
Why Trump's attacks on Jerome Powell are raising fears for the US economy
While Trump is not the first president to clash with the head of the US central bank on monetary policy, he has gone further than his predecessor by threatening to fire Powell and pressuring him to resign.
Trump's barbs have raised concerns about the prospect of the Fed losing its independence, which would have serious ramifications for the US economy.
What has Trump said about Powell?
Trump's main gripe with Powell has been the Fed's decision to keep its benchmark interest rate in the range of 4.25 to 4.50 percent.
The US central bank has resisted calls to lower the rate, which would spur economic growth by reducing borrowing costs across the economy, to keep a lid on inflation.
While inflation remains modest at present, Powell and his colleagues fear that prices could rise significantly in the coming weeks and months due to Trump's tariffs.
Trump has argued that the rate should be as low as 1 percent.
Trump has been at odds with Powell since his first term, when he nominated him to the top job, but the president began ramping up his attacks in April, when he branded the monetary policy chief 'a major loser' and 'numbskull' whose 'termination cannot come fast enough'.
Since then, Trump has made conflicting remarks about whether he intends to fire Powell, and last week asked a group of Republican lawmakers for their opinion on the matter.
While Trump continues to blast Powell on social media, other top White House officials have joined the condemnation.
Earlier this month, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought accused Powell of mishandling the 'ostentatious' $2.5bn refurbishment of the Fed's headquarters in Washington, DC.
On Tuesday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused the Fed of 'persistent mandate creep into areas beyond its core mission' and called for a review of the renovation project.
Today in a CNBC interview, I called for a review of the Federal Reserve. It is my belief that the central bank should conduct an exhaustive internal review of its non-monetary policy operations. Significant mission creep and institutional growth have taken the Fed into areas that…
— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) July 21, 2025
Does Trump have the power to remove Powell?
The Fed chair is harder to remove than the heads of other independent government agencies.
Under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the president may remove the head of the central bank 'for cause' – widely interpreted to mean proof of corruption or malfeasance.
A landmark 1935 Supreme Court ruling further insulated the Fed from political pressure by explicitly stating that the heads of independent agencies cannot be removed without cause.
David Wilcox, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who served on the staff of the Federal Reserve Board, said the Trump Administration appeared to be zoning in on the Fed's renovation project to create a pretext to fire Powell.
'The way they're doing that is they're drumming up a lot of controversy around the expenses that have been incurred and will be incurred in the renovation of two of the historic buildings,' Wilcox told Al Jazeera.
'The drumbeat of criticism seems to be that Powell allegedly has mishandled this situation, and concern is that this very small-scale situation might be somehow blown up into an excuse for firing Powell 'for cause'.'
Is there any precedent for Trump's campaign against Powell?
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, presidents Lyndon B Johnson and Richard Nixon – a Democrat and a Republican – both famously exerted pressure on the Fed chair to keep interest rates low.
Some historians have theorised that Nixon's cajoling of then-Fed chair Arthur Burns stopped him from rolling out rate hikes that could have halted the emergence of double-digit inflation in the mid-1970s.
'What does compromising central bank independence do? It runs the possibility of giving some kind of short-term gain for long-term pain,' Mark Spindel, the CIO of Potomac River Capital and a Federal Reserve historian, told Al Jazeera.
'And politicians have short memories.'
How will markets react if Powell is removed?
Suggestions that Trump could remove Powell have roiled markets on several occasions.
On Wednesday, the benchmark US S&P 500 briefly fell by 0.7 percent, and the US dollar sank 0.9 percent, following reports that Trump had asked Republican lawmakers whether he should fire the Fed chair.
Stocks recovered a short time later after Trump denied that he had any plans to remove Powell, the latest example of what investors have dubbed the 'TACO Trade' – short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'.
If Trump were to follow through on his threat to remove Powell, the stock market and confidence in the US economy would take a major hit, Wilcox said.
'It would probably be reflected in an increase in the expected inflation that's built into borrowing rates. It would be reflected in an increase in the risk premiums that are built into long-term Treasury rates,' he added.
'It would probably be reflected in a weakening of the US dollar because of a loss in confidence that would follow from the knocking down of yet one more signature aspect [of the economy] that has been taken for granted for many decades.'
Why might Trump not want to fire Powell?
Fed historian Spindel said Trump may ultimately decide to keep Powell despite his threats.
The Fed chairman's term expires in May next year, Spindel said, and, until then, Trump can use Powell as a scapegoat for any problems with the economy.
As a businessman, Trump also considers the stock market an important barometer of success, Spindel added.
'The market is an important governor on his policies,' he said.
'He has a large constituency in the corporate sector. He obviously enjoys support from the middle and upper wealthy class, and he doesn't want to torpedo the equity market.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Has the US cancelled free speech?
Why are US professors suing to challenge the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestine activism? Several groups of professors in the United States are suing the Trump administration over its policy of arresting, detaining, cancelling visas, and deporting students who participate in pro-Palestinian advocacy. The crackdown on free speech is creating a chilling effect across US academia, argues Jamil Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which is one of the organisations that brought the lawsuit. Jaffer tells host Steve Clemons that the issue is much wider than the rights of non-citizens in the country. The government's actions have the effect of 'stifling a political viewpoint that the government doesn't like'.


Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US-EU trade talks: Will the EU chief clinch a deal with Trump?
United States President Donald Trump is scheduled to hold crunch talks with European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland after weeks of intense trade talks between the two sides as Brussels aims to ink a deal with Washington to avoid a transatlantic trade war. Von der Leyen, the European Commission president, will meet with the US president at his Turnberry golf club in Scotland on Sunday. European ministers are hoping the meeting will result in a deal to avoid the 30 percent tariffs that Trump has threatened on EU goods. According to people involved in the talks, European negotiators are aiming for tariffs to be set at 15 percent. Trump told reporters on Friday that the bloc 'want[s] to make a deal very badly'. On July 12, Trump threatened to impose the 30 percent tariffs if no agreement could be secured by his deadline, which expires on Friday. That would come on top of the 25 percent tariffs on cars and car parts and 50 percent levies on steel and aluminium already in place. The EU, Washington's biggest trading partner, has been a frequent target of Trump's escalating trade rhetoric with the president accusing the bloc of 'ripping off' the US. In 2024, EU exports to the US totalled 532 billion euros ($603bn). Pharmaceuticals, car parts and industrial chemicals were among the largest exports, according to EU data. Will the Trump-von der Leyen meeting achieve a breakthrough and end the uncertainty in transatlantic trade ties? What are the main differences between the two sides? The US president told reporters at Turnberry on Friday that there are '20 sticking points'. When asked what they were, he said: 'Well, I don't want to tell you what the sticking points are.' At the same time, he described von der Leyen as a 'highly respected woman' and predicted their meeting on Sunday would be 'good', rating the chances of a deal as '50-50'. On the European side, it is understood that a growing number of EU countries are calling for Brussels to push ahead with an already prepared retaliatory tariffs package on 90 billion euros ($109bn) of US goods, including car parts and bourbon, if talks break down. The two sides, which traded 1.6 trillion euros ($1.8 trillion) in goods and services in 2023, have been negotiating since April 9 when Trump paused what he calls his 'reciprocal' tariffs, which he placed on nearly all countries. During that time, the US has been charging a flat 10 percent levy on all EU products as well as 25 percent on cars and 50 percent on steel and aluminium. This month, EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said: 'We have to protect the EU economy, and we need to go for these rebalancing measures.' Still, the bloc is understood to be rife with disagreement over trade policies with the US. While Germany has urged a quick deal to safeguard its industries, other EU members, particularly France, have insisted EU negotiators must not cave in to an asymmetrical deal that favours the US. On Saturday, von der Leyen spokesperson Paula Pinho said: 'Intensive negotiations at technical and political [level] have been ongoing between the EU and US. Leaders will now take stock and consider the scope for a balanced outcome that provides stability and predictability for businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic.' What have the US and EU traded with each other? In 2024, the US-EU goods trade reached nearly $1 trillion, making the EU the single largest trading partner of the US. In total, the US bought $235.6bn more in goods than it sold to the 27 countries that make up the EU. On the other hand, the US earned a surplus on services trade with the EU. The US mainly bought pharmaceutical products from the EU as well as mechanical appliances, cars and other nonrailway vehicles – totalling roughly $606bn. The US exported fuel, pharmaceutical products, machinery and aircraft to the EU to the tune of $370bn. Why have they struggled to ink a deal so far? Like all the nations the US runs a trade deficit with, Trump has long accused the EU of swindling his country and is determined that Brussels adopt measures to lower its goods trade surplus with the US. Washington has repeatedly raised concerns over Europe's value-added tax as well as its regulations on food exports and IT services. Trump has argued that these controls act as nontariff trade barriers. Indeed, Sefcovic recently told the Financial Times that he wants to reduce the US-EU trade deficit by buying more US gas, weapons and farm products. And while European leaders want the lowest tariffs possible, they 'also want to be respected as the partners that we are', French President Emmanuel Macron said on Wednesday. On July 14, meanwhile, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels that 'we should prepare to be ready to use all the tools'. He added: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war.' Negotiators in Scotland are hoping it doesn't come to that. This month, Oxford Economics, an economic forecasting consultancy, estimated that a 30 percent tariff could push the EU 'to the edge of recession'. Countermeasures from the EU would also hit certain US industries hard. European tariffs could reduce US farmers' and auto workers' incomes, which are key Trump constituencies.


Al Jazeera
9 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's ceasefire push fails to stop Thailand-Cambodia border clashes
Cambodia and Thailand have traded accusations of artillery attacks hours after United States President Donald Trump said both countries had agreed to hash out a ceasefire. The attacks on Sunday came after both sides said they were willing to start talks to end the fighting over their border dispute after Trump spoke to their leaders late on Saturday. Four days after the worst fighting in more than a decade broke out between the Southeast Asian neighbours, the death toll stood above 30, including 13 civilians in Thailand and eight in Cambodia. More than 200,000 people have also been evacuated from border areas in the two countries, authorities said. Cambodia said it fully endorsed Trump's call for an immediate ceasefire. Thailand, on the other hand, said while it was grateful to Trump, it could not begin talks while Cambodia was targeting its civilians, a claim that Phnom Penh has denied. 'We have proposed a bilateral between our foreign ministers to conclude the conditions for a ceasefire and drawing back troops and long-range weapons,' acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai told reporters before heading off to visit border areas. But artillery fire erupted on Sunday morning, and both nations blamed each other for the attacks. Cambodia's Ministry of National Defence said Thailand shelled and launched ground assaults on Sunday morning at a number of points along the border. The ministry's spokesperson said heavy artillery was fired at historic temple complexes. The Thai army, meanwhile, said Cambodian forces fired shots into several areas, including near civilian homes, early on Sunday and were mobilising long-range rocket launchers. 'Both governments today … blaming the other side for initiating the attacks, saying they both want a ceasefire but the other side has to meet certain conditions first. … We are reaching this sort of deadlock where neither side is able to stand back,' Al Jazeera's Tony Cheng said, reporting from the Thai province of Surin along the Thai-Cambodia border. 'We just checked in with some contacts on the border. They say they are still hearing exchanges of artillery fire. There were heavy barrages going in from Thailand, most of it from the Thai side going across into Cambodia, but some … rockets coming back in exchange.' Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over undemarcated points along their 817km (508-mile) land border with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples of Ta Moan Thom and the 11th century Preah Vihear central to the dispute. Preah Vihear was awarded to Cambodia by the International Court of Justice in 1962, but tensions escalated in 2008 after Cambodia tried to list it as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and skirmishes over several years killed at least a dozen people. Ceasefire push Trump on Saturday said he had spoken with Phumtham and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and they had agreed to meet immediately to quickly work out a ceasefire to end the fighting, which began on Thursday. 'Both Parties are looking for an immediate Ceasefire and Peace,' Trump wrote on social media, adding that tariff negotiations with both the countries were on hold until the fighting stopped. Hun Manet said his foreign minister, Prak Sokhonn, will speak with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to coordinate with the Thais and warned Bangkok against reneging on any agreement. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres also urged both sides on Saturday to 'immediately agree to a ceasefire' and hold talks to find a lasting solution. As fighting continues, those evacuated from areas along the border in both countries are being 'relatively well cared for' at evacuation centres, Cheng said. 'They've got basic things like food, water, a little bit of bedding, but they came with virtually nothing, and they don't know if they're going to be here for days, weeks or even months,' he said from a centre in Surin, where 3,000 people are staying. Civilians on both sides are urging a ceasefire be implemented soon. 'For me, I think it is great if Thailand agreed to stop fighting so both countries can live with peace,' Phnom Penh university student Sreung Nita told the Reuters news agency. A resident in Sisaket in northeastern Thailand, Thavorn Toosawan, told Reuters that 'if there is a ceasefire, things will be better.' 'It's great that America is insisting on the ceasefire because it would bring peace.'