logo
Friday night at the Statehouse: Where everyone wants to be

Friday night at the Statehouse: Where everyone wants to be

Politico27-06-2025
Good Friday morning!
Once again, New Jersey is running right up to the budget deadline. The Senate and Assembly budget committees met yesterday and approved dozens of bills. But the budget was not among them.
The plan is for the committees to tackle the budget today at 8 p.m. — the p.m. is not a typo — and have floor votes Monday.
Even as budget drama stirred in the Statehouse — especially with union members protesting the agreement between Gov. Phil Murphy and legislative leaders to find $100 million in savings in the State Health Benefits Plan — legislative leaders said a deal remained firmly in place. They cited the complicated process of drafting it by the Office of Legislative Services as the reason for the delay.
I could give many reasons why the rushed budget process is bad for New Jersey. Like the fact that you don't get to actually see the final budget until a couple days before it passes, enabling legislators to bury controversial items, including pork projects, until they're cemented into law.
Republican state Sen. Michael Testa provided an example of how nothing's really known until it's done by outlining three things he assumed would be in the budget that he considered unconstitutional because of the 'Single Object Clause' against rolling multiple pieces of legislation into one: allowing some school districts to raise property tax rates well beyond the 2 percent cap, Murphy's plan for the health benefits and enabling 16- and 17-year-olds to vote.
'This budget is unconstitutionally jamming through these major policy changes that can never be done without a standalone vote,' Testa said.
Democratic Senate Budget Chair Paul Sarlo shot back that the budget doesn't permit kids to vote but rather provides money to encourage districts to allow it, and that he wasn't sure about allowing school districts. But he stressed 'we haven't seen the language yet on the health care negotiations.'
'We would love to have seen the budget, but no one's seen it,' shot back Senate Republican Budget Officer Declan O'Scanlon.
'It will lay over all weekend for the entire state to see it,' Sarlo said.
Enjoy your weekend reading the budget, New Jersey!
FEEDBACK? Reach me at mfriedman@politico.com
WHERE'S MURPHY — In New York for a street naming ceremony at noon
QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'We haven't seen the language yet on the health care system, so you're assuming I'm assuming, or you go by what you read in the press?' — Paul Sarlo, to Mike Testa on the budget
POLL OF THE DAY: Sixty-five percent of New Jerseyans think the state's beaches should be free to residents, according to a Stockton poll
HAPPY BIRTHDAY — Gail Gordon, Scarlett Rajski Martin, Nathan Rudy, Jim Schulz. Saturday for Teresa Ruiz, Alana Burman, Joe Doria, John Wisniewski, Reginald Bledsoe, Colleen McCann, Adya Beasley. Sunday for Claire Swift, Mike Rispoli.
WHAT TRENTON MADE
WHO YOU TALKIN' TO, WILLIS? — 'A bizarre N.J. corruption case ends with a plea over kickbacks, fraud and plagiarism,' by NJ Advance Media's Ted Sherman: 'Five years after former state Assemblyman Willis Edwards III was indicted in a wide-ranging corruption scheme in 2020, the one-time business administrator of the city of Orange abruptly entered into a plea deal this week to admit guilt to five of the 31 counts against him. Edwards acknowledged approving a fake 'management oversight' contract with a company he helped set up and receiving thousands in kickbacks from the deal, according to court filings. He also pleaded guilty to charges of mortgage and tax fraud. And, strangely enough, he admitted using public funds to pay a consultant to write his dissertation for a graduate program at Seton Hall University. The other 26 counts of the indictment against him, including charges that thousands in federal funds intended for a children's literacy program were instead funneled into a company he controlled, and separate allegations that he steered a no-bid computer consulting contract to an associate, were dismissed as part of the agreement. His plea came as court records showed a trial date had finally been scheduled for August, following continual deferrals of the matter over years and years, during which time Edwards, 54, remained free on bail … The plea agreement filed with the court, meanwhile, made no specific mention of whether Edwards had been cooperating, or why the matter had been deferred for so long.'
ELDERCARE — Legislation inspired by Spadea's fundraising practices advances, by POLITICO's Matt Friedman: Candidates and leaders of PACs that sign up unwitting contributors for recurring donations would face criminal charges and big fines under legislation that began advancing Thursday in Trenton. The mainly Republican-sponsored 'Political Donations Transparency Act,' inspired by former GOP gubernatorial candidate Bill Spadea's fundraising practices, on Thursday won the unanimous approval of the Assembly Budget Committee without debate. POLITICO reported in February that fundraising solicitations from the Spadea campaign and super PAC included pre-checked boxes to make the donations recurring. Most of the donors POLITICO spoke to were not aware that they were making continual donations to Spadea's campaign or one of his super PACs, Elect Common Sense, sometimes amounting to thousands of dollars … The bill was introduced during the Republican primary by supporters of its eventual winner, Jack Ciattarelli. Spadea was Ciattarelli's main opponent.
TESTA CROSSES DELAWARE — State Sen. Michael Testa wants to pull a Trump and rename Delaware Bay, which borders his home county of Cumberland, The Bay of New Jersey. Testa introduced a bill to change the name Thursday, as well as one to enter into a 'New Jersey-Delaware Territorial Boundary Adjustment Compact.' The former bill is self-explanatory. As for the latter, it's not yet available online, and Testa was in the budget committee yesterday so I didn't manage to get him on the phone. But it almost certainly has to do with revisiting an ancient dispute between the states over that tiny little piece of Delaware attached to the New Jersey mainland called Finns Point or The Baja.
THE BILL COMES DUE — Bill to end newspaper legal notice requirement nears passage, by POLITICO's Matt Friedman: New Jersey is on the cusp of stripping government legal notices from news publications following the end of the print edition of the state's largest newspaper. The Senate and Assembly budget committees on Thursday approved legislation sponsored by Senate President Nick Scutari that would require governments to post legal notices on their own websites, removing a decades-old lifeline for a struggling news industry that's earned it tens of millions a year in revenue. The Assembly Budget Committee approved the measure 14-1, while the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee advanced it unanimously.
OPIA — 'OPIA destroyed cell phones of investigators in corruption sting operation,' by New Jersey Globe's David Wildstein: 'The embattled Office of Public Integrity and Accountability has destroyed the cell phones of detectives who investigated a nearly six-year-old bantam public corruption case against former Assemblyman Jason O'Donnell (D-Bayonne), even though investigators used those phones to send text messages to each other — and prosecutors — about the case. O'Donnell's attorney, Leo Hurley, alleged that the OPIA dumped the phones two years after his 2020 discovery demand. He stated that text messages relevant to the case had previously been discussed in court and that there are no reports or documentation explaining the destruction and preservation process … According to Deputy Attorney General Frank Valdinoto, work-issued cell phones for three investigators — Michael Fallon, Ho Chul Shin, and Brian Powers — were destroyed. A fourth phone issued to Detective Miguel Rodriguez has not been replaced, but he is currently on active military duty, and the attorney general's office does not have possession of it.'
— 'From Bergen to Cape May, Ciattarelli dominated in GOP gubernatorial primary'
— 'New Jersey legislators give preliminary OK to higher sports betting, internet gambling taxes'
— 'NJ Transit explains why trains were canceled during the scorching heatwave'
— 'Gov. Phil Murphy makes a change on the Gateway Development Commission. Who's in?'
— 'N.J. man avoided prison for child sexual abuse images — then a higher court stepped in'
TRUMP ERA
MEGA ANXIETY — Megabill threatens to languish as challenges pile up, by POLITICO's Jordain Carney, Lisa Kashinsky and Robert King: Republicans aren't panicking about their fraying domestic policy bill. But they aren't exactly sure about how it's all going to come together, either. Senate Republicans emerged from a closed-door lunch meeting Thursday putting on a brave face about the megabill's progress. Yet this time last week, members were expecting revised text of the sprawling bill Monday with votes starting a couple of days later. In other words, they thought they'd be close to done by now. Instead, Majority Leader John Thune refrained from giving his members a specific timeline during a closed-door lunch Thursday, according to three attendees granted anonymity to describe the private meeting. Senators are preparing to stay in town and vote through the weekend, but internal policy disputes and procedural roadblocks thrown up by the chamber's parliamentarian are keeping firmer plans in flux.
— Senate GOP dealt major blow on Medicaid cuts in megabill
LOCAL
EXIT SANDMEN? — 'Can beach projects save New Jersey shorelines indefinitely?' by The Press of Atlantic City's Bill Barlow: 'Shore towns tried a variety of methods to keep sand on the beaches, including building structures at a right angle to the shore, hoping to lock in the sand. The shoreline soon bristled with the wooden or stone structures, called jetties or groins. But the sand kept on one beach did not reach another, leading to a scoop-like pattern along the shore. And the sand washed away anyway. There had been sporadic attempts to put sand back on beaches, by truck or dredged from inlets or back bays. The efforts were expensive and only briefly successful. If the beaches were to remain, it was time to consider another option. That started in Cape May at the dawn of the 1990s, with a 50-year commitment from the federal government to rebuild the beaches. Now, 35 years later, almost every occupied barrier island in New Jersey has a similar long-term commitment, and the total costs are over $2 billion and climbing. Do the projects still make sense? And if so, for how long?'
ACTION PORK — 'Most Lakewood School monitors fail at key aspect of their job as two more are hired,' by the Asbury Park Press' Joe Strupp: 'Most of the state education monitors who have been hired at a cost of nearly $2 million to watch over Lakewood Schools' finances and propose solutions have failed to develop mandatory action plans as required by law, an Asbury Park Press investigation shows. The revelation of the failure of most of the monitors comes as yet another two new state monitors are hired by the district for a possible cost of more than $400,000. The practice of hiring state monitors for Lakewood has been criticized by one expert as 'a big waste of money.' A Press review of past state monitor activities finds that two of the eight people to hold the post since 2014 have submitted the required plans to fix district operations.'
PLEADINGS FROM ASBURY PARK — 'Asbury Park residents sue, say city mismanagement killed their affordable housing,' by the Asbury Park Press' Charles Daye: 'Six residents have filed a lawsuit claiming that the city violated their constitutional and civil rights after it mismanaged funds intended for affordable housing. The city gave landlords money for home repairs with the understanding the homes would remain affordable for the tenants. However, the city didn't monitor landlords who received funds to make sure they kept the homes affordable, leaving the most vulnerable residents to deal with rent increases and evictions, according to the suit. That lack of monitoring and administration from city officials hurt a decades-old rehabilitation program in Asbury Park intended to preserve and revive housing already owned or rented by low-income residents across the city, the suit says.'
THE AGONY OF DEHEAT — 'Paterson schools chief says she had no Plan B amid heat fiasco at graduation,' by Paterson Press' Joe Malinconico: 'With extreme heat forecast days in advance, Paterson school officials didn't have a bad weather contingency plan for the June 23 outdoor graduations at Hinchliffe Stadium that ended up being halted mid-ceremony after scores of people were overcome by oppressive temperatures. Paterson Schools Superintendent Laurie Newell made that revelation during her five-minute speech about the district's heat problems at the city Board of Education meeting on June 25. 'We committed to Hinchliffe Stadium and did not plan for an alternative location,' Newell said. 'For this, as superintendent of schools, I take full responsibility.''
— 'Newark councilwoman's former aide, county employee charged with dealing cocaine'
— 'Longtime Camden educator to be named interim superintendent'
— 'Has Avalon become too exclusive for the people who live there?'
— 'Wildwood eyes committee for non-resident homeowners'
— ''Sinking ship' or transition time? What's behind mass flight of Wayne school leaders?'
— '[Rockaway] Clerk admits error that cost election winner his seat'
EVERYTHING ELSE
THE RISK OF IMPALEMENT BY A MAI TAI UMBRELLA — Easiest lifeguard job at the Jersey Shore? It might be watching this two-foot Bar A pool,' by the Asbury Park Press' Michael L. Diamond: 'The grotto at Bar Anticipation was open on a sweltering Sunday afternoon, with water cascading into the shallow pool, and lifeguard Bella Maikranz was on high-ish alert. It's true, not much has happened the past two summers she has been on patrol. But that's not the point. The point is, something could happen … Maikranz is a lifeguard at the Bar A grotto, spending her weekends overlooking the shallow pool and waterfall from the umbrella-shaded stand nearby. She stands guard over an estimated zero to five swimmers — or waders — a day ... Without Maikranz, though, Bar A would have to forgo an inviting water feature. New Jersey requires public pools to have a lifeguard on duty, no matter how deep the water. 'I don't know if there's ever been a (legal) case that addresses a swimming pool that is two-feet deep,' said Richard Lomurro, an attorney based in Freehold. 'It doesn't seem to me something the Legislature would have contemplated when writing the statute.''
IN 1988 A NEPTUNE MAN FOUND OUT ABOUT HIS TWIN FROM AUSTRIA — 'Twins everywhere! N.J. high schools report record numbers of multiples graduating,' by NJ Advance Media's Nyah Marshall: 'At last week's ceremony, the Ocean County high school's Class of 2025 included what officials believe to be a record six sets of twins. They made up nearly 5% of 245 graduates … Seven sets of twins graduated together from Mahwah High School's 207-member senior class … In recent years, more schools around the country have seen an uptick in twins — and even triplets — graduating together, reflecting a broader trend that began in the early 2000s ... A surge in multiple births was largely driven by fertility treatments … But that trend has shifted. Since 2014, the rate of multiple births in the U.S. has steadily declined, in part due to advancements in reproductive technology, the CDC reported. Still, New Jersey schools continue to see large groups of multiples in their graduating classes.'
— 'N.J. restaurant told customers to 'f--- off' on TikTok. It didn't go well'
— 'Inside look at how New Jersey Air National Guard pilots defend restricted airspace as violations spike'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility
Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility

If you're wondering about a fourth stimulus check in 2025 from President Donald Trump or the IRS, here's what to know about eligibility and the reality of it happening. On July 25, Trump floated the idea of a tariff rebate check for American taxpayers in response to questions about all the new tariff revenue being generated, "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate." A few days after the president's tariff rebate comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley announced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 aimed at sending checks to Americans. Note that a few months back, in February, Trump also said he would consider a plan to pay out a portion of the savings identified by the Department of Government Efficiency in the form of a $5000 dividend check as payback to taxpayers. The DOGE dividend proposal, authored by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, was meant to give back or refund taxpayers a savings from Elon Musk's DOGE related cuts and reductions in government spending. Here's what to know about Trump's two proposals this year, what the amounts would be, qualifications and status. Are we getting a fourth stimulus check in 2025? While speculation about a of $2,000 has surfaced on social media and unverified websites, there has been no official confirmation of any additional economic relief package in 2025 from Congress or the IRS to support this claim. Any such news should be taken with caution as it could be misinformation or attempted fraud. Either of Trump's ideas for a tariff rebate or DOGE dividend this year would be similar to a fourth stimulus check, if approved. Albeit, there are differences between a stimulus check versus a dividend, refund or rebate. By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user that previously paid for something. While a rebate is a partial refund of the purchase price that a consumer paid, often upon meeting certain conditions — more like a discount that is refunded after the purchase versus a discount that is applied at the point of sale. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. Also similar to the stimulus checks sent during the pandemic, these proposals would require congressional approval. What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Hawley's bill, called the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, would provide a minimum of $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to news officials. The benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000 individually. According to an analysis from the Budget Lab at Yale released July 28, Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025 through higher prices passed on from companies paying higher tariff taxes. The Treasury Department said on July 25 that the U.S. government posted a $27 billion surplus in June, following a $316 billion deficit in May. Customs duties totaled approximately $27 billion for the month, up from $23 billion in May and 301% higher than in June 2024. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled $113 billion, or 86% more than a year ago. The bill would allow for a larger rebate if the tariff revenue exceeds projections. What is the status of the DOGE dividend check proposal? Fishback announced that he was stepping away from the DOGE dividend check movement after Musk lashed out at the president in June, although he also said he would continue working with the administration "to return savings to taxpayers." The latest update on DOGE dividend came from Fishbacks tweet on June 6, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." He added, "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay." According to Fishback's proposal, the DOGE dividend check was described as tax refund check to be sent to every taxpaying household, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE. The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. According to the DOGE website, it cites an estimated $205 billion — approximately $1,273 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only half the amount is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. Amy Gleason is the acting administrator and head of DOGE. Musk's departure from the federal government will likely do little to change DOGE's work carrying out Trump's vision of downsizing the federal government or eliminating the 'fraud and waste.' Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: How to check your stimulus check status? Trump $600 - $2400 rebate Solve the daily Crossword

California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery
California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery

After California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would move forward with a state redistricting plan – replete with implied mockery of President Donald Trump – California Republicans responded late Thursday. Newsom had declared "liberation day" – an apparent reference to Trump's own moniker for the day he introduced a comprehensive tariff regime – and preceded the announcement with "ALL CAPS" social media posts meant to mock the president's penchant for doing the same on Truth Social. California Republicans were not amused and pushed back on the project that could put an end to their already muted federal representation in America's most populous state. "Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite," the top Republican on the state's Elections Committee said. California's Top Republican Rips Dems Blocking 'Oil Goldmine' After New Trump Project Rebuffs Schiff "There is no public input," lamented state Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, R-Tulare, as the state hosts nine Republican federal House lawmakers of the 52 total. The state's last Republican senator was Sen. John Seymour in 1991 – who had been appointed for a brief stint after Sen. Pete Wilson resigned to take the governor's office. Read On The Fox News App Macedo suggested Newsom would go to great lengths just to grab national headlines, no matter what the "will of the voters" is in reality. "Governor Newsom is on a mission to take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission," Macedo said of the panel that typically would help decide decennial mapping. "Governor Newsom's power-grab erodes public trust in our government. Undermining the commission's hard work … is shortsighted and insulting to voters," said Macedo, whose caucus holds 19 of the 60 assembly seats. Mamdani Studies 'America's Worst Mayor' Brandon Johnson To Avoid His Political Pitfalls: Report Newsom, however, defended his decision, saying that Trump "poked the bear" – the animal which also appears on the Golden State's flag – and that California will therefore push back. "DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!)," Newsom wrote in his Trump-esque post. Trump has supported a "simple redrawing" of the Texas congressional map to represent the state's Republican bent, he said. "We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas, I got the highest vote in the history of Texas as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats," Trump recently said. Sen. Brian Jones, R-San Diego, leader of the upper chamber's minority in Sacramento, directed Fox News Digital to recent comments prior to the official announcement by Newsom. "Californians didn't elect Newsom to play gerrymandering games to boost his presidential campaign, they elected him to solve problems here at home," said Jones, who leads 10 senators compared to the Democrats' 30. "What he's doing now undermines the independent redistricting commission that voters created to stop exactly this kind of political manipulation." He also ripped Democrats after hearing that California Secretary of State Shirley Weber told reporters the legislature would have only a short window to schedule a special election for redistricting to coincide with the November elections. California lawmakers are on summer recess until Monday. The process would have to finish by next Friday; five days. "Once again, Newsom convinced Senate and Assembly Democrats to roll over, ignore voters, rush sham hearings, and violate the California Constitution," Jones said. "Democracy is dead in California, killed by Newsom's corrupt pursuit of the presidency." Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this article source: California Republicans accuse Newsom of 'sinister redistricting scheme' after Trump mockery

Eric Swalwell rejects Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' message, vows to 'bury' Republicans
Eric Swalwell rejects Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' message, vows to 'bury' Republicans

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

Eric Swalwell rejects Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' message, vows to 'bury' Republicans

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., dismissed former First Lady Michelle Obama's famous "when they go low, we go high" mantra on Saturday, instead threatening to "bury" Republicans "below the Capitol" during a redistricting fight. On "CNN Newsroom," host Omar Jimenez brought up Obama's old mantra after asking the congressman whether there were concerns that "fighting fire with fire" in redrawing congressional maps could backfire on the Democratic Party. "No, when they go low, we're going to bury them below the Capitol," Swalwell said. "That's what we're going to do, because this is about protecting democracy. And right now, as you see, D.C. has been militarized, and we were weak as Democrats." Swalwell called recent efforts by Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional districts a "grab for power" by President Donald Trump to make sure Democrats lose in the upcoming midterm elections. He argued that fighting fire with fire was the only way "to protect the most vulnerable" and defend democracy. "We have paid the price for our weakness in the past, and we can't be so weak next time we have power," Swalwell said. "Gavin Newsom is making Donald Trump react to him with the lawsuits with this new map to match what's happening in Texas. And the way I see it is, either we're on our heels, and the most vulnerable are on their heels reacting to Donald Trump, or he's on his heels reacting to us." Newsom has proposed a controversial initiative that would allow for mid-decade redistricting, aiming to eliminate five Republican-held seats in response to GOP-led map changes in Texas. However, such changes are currently prohibited by the California state constitution, which mandates nonpartisan redistricting through an independent commission. Newsom and California Democrats are pushing for a special election later this year to obtain voter approval to bypass the constitution. Swalwell didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Swalwell is the latest in a long line of Democrats who have appeared to abandon the "when they go low, we go high" mantra in favor of harsher and sometimes violent rhetoric. Michelle Obama also amended the phrase in a 2020 DNC speech. "Let's be clear: going high does not mean putting on a smile and saying nice things when confronted by viciousness and cruelty," Obama said in 2020. "Going high means taking the harder path. It means scraping and clawing our way to that mountain top. Going high means standing fierce against hatred while remembering that we are one nation under God, and if we want to survive, we've got to find a way to live together and work together across our differences."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store