We woke up to find a Banksy on our house - we thought it would make us millionaires but it's cost us £400,000 and we wish he had never bothered
A couple have complained that waking up to a Banksy artwork on the side of their property has cost them £400,000.
Gert and Gerry Coutts, who live in Enfield, north London, were renting the Suffolk property out when tenants called them in August 2021 to say scaffolding had suddenly appeared.
Mr Coutts and his wife thought it was the council fixing a chimney, only for the rigging to disappear the next day - with the piece of artwork, later verified to be a Banksy, in its place.
The artwork was comprised of a 14-foot seagull mural on the wall of the Lowestoft house, with a skip placed next to the house filled with insulation to look like a tray of chips.
It attracted global attention and soon the property was being visited by hundreds of tourists a day.
But while the owners initially thought the development might make them rich, they have now accused 'a**ehole' Banksy of acting without 'giving a damn about the consequences'.
Mr Coutts told the Sun: 'I'm completely depressed and sick about it.
'I've done everything I can, tried to do the right things, and me and my wife have just had the p**s taken out of us.
'I'm so angry about what has gone on because of that a**ehole Banksy. It's as simple as that.'
Rod, who co-owns the house with the Coutts, added: 'To us he's an uncaring, unthinking person who has had a massive detrimental impact.'
Within a short space of time, their renters were faced with queues built up around the house and one man even stole the property's scaffolding from a skip, and attempted to sell it on Facebook for £1,600.
The couple said what they first thought of as a 'gift' turned into a nightmare.
The 22-tonne artwork was finally removed overnight in April after the couple hired a building firm and council officials approved closing the road.
Initially, it was estimated the artwork could be worth some £3 million, but the couple told how they were informed the council wished to put a preservation on the artwork, which would make the owners liable for an annual £40,000 upkeep.
Ms Coutts said: 'So, there you go Banksy. Does he realise what the consequences are of his art work - or does he care?'
Instead, they eventually arranged for the entire wall to be removed at a cost of some £200,000 - but still pay £3,000 per month to keep it in storage while looking for a buyer.
The decision to take down the artwork proved highly controversial in the town, with passersby accusing the owners of 'stealing' the artwork from the public.
Speaking to the Mail previously, retired roofing contractor Mr Coutts said: 'At first it was obviously incredible but as things have gone on it has become extremely stressful. I'm not sure Banksy realises the unintended consequences on homeowners. If we could turn back the clock, we would.
'We had the council get in touch to tell us that they could put a preservation order on the piece and we would be responsible for maintaining it at a cost of £40,000 a year.
'I have had to hire a night watchman to look after it after someone stole part of it and tried to sell it on Facebook. Another time vandals were caught with a dozen pots of white paint and were apparently going to paint over it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK regulator gives thumbs down to household wealth statistics
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Britain's statistics regulator ruled on Friday that official data on how rich British households are can no longer be treated as reliable, in another blow to the Office for National Statistics. The suspension of accredited status for the data by the Office for Statistics Regulation comes as the ONS is under investigation by the government over long-running problems with labour market data and follows a significant error in April's inflation data and the suspension of producer price figures. "Declining response rates and a lack of investment have significantly impacted the quality of the survey data, which measures the financial wellbeing of households across Great Britain," the regulator said. The most recent version of the wealth data, published in January, stated that the median British household had wealth of 293,700 pounds ($397,552), with the top 10% of households being worth at least 1.2 million pounds and the bottom 10% under 16,500 pounds. The regulator said the survey, which began in 2006, had provided "crucial economic data on assets, savings, debt and retirement planning that informs state pension levels, academic research, and both monetary and fiscal policy development." The regulator said it had given the ONS instructions on how to improve the data and expected a progress report in September. Declining response rates lie at the heart of the problems with the ONS' Labour Force Survey - used to calculate the unemployment rate and inactivity in the labour force, key data points for the government and the Bank of England. The BoE and the regulator have said the fall in responses to the often lengthy ONS surveys appeared sharper than in other countries which collect similar data. ($1 = 0.7388 pounds)
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
How do add-ons work in football transfers?
Liverpool have agreed a deal worth up to £116m for Germany forward Florian Wirtz - but it is still not entirely clear when the transfer would become a British basic fee is £100m, which puts it level with Jack Grealish's transfer from Aston Villa to Manchester City in 2021, Declan Rice's switch from West Ham to Arsenal in 2023, and Moises Caicedo's move to Chelsea from Brighton in the same the latter two of those deals had 'add-ons' attached to them - and Wirtz's transfer includes add-ons of £ payments are often complex and usually kept secret. What kind of add-ons exist? Clubs sometimes say add-ons are 'easily achievable' or 'difficult'.Easier-to-achieve add-ons can include things like making a basic number of appearances, or scoring a certain amount of goals. Add-ons can also be attached to a team's success rather than the individual player's - a club may agree to an add-on requiring an extra payment if they qualify for Europe, for can be more ambitious - tied to extreme levels of individual or collective success, like winning the Champions League or the Ballon d' example of the difficulty add-ons can present when discussing valuations would be the claims made in the Portuguese media in 2022 that the first additional payment in Darwin Nunez's £64m-plus-add-ons move from Benfica to Liverpool was triggered by the Uruguayan making just 10 April, Liverpool boss Arne Slot rejected speculation he had not started Nunez in any game since 8 March because it would trigger an additional Liverpool paid more for Nunez, or club captain Virgil van Dijk - for whom they paid a flat fee of £75m to Southampton in 2017 - cannot be determined without knowing exactly what add-ons were included in the Nunez deal, then figuring out which conditions he has and has not met. How expensive can add-ons become? It is common practice these days for transfer fees to have performance-based add-ons. The theory is the selling club gains more if the player goes on to be extremely successful, while the buying club is to some extent protected financially if the transfer doesn't work some cases, the total value of add-ons is significant - Real Madrid could end up paying an extra £30m to Borussia Dortmund for Jude Bellingham depending on how successful he is over the course of his career in the Spanish capital, for others, like the potential £1.7m worth of add-ons Brighton's £29.78m signing of Greece Under-21 forward Charalampos Kostoulas earlier this week included, are less significant. How do add-ons impact clubs' financial accounts? These extra amounts certainly add up. Let's take Manchester United as an their third-quarter financial results for 2024-25 - announced on 6 June - deep down on page 45 of 47, United confirmed that "under the terms of certain contracts with other football clubs and agents in respect of player transfers, additional amounts, in excess of the amounts included in the cost of registrations, would be payable if certain substantive performance conditions are met".United confirmed that as of 31 March 2025, the potential liability was £138.82m. Of that, £112.25m was related to player appearances, team success or new contracts, while £3.19m was around international appearances and £22.03m was related to 'awards', with the rest classed as 'other'.That entry goes some way to explaining what add-ons are and how they can tot he signed for United, the club let it be known that one of the add-ons attached to Anthony Martial's £36m move from Monaco was connected to the France striker winning the Ballon d'Or. This was never were also very quick to reject speculation Mason Mount had triggered one of the add-ons included in his transfer from Chelsea by playing for the club in a European final, the Europa League final defeat by Tottenham in Martial Ballon d'Or one was clearly far more difficult, although United argued at the time that if the forward reached that level of success, they would happily pay the clause on the basis they would have benefited enormously through results on the article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team explores everything you need to know and calls upon a network of contacts including our experts and answer your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and go behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage spans the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... Why Alexander-Arnold is not allowed to wear number 66 for Real MadridWhen does the summer transfer window reopen?How is the Ballon d'Or winner decided?Summer transfer window - your questions answeredWhen are the 2025-26 Premier League fixtures released?
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of England policymakers' comments on the UK outlook
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said earlier this month that he was sticking with a "gradual and careful" approach to cutting interest rates as uncertainty from U.S. tariffs clouds the outlook. In May, the BoE's Monetary Policy Committee voted 5-4 to cut interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point to 4.25%. External MPC members Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor backed a cut to 4%, while Catherine Mann and Huw Pill voted to hold rates. Financial markets see a roughly 90% chance that the BoE will keep rates at 4.25% on June 19, and price in about 50 basis points of rate cuts by the end of 2025 - similar to what is expected from the U.S. Federal Reserve. Following is a summary of comments by MPC members since their last rate decision was announced on May 8. June 3: "I think the path (for interest rates) remains downwards, but how far and how quickly is now shrouded in a lot more uncertainty." "Gradual and careful remain my ... guiding line," Bailey said of his thinking on future rate cuts. June 3: "We've added the word 'unpredictable' to 'uncertain' because of the sheer nature of what we're dealing with." May 29: "The less volatile part (of inflation), again it's gradually grinding down but very slowly." "We don't want to lose the relationship with the U.S. We really want to get to the (trade) issues that are underlying this and help to solve them." May 20: "I would characterise my May vote as favouring a 'skip' within a continuing withdrawal of monetary policy restriction, rather than a halt to the process of withdrawal." "It should not be seen as favouring a halt to - still less a reversal - of that withdrawal of restriction." "(As) long as disinflation back to target is not complete, maintenance of some restriction will still be required. On my reading, that is a view that is held across a broad swathe of MPC members." May 13: "I remain concerned that we have seen a sort of structural change in price and wage-setting behaviour, maybe driven by the type of things that were involved in models of the inflation process from the '70s and '80s." May 9: "The analysis in the baseline forecast does not suggest that there's a dramatic shift in the behaviour of the UK economy on the back of these trade announcements and trade uncertainties." May 12: "Caution remains appropriate. I'll be more comfortable when I see material deceleration in the data over a longer period." June 3: "I thought that there was a case for a cut in Bank Rate, even absent the international developments, because I judged that domestic disinflationary process that we've all talked about was progressing as I expected, and I thought it would continue." June 1: "The big picture, the landscape on which I'm thinking about policy, is that the waves of disinflation are continuing." "I think the labour market is loosening. We've seen unemployment rise a little bit, and in addition we've got relatively weak growth." May 30: "I'm not going to pre-emptively announce my vote, but I think I indicated in my dissent that I thought we needed to be on a lower (monetary) policy path." "I'm seeing more risk piling up on the downside scenario because of global developments." May 12: "The erosion of confidence that we saw has continued. We're getting very low readings on PMI and REC and so forth. So there's that continuation, the sort of wait and see in ... precautionary saving (and) postponement of investment." "The international dimension for me is quite perilous." June 7: "Our view is that we can look through it (higher inflation), but of course there's a pretty big risk." "The last time we had a lot of second-round effects. We're hoping that we won't have second-round effects this time around, but we're not sanguine about it." "(Private-sector pay growth was) way above what would be consistent with a 2% inflation target". "It's (going) in the right direction, it's just not going as quickly as I would like it to." May 12: "What's a little bit more worrisome for me is that medium-term inflation expectations have also started picking up." "I came into this last round quite torn about whether to hold or cut by 25 basis points." June 3: "On balance, the risks to inflation and growth appear to me to be tilted to the downside." "The most significant contributions to the near-term pickup in headline inflation reflect developments in household energy bills and past energy shocks, and to a lesser degree, regulated price increases, rather than an imbalance in underlying supply and demand pressures." June 2: "An additional cut in this cycle of Bank Rate reduction, so as to try to compensate for tightening at the long end, could run counter to the need to maintain restrictiveness for long enough to purge the structural rigidities in labour and product markets that I have often noted are key to my Bank Rate decisions." "Now that the MPC is reducing restrictiveness, I believe that we need to consider the differing effects of our policies on different parts of the yield curve ... as a more salient issue." May 14: "The labour market has been more resilient. Now, yes, we've had some prints that are indicative of a slowing labour market, but it is not a non-linear adjustment." "I need to see the loss of pricing power. I need to see that firms are starting to be much more moderate in setting their prices across a broad range of products." May 8: "I am worried that we're not going to see that recovery in productivity and supply, which is a kind of fundamental judgment to our baseline forecast. If that on its own happens, that would tend to push inflation up relative to baseline forecast."
