Canadian dollar rallies as BoC pauses interest rate cuts
TORONTO, April 16 (Reuters) - The Canadian dollar strengthened against its U.S. counterpart on Wednesday as the greenback posted broad-based declines and the Bank of Canada paused its interest rate cutting campaign.
The loonie was trading 0.6% higher at 1.3875 per U.S. dollar, or 72.07 U.S. cents, moving back in reach of the five-month high it touched on Monday at 1.3827.
The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here.
The BoC held its benchmark rate at 2.75%, its first pause after seven consecutive cuts, and said that the uncertainty around U.S. tariffs made it impossible to issue regular economic forecasts.
Investors see a roughly 50% chance the central bank will return to easing at its next policy decision on June 4 and expect two further cuts in total by year-end.
The U.S. dollar (.DXY), opens new tab resumed its recent decline against a basket of major currencies as traders waited to see if U.S. President Donald Trump's administration reaches new trading agreements with partners.
"The BoC's hold is providing some support to the loonie," strategists at TD Securities, including Jayati Bharadwaj, said in a note.
"In the absence of the trade spat between Canada and US worsening and Trump diverting attention to China, we can expect better price action in CAD and positioning there has been consistently improving."
Speculators have reduced their bearish bets on the Canadian dollar to the lowest since October, data from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission showed on Friday.
The price of oil, one of Canada's major exports, rose 1.8% to $62.45 a barrel after Washington issued new sanctions targeting Chinese importers of Iranian oil.
Canadian bond yields were mixed across the curve. The 10-year was up less than one basis point at 3.121% after earlier touching an eight-day low at 3.078%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Majority of Australians think China will be world's most powerful country by 2035, poll finds
A majority of Australians expect China will be the most powerful country in the world by 2035 as trust in the US tumbles, new research has found. Just over one in three Australians (36%) trusted the US to act responsibly on the world stage, representing a 20-point fall from 2024 and the smallest proportion since the Lowy Institute began polling in 2005. The thinktank's 2025 report found only one in four respondents had any confidence in president Donald Trump's approach to world affairs – less than half of the 46% who expressed faith in Joe Biden the previous year. Confidence in the Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, rose four points to 16%, and Australians were evenly split on whether Xi or Trump was a more reliable partner. Australians were just as likely to view China as an economic partner than as a security threat for the first time since 2020 – though a high proportion of voters still distrust China and believe it will become a military threat to Australia in the next 20 years. 'There's slightly more trust, slightly less threat perceptions, [but] it's still a pretty bleak picture for how Australians look at China,' said Ryan Neelam, the poll author and a director at the Lowy Institute. A majority of respondents believed the US would come to Australia's defence if it were attacked, with 63% agreeing, a drop from the 75% agreement recorded in similar questions in recent years. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But Australians nonetheless continued to support the strong military relationship, despite a loss of trust likely inspired by Trump's 'shocking' and 'norm-breaking' foreign policy, according to Neelam. 'It's almost as if the Australian public are separating those two things in their minds: the instability and unpredictability of Trump's approach to world affairs, from the institution of the alliance.' Since the 2024 survey, the gap between Australians' trust in the US compared with China has more than halved, as perceptions of China continued to improve from their nadir in 2022, Neelam said. 'That's quite remarkable for Australia's key security ally to have such a low level of trust,' he said. 'The weight of expectation is that China will be more powerful and more predominant in the global system.' Just over one in four respondents believed the US would be the most important and powerful nation in 10 years' time, with more than half expecting China to take the lead. Four in five voters said the alliance with the US was important for Australia's security, similar to the support observed in 2023 and 2024. Support for the Aukus nuclear-powered submarine deal was also steady with two-thirds of those polled in favour, similar to the level observed since 2022. Coalition voters and residents of Queensland and Western Australia were especially supportive, each recording about four in five people in favour, while Victorians and Labor voters were more lukewarm, at three in five. Respondents were polled in March, prior to the US defence department's announcement of a review of the Aukus deal, which Anthony Albanese described as 'appropriate' ahead of a possible meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada. Three in five people expressed confidence in Albanese's approach to world affairs in the Lowy poll, putting the prime minister just behind France's Emmanuel Macron and New Zealand's Christopher Luxon. Luxon was the most trusted world leader, though nearly a quarter of those polled expressed no view, most of whom saying they did not know who he was.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Americans reveal whether they back Trump's Big Beautiful Bill as its future hangs in the balance
A shock new poll shows the majority of voters are against Donald Trump 's signature tax 'big beautiful' bill signaling concern for the GOP. The Republican-led Big Beautiful Bill Act (BBB) aims to provide $1,000 'Trump Accounts' for babies, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime work, provide billions for border wall and increase the U.S. debt limit. GOP leaders, and the 79-year-old president, have highlighted how the bill will provide for 'the largest tax cut in history' and economic relief to the middle class. The over 1,000-page bill also adds new work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP recipients. It also would ban states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next 10 years - a provision that has infuriated a major Trump ally. The Congressional Budget Office projects that the massive measure will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt from 2025 - 2034 while reducing taxes by $3.75 trillion. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has likened the bill to a 'tax scam' that will give tax breaks to the GOP's 'billionaire donors.' He claims that bill will actually add $2 trillion to the U.S. budget deficit. As the parties wrangle over the trillion-dollar legislation, U.S. voters have seemingly already made up their mind on the matter. According to the latest J.L. Partners poll for the Daily Mail, just one in four Americans back the the BBB, feedback that may spell trouble for Republicans. The survey found that just 28 percent of Americans support the Trump-led measure while 36 percent are against it. The remainder either were unsure or neither supported or opposed the legislation. According to the survey, the package has a negative net approval rating of -8. Republicans were the most likely group to support the BBB, receiving a +36 rating among self-identified party members. But the support for the bill completely evaporated among independents and Democrats. Asked if they would support Trump's landmark legislation, unaffiliated voters had a net opposition of -14, while Democrats had a staggering -41 opposition to the BBB. The J.L. Partners survey was not the only recent bad poll for the bill, however. A recent CBS News/YouGov poll also found that 47 percent of respondents think the measure will hurt middle-class Americans. The survey found 31 percent who said the measure will benefit them. The measure has already passed the House and it is expected to be voted on by the Senate before July 4, a self-imposed deadline handed down to rank-and-file members from GOP leadership. Though as negotiations have stalled, and the House has delayed in transmitting the bill to the upper-chamber, the timeline is tightening for Senate Republicans. Senators will certainly amend the House's version of the bill and seek to add their influence over the package. Different factions have emerged in the Senate about what provisions need to be changed. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., for example, has threatened to withhold his vote alongside other conservative members over the BBB's impact on the growing budget deficit. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., meanwhile, is fighting to protect Medicaid - a popular target for his GOP colleagues. The emerging forces could spell significant changes for the Trump-backed measure. Though should the bill pass out of the Senate it would need to go back to the House to be confirmed before the 1,000-page bill makes its way to Trump's desk for his signature.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tariff dodgers take big risks to cut small corners
If you put up a barrier, people will find a way around it. So its not shocking to read recent news stories about how some businesses are trying to skirt around tariffs – particularly from China. They're shipping goods through third countries, rather than directly from China, using special 'shoppers' to skirt minimum quantity amounts, colluding with suppliers to falsify country-of-origin labels, undervaluing goods, or 'assembling' products out of China where tariffs are lower. They're creating shell companies in more tariff-friendly countries and even going so far as forging certificates of origin (thanks ChatGPT!) and otherwise falsifying shipping documentation in collusion with, or independently from, their suppliers. I get it. Whether you're a supporter or not of the administration's tariff policies, you're still likely fed up with Donald Trump's almost daily changes of his mind, the court cases, the lack of process, the chaos, the Tweets (sorry Xs, no, wait Truths). It's not as if businesses don't do this stuff all the time. For thousands of years, butchers have been putting their fingers on the scale; middlemen pocketed a few stolen pennies or denarii or drachmas behind their customers' backs. I have clients who regularly undervalue (or even hide) their inventory, keep two sets of books, fail to report cash receipts, run their personal expenses through their companies. The list goes on. But none of this is a great idea. As a certified public accountant, I have a professional obligation to not only point this kind of behavior out to my clients but to disengage from providing services to those who are breaking the law, or at the very least demonstrating a significant lack of ethics. I warn them about the downsides: the penalties, the fines, the potential jail time for criminal behavior. I try to make them understand that behaving this way risks ruining relationships with suppliers, customers, partners and employees. If caught it's both professionally and personally humiliating and not the kind of PR that will benefit your company. And it definitely upsets those in the community who are doing their best to abide by the law. And when it comes to tariffs, there are other – legal – ways to either avoid or reduce their impact on your business. You could use bonded or free trade zone warehouses. You could raise prices, cut other costs, invest in technologies. You can use new resources from the Small Business Administration to find domestic suppliers or lean into organizations like the World Trade Center Association to find alternate suppliers in more tariff-friendly locales. And yet, I know – and read – of a not-insignificant number of business people who insist on just skirting the law. Why? It's down to risk. Every decision one makes when running a business – or living your life – involves a risk/reward analysis. Rolling out a new product? It's possible no one buys it. Investing in a piece of property? Getting on an airplane? Crossing the street? We all take risks every day because we want the rewards. Some people have a higher tolerance for this stuff. Those are the ones playing the tariff lottery, risking that their number won't get picked. The business people I know who are willing to take these risks – even if they're on dubious legal grounds – all have a reason to back up their actions. Maybe they were 'completely ignorant, innocent or naïve' about the law. Or they come up with some legal explanation for their actions, regardless of how flimsy or far-fetched. Some of them have no problem throwing their supplier or employee or customer under the bus and then sleeping like a baby that night. They don't just hope that no one finds out. They have a story to tell. Personally, this is not for me. I'm not a big risk taker. And, like most people, I'm a pretty bad liar.
