logo
The Era Of Online Age Checks Is Here - How Does It Work?

The Era Of Online Age Checks Is Here - How Does It Work?

Gulf Insider4 days ago
In the United States, at least 24 states have already passed laws requiring pornography sites to verify users' ages, according to the Age Verification Providers Association.
A handful of countries, including Germany, France, Australia, and Ireland, have implemented age verification to access specified content, from social media access to pornography.
At the end of July, the UK rolled out the most comprehensive national system so far.
How does age verification work in practice? What are the loopholes? And how might it reshape the internet? Here's what the experts say.
Age‑verification systems range from uploading a photo of an identification such as a driver's license to advanced biometric scans.
The Age Verification Providers Association lists several approved methods for age checks, including mobile phone account verification, credit database matching, transactional records, and digital ID apps.
Some platforms ask users to upload a government‑issued ID, while others rely on mobile phone account data, banking or credit records, or digital ID apps to confirm age.
Increasingly, sites are turning to biometric solutions, such as facial analysis that estimates age from a selfie or a brief movement check.
Reddit, for example, uses the third‑party service Persona to verify either an ID or a live selfie, while Discord relies on k‑ID, which confirms age by analyzing facial movements. X combines internal account signals with optional ID checks.
Porn sites like Pornhub offer a mix of options, such as requiring a photo ID or running a credit card check before users can view sexually explicit material.
Mary Ann Miller, vice president and fraud adviser at Prove, a digital identity verification platform, said that age verification will become more standard and required over the next 24 months.
Miller said that simpler methods include uploading a government-issued ID that is sometimes checked for authenticity or a selfie taken to ensure identity accuracy and that the person is alive.
'Other methods use solutions that leverage technology that uses the phone as a proxy for our identity since we have them with us 'all the time' and determine the assurance and trust of the person presenting information or attesting their age or attesting for a child's age as part of parental consent,' she told The Epoch Times by email.
'Other methods include age estimation from facial recognition or other data sources.'
In terms of which methods are most reliable, Miller pointed to those that 'can use passive techniques to determine identity assurance first, then age verification as part of an identity flow.'
Passive identity assurance techniques verify a user's identity without requiring the user to actively perform actions—such as entering a password or scanning a fingerprint—by using data already available to infer age, including credit cards, IP addresses, or other information.
Businesses in the near future will have to overhaul their age‑verification systems to meet stricter standards, rather than relying on low‑accuracy or patchwork identity checks.
'What has taken many businesses by surprise is that when they try to apply age verification with low-accuracy identity checks or the absence of identity checks, they have to 'go back to the drawing board' on both aspects,' she said.
Biometric age estimation can be conducted using facial analysis.
Other methods include voice blueprints, gestures, and keystrokes (how you type). These methods are currently less well-developed than facial analysis but are progressing quickly.
Derek Jackson, chief operations officer and cofounder of Cyber Dive, a tech company founded with the mission of keeping children safe online, told The Epoch Times by email that facial biometrics are 'newer but catching on quickly.'
'They estimate your age by analyzing your facial features, cheekbones, eye spacing, skin tone, in real time,' Jackson said. 'Voice biometrics and keystroke patterns are even newer. They try to match your unique patterns, your voice pitch, how fast or slow you type to known age profiles.'
He said that facial recognition is growing quickly because 'it's simple, fast, and surprisingly effective.'
Users remain wary about sharing personal data online, especially government IDs or biometrics.
Denis Vyazovoy, chief product officer of AdGuard VPN, said that some platforms attempt to be more privacy-aware by, for example, not permanently storing selfies or ID documents or keeping data for just seven days.
'But even with such reassurances, trust is low,' he told The Epoch Times by email.
'Even though platforms claim that facial data or ID scans are not stored long-term, people remain wary, and rightfully so. The truth is, any method that requires biometric data, government ID, or sensitive financial information introduces serious privacy risks.'
The UK's Online Safety Act does not mandate a single method of age verification. The UK's tech regulator Ofcom, which is in charge of policing the law, just requires companies to implement highly effective age assurances.
The law focuses on keeping under‑18s out of adult spaces but does not tell companies how to achieve this goal, leaving firms to choose their own verification systems as long as they are 'highly effective.'
But failure to implement a system can result in financial penalties of up to 10 percent of a service's qualifying worldwide revenue, or 18 million pounds ($23.9 million), whichever is greater. The Online Safety Act is a UK-specific law, but it affects U.S. and global companies with no legal presence in the country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI Brings GPT-4o Back After Users Revolt Over GPT-5
OpenAI Brings GPT-4o Back After Users Revolt Over GPT-5

Gulf Insider

time16 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

OpenAI Brings GPT-4o Back After Users Revolt Over GPT-5

Updates to ChatGPT:You can now choose between 'Auto', 'Fast', and 'Thinking' for GPT-5. Most users will want Auto, but the additional control will be useful for some limits are now 3,000 messages/week with GPT-5 Thinking, and then extra capacity on GPT-5 Thinking… — Sam Altman (@sama) August 13, 2025 OpenAI has brought back GPT-4o following the rollout of their latest GPT-5 model, after users complained that the new model was lame in comparison. The company advertised the new model as the 'smartest, fastest, most useful model yet,' which uses a 'real-time router' to switch between more efficient models for basic questions vs. deeper reasoning for more complex demands. During a Reddit AMA, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman responded to a question by saying that GPT-5's writing quality is better than previous models – only to have several Redditors say the new model felt 'sterile' and 'much worse' – and answered 'briefly and dryly,' according to engadget . 'We for sure underestimated how much some of the things that people like in GPT-4o matter to them, even if GPT-5 performs better in most ways,' Altman posted on X. The return of GPT-4o was celebrated, but there's still no guarantee that OpenAI will keep its older model around indefinitely. In the same X post, Altman said that OpenAI 'will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for.' In the meantime, OpenAI is focusing on finishing the GPT-5 rollout and making changes that will 'make it warmer.' However, for users who have grown attached to GPT-4o as more than just an AI chatbot, this could be the beginning of the end. OpenAI called GPT-5 a 'significant upgrade' which used PhD-level intelligence and amazing coding skills, only for users to immediately complain. 'I've been trying GPT5 for a few days now. Even after customizing instructions, it still doesn't feel the same. It's more technical, more generalized, and honestly feels emotionally distant,' wrote one Redditor. 'Kill 4o isn't innovation, it's erasure.' 'Sure, 5 is fine—if you hate nuance and feeling things,' wrote another user. On Friday, Altman took to X to say that the company would keep the previous model running for Plus users, and promised to implement fixes to improve GPT-5's performance and user experience. Altman also promised to double GPT-5 rate limits for ChatGPT Plus users, saying 'We will continue to work to get things stable and will keep listening to feedback.' As Wired notes further; The backlash has sparked a fresh debate over the psychological attachments some users form with chatbots trained to push their emotional buttons. Some Reddit users dismissed complaints about GPT-5 as evidence of an unhealthy dependence on an AI companion. In March, OpenAI published research exploring the emotional bonds users form with its models. Shortly after, the company issued an update to GPT-4o, after it became too sycophantic. 'It seems that GPT-5 is less sycophantic, more 'business' and less chatty,' says Pattie Maes, a professor at MIT who worked on the study. 'I personally think of that as a good thing because it is also what led to delusions, bias reinforcement, etc. But unfortunately many users like a model that tells them they are smart and amazing, and that confirms their opinions and beliefs, even if [they are] wrong.' Also read: Swedish PM Slammed After Admitting He Uses ChatGPT To Help Run Government

The Era Of Online Age Checks Is Here - How Does It Work?
The Era Of Online Age Checks Is Here - How Does It Work?

Gulf Insider

time4 days ago

  • Gulf Insider

The Era Of Online Age Checks Is Here - How Does It Work?

In the United States, at least 24 states have already passed laws requiring pornography sites to verify users' ages, according to the Age Verification Providers Association. A handful of countries, including Germany, France, Australia, and Ireland, have implemented age verification to access specified content, from social media access to pornography. At the end of July, the UK rolled out the most comprehensive national system so far. How does age verification work in practice? What are the loopholes? And how might it reshape the internet? Here's what the experts say. Age‑verification systems range from uploading a photo of an identification such as a driver's license to advanced biometric scans. The Age Verification Providers Association lists several approved methods for age checks, including mobile phone account verification, credit database matching, transactional records, and digital ID apps. Some platforms ask users to upload a government‑issued ID, while others rely on mobile phone account data, banking or credit records, or digital ID apps to confirm age. Increasingly, sites are turning to biometric solutions, such as facial analysis that estimates age from a selfie or a brief movement check. Reddit, for example, uses the third‑party service Persona to verify either an ID or a live selfie, while Discord relies on k‑ID, which confirms age by analyzing facial movements. X combines internal account signals with optional ID checks. Porn sites like Pornhub offer a mix of options, such as requiring a photo ID or running a credit card check before users can view sexually explicit material. Mary Ann Miller, vice president and fraud adviser at Prove, a digital identity verification platform, said that age verification will become more standard and required over the next 24 months. Miller said that simpler methods include uploading a government-issued ID that is sometimes checked for authenticity or a selfie taken to ensure identity accuracy and that the person is alive. 'Other methods use solutions that leverage technology that uses the phone as a proxy for our identity since we have them with us 'all the time' and determine the assurance and trust of the person presenting information or attesting their age or attesting for a child's age as part of parental consent,' she told The Epoch Times by email. 'Other methods include age estimation from facial recognition or other data sources.' In terms of which methods are most reliable, Miller pointed to those that 'can use passive techniques to determine identity assurance first, then age verification as part of an identity flow.' Passive identity assurance techniques verify a user's identity without requiring the user to actively perform actions—such as entering a password or scanning a fingerprint—by using data already available to infer age, including credit cards, IP addresses, or other information. Businesses in the near future will have to overhaul their age‑verification systems to meet stricter standards, rather than relying on low‑accuracy or patchwork identity checks. 'What has taken many businesses by surprise is that when they try to apply age verification with low-accuracy identity checks or the absence of identity checks, they have to 'go back to the drawing board' on both aspects,' she said. Biometric age estimation can be conducted using facial analysis. Other methods include voice blueprints, gestures, and keystrokes (how you type). These methods are currently less well-developed than facial analysis but are progressing quickly. Derek Jackson, chief operations officer and cofounder of Cyber Dive, a tech company founded with the mission of keeping children safe online, told The Epoch Times by email that facial biometrics are 'newer but catching on quickly.' 'They estimate your age by analyzing your facial features, cheekbones, eye spacing, skin tone, in real time,' Jackson said. 'Voice biometrics and keystroke patterns are even newer. They try to match your unique patterns, your voice pitch, how fast or slow you type to known age profiles.' He said that facial recognition is growing quickly because 'it's simple, fast, and surprisingly effective.' Users remain wary about sharing personal data online, especially government IDs or biometrics. Denis Vyazovoy, chief product officer of AdGuard VPN, said that some platforms attempt to be more privacy-aware by, for example, not permanently storing selfies or ID documents or keeping data for just seven days. 'But even with such reassurances, trust is low,' he told The Epoch Times by email. 'Even though platforms claim that facial data or ID scans are not stored long-term, people remain wary, and rightfully so. The truth is, any method that requires biometric data, government ID, or sensitive financial information introduces serious privacy risks.' The UK's Online Safety Act does not mandate a single method of age verification. The UK's tech regulator Ofcom, which is in charge of policing the law, just requires companies to implement highly effective age assurances. The law focuses on keeping under‑18s out of adult spaces but does not tell companies how to achieve this goal, leaving firms to choose their own verification systems as long as they are 'highly effective.' But failure to implement a system can result in financial penalties of up to 10 percent of a service's qualifying worldwide revenue, or 18 million pounds ($23.9 million), whichever is greater. The Online Safety Act is a UK-specific law, but it affects U.S. and global companies with no legal presence in the country.

Britons Flock To VPNs To Dodge New Age Verification Checks Online
Britons Flock To VPNs To Dodge New Age Verification Checks Online

Gulf Insider

time29-07-2025

  • Gulf Insider

Britons Flock To VPNs To Dodge New Age Verification Checks Online

Downloads of virtual private network (VPN) apps have surged in the UK as users look for ways to bypass new age verification rules introduced after the latest provisions of the Online Safety Act took effect on July 25. The rules require online platforms to implement strict age checks to shield children from content deemed harmful, including bullying, pornography, self-harm, and hateful content. They effectively mean that all adult internet users in the UK must prove they are not children to access certain websites. Rather than upload their ID or have their faces scanned, users are moving towards VPNs. A VPN allows users to establish a secure and encrypted connection over the internet. They effectively mask Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and anonymize online presences, making it more difficult for websites, advertisers, and government agencies to track a user's activities. On July 25, ProtonVPN said on X it was experiencing a surge in sign-ups from UK users. 'Just a few minutes after the Online Safety Act went into effect last night, Proton VPN signups originating in the UK surged by more than 1,400,' ProtonVPN stated. 'Unlike previous surges, this one is sustained, and is significantly higher than when France lost access to adult content.' Created by the former Conservative government as the world's first comprehensive online safety law, the Online Safety Act received Royal Assent in October 2023. The now-Labour government states on its website that platforms 'have a legal duty to protect children online.' Telecommunications regulator Ofcom said on July 25 that the most popular adult service providers, including Pornhub, along with thousands of smaller sites, have committed to deploying age checks across their services. 'This means it will be harder for children in the UK to access online porn than in any other OECD country,' it said, referring to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member nations. Ofcom also said that other online platforms have now announced they will deploy age assurance, including Bluesky, Discord, Grindr, and X. News aggregation website Reddit said that, from July 14, a third-party provider called Persona will perform age verification for the social media platform either through an uploaded selfie or 'a photo of your government ID,' such as a passport. 'Reddit will not have access to the uploaded photo, and Reddit will only store your verification status along with the birthdate you provided so you won't have to re-enter it each time you try to access restricted content,' it said. The Age Verification Providers Association lists several approved methods for age checks, including mobile phone account verification, credit database matching, transactional records, and digital ID apps. Biometric age estimation can be done using facial or even voice blueprints, gestures, and keystrokes (how you type), though it is said that these methods are currently less well-developed than facial analysis, but are progressing fast. Ofcom said that it is now actively checking compliance. If companies fail to comply with their new duties, Ofcom has the power to impose fines and, in very serious cases, apply for a court order to block the site or app in the UK. Google Trends data showed that searches for VPNs in the UK quadrupled following the law's implementation. A recent petition to repeal the act has already gathered more than 350,000 signatures. Many of the top 10 free apps in the UK Apple Store are currently VPNs. Economist Maxwell Marlow told The Epoch Times that he believed that the rise in the use of VPNs is 'indicative of how short-sighted, malicious, and authoritarian this Act is.' 'It seems members from all parties were taken in by the spiel of 'safety first,' disregarding concerned critics and specialists, about how this legislation will only crush freedom of speech and association, and not protect a single vulnerable person,' he said by email. 'Young and old know what VPNs are, no matter if the government tries to prevent their usage, they are ubiquitous and will easily side-step the provisions in the law. The government should repeal this dreadful law,' Marlow said. Conservative Peer Lord Daniel Moylan told The Epoch Times that during the passage of the Online Safety Act, he challenged the government over the 'unintended effects of implementing blanket protections for children from harm.' 'The government was not keen to engage and, remarkably, expressed confidence in Ofcom to get these fine balances right,' he said via email. 'I'm not surprised that many people appear to be seeking to circumvent requirements to disclose personal details to often foreign websites with no proven track record of data security. Wasn't this predictable? And how many of those doing so are in fact children?' Moylan previously told NTD's 'British Thought Leaders' that while the intention to protect children is 'laudable,' he doesn't believe that seeking to 'regulate the entire internet is a proportionate or effective answer to that particular problem.' An Ofcom spokesman told The Epoch Times by email that some teenagers might bypass checks. 'Until now, kids could easily stumble across porn and other online content that's harmful to them without even looking for it. Age checks will help prevent that. We're now assessing compliance to make sure platforms have them in place, and companies that fall short should expect to face enforcement action,' the spokesperson said. 'But age checks are not a silver bullet, and some determined teenagers may get round them. Ultimately, this needs to work alongside education, awareness campaigns and through supportive conversations with trusted adults.' VPNs are legal in the UK. A government spokesman told The Epoch Times by email that platforms 'have a clear responsibility to prevent children from bypassing safety protections.' 'This includes blocking content that promotes VPNs or other workarounds specifically aimed at young users,' he said. 'Where platforms deliberately target UK children and promote VPN use, they could face enforcement action, including significant financial penalties.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store