approach to diplomacy, with principles of non-interference, consensus, and neutrality at its core.
The "ASEAN Way' of informal dialogue and mutual respect has helped prevent open conflict among its members for decades.
There are challenges, however, with great power rivalry over the South China Sea, which has exposed Asean's internal divisions as just one glaring example.
While Vietnam and the Philippines seek stronger resistance against encroachments, others like Cambodia and Laos often take a more accommodating stance. This divergence threatens to paralyse the grouping when collective action is most needed.
Furthermore, Asean faces growing pressure from external powers such as China, the United States, India, Japan, and the European Union, all vying for influence in the region.
The Quad, AUKUS (Australia, the UK, and the US), and increased US military presence signal a securitised Asia-Pacific that could soon drag Asean into rivalries it has long sought to avoid.
Without greater strategic cohesion, Asean risks repeating the Middle Eastern pattern of division and dependency, becoming an arena for power projection rather than an actor shaping its own future.
Key lessons and the way forward for Asean
The Middle East demonstrates that a lack of regional unity leaves individual nations vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation.
Asean must recognise that its strength lies not in the sum of its parts, but in its ability to act with a unified voice. While complete consensus may be elusive, a flexible core group of willing states could lead on issues of regional security without waiting for unanimity.
Asean's commitment to neutrality has served it well, but in a more polarised world, neutrality must evolve into proactive non-alignment.
This means not only avoiding entanglement in great-power blocs but also taking a firmer stand on regional security issues, particularly in maritime disputes, cross-border security, and transnational crime.
It is important to note that these very criminal networks that operate along porous borders are often exploited to traffic arms that could be used by non-state actors to create instability.
Unlike the Middle East, Asean has an advantage through its institutional foundation, which could facilitate a multilateral defence or security coordination framework.
While a full military alliance may be unrealistic, a regional maritime coordination centre, joint patrol arrangements, or a rapid response force for non-traditional threats such as disaster relief, piracy, and cyberattacks would enhance Asean's credibility and security.
Asan should adopt a more robust position against the militarisation of its region by external actors.
Just as foreign bases and arms deals in the Middle East have entrenched foreign influence, Southeast Asia must guard against becoming a base for great-power military logistics or surveillance.
Transparency, dialogue, and clear regional red lines can help manage this risk.
Institutions such as the Arab League have been ineffective in part due to a lack of enforcement capability and legitimacy. Asean must avoid the same fate by streamlining decision-making, empowering its secretariat, and reducing the influence of members who act as proxies for external interests.
To secure its future, Asean must begin a serious conversation about regional defence autonomy. This doesn't mean cutting ties with the US or China or other blocs, but rather strengthening the grouping's collective bargaining power and ability to shape outcomes in its own neighbourhood.
South-East Asia's economic dynamism and strategic location give it leverage, but only if wielded with strategic intent.
Asean could develop a code of conduct not only for the South China Sea but for all foreign military activity in Southeast Asia. This would require transparency on base agreements, arms transfers, and intelligence-sharing with external powers.
This must be paired by expanding the Asean Défense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) to include a permanent crisis monitoring centre capable of early warning and real-time coordination.
Intelligence sharing and surveillance coordination, which are currently fragmented, will be far more effective and successful through this.
The grouping must also reinforce its political values. Non-interference must not become a shield for impunity.
Myanmar's crisis is a test of Asean's will to uphold basic norms of governance and order. If unresolved, it threatens to erode the region's moral authority and cohesion.
Asean must shape its own trajectory
The Middle East did not descend into chaos overnight. It unravelled through decades of missed opportunities, broken alliances, and dependence on foreign patrons.
For now, Asean is in a far better position as it can either build on its history of cautious cooperation to become a more resilient, strategic actor, or it can cling to an outdated consensus model and become another arena for global competition.
Asean's future as a stable, independent regional bloc depends on whether it can draw the right lessons from the Middle East and act on them before the storm arrives. - Bernama

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
4 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
UN tells Cambodia, Thailand to exercise maximum restraint amid rising border tensions
A pagoda damaged by Thai artillery is pictured in Oddar Meanchey province on July 25, 2025. – AFP photo PHNOM PENH (July 26): The United Nations (UN) urged Cambodia and Thailand to exercise maximum restraint after their long border disagreement erupted into a bloody battle on Thursday morning. The United Nations Security Council held an emergency closed-door meeting on Friday to discuss the ongoing conflict between the two neighbours. The council is yet to issue any statement on the outcome of the highly anticipated meeting. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, in a July 24 statement, called on both warring parties to pursue peaceful dialogue to the long-running dispute, according to the UN website. 'Exercise maximum restraint and address any issues through dialogue and in a spirit of good neighbourliness, with a view to finding a lasting solution to the dispute,' said Guterres. Prime Minister Hun Manet wrote to the UN Security Council on Thursday, seeking the global body's support to resolve the conflict that flared up between Cambodian and Thai soldiers along the Oddar Meanchey and Preah Vihear areas, after weeks of simmering tensions. According to the website, the Security Council held an urgent private meeting under the 'Threats to international peace and security' on Friday to discuss the Cambodia-Thailand border issues. Both countries have been engaged in a decades-long hostile dispute over the sovereignty of the 817-km non-demarcated areas along their borders, where several ancient temples are also located. At Friday's meeting, several council members acknowledged ASEAN's role in facilitating a dialogue to resolve the crisis, according to the UN website. Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, also the current ASEAN chair, presented a ceasefire proposal to both governments. – Bernama border dispute cambodia Thailand united nations


The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
Brunei Law Society attends Asean Bar Leaders' Summit
President of The Law Society of Brunei Muhammad Zainidi Abdul Hamid during a discussion. - Law Society of Singapore via BB/ANN KUALA LUMPUR: President of The Law Society of Brunei Muhammad Zainidi Abdul Hamid attended the Asean Bar Leaders' Summit 2025 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and participated in discussions aimed at strengthening cross-border cooperation among Asean legal institutions. Thirty seven representatives from across Asean's legal community attended the summit from July 22 to 23 aimed at fostering meaningful dialogues on relevant issues, emerging trends, and challenges within the legal profession. The summit provided an opportunity to foster friendships, strengthen networks, and exchange ideas towards building a cohesive Asean legal community. The participants explored collaborative initiatives such as sports events, exchange programmes and knowledge-sharing endeavours. A highlight of the summit was the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the Law Society of Singapore and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, marking an important step in regional partnership. - Borneo Bulletin/ANN


The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
China must strike a delicate balance in its approach towards Thai-Cambodian conflict, say analysts
CHONGQING, (China): China faces a delicate balancing act as it decides what role it should play in the ongoing border hostilities between Thailand and Cambodia, two South-east Asian nations that are its close neighbours and which it wields strong influence over. Analysts told The Straits Times that while the clash, which began on Thursday (July 24) and has so far reportedly left at least 16 dead, could present an opportunity for China to showcase its leadership in the region, the world's second-largest economy is likely to keep to its traditional approach of having the two countries resolve the matter on their own. It is also likely to first look to Asean as it assesses how it can best help the process along. But that does not mean that China will not attempt to bring both countries to the negotiating table as the conflict is happening in its neighbourhood, said Professor Fan Lei, an expert on China-Asean relations at China's Charhar Institute, an international relations think-tank. Asean is China's largest trading partner, representing 16.6 per cent of the world's second-largest economy's overall foreign trade. Total trade between Asean and China reached 1.71 trillion yuan (S$305 billion) in 2024, up 7.1 per cent from 2023. Analysts pointed to how China can play a bigger role in the dispute between Thailand and Cambodia, given that China is both countries' top trading partner and thus wields strong economic influence over both states. Thailand relies on Chinese imports such as machinery, electronics and vehicles. China is also Thailand's top source of foreign tourists. Meanwhile, bilateral trade between Cambodia and China grew 26.9 per cent in the first six months of 2025, compared with the same period in 2024, official data from Cambodia showed. China is a major investor in both Thailand and Cambodia in sectors such as electric vehicles, infrastructure and real estate. It also conducts separate military exercises with Cambodia and Thailand. In April, Chinese-sponsored upgrades to Ream Naval Base in Cambodia raised concerns about China's growing footprint in South-east Asia. But China has to tread a delicate balance. On the one hand, 'China may feel that it should not just sit idly by and do nothing if such military conflict is in its neighbourhood', said Associate Professor Li Mingjiang, an expert on Chinese foreign policy and regional security at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. On the other hand, it has to be mindful not to 'leave the impression it is disregarding Asean', said Professor Zhu Feng, dean at the School of International Studies at Nanjing University. Already, countries in South-east Asia are wary of China's expanding influence in the region – and its clashes with the Philippines over maritime territorial claims – as they navigate an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape amid intense US-China rivalry. That is why China is most likely to conduct 'quiet and informal mediation', Prof Li said, adding that he believes 'Chinese diplomats may already be involved in discussions with Cambodia and Thailand, urging them to de-escalate and engage in talks'. Professor Gu Jiayun, vice-dean at the School of Asian Studies at Beijing Foreign Studies University, said: 'It is in China's interest to keep the peace among its neighbours, given that conflict can hurt the region's as well as its own development prospects.' Prof Gu said that both Thailand and Cambodia have 'shown restraint in the clash so far, so they might be looking for an out to start negotiations'. Publicly, Thailand has rejected mediation efforts from third countries to end the ongoing conflict. However, it has signalled that the door will be kept open for Asean to facilitate a return to bilateral negotiations with Cambodia. Phnom Penh has written to the United Nations for help – the first time in more than a decade that an Asean member state has made such a request. The latest border dispute escalated sharply on July 24 after a Thai F-16 fighter jet bombed targets in Cambodia that day. Tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have been steaming since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed during a brief exchange of gunfire near the border in north-eastern Thailand. Both countries – which share a long history of border disputes that date back to France's occupation of Cambodia until 1953 – have blamed each other for the latest escalation, and downgraded their diplomatic ties on July 23. During a meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Asean secretary-general Kao Kim Hourn in Beijing on July 25, Wang said that China 'stands ready to continue playing a constructive role in easing tensions (between Thailand and Cambodia) and de-escalating the situation in an impartial and fair manner'. Calling the latest deadly clash 'distressing and concerning', Wang added: 'China appreciates and supports the proactive mediation efforts of the Asean Chair and encourages the 'Asean Way' to promote dialogue and political resolution.' Asean's fundamental principles include mutual respect for the sovereignty of all nations, non-interference in the internal affairs of member states, peaceful settlement of disputes, and renunciation of the threat or use of force. On July 24, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman told reporters at a regular briefing that 'China has and will continue to promote talks (between the two Asean states) for peace in its own way, and play a constructive role in promoting de-escalation'. Prof Fan said that China is likely to draw Cambodia and Thailand into negotiations with economic ways. This would be in line with the Chinese government's emphasis on cooperative win-win partnerships and non-interference principles regarding foreign diplomacy that are part of China's Three Global Initiatives, he added. 'It is also a possibility that China might encourage Thailand and Cambodia to resolve their dispute at Hong Kong's new international mediation body,' Prof Fan said. China signed on May 30 a convention to set up an international organisation for mediation in Hong Kong to resolve cross-border disputes among countries and international companies that Beijing hopes can match up to the UN's International Court of Justice. Analysts noted that China's actions will be a test of its diplomatic strength in the region. Prof Li said China has been signalling that 'it does want to gradually play a slightly larger role in the region' that goes beyond traditional security issues. Chinese President Xi Jinping's first overseas trip in 2025 amid growing trade tensions with the US was to South-east Asia, where he visited Malaysia, Cambodia and Vietnam for a week in April. Prof Li said: 'The conflict between Cambodia and Thailand could be an opportunity for China to try out its limited role so far in addressing the security issues in the Mekong region, cautiously, quietly and informally, of course.' - The Straits Times/ANN