Cross-border payments
THE global financial landscape is shifting, and banks are feeling the pressure to recalibrate. With evolving international policies and changing market dynamics brought on by tariff uncertainties, the need for greater agility and efficiency has never been greater.
At this critical juncture, transforming cross-border payments has become crucial. Banks have traditionally relied on correspondent banking to facilitate international transactions, but this method often falls short, especially when measured against the expectations of today's customers (retail and businesses alike).
Much like e-commerce platforms such as Shopee and Amazon, which enable businesses to expand seamlessly into new markets without setting up local stores, banks use correspondent relationships to facilitate cross-border payments without needing a physical presence in every country. But this once-efficient system now needs to evolve to meet the expectations of today's fast-paced, customer-centric economy.
Why it's time to fix international payments plumbing
The gap between customer expectations and realities of modern banking has widened. People have always expected payments to be fast, transparent, and cost-effective. And, with every new generation and wave of tech advancements, these expectations only grow – faster, more transparent, and cheaper than ever before.
At the same time, demand for international payments is surging, especially for low-value cross-border transactions. This has contributed to S$3.9 trillion in global outflows in Asia, underscoring the need for a more efficient and affordable payment system.
Yet, many of these transfers still take too long. On top of that, hidden fees and foreign exchange markups are often concealed from the consumer, leaving them unaware that they're paying more than they should.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In fact, 56 per cent of Singaporeans who have made international payments think they know the full cost, but are unaware of the hidden fees. As a result, Singaporeans lost some S$590 million to these fees in 2023 alone.
These inefficiencies are recognised at a global level, with initiatives like the G20 roadmap for enhancing cross-border payments aiming to address these issues by setting quantitative targets to improve the speed, cost and transparency in international payments.
But banks and the traditional transfer system aren't deliberately creating this disconnect between what customers want and what they get – the international banking model is simply built on legacy methods.
The model's reliance on 'middlemen' or intermediaries slows transactions and increases costs. For instance, if a bank in Singapore doesn't have a direct correspondent relationship with a Brazilian counterpart, it will need to route the payment through intermediaries, perhaps through Japan, the UK, then the US, before finally reaching Brazil.
This journey adds extra fees and makes lower-value transfers too costly for consumers and small businesses. Settlement times also drag, as payments navigate complex networks and regulatory checkpoints, sometimes taking days to clear. As the number of handover points increase, so do the chances of a payment getting stuck or having limited visibility for compliance.
One way to fix this is through connecting local payment systems across borders. By enabling direct settlement between these rails, it removes the need for middlemen. For example, linking Singapore's PayNow with Thailand's PromptPay allows real-time transfers between the two countries, making payments faster and cheaper. But scaling these connections globally is complex. It takes time, significant investment, and coordination between regulators.
Making smarter cross-border payments
Fixing cross-border inefficiencies requires a broader approach that complements correspondent banking relationships.
Banks need technology-driven solutions that modernise transfers, making them as fast, intuitive, secure, and transparent as today's consumers expect. But this isn't an easy task – cross-border payments are one of the toughest financial services to get right.
Scaling a payments network globally is complicated, expensive, and time-consuming – something no bank can easily tackle alone. And, realistically, given that cross-border payments typically make up only a fraction of a bank's overall services, building a global payments infrastructure from scratch would mean massive investments that many banks neither want nor need.
After all, most banks are, first and foremost, built for their local markets. Their focus is on core services like loans, credit, and domestic payments. These systems, designed primarily for domestic transactions, still serve their purpose well, remaining efficient and cost-effective.
When it comes to international payments, however, efficiency and cost control are often blind spots. Many banks assume the delays and high costs are simply part of the system— or that solving these challenges means taking it on alone.
But the landscape is changing. Technology advancements now enable new approaches that improve cross-border payments without requiring banks to overhaul their entire infrastructure. For example, some systems tap into local payment rails across markets worldwide, linking these networks to create more efficient paths for global transactions. This makes the process faster and more cost-effective. Some of these solutions can also complement a bank's existing correspondent relationships, including the Swift network, helping to reduce friction while enhancing capabilities.
The tricky part is choosing the right solution.
Banks must assess providers based on how transparent they are with fees and services, the reach and quality of their currency network, and whether they give banks visibility over the payment process. Reliability and efficiency throughout the whole process are key.
Importantly, with Singapore being such a thriving fintech hub, local banks must also team up with tech firms to develop solutions that not only streamline operations but also stay in line with evolving regulations.
The road ahead: Simplicity, transparency, and efficiency
The transformation of correspondent banking is well underway, driven by the need for simplicity, transparency, and efficiency. The challenges faced by banks attempting to modernise cross-border payments highlight the necessity of ecosystem partnerships.
Singapore's financial institutions are well-positioned to lead this shift. By prioritising infrastructure modernisation and partnerships to leverage emerging payments innovation, they can set new benchmarks for cross-border transactions.
The path forward is clear: banks that embrace innovation and collaboration will not only compete, but lead in the evolving landscape of global finance.
The writer is general manager, Wise Platform, Asia Pacific

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Chinese economy stays challenged but some consumer stocks offer potential: BOA
[SINGAPORE] While headwinds persist for the Chinese economy and consumer confidence stays low, a select range of stocks could defy broader market trends and outperform their peers, said the Bank of America (BOA). Despite improved market sentiment, the Chinese economy remains saddled by challenged consumption growth and elevated youth unemployment alongside deflationary pressures, BOA analysts noted in a report last Thursday (May 29). However, stocks related to five themes could benefit from Chinese consumer spending, the BOA analysts said. Specifically, these are stocks that focus on the categories of health and wellness; affordable luxury; pragmatic goods and services; personal experiences and emotional value; as well as intellectual property. These 'new consumption' stocks display 'significant divergence in performance' amid softer market trends and sharply outperformed their peers in earnings growth and share prices, BOA analysts said. With clear value propositions – be it emotional value, functionality or affordability – these stocks are favoured over large-cap premium brands or market proxy players, they added. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Energy drinks, outdoor brands win on post-pandemic health, wellness focus An increased interest in health and wellness among Chinese consumers post Covid-19, has benefitted stocks focusing on these themes, BOA said. In the beverage market, energy drinks and soft drinks that focus on health and anxiety alleviation logged stronger sales growth compared to liquor or beer, the analysts noted. Outdoor brands including Amer Sports enjoyed nearly 40 per cent year-on-year growth compared to the overall domestic sportswear market, which logged sales growth only in the single-digit percentages. Online healthcare experienced 'rapid growth' fuelled by rising demand for proactive and preventive health management, and the increasing penetration of online drug purchasing. Affordable luxury gains amid deflationary environment Consumers tend to be price sensitive in deflationary environments. Within the passenger vehicle market, domestic brands nearly doubled their market share from 33 per cent in 2020 to 65 per cent in the first four months of 2025, thanks to better price-performance than European and Japanese brands, the report said. With improved product offerings, local brands in the smartphone market such as Xiaomi and Huawei have taken market share away from Apple. This trend towards affordability is reflected in travel, where short-haul and domestic trips via railways and budget airlines have been on the rise; and domestic, 'affordable luxury' hotel chains have wrestled market share away from global five-star hotels. Policy stimulus, subsidies boost demand for pragmatic items The analysts also observed an increased focus on the utility and functionality over brand names among consumers. Boosted by policy stimulus, sales for home appliances, furniture and consumer electronics rose by 20 to 25 per cent year-on-year for the first four months of 2025, outpacing overall retail sales growth, they noted. Mass market brands such as Geely, Leapmotor and XPeng are expected to outperform premium/luxury brands including Zeekr, Li Auto and Nio. Consumer willingness to spend on experiences The analysts noted that consumers are willing to invest time and money in experiences. Consumers are travelling more albeit spending less and treating themselves to 'small delights' such as new snacks, online games, cosmetics and pets. Companies such as Tencent and NetEase posted gaming revenue growth for Q1 2025. Meanwhile, Chinese snackmaker Yankershop reported 76 per cent year-on-year growth in 2024, significantly higher than that of the overall snack industry, thanks to its innovative konjac products. Co-branded products get boost from consumer spend on intellectual property BOA analysts highlighted that consumer spending on intellectual property-related goods and services – such as Labubu toys or domestic movies like Ne Zha – drives up sales for co-branded products. For instance, Pop Mart's retail sales rose by 165 to 170 per cent for Q1 of 2025, with China sales up by 95 to 100 per cent. The success of the animated movie Ne Zha 2, which contributed to around 60 per cent of China's Q1 2025 box office, also drove sales of co-branded products such as milk, teas and toys.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Going alone is not the answer to security questions: Chan Chun Sing
[SINGAPORE] Political and military leaders must arrest the temptation to go it alone when they feel insecure, as history has many examples of such an approach backfiring, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday(June 1). This is as attempts to prioritise one's security without due regard for international laws and norms could easily lead to greater insecurity in others, sparking a vicious spiral that begets greater insecurity, Chan said at the sixth and final plenary session of the Shangri-La Dialogue. This applies to all aspects of security, including countries' economic well-being, he added, recalling a point made by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim at the forum a day earlier that faltering trade has consequences that ripple beyond any one region. Chan said today's world is not unlike the 1930s, when beggar-thy-neighbour policies arguably contributed to expansionist and irredentist foreign policies that culminated in World War II. As competition in the security and economic domains increase, so has the need for guardrails and communication channels to reduce the risk of miscalculation, he said. He cited how Singapore and Malaysia both respected an international tribunal's directive when there was a disagreement over reclamation works, and thereby managed to reach an amicable settlement. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'While the issue began with acrimony, the warmth and civility between the negotiating teams led to an amicable resolution,' he noted. The two neighbours still have their differences, but have continued to deepen cooperation, such as through the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, he said. Chan emphasised that while great powers have great responsibilities when it comes to upholding international rules, small countries also have agency and responsibility in upholding the global economic and security order. On its part, Singapore is committed to engaging both the US and China without taking any sides. 'We believe that taking sides, regardless of issues and context, breeds irrelevance,' he said. 'And if one is irrelevant, it will almost certainly require (one) to take sides.' Instead, Singapore takes the side of principles that promote a more integrated global economic and security order, where states have a fair chance to compete and can improve the lives of their people through trade rather than war, he added. Noting that emerging security challenges have to do with threats against networked infrastructure that transcend borders, Chan said Singapore is working with Asean partners to develop principles to facilitate defence cooperation for the region's critical underwater infrastructure. Fellow speakers at the plenary also shared different ways by which small states can contribute to tackling security problems. Sweden's Defence Minister, Dr Pal Jonson, noted his country's expertise in psychological defence and in responding to information operations, and how small states like Sweden and Singapore are ranked well when in innovation and research capabilities. Papua New Guinea Defence Minister Billy Joseph said his country amplifies its voice by working through multilateral forums such as the South Pacific Defence Ministers' Meeting and the Pacific Islands Forum. The Pacific Response Group, a disaster coordination organisation formed in November 2024, helped Vanuatu following an earthquake there a month later, added Dr Joseph. Responding to a question about Singapore's diplomatic approach, Chan said small states are realistic that engagement is not on the basis of sympathy or charity, but on being successful and having value-add. Singapore's approach is to look at the principles that will best enable it to survive and thrive, he added. For instance, on Ukraine, Chan said the principle the Republic holds dear is that of the sovereignty of nations, as it would be a dangerous world if one country can march into another on the basis of wanting to right the wrongs of history. Holding to this principle meant it has stood up to great powers in the past for doing the same, as the greater risk is of the principle no longer being observed by countries big and small, he added. On questions about understanding China's perspectives, Chan said it is in the interest of everyone to work with China, and vice versa. This year's summit was the first time since 2019 that China did not send its defence minister, which raised questions about Beijing's continued engagement with the region. If China perceives that the world does not respect or understand it sufficiently, it is incumbent upon the country to use every opportunity possible, including the Shangri-La Dialogue, to get its voice heard and make clear its stance, said Chan. He urged countries to deepen efforts to understand others, so that they do not end up with simplistic interpretations or misreadings of other people's intentions. Chan was also asked if Singapore would apply the concept of self-determination to the case of Taiwan. Responding, he said it was scary to hear simplistic explanations that try to frame the conflict as one between democracy and autocracy, or to draw 'unhelpful parallels' between Taiwan and Ukraine. How the issue is going to be resolved, if not managed, will have to be determined by the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, he added. People on both sides share similar end goals of having security, including economic security, and the hope is that channels of communication can be opened so they can discuss where their shared future lies, said Chan. Chan said his final takeaway from the forum was the need for deeper cooperation, given the complexity of the issues confronting the world. 'Today, the challenges that we face are not geographically isolated challenges (but) are interwoven,' he said. 'And to solve those issues... we need to build the solutions at the network level, and all of us can contribute to that – be it big or small countries.' THE STRAITS TIMES


AsiaOne
13 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Why These Buyers Chose Older Leasehold Condos—And Have No Regrets, Money News
"Old" and "leasehold" are Singaporeans' least favourite combination of words. We ourselves have seen that, despite numerous presentations on how leasehold can outdo freehold, there's just a strong reluctance to accept it: on some visceral level, many like to feel that they're paying for 25+ years of their lives for something permanent. So why did three of these homeowners we speak to decide to purchase not only leasehold condos, but older leasehold condos? Here are their stories: 1. Affordability issues when both spouses are self-employed CH is Malaysian but works in Singapore, and his wife is a Singaporean; he's currently awaiting a change in his citizenship status. The couple's main worry, when choosing their property, was twofold: First, qualifying for a loan was tougher for both of them. Banks apply a haircut of 30 per cent to variable sources of income, for Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) purposes. The TDSR, in turn, limits home loan repayments to 55 per cent of monthly income, inclusive of other debts. Because CH and his wife are both self-employed, their maximum loan amount was cut by a third; and this required them to put down a larger down payment. The second reason was the fear of losing clients, late-paying clients, and other cash flow issues faced by the self-employed. CH says that: "If one of us has a salary it's not so bad, but when it's both of us, it's possible both of us go through a dry spell at the same time." The affordability concern was such that, for a time, the couple even considered buying a condo in Malaysia instead. But this idea was eventually scrapped, as the couples' clients were all Singaporeans, and even CH's father happens to live in Singapore. The two had a difficult time finding a unit large enough, but at the same time cheap enough to meet tighter affordability limits. CH says they viewed five or six different projects, but were unimpressed until they found their unit on the East Coast. While they don't want to divulge the name, the couple says the condo dates back to 1986, and is close to East Coast Beach (in fact they can walk there). CH says: "At first we were surprised the agent wanted to bring up this condo, because it was leasehold and quite old. Also there are over 1,000 units, which we had specified we didn't prefer as we prefer privacy. But when we visited the view of the sea, along with the area being very private despite the condo's size, won us over. Furthermore the unit was around 937 sq ft, and it was around $1,279 psf. Our agent warned us that we were unlikely to find such a large unit with a sea view at that price, even though it was leasehold. After we tossed and turned for about a week, we couldn't get it out of our heads. So we went ahead with it, even though it was an older leasehold." The total cost, according to the couple, was under $1.2 million, leaving them more than sufficient funds to renovate and furnish without a loan. Even better, CH says it became possible to place the condo entirely under his wife's name, due to the lower cost. This leaves him with the possibility of buying another property, if it comes up in the future. Still, for the long term, CH says he's not really worried: 60 years is a long remaining lease for a couple already in their early forties. The two have no long-term plans to upgrade or move, and they may hold the condo to the end. 2. The privilege of living in the heart of Chinatown, until the en-bloc came SY is one of the few Singaporeans who has no qualms about older leasehold properties, because he has owned one and come out on top from it. When he was in his mid-thirties, SY and his spouse purchased a unit at Pearl Bank Apartment in Chinatown — today redeveloped as One Pearl Bank. At the time he made his purchase, he was given numerous warnings by his family and friends not to go ahead. The original Pearl Bank Apartment was built back in 1976; and by the time SY moved in (sometime in the 1990s) it already had a bad reputation: it was known that some vice workers rented out units there, and some of the common areas were not in good condition. SY says that: "We chose to stay because it was close to the temple which we frequent, so it was very convenient. Any time, day or night, there was all kinds of wonderful food to eat. I could just cross one road to buy anything I wanted, or to reach the Chinatown MRT. " When Pearl Bank was bought by CapitaLand in 2018, SY's decision was proven to be a good one. While he doesn't want to disclose the figures, SY does point out that - compared to two of his brothers and a sister who bought newer properties — his was the one that saw the best gains. (We did our own snooping around though: CapitaLand purchased Pearl Bank Apartments for $728 million, and the various units — which ranged from 1,323 sq ft to 3,339 sq ft, received between $1.8 million to $4.9 million for the sale.) SY even briefly considered buying a unit in the redeveloped One Pearl Bank, but unfortunately his living situation had changed, and he needed to be closer to his children. Nonetheless, he considers it one of his best decisions; and his sale proceeds more than covered the cost of his current resale condo. 3. Needing the size for a production studio as well as a home GT works in product design and prototyping, and his clients have ranged from toy companies to packaging firms. As he runs his own business, he wanted a home that was also versatile enough to act as his office and his showroom: "This is practical for me as I also meet clients in my home, and I have a gallery to show them my process and end-results," GT says. "So I made my needs plain to my agent from day one, and it was agreed we would probably be looking at leasehold, as I needed a lot of space but the budget was very fixed." When the agent showed him a 1,180 plus sq ft unit in Lakeshore, GT said he felt something "jump" in his mind. Despite viewing three other projects, he said: "I didn't find the others appealing because of cost, maintenance, or a layout that would take too much work to reno." For the Lakeshore unit, GT already had a clear idea in his mind: he would merge two of the bedrooms into a bedroom or office, and use the study space as a separate gallery from the living room, thus separating his work by theme. "When I already have such a strong impression I guess it's hard to let go," GT says, "And what sealed the deal was the price, which was exactly within budget." GT says the unit was about $1.6 million, which would be a minimal stretch after the sale of his previous two-bedder. GT says the lease is 99-years from 2002, which he doesn't feel is very old at all (most Singaporeans feel a condo is getting old when it nears 25). GT is open to the idea of upgrading again to a larger unit — but for now, he enjoys living so close to the convenience of Jurong East. [[nid:718256]] This article was first published in Stackedhomes.