Auto loan interest becomes tax-deductible under Trump's tax cut
Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans.
The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach.
The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications.
Here are some things to know about the new auto loan interest tax deduction: Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and 'stimulate massive domestic auto production.' The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4.
The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes.
The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break.
U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60% of retail sales are financed with loans.
After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive.
The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda.
Last year, 78% of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico.
General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44% of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14% of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60%), Toyota (52%) and Nissan (48%), which all are headquartered in Japan.
The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end.
At a 9.3% interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5%, which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group.
Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction.
On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed.
At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website.
A website ribbon exclaims: 'CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE' while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why Trump's attacks on Jerome Powell are raising fears for the US economy
United States President Donald Trump has spent months attacking US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell for not moving faster to lower interest rates. While Trump is not the first president to clash with the head of the US central bank on monetary policy, he has gone further than his predecessor by threatening to fire Powell and pressuring him to resign. Trump's barbs have raised concerns about the prospect of the Fed losing its independence, which would have serious ramifications for the US economy. What has Trump said about Powell? Trump's main gripe with Powell has been the Fed's decision to keep its benchmark interest rate in the range of 4.25 to 4.50 percent. The US central bank has resisted calls to lower the rate, which would spur economic growth by reducing borrowing costs across the economy, to keep a lid on inflation. While inflation remains modest at present, Powell and his colleagues fear that prices could rise significantly in the coming weeks and months due to Trump's tariffs. Trump has argued that the rate should be as low as 1 percent. Trump has been at odds with Powell since his first term, when he nominated him to the top job, but the president began ramping up his attacks in April, when he branded the monetary policy chief 'a major loser' and 'numbskull' whose 'termination cannot come fast enough'. Since then, Trump has made conflicting remarks about whether he intends to fire Powell, and last week asked a group of Republican lawmakers for their opinion on the matter. While Trump continues to blast Powell on social media, other top White House officials have joined the condemnation. Earlier this month, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought accused Powell of mishandling the 'ostentatious' $2.5bn refurbishment of the Fed's headquarters in Washington, DC. On Tuesday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused the Fed of 'persistent mandate creep into areas beyond its core mission' and called for a review of the renovation project. Today in a CNBC interview, I called for a review of the Federal Reserve. It is my belief that the central bank should conduct an exhaustive internal review of its non-monetary policy operations. Significant mission creep and institutional growth have taken the Fed into areas that… — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) July 21, 2025 Does Trump have the power to remove Powell? The Fed chair is harder to remove than the heads of other independent government agencies. Under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the president may remove the head of the central bank 'for cause' – widely interpreted to mean proof of corruption or malfeasance. A landmark 1935 Supreme Court ruling further insulated the Fed from political pressure by explicitly stating that the heads of independent agencies cannot be removed without cause. David Wilcox, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who served on the staff of the Federal Reserve Board, said the Trump Administration appeared to be zoning in on the Fed's renovation project to create a pretext to fire Powell. 'The way they're doing that is they're drumming up a lot of controversy around the expenses that have been incurred and will be incurred in the renovation of two of the historic buildings,' Wilcox told Al Jazeera. 'The drumbeat of criticism seems to be that Powell allegedly has mishandled this situation, and concern is that this very small-scale situation might be somehow blown up into an excuse for firing Powell 'for cause'.' Is there any precedent for Trump's campaign against Powell? In the late 1960s and early 1970s, presidents Lyndon B Johnson and Richard Nixon – a Democrat and a Republican – both famously exerted pressure on the Fed chair to keep interest rates low. Some historians have theorised that Nixon's cajoling of then-Fed chair Arthur Burns stopped him from rolling out rate hikes that could have halted the emergence of double-digit inflation in the mid-1970s. 'What does compromising central bank independence do? It runs the possibility of giving some kind of short-term gain for long-term pain,' Mark Spindel, the CIO of Potomac River Capital and a Federal Reserve historian, told Al Jazeera. 'And politicians have short memories.' How will markets react if Powell is removed? Suggestions that Trump could remove Powell have roiled markets on several occasions. On Wednesday, the benchmark US S&P 500 briefly fell by 0.7 percent, and the US dollar sank 0.9 percent, following reports that Trump had asked Republican lawmakers whether he should fire the Fed chair. Stocks recovered a short time later after Trump denied that he had any plans to remove Powell, the latest example of what investors have dubbed the 'TACO Trade' – short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. If Trump were to follow through on his threat to remove Powell, the stock market and confidence in the US economy would take a major hit, Wilcox said. 'It would probably be reflected in an increase in the expected inflation that's built into borrowing rates. It would be reflected in an increase in the risk premiums that are built into long-term Treasury rates,' he added. 'It would probably be reflected in a weakening of the US dollar because of a loss in confidence that would follow from the knocking down of yet one more signature aspect [of the economy] that has been taken for granted for many decades.' Why might Trump not want to fire Powell? Fed historian Spindel said Trump may ultimately decide to keep Powell despite his threats. The Fed chairman's term expires in May next year, Spindel said, and, until then, Trump can use Powell as a scapegoat for any problems with the economy. As a businessman, Trump also considers the stock market an important barometer of success, Spindel added. 'The market is an important governor on his policies,' he said. 'He has a large constituency in the corporate sector. He obviously enjoys support from the middle and upper wealthy class, and he doesn't want to torpedo the equity market.'
Qatar Tribune
16 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Japan's Ishiba vows to stay to tackle inflation, US tariffs despite election loss
Agencies Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Monday he would remain in office to address key challenges, including surging prices and steep U.S. tariffs, despite his coalition's election loss over the weekend that left it with a minority in both chambers of parliament and sparked calls for his resignation. Ishiba's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its junior coalition partner Komeito were short three seats to maintain a majority in the 248-seat upper house in Sunday's vote. Though the LDP is still the leading party, its ruling coalition is now a minority in both houses of the Diet, or parliament, which makes it difficult for the coalition to pass any legislation. The loss of a majority in Sunday's election does not immediately lead to a change of government because the upper house lacks the power to file a no-confidence motion against a leader. With opposition too fractured to form a united front powerful enough to topple the ruling coalition, Ishiba is under more pressure to step down from ultraconservative rivals in his own party. Ishiba said he takes the result seriously but that his priority is to avoid creating a political vacuum and to tackle impending challenges, including the Aug. 1 deadline for a tariff deal with the U.S. 'While I painfully feel my serious responsibility over the election results, I believe I must also fulfill my responsibility I bear for the country and the people so as not to cause politics to stall or go adrift,' Ishiba said. 'Challenges such as global situation and natural disaster won't wait for a better political situation.' His chief tariff negotiator, Economic Minister Ryosei Akazawa, is heading to Washington for his eighth round of talks. The prime minister hopes to reach a mutually beneficial deal and meet with U.S. President Donald Trump 'as soon as possible,' he said. Sunday's vote comes after Ishiba's coalition lost a majority in the October lower house election, stung by past corruption scandals, and his unpopular government has since been forced into making concessions to the opposition to get legislation through parliament. It has been unable to quickly deliver effective measures to mitigate rising prices, including Japan's traditional staple of rice, and dwindling wages. Trump has added to the pressure, complaining about a lack of progress in trade negotiations and the lack of sales of U.S. autos and American-grown rice to Japan despite a shortfall in domestic stocks of the grain. A 25% tariff due to take effect Aug. 1 has been another blow for Ishiba. At a news conference Monday, Ishiba said his LDP and the Komeito have agreed to stick with their coalition while seeking further cooperation from opposition parties. Ishiba resisted calls for his resignation and did not say how much longer he planned to stay on. He is sticking around for the country and the people, not for self-interest, 'to put the pressing issues on a path to a solution,' he said. Voters frustrated with price increases exceeding the pace of wage hikes, especially younger people who have long felt ignored by the ruling government's focus on senior voters, rapidly turned to emerging conservative and right-wing populist parties. Established liberal to centrist parties, including the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, gained little ground. The Democratic Party for the People quadrupled its seats by campaigning for higher take-home pay. The right-wing Sanseito, running on a 'Japanese First' platform that puts tougher regulations on foreigners and brakes on gender and sexual diversity, surged to number three in the opposition. The LDP has lost support due to the people's discontent over the party's measures for rising prices, foreign residents and other reasons and that he will 'quickly analyze the results and learn the lesson,' Ishiba said. None of the opposition parties said they want to form a full-fledged alliance with the governing coalition, but are open to cooperating on policy. CDPJ leader Yoshihiko Noda told broadcaster NHK that his priority is to form an alliance among the opposition. 'Public opinion clearly said 'no' to the Ishiba government,' Noda said. Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya told NHK late Sunday he is open to cooperating with the ruling bloc on conservative policies. While he said his party did better than expected, he would wait to gain more seats in the other house in the next election and attempt to form a multi-party coalition like in Europe. The Sanseito party's stance encouraged the spread of xenophobic rhetoric in the campaign and on social media, while also attracting people who are struggling with economic woes and looking for targets to vent their discontent and anxiety, experts say. The language triggered protests from rights activists and alarmed foreign residents.
Qatar Tribune
16 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
ECB expected to hold rates as tariff uncertainty lingers
Agencies The European Central Bank is set to hold interest rates for the first time in almost a year when policymakers meet this week, despite concerns over the potential impact of higher US tariffs on the eurozone economy. The 26 members of the ECB's governing council will meet just over a week before an August 1 deadline set by US President Donald Trump for the imposition of his government's punitive tariffs. Trump has threatened to triple a basic tariff on imports from the EU to 30 percent if Brussels does not cut a deal by the end of the month, casting uncertainty over the future of transatlantic trade. But the ECB was expected to hold tight on rates instead of preempting the outcome of negotiations, pausing a series of cuts that goes back to September. The central bank has reduced its benchmark rate a total of eight times since June last year and at each of its last seven meetings, bringing it down to two percent. The rapid reduction in rates has come as eurozone inflation has fallen back towards the ECB's two-percent target from the double-digit highs seen in 2022. In June, eurozone inflation sat exactly on the ECB's target and was forecast by officials at the central bank to even out at two percent for the year. The ECB would 'almost certainly leave interest rates unchanged' at the conclusion of its monetary policy meeting on Thursday, analysts from Italian bank UniCredit said in a note. 'The central bank will now want to have more clarity on the trade outlook before it considers adjusting its policy further,' they said. Despite the murky outlook, the ECB was in a 'good place' to deal with what comes next, executive board member Isabel Schnabel told financial news service Econostream Media this month. And with the euro area economy showing some signs of life despite Trump's threats on tariffs, 'the bar for another rate cut is very high', she said. Euro area factory output has grown four months in a row and the bloc's manufacturing PMI—a survey-based measure of manufacturer's overall health—rose in June to its highest level since August 2022. The improving picture painted by recent indicators could, however, be shattered were Trump to follow through with additional tariffs on top of steep existing levies on auto manufacturers, steel and aluminum. The saber-rattling from the Oval Office over trade—and Trump's repeated attacks on the US Federal Reserve's independence—have otherwise had the impact of weakening the dollar against the euro. Were the euro to rise much further it would make matters 'much more complicated', ECB Vice President Luis de Guindos told Bloomberg TV this month. A stronger single currency brought with it the risk of undershooting the ECB's inflation target by making imports cheaper and cooling the economy, while making European exports more expensive. Already, the ECB's forecasts published last month predict inflation to fall to 1.6 percent in 2026, before recovering to two percent the following year. A strong euro meant rate cuts later in the year were a matter of 'when and by how much and not if', ING bank analyst Carsten Brzeski said. The question would get 'more attention' at forthcoming ECB gatherings, Brzeski said, but the uncertainty over US tariffs argued in favor a 'wait-and-see approach'. Trump had upped the threatened level of tariffs on EU exports to the United States since the ECB's last meeting but where they would land after August 1 was uncertain. With the EU locked in talks with Washington to avoid higher tariffs, the necessary 'clarity is unlikely to emerge by next Thursday', UniCredit analysts said. A pause was likely before another cut later in the year, perhaps already in September, the first meeting after the summer, they said.
