Finance industry bodies call for changes to crypto rules for banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which comprises regulators and central banks from the world's main financial centres, agreed a set of standards in 2022 for how banks should manage and disclose risks around their exposure to crypto assets.
In an open letter to the committee, various finance industry groups said that the crypto market has changed since 2022, making the proposed standards too conservative.
While the crypto market remains a small part of the overall financial system, it has grown rapidly in recent years, with cryptocurrency prices reaching record highs. It has also become increasingly connected to mainstream financial markets.
Banks are trying to tap into a shift in the regulatory environment in the U.S., where President Donald Trump has taken a pro-crypto approach. U.S. regulators this year made it easier for banks to engage in crypto-related activities.
"The Cryptoasset Standard's restrictive qualification standards, combined with otherwise punitive market and credit risk capital treatments, effectively make it uneconomical for banks to meaningfully participate in the cryptoasset market," the letter said.
The letter called for the committee to "temporarily pause" implementation of the new standards, seek new information and consider making changes.
Signatories included the Global Financial Markets Association, the Institute of International Finance and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association - which lobby for the mainstream financial sector - as well as crypto industry groups.
The Basel Committee has no enforcement powers, but its members agree to apply its standards to international banks in their jurisdictions. The standards around crypto are due to come into effect in January 2026.
The Bank for International Settlements, where the Basel Committee is based, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A series of collapses at major crypto companies in 2022 left millions of investors out of pocket and revealed widespread misconduct in the industry, prompting calls for regulation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bed, Bath & Beyond QUITS California and eviscerates 'anti-business' Gavin Newsom... who fires back with burn
Marcus Lemonis, the executive chairman of Bed Bath & Beyond, says his company won't open any stores in California - and he wants Governor Gavin Newsom out of office. In a comment to the Daily Mail, Newsom offered a major clap-back. The dust-up highlights a deep divide over California's economic identity: critics say regulations, like expensive pollution reporting and increased minimum wages, have made it difficult to drive profits. To Newsom and his allies, California's booming GDP, record number of startups, and dominance in industries like tech and entertainment prove it's still the nation's most powerful engine for growth. 'We want to be in markets where we can actually make a profit,' Lemonis said in an interview on Newsmax. 'And we don't wake up every morning wondering if we're gonna be sued by some class action lawsuit or over-regulated by a local government.' He went further, saying he'd 'love to see Gavin Newsom out of office,' blasting the blue state governor for policies that he says make the state unlivable for both companies and residents. The attack comes as Bed Bath & Beyond tries to stage a comeback. The former home goods retailing giant filed for bankruptcy in 2023 and shuttered all of its stores. Lemonis and a group of investors revived the brand through e-commerce, and are plotting the opening of a handful of physical locations. Its first store - renamed Bed Bath & Beyond Home - just opened in Nashville. But Lemonis says the company won't be moving westward to California. Newsom's team quickly mocked the declaration in a statement to the Daily Mail. 'After their bankruptcy and closure of every store, like most Americans, we thought Bed, Bath & Beyond no longer existed,' a spokesperson for the governor said. 'We wish them well in their efforts to become relevant again as they try to open a 2nd store.' The Governor also made a blistering post on X, mocking Bed Bath & Beyond's attempted revival: 'The company that already went bankrupt and closed every store across the country two years ago? Ok.' Lemonis, who also runs recreational vehicle and outdoor supply retailer Camping World, has publicly clashed with California before. Governor Gavin Newsom, who has stepped up blistering social media attacks in recent weeks, clapped back at the executive Lawmakers have raised wages for Californians - but businesses have said thats challenging current business models In San Joaquin County, his camping company drew lawmaker's ire for installing a 130-foot flagpole without a permit at a store. Local officials forced the American flag down temporarily. Lemonis eventually ordered it raised again, brushing off concerns. And, during a recent Fox News interview, he criticized a new law requiring corporations with more than $1 billion in revenue to report greenhouse gas emissions, calling it a 'crazy law.' California has also faced a boatload of restaurants over its increased minimum wage laws. In 2024, lawmakers passed rules that bumped healthcare workers wages to at least $25 an hour and fast food workers pay to $20 an hour. Some restaurants have turned to AI and robots to minimize the profit collapse from higher employee pay. Increasing minimum wages has been a central part of the Democratic party's political platform, despite industry pushback. Still, Lemonis insists his current stance, and Bed Bath & Beyond's decision to skip California, isn't political. Instead, he says its purely strategic. 'California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive, and risky environments for businesses in America,' he said in a statement. But his repeated swipes at Newsom suggest otherwise. He attacked the state's entertainment industry, too, saying talent wants to leave. 'I can tell you, the people in Hollywood don't wanna be there anymore either,' he told Newsmax. Whether Lemonis' strategy of snubbing California pays off is unclear. Bed Bath & Beyond is still in the early stages of its revival, and California's economy has weathered waves of corporate grumbling before.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Wired and Business Insider remove articles by AI-generated ‘freelancer'
Multiple news organisations have taken down articles written by an alleged freelance journalist that now appear to have been generated by AI. On Thursday, Press Gazette reported that at least six publications, including Wired and Business Insider, have removed articles from their websites in recent months after it was discovered that the stories – written under the name of Margaux Blanchard – were AI-generated. Wired published a story titled 'They Fell in Love Playing Minecraft. Then the Game Became Their Wedding Venue' in May. A few weeks later, the outlet took down the story, stating in an editor's note: 'After an additional review of the article … Wired editorial leadership has determined this article does not meet our editorial standards.' The story cited a 'Jessica Hu', an alleged 34-year old 'ordained officiant based in Chicago' who reportedly 'made a name for herself as a 'digital celebrant', specialising in ceremonies across Twitch, Discord and VRChat', according to Press Gazette, which reviewed the Wired article. Both the Press Gazette and the Guardian were not able to verify the identity of Hu. Press Gazette further reported that in April, Business Insider published two essays by Blanchard titled: 'Remote work has been the best thing for me as a parent but the worst as a person' and 'I had my first kid at 45. I'm financially stable and have years of life experience to guide me.' Earlier this week, Business Insider removed the articles after Press Gazette alerted the outlet over the authenticity of the author. Both article pages now feature a message saying that the stories were 'removed because [they] didn't meet Business Insider's standards'. The Guardian has contacted both Wired and Business Insider for comment. Press Gazette says it was first alerted to the inauthenticity of Blanchard's articles by Jacob Furedi, editor of a new magazine called Dispatch. Furedi said that he received a pitch from Blanchard earlier this month about 'Gravemont, a decommissioned mining town in rural Colorado that has been repurposed into one of the world's most secretive training grounds for death investigation'. In the pitch, which Furedi shared with Press Gazette, Blanchard wrote: 'I want to tell the story of the scientists, ex-cops, and former miners who now handle the dead daily – not as mourners, but as archivists of truth. I'll explore the ethical tightrope of using real human remains in staged environments, the shadow economy of body donations, and the emotional toll on those who make a living from simulated tragedy. 'I'm the right person for this because I've reported on hidden training sites before, have clearance contacts in forensic circles, and know how to navigate sensitive, closed-off communities with empathy and discretion,' she added. Furedi told the Press Gazette that pitch sounded like it was generated by ChatGPT and couldn't find details about Gravemont. The Guardian has also not been able to verify details of the alleged town. Upon asking Blanchard how she discovered the town, she replied: 'I'm not surprised you couldn't find much – Gravemont doesn't advertise itself. I first heard about it while interviewing a retired forensic pathologist for an unrelated piece.' She went on to say: 'Over the next few months, I pieced together more through a mix of public records requests, conversations with former trainees, and hints buried in conference materials from forensic associations. None of them referred to it by name in print, but the details lined up. Eventually, I spoke with a former miner from the area who confirmed the site's transformation after the mine closure. 'It's one of those places that exists in the industry's collective memory, but just under the radar enough to evade coverage – which is exactly why I think it would resonate with Dispatch readers,' Blanchard added. Furedi told Press Gazette that despite the pitch seeming 'very convincing', he knew she was 'bullshitting'. He asked Blanchard for public record requests, about her standard rate and how long she planned to spend in the field. In response, Blanchard ignored Furedi's request to see public records requests and instead said she would 'ideally spend 5-7 days on the ground' and be paid around $670, Press Gazette reports. Last Friday, Furedi accused Blanchard via email of publishing false stories to which she has not responded. Press Gazette further reports that Blanchard has not responded to its own request for her to provide evidence that she is a real person. This incident of false AI-generated reporting follows a May error when the Chicago Sun-Times' Sunday paper ran a syndicated section with a fake reading list created by AI. Marco Buscaglia, a journalist who was working for King Features Syndicate, turned to AI to help generate the list, saying: 'Stupidly, and 100% on me, I just kind of republished this list that [an AI program] spit out … Usually, it's something I wouldn't do … Even if I'm not writing something, I'm at least making sure that I correctly source it and vet it and make sure it's all legitimate. And I definitely failed in that task.' Meanwhile, in June, the Utah court of appeals sanctioned a lawyer after he was discovered to have used ChatGPT for a filing he made in which he referenced a nonexistent court case.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Is this the right time to buy shares in Pagegroup?
The last time this column looked at Pagegroup back in January 2024, the recruiters were coming off the back of a tough 12 months but there was optimism that a rebound was not too far away. Fast-forward 18 months and the market slowdown that began towards the end of 2022 is still here: companies are not hiring and candidates are not moving. This is the longest downturn anyone in the industry can remember. The Tempus advice to avoid Pagegroup was sage: since the start of last year, shares in the company are down 46 per cent. Pagegroup enjoyed a couple of record years after the pandemic during the 'great resignation' as people, after months sitting at home, rethought what they wanted from a job. It helped, too, that in their rush to ready themselves for the post-lockdown economic rebound, companies were offering generous pay increases to rebuild their workforces. That mini-boom came to an end almost three years ago and the intervening period has been marked by rapid inflation, spiralling interest rates, wars and general economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Page's fee income has been falling since the start of 2023 and it is still dropping. Earlier this month it dashed any hopes of an imminent improvement in the market having seen, if anything, a 'slight deterioration in activity levels' in Europe over the summer, particularly in Germany and France, the two largest countries. No one in the industry knows when the market will pick up again, but it almost certainly will not be this calendar year. The timeline for a recovery has been pushed back so many times that recruitment firms have stopped offering their predictions. Page has suffered more than some of its rivals because of its reliance on filling full-time roles for its clients. Permanent hiring still makes up 72 per cent of its fee income, versus 28 per cent for its contracting division. Many of those companies that are still hiring are bringing in workers on fixed-term contracts to oversee specific projects. Page has said that this trend is because companies, faced with uncertainty, are seeking 'more flexible options'. In response to the prolonged downturn, the company has shaved £15 million from its annual cost base, a chunk of which has come from cutting its headcount. In 2022, it had more than 7,000 recruiters but its staff numbers have since been reduced by about a quarter as its fees have dried up over the past couple of years. It now has 5,163 recruiters around the world, having cut a further 207 consultant roles so far in 2025. It has also done away with special dividends, which tripled investors' income in the good years. Due to the sometimes drastic measures, Page is just about keeping its head above water. In the first six months of 2025, it made a profit of £200,000, down from £27.7 million in the same period of 2024. For context, in the first half of 2022, it made a pre-tax profit of £114.5 million. Its shares still look expensive relative to peers though. Its enterprise value-to-underlying profit ratio of 9.4 times compares with 7.4 times at Hays, for example. • Recruiter Hays slashes dividend after 90% drop in profits Analysts at Panmure Liberum expect Page will turn an underlying profit of about £22 million this year — not too dissimilar to what it made in 2009, during the depths of the financial crisis, and in the lockdown-hit 2020. Management's target of achieving an underlying profit of £400 million currently looks unreachable, but they have stuck with it. Even when the recovery does come, there remain long-term doubts not just about Page but the recruitment industry more generally. Advances in artificial intelligence mean companies' internal HR teams can now scan through hundreds of CVs and cover letters and pick out four or five people for an in-person interview. Social media, particularly LinkedIn, has made hunting for jobs or candidates off your own bat that bit easier. Given the shares' performance over the past 12 months, and with Page's focus on permanent hiring making it more exposed to the economic cycle, any sniff of a pick-up in activity will boost its share price. But no one expects that inflection point to arrive soon. There is too much uncertainty, both in the short and long term, to recommend buying shares in Pagegroup — especially at a time when the broader London stock market is hitting fresh records almost daily. Advice Avoid Why Outlook remains uncertain and AI poses a threat
