Did cloud seeding cause the deadly Texas floods? Report sparks outrage after disaster that killed over 100
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why are people blaming Rainmaker?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What exactly is cloud seeding?
What do scientists say about the risks?
What sparked the conspiracy theories?
What happened during Rainmaker's Texas mission?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
How has Rainmaker responded to the backlash?
What is the government saying about cloud seeding and geoengineering?
FAQs
Over 100 people have died in a terrible flood in Texas, and conspiracy theories are once again in the news. Some people are blaming a cloud-seeding company for the heavy rain this time, but scientists strongly disagree. As people get more and more angry online, the facts about changing the weather are getting lost. Rainmaker , a cloud-seeding startup, is getting a lot of hate because conspiracy theories wrongly connected its work to the deadly floods in Texas. The argument has brought up old arguments about geoengineering and changing the weather.When Augustus Doricko established a cloud-seeding start-up in 2023, he was aware that he would have to deal with misconceptions and conspiracy theories about the technology. However, he was unprepared for the overwhelming amount of online rage he has encountered following the devastating floods in Texas that have left over 100 people dead and almost twice as many missing, as per a report by The Washington Post.In a phone interview on Wednesday, Doricko stated, "It has been constant chaos." Social media posts implying that the floods in Kerr County were a man-made calamity have focused on Doricko and his business, Rainmaker.Many prominent individuals, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), former Trump adviser Michael Flynn, and other influential people, have openly suggested that cloud-seeding operations like Rainmaker's may have caused or at least contributed to the historic flood, as per a report by The Washington Post.The technique known as "cloud seeding," in which aircraft disperse dust particles through clouds to cause rain and snow, is still in its infancy. Its effects are too restricted and localized to result in anything approaching the 15 inches of rain that flooded large areas of South Central Texas over the Fourth of July weekend.According to atmospheric scientists, that is not feasible. Bob Rauber, an emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has researched the technology, said, "The amount of energy involved in making storms like that is astronomical compared to anything you can do with cloud seeding." "We're talking about a very small increase on a natural process at best."Conspiracy theorists continue to use cloud seeding as a flaming explanation for natural disasters despite this. The hunt for a scapegoat has brought attention to a contentious technology that, despite scant proof of its efficacy and larger social and environmental worries about changing the weather, has attracted interest from drought-stricken Western states and dozens of nations seeking to replenish water reservoirs.Over Runge, Texas, more than 100 miles southeast of Kerr County, a single-engine aircraft operated by the start-up Rainmaker, based in El Segundo, California, flew on a cloud-seeding mission on the afternoon of July 2.According to Doricko, the mission was followed by a light drizzle that dumped less than half a centimeter of rain on the arid farms below. It released roughly 70 grams of silver iodide into a pair of clouds over the course of about 20 minutes.The run was a component of a deal Rainmaker signed this spring to replenish water reservoirs and increase rainfall across cropland with the South Texas Weather Modification Association, a nonprofit organization supported by regional water management districts.Doricko claimed that his company's meteorologists quickly canceled their operations in the region after spotting an impending storm front. Parts of Kerr County received up to 15 inches of rain by the morning of July 4 from Tropical Storm Barry's remnants.Conspiracy theorists on the internet seized upon the coincidence and demanded "accountability" as documents proving Rainmaker's registration to carry out weather modification projects in Texas were circulated by verified accounts.While patiently answering more serious questions and participating in live audio events on X to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of cloud seeding, Doricko attempted to brush off the threats.Posts on X with images of Rainmaker's office's exterior and its address were pushed back by him.Recent natural disasters have given rise to theories about cloud seeding, with some people thinking that these events could be "chemtrails" of evil schemes to change the weather or contaminate the public.In response, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it agrees with the concerns expressed by many Americans regarding geoengineering.Although the federal government stopped experimenting with cloud seeding in the 1980s, some investors have supported businesses like Rainmaker, which has 58 employees and raised $31 million in venture capital. Building trust will require careful regulation, oversight, and transparency; it is also annoying when online influencers try to place blame for natural disasters.No. According to experts, cloud seeding alone cannot produce enough rainfall to cause such widespread flooding.No, but certain states regulate or prohibit it. Others, particularly in the drought-prone West, actively support cloud-seeding initiatives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 days ago
- Time of India
Cancer: Toxic air in the kitchen: Gas stoves found to emit "cancer-causing" benzene indoors
Our kitchen, the heart of our homes, might have been harboring a toxic secret all these years. For decades, gas stoves have been a staple in our lives, praised for their performance and precision. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But beneath those glowy blue and orange flames lies a growing public health concern. A New study published, titled ,' reveals that these everyday appliances release Benzene, a well-documented carcinogen, directly into household air during use. As indoor air pollution gains urgent attention, the latest research uncovers just how dangerous this can be. The suspect in question Benzene is a volatile organic compound that is listed as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the World Health Organization. It is an aromatic, colorless, or light-yellow liquid chemical at room temperature and is mainly used as a solvent in chemical and pharmaceutical applications. How are individuals exposed to benzene? Employees in manufacturing industries that handle benzene are exposed to its highest concentrations, even though exposure has been decreased by federal and state laws over the last few decades. If you smoke, be careful! 90% of benzene exposure results from cigarette smoking. It is present in common products like glues, adhesives, and cleaning agents. How was the study conducted Researchers used the National Institute of Standards and Technology's CONTAM model to recreate how benzene emitted from gas and propane stoves disperses in a variety of typical U.S homes, ranging from smaller apartments to larger houses. The team further applied the U.S EPA's health risk assessment framework to estimate incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) and other health impacts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now And they particularly found that leukemia is associated with benzene exposure. What were the key findings Benzene travels to bedrooms and living rooms Due to high intake relative to body weight, kids face nearly double the cancer risk compared to adults. Ventilation helps but is not enough. Even with good ventilation, modelled benzene levels sometimes remained above safe limits Among 6.3 million U.S residents exposed to the highest-emitting stoves, the study estimates 16-69 additional leukemia cases per year could occur under high-use conditions. Further, this study is the first to quantify these long-term cancer risks using a full risk assessment approach. It highlights that gas stoves emit not only carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides but also carcinogens that can silently accumulate over time. The bigger problem is: What about the people who live in disadvantaged communities where residents may live in small, poorly ventilated spaces with older gas stoves? For decades, gas stoves have been marketed as superior for culinary performance, but the cost may be far steeper than anyone has ever realized. With alternatives now widely available, it may be the time to reconsider what we bring into our kitchen; after all, safety begins at home. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice.
Time of India
11-07-2025
- Time of India
Did cloud seeding cause the deadly Texas floods? Report sparks outrage after disaster that killed over 100
Recent Texas floods led to conspiracy theories. These theories wrongly blamed cloud seeding company Rainmaker. Augustus Doricko, Rainmaker's founder, faced online anger. Influencers suggested cloud seeding caused the disaster. Scientists deny cloud seeding can cause such heavy rain. Rainmaker had a small operation far from the flooded area. The EPA acknowledges public concerns about geoengineering. Regulation and transparency are essential. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why are people blaming Rainmaker? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What exactly is cloud seeding? What do scientists say about the risks? What sparked the conspiracy theories? What happened during Rainmaker's Texas mission? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How has Rainmaker responded to the backlash? What is the government saying about cloud seeding and geoengineering? FAQs Over 100 people have died in a terrible flood in Texas, and conspiracy theories are once again in the news. Some people are blaming a cloud-seeding company for the heavy rain this time, but scientists strongly disagree. As people get more and more angry online, the facts about changing the weather are getting lost. Rainmaker , a cloud-seeding startup, is getting a lot of hate because conspiracy theories wrongly connected its work to the deadly floods in Texas. The argument has brought up old arguments about geoengineering and changing the Augustus Doricko established a cloud-seeding start-up in 2023, he was aware that he would have to deal with misconceptions and conspiracy theories about the technology. However, he was unprepared for the overwhelming amount of online rage he has encountered following the devastating floods in Texas that have left over 100 people dead and almost twice as many missing, as per a report by The Washington a phone interview on Wednesday, Doricko stated, "It has been constant chaos." Social media posts implying that the floods in Kerr County were a man-made calamity have focused on Doricko and his business, prominent individuals, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), former Trump adviser Michael Flynn, and other influential people, have openly suggested that cloud-seeding operations like Rainmaker's may have caused or at least contributed to the historic flood, as per a report by The Washington technique known as "cloud seeding," in which aircraft disperse dust particles through clouds to cause rain and snow, is still in its infancy. Its effects are too restricted and localized to result in anything approaching the 15 inches of rain that flooded large areas of South Central Texas over the Fourth of July to atmospheric scientists, that is not feasible. Bob Rauber, an emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has researched the technology, said, "The amount of energy involved in making storms like that is astronomical compared to anything you can do with cloud seeding." "We're talking about a very small increase on a natural process at best."Conspiracy theorists continue to use cloud seeding as a flaming explanation for natural disasters despite this. The hunt for a scapegoat has brought attention to a contentious technology that, despite scant proof of its efficacy and larger social and environmental worries about changing the weather, has attracted interest from drought-stricken Western states and dozens of nations seeking to replenish water Runge, Texas, more than 100 miles southeast of Kerr County, a single-engine aircraft operated by the start-up Rainmaker, based in El Segundo, California, flew on a cloud-seeding mission on the afternoon of July to Doricko, the mission was followed by a light drizzle that dumped less than half a centimeter of rain on the arid farms below. It released roughly 70 grams of silver iodide into a pair of clouds over the course of about 20 run was a component of a deal Rainmaker signed this spring to replenish water reservoirs and increase rainfall across cropland with the South Texas Weather Modification Association, a nonprofit organization supported by regional water management claimed that his company's meteorologists quickly canceled their operations in the region after spotting an impending storm front. Parts of Kerr County received up to 15 inches of rain by the morning of July 4 from Tropical Storm Barry's theorists on the internet seized upon the coincidence and demanded "accountability" as documents proving Rainmaker's registration to carry out weather modification projects in Texas were circulated by verified patiently answering more serious questions and participating in live audio events on X to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of cloud seeding, Doricko attempted to brush off the on X with images of Rainmaker's office's exterior and its address were pushed back by natural disasters have given rise to theories about cloud seeding, with some people thinking that these events could be "chemtrails" of evil schemes to change the weather or contaminate the response, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it agrees with the concerns expressed by many Americans regarding the federal government stopped experimenting with cloud seeding in the 1980s, some investors have supported businesses like Rainmaker, which has 58 employees and raised $31 million in venture capital. Building trust will require careful regulation, oversight, and transparency; it is also annoying when online influencers try to place blame for natural According to experts, cloud seeding alone cannot produce enough rainfall to cause such widespread but certain states regulate or prohibit it. Others, particularly in the drought-prone West, actively support cloud-seeding initiatives.
Hindustan Times
04-07-2025
- Hindustan Times
Fourth of July: New study warns there's ‘no safe amount' of hot dogs to eat
An all-new meta-analysis has suggested that there is no safe amount of hot dogs, or any other processed food, to consume. The study, led by Dr Demewoz Haile of the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, was published in the Nature Medicine journal on June 30. Researchers found that even small daily servings of processed meat hold the potential of significantly increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer, Newsweek reported. Why you should skip eating hot dogs this Fourth of July Why does this matter? This comes as Americans are celebrating Independence Day. Hot dogs remain a staple during the July 4 celebrations. According to the outlet, more than 150 million hot dogs are expected to be consumed across the United States during the Fourth of July weekend. The study contributes to the rising body of evidence that links processed meats to the risk of chronic disease. Notably, diet-related illnesses are already counted among the leading causes of death in the country. Key findings of the study As part of the analysis, the researchers took into consideration 77 different studies to find out the link between common chronic diseases and certain amounts of such food items. Dr Demewoz Haile told Fox News Digital that habitual consumption of 'even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer.' He suggested that there was 'no safe level of habitual consumption' of such food items and has advised people to refrain from adding these to their daily diet. In terms of processed meats, the team found out that eating even 0.6 to 57 grams of it on a daily basis was linked to an 11 per cent greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. Moreover, daily consumption between 0.78 and 55 grams was discovered to be associated with a 7 per cent increase in colorectal cancer risk. A hot dog typically weighs around 50 grams and is made of almost entirely processed meat. Further, the study found that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, between 1.5 and 390 grams per day, might increase the risk for type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent. Also, there is a risk of ischemic heart disease if consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages ranges between 0 and 365 grams on a daily basis. FAQs: 1. What's the major takeaway from the University of Washington study? It found out that there is "no safe level of habitual consumption" of processed food items. 2. How do daily servings of processed meat affect our body? As per the study, it increases the risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer. 3. Is July 4 a federal holiday in the US? Yes. Americans are celebrating Independence Day on Friday.
