logo
Federal Reserve likely to stand pat on rates this week, deepening the gulf between Powell and Trump

Federal Reserve likely to stand pat on rates this week, deepening the gulf between Powell and Trump

Yahoo29-07-2025
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve is expected to leave its short-term interest rate unchanged on Wednesday for the fifth straight meeting, a move that will likely underscore the deep divide between how Chair Jerome Powell and his chief critic, President Donald Trump, see the economy.
The Fed itself, to be sure, is increasingly divided over its next steps, and many economists expect that two members of the Fed's governing board — both appointed by Trump — could dissent on Wednesday in favor of cutting rates. If so, that would be the first time two governors vote against the chair since 1993.
Even so, the gap between the views of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee, chaired by Powell, and the White House is unusually large. In several areas, Trump's views sharply contrast with that of the Fed's leadership, setting up likely clashes for years to come, even after Powell's term as chair ends in May 2026.
For example, Trump says that because the U.S. economy is doing well, the Fed should cut rates, as if the U.S. is a blue-chip company that should pay less to borrow than a risky start-up.
But Fed officials — and nearly all economists — see it the other way: A solid economy means rates should be relatively high, to prevent overheating and a burst of inflation.
'I'd argue that our interest rates are higher because our economy's doing fairly well, not in spite of it,' said Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities.
Trump argues that the Fed in general and Powell in particular are costing U.S. taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments by not reducing borrowing costs. Yet Fed officials don't think it's their job to reduce rates the government pays on Treasury notes and bonds.
Most economists worry that if they did, they would risk failing at one of the key jobs Congress gave them: fighting inflation.
'It's using monetary policy to ease pressure on fiscal policymakers, and that way points to higher inflation and bigger problems down the road," said William English, an economist at the Yale School of Management and former senior Fed staffer.
If financial markets see that the Fed is focused on keeping borrowing costs low to help the government — rather than focusing on its congressionally-mandated goals of stable prices and maximum employment — Wall Street investors, worried about future inflation, will likely demand higher interest rates to hold Treasury bonds, economists say, pushing up borrowing costs across the economy.
For his part, Trump says there is 'no inflation' and so the Fed should reduce its short-term rate, currently at about 4.3%, which was ramped up in 2022 and 2023 to fight rising prices. The Fed's rate often — but not always — influences longer-term borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit cards.
Inflation has fallen sharply and as a result Fed officials have signaled they will cut rates by as much as a half-percentage point this year. Yet it has picked up a bit in the last two months and many of those policymakers, including Powell, still want to make sure that tariffs aren't going to lift inflation much higher before they make a move.
Inflation accelerated to 2.7% in June from 2.4% in May, the government said earlier this month, above the Fed's 2% target. Core prices, which exclude the volatile food and energy categories, rose to 2.9% from 2.8%.
Last week, Trump and several White House officials ramped up their attacks on Powell over rates. They also criticized the ballooning costs of the Fed's renovation of two of its buildings, raising questions over whether the president was looking to fire Powell for cause rather than policy differences.
Trump and Powell engaged in an extraordinary on-camera confrontation over the cost of the project during Trump's visit to the building site last Thursday. On Monday, Trump was more restrained in his comments on the Fed during a joint appearance in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
"I'm not going to say anything bad,' Trump said. 'We're doing so well, even without the rate cut.'
But he added, 'a smart person would cut."
Some economists expect that the Fed will reduce its key rate by a quarter-point in September, rather than July, and say that the two-month delay will make little difference to the economy.
Yet beyond just the timing of the first cut, there is still a huge gulf between what Trump wants and what the Fed will even consider doing: Fed officials in June penciled in just two reductions this year and one in 2026. They forecast that their key rate will still be 3.6% at the end of next year. Trump is pushing them to cut it to just 1%.
'That's not going to happen with anything like the current people on the committee,' English said.
Wall Street investors also expect relatively few cuts: Two this year and two in 2026, according to futures pricing tracked by CME's Fedwatch.
According to the Fed's projections, just two officials in June supported three cuts this year, likely Trump's appointments from his first term: governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman.
Waller gave a speech earlier this month supporting a rate reduction in July, but for a very different reason than Trump: He is worried the economy is faltering.
'The economy is still growing, but its momentum has slowed significantly, and the risks' of rising unemployment 'have increased,' Waller said.
Waller has also emphasized that tariffs will create just a one-time bump in prices but won't lead to ongoing inflation.
Yet most Fed officials see the job market as relatively healthy — with unemployment at a low 4.1% — and that as a result, they can take time to make sure that's how everything plays out.
'Continued overall solid economic conditions enable the Fed to take the time to carefully assess the wide range of incoming data,' said Susan Collins, president of the Boston Federal Reserve. 'Thus, in my view, an 'actively patient' approach to monetary policy remains appropriate at this time.'
Christopher Rugaber, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If You'd Invested $10,000 in Nvidia Stock 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
If You'd Invested $10,000 in Nvidia Stock 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If You'd Invested $10,000 in Nvidia Stock 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Key Points Nvidia's GPU technologies have been at the center of the AI revolution over the last five years. The importance of Nvidia's processing hardware has meant that the company's shareholders have been richly rewarded. GPU hardware sales are a fantastic foundation for Nvidia, but the company is also exploring growth opportunities in other categories. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has helped transform the world and absolutely crushed the market over the last five years. The rise of the company's graphics processing units (GPUs) as essential computational hardware for training and running artificial intelligence (AI) applications has helped power incredible sales and earnings growth, and investors who have taken a long-term-holding approach to the company have been richly rewarded. Over the last five years, Nvidia stock has delivered share price gains of roughly 1,500%. That means that a $10,000 investment in the company half a decade ago would now be worth roughly $160,000. The AI hardware leader has delivered incredible wins for long-term shareholders, and forthcoming chapters in its growth story seem to hold plenty of promise. Nvidia continues to dominate the AI hardware market When it comes to the key computational hardware at the heart of the artificial intelligence revolution, no company has a stronger position than Nvidia. The company's advanced GPUs and AI accelerators have been delivering performance that's significantly exceeding the competition and paving the way for the most important leaps forward in artificial intelligence. With the company's last quarterly report, revenue increased roughly 69% year over year to reach approximately $44.1 billion, and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share rose approximately 33% compared to the prior-year period even in the face of some heavy investment in growth projects. Nvidia's leadership in AI computing technologies is opening the door for the company to potentially become a leader in areas such as processing as a service and robotics, and the tech leader's competitive advantages suggest it could continue serving up wins for patient shareholders. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If You'd Invested $10,000 in Nvidia Stock 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today was originally published by The Motley Fool

Pinterest Stock Just Dropped 12% After Earnings. Is It a Red Flag, or a Buying Opportunity?
Pinterest Stock Just Dropped 12% After Earnings. Is It a Red Flag, or a Buying Opportunity?

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pinterest Stock Just Dropped 12% After Earnings. Is It a Red Flag, or a Buying Opportunity?

Key Points Pinterest reported strong numbers for the second quarter, especially on the top line. Monetization of non-U.S. users continues to be a strong point. Tariff-related advertising concerns are weighing on investor confidence. 10 stocks we like better than Pinterest › Pinterest (NYSE: PINS) reported its second-quarter earnings recently, and the stock fell by about 12% the next day. Although top-line revenue is growing faster than expected, the company's profitability was a little lower than analysts had hoped for, and there are some concerns about the effect of new tariffs on ad demand. In other words, there was a lot of good to balance out the bad. So why is the stock falling so much? Is it a buying opportunity for long-term investors, or would it be best to stay away for the time being? Here's a quick rundown of Pinterest's Q2 results, why the stock is down, and whether it could be a good time to buy. Pinterest's second quarter: The good and the bad We'll start with the good. Pinterest reported top-line revenue that grew by 17% year over year and handily surpassed analysts' expectations. Not only that, but the company gave upbeat third-quarter revenue guidance, and the platform added 8 million users for the quarter, nearly twice as many as were projected. There are now 578 million monthly active users worldwide, and there was growth in all three geographical segments Pinterest reports (U.S & Canada, Europe, and Rest of World). The weakness, however, came on the bottom line. Pinterest missed earnings per share (EPS) estimates by two cents, which appears to be the main negative in the earnings report. To be sure, other profitability metrics were quite strong. Free cash flow margin was almost 20%, compared with just 12% in the second quarter of 2024. Monetization of the user base is also progressing nicely, especially outside of the U.S., which is where the bulk of Pinterest users are. Average revenue per user (ARPU) from the platform's 146 million European users grew by 26%. In the crucial Rest of World group, which includes 329 million users, Pinterest generated 44% more than it did a year ago. This remains a massive opportunity, as the average user in this group still generates less than 3% of the revenue that a typical U.S. user brings in. Pinterest has $2.66 billion in cash and marketable securities on its balance sheet, nearly $150 million more than a year ago. The company's outstanding share count has fallen by almost 3% over the past year thanks to buybacks, and Pinterest has financial flexibility to take advantage of future opportunities that arise. Concerns going forward Despite the strong forecast going forward, Pinterest's management expressed concern over the effects of tariffs on ad spending. One example CFO Julia Donnelly cited in the company's earnings call is Asia-based e-commerce retailers hit by the end of the de minimis exemption to tariffs. So, while Pinterest stock took an initial plunge immediately after the earnings release, these comments are what triggered the double-digit decline. Is it a buying opportunity? In full disclosure, Pinterest is already one of my largest investments, so I'm not likely to add shares anytime soon. However, if you believe (as I do) that the tariff effects will be more of a short-lived problem than a permanent drag on ad demand, it could be a good time to take a closer look. I've said many times that some of my favorite opportunities to buy shares of my favorite companies are when companies miss earnings by a penny or two and the stock proceeds to fall by double digits. While Pinterest could certainly be volatile, especially as the initial effect of tariffs plays out, the long-term thesis is still very much intact, and management is doing an excellent job. Should you invest $1,000 in Pinterest right now? Before you buy stock in Pinterest, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Pinterest wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Matt Frankel has positions in Pinterest. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Pinterest. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Pinterest Stock Just Dropped 12% After Earnings. Is It a Red Flag, or a Buying Opportunity? was originally published by The Motley Fool Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

Alaska Governor Reacts To Trump-Putin Meeting: 'Most Strategic Location'
Alaska Governor Reacts To Trump-Putin Meeting: 'Most Strategic Location'

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Alaska Governor Reacts To Trump-Putin Meeting: 'Most Strategic Location'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Alaska is the "most fitting" location for the summit between presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the state's governor has said. Mike Dunleavy posted on X that Alaska's location, which at its closest point is only 2 miles from Russia, makes it "the most strategic location" for the leaders to discuss the war in Ukraine on August 15. Russian media also welcomed the location for Putin, who will make his first visit to the U.S. for a decade. This montage shows Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump. This montage shows Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump. Getty Images Why It Matters A U.S. location has allowed Trump to make a bold announcement and act as host for an event with potentially significant geopolitical consequences. Alaska was once a part of the Russian empire before it was sold to the U.S. by Tsar Alexander II for $7.2 million in 1867 and Russian media, which have discussed Moscow trying to recapture it, have noted the symbolism of the Arctic state's location for a summit. What To Know Russian tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda called the choice "logical" given the countries' common economic interests in the Arctic and that unlike the various other venues broached, Putin runs no risk of being arrested under a warrant by the International Criminal Court (ICC), the jurisdiction of which the U.S. does not recognize. Before Trump and the Kremlin confirmed the meeting between the leaders, Putin had suggested the United Arab Emirates as a possible venue but the choice of Alaska has been welcomed by Moscow. Trump announced on Truth Social that the summit would take place on Friday, August 15, in Alaska, which was confirmed by Putin's aide Yury Ushakov who described the location as "logical." I welcome the upcoming meeting between President Donald J. Trump and Russia's President Putin being held here in the great state of Alaska. Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and… — Governor Mike Dunleavy (@GovDunleavy) August 8, 2025 The Alaska governor agreed, saying on X that his state "is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia," with the Arctic to the north and the Pacific to the south. What happens in the Arctic and the Pacific impacts Alaska before the rest of the country and that it was "fitting that discussions of global importance take place here," he added. Komsomolskaya Pravda praised the choice of Alaska and the absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the talks, although many details have not been clarified. What People Are Saying Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy on X: "With a mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defense, energy security, and Arctic leadership." Russian tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda: "The two countries are close neighbors, the choice is logical. There are common economic interests in the Arctic, so joint projects are possible." It added: "In Alaska, outsiders are excluded. Only Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will be there. No Zelensky, no Europe." What Happens Next When they meet in Alaska, Trump and Putin are expected to discuss a peace plan that would see Ukraine surrendering new territories to Russia Trump himself saying territory could be exchanged for a ceasefire. On Saturday, Zelensky said Ukraine's territorial integrity was enshrined in its constitution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store