NATO's rearmament reignites age-old defence debate of quantity vs. quality
Moscow's ability to produce en masse drones, missiles, aircraft and other weapons of war has been hampered by sanctions and a long-term erosion of quality is taking place.
"Russia is currently struggling to build genuinely new and technologically advanced systems," said the report by Mathieu Boulègue, published last month by the U.K.-based Chatham House think-tank.
"Instead, it is relying on Soviet-era legacy systems and research. It is also heavily dependent on third-party suppliers to replace essential Western-made components — with import substitutions and domestic production failing to meet requirements."
The report, in part, exposes one of the biggest debates going on in the Western defence community right now. The 32 members of the NATO military alliance have agreed to drastically expand military spending, aiming to deliver five per cent of their gross domestic product for defence spending by 2035. The emphasis, especially for Canada, is in high-tech innovation.
WATCH | What's next for Canada's drone industry?:
But, experts ask, should NATO nations be investing billions of dollars in expensive, high-tech weapons systems, such as the F-35 stealth jet and the highly sophisticated, recently ordered River Class destroyers? Or, should there be more emphasis on cheaper, disposable technology?
While acknowledging the debate is not mutually exclusive, critics of high-spending, high-tech plans point at how multimillion-dollar Russian tanks are being disabled and destroyed by small, inexpensive — in some cases garage-built — drones.
The emphasis on quantity over quality is something NATO should be paying closer attention to as it builds out its rearmament plans, said a Canadian arms control expert.
"This is a long, long running debate," said Andrew Rasiulis, who once ran the Directorate of Nuclear and Arms Control Policy at the Department of National Defence.
"Quantity has a quality of its own, and the Russians have quantity."
He said too much should not be made of the fact that Moscow's munitions and equipment are less sophisticated and NATO nations, such as Canada, need to look at their investments not through the lens of spending a certain amount of money, but what makes sense militarily.
"What's important is the ability of one side to deter and defend, if necessary, against the other side," Rasiulis said.
In many respects, NATO has been here before.
When the Cold War reached new heights in the 1980s, the Soviet Union maintained an enormous military presence in Warsaw Pact nations with a ratio of five divisions for every U.S.-led division. NATO made up for that with better technology and nuclear deterrence.
Russia was largely equipped with less sophisticated Soviet-designed weapons that benefited from common parts and ammunition, which meant simplified logistics and training.
The Chatham House report said despite the Kremlin's record levels of military spending, the current state of its military industry is one of regression — contrary to what the Kremlin would have the world believe.
"Production will likely have to be simplified and slowed over the coming years, while Russia will be forced to accept reduced quality of outputs and will suffer from 'innovation stagnation' in its technological research and development," said the report.
"These problems are not insurmountable. Russia will continue to muddle through and keep producing systems that are 'good enough' to pose a sustained threat to Ukraine. But being 'good enough' to prolong a war against Ukraine is not the same as being able to keep up with Western (and Chinese) advances in military technology over the longer term."
Russian know-how being shared with North Korea
It seems, however, the quantity versus quality debate is not only going to be NATO's problem.
Defence Intelligence of Ukraine head Kyrylo Budanov said in early June that Russia's proven, basic technological know-how is being shared with North Korea.
On July 1, he said Moscow had transferred the first batch of its Pantsir-S1 surface-to-air missile systems to the regime of Kim Jong-un and had provided technology for mass-producing Iran-designed Shahed-type attack drones.
"It will for sure bring changes in the military balance in the region between North Korea and South Korea," Budanov was quoted as saying by Ukrainian media.
Recent information, he said, indicates that North Korean workers are being trained at Russian plants, including facilities in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone, in Tatarstan, where modified Shahed drones are assembled.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU leaders urge more pressure on Russia ahead of Ukraine talks
European allies renewed pressure on Russia overnight Saturday as they rallied behind Ukraine in insisting that any deal to end the war include Kyiv ahead of next week's bilateral peace talks in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says
(Reuters) -One person was killed, and several apartments and an industrial facility were damaged in a Ukrainian drone attack on the south Russian region of Saratov, the governor said on Sunday. Roman Busargin posted on the Telegram messaging app that residents were evacuated after debris from a destroyed drone damaged three apartments in the overnight attack. "Several residents required medical assistance," Busargin said. "Aid was provided onsite, and one person has been hospitalised. Unfortunately, one person has died." Russian air defence units destroyed 121 Ukrainian drones overnight, including eight over the Saratov region, the defence ministry said. It reports only how many drones its defence units down, not how many Ukraine launches. Busargin did not specify what kind of industrial site was damaged. Social media footage showed thick black smoke rising over what looked like an industrial zone. Reuters verified the location seen in one of the videos as matching file and satellite imagery of the area. Reuters could not verify when the video was filmed. Ukrainian media, including the RBK-Ukraine media outlet, reported that the oil refinery in the city of Saratov, the administrative centre of the region, was on fire after a drone attack. Reuters could not verify those reports. There was no official comment from Russia. The Rosneft-owned refinery in the Saratov city was forced to suspend operations earlier this year for safety reasons after Ukrainian drone attacks, industry sources told Reuters. Russia's SHOT Telegram channel, which often publishes information from sources in the security services and law enforcement, reported about eight explosions were heard over Saratov and Engels, cities separated by the Volga River. Russia's civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia said on Telegram that flights in and out of Saratov had been halted for about two hours early on Sunday to ensure air safety. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes on each other's territory in the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Kyiv says its attacks inside Russia are aimed at destroying infrastructure that is key to Moscow's war efforts, including energy and military infrastructure, and are in response to Russia's continued strikes.


Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Russians cheer Putin's Alaska invitation, envision no concessions on Ukraine
MOSCOW — Russian officials and commentators crowed about landing a summit between President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump on Friday in Alaska, the first time the Russian leader has been invited to the United States outside the United Nations since 2007 — and apparently without the Kremlin having made any clear concessions over its war in Ukraine. European and Ukrainian officials, meanwhile, were scrambling to understand and respond to the administration's sudden reversal. Days before announcing the summit this past Friday, Trump was expressing frustration over Putin's continued bombardment of Ukrainian sanctions and threatening to ratchet up sanctions on Russia. Russia's special economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev, a key interlocutor between the Kremlin and the Trump administration, said the decision to hold the summit in Alaska was symbolically important for the U.S.-Russian partnership. The United States purchased the territory from Russia in 1867 for $7.2 million, or about 2 cents per acre. 'Born as Russian America — Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade — Alaska echoes those ties and makes the U.S. an Arctic nation,' Dmitriev wrote on X. Billionaire Konstantin Malofeyev, sanctioned by the Obama administration for funding pro-Kremlin separatists in Ukraine and interfering with elections in several countries, said Alaskans 'respectfully remember their Russian past and their Orthodox present.' Russian military bloggers also celebrated, while tempering expectations. 'The meeting in Alaska has every chance to become historic,' wrote pro-Kremlin war correspondent Alexander Kots on his channel on the Telegram messaging app. 'That is, of course, if the West does not try to pull off another scheme.' Western analysts said Trump should tread carefully. 'Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian Empire,' Michael McFaul, an Obama-era U.S. ambassador to Russia, wrote on X. 'Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected.' Sam Greene, professor in Russian politics at King's College London, said the venue favored Russia. 'The symbolism of holding the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska is horrendous — as though designed to demonstrate that borders can change, land can be bought and sold,' Greene said. 'Never mind that mainstream Russian discourse maintains a claim that Alaska should be returned to Russia.' A key difference: Czar Alexander II offered to sell Alaska. Putin has seized Ukrainian territory by force, illegally annexing Crimea in 2014 and launching the full invasion and illegally claiming to annex four other Ukrainian regions in 2022. Trump has often expressed admiration for Putin. But in recent weeks, Trump has complained about the Russian leader's resistance to the full and unconditional ceasefire that Ukraine and its allies have demanded before any peace talks. Russian analysts said it was clear that Trump had swerved first in agreeing to the meeting. It was unlikely, they said, that the Kremlin had dropped its ultimate goals for Ukraine — demilitarization, the installation of a pro-Russian regime and neutral status outside NATO. Trump 'didn't want to fall into confrontation with Russia,' said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. 'Trump himself said that further sanctions probably wouldn't force Putin to change his mind. We could see from these signals that Trump could be open to a new attempt, and he did so just days before the end of his ultimatum.' A former senior Kremlin official said Russia was moving toward compromise by signaling it was ready for a ceasefire. 'Politically it is easier [for the Kremlin] to continue the war until Ukraine's final collapse than to make peace,' said the former official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter. 'This is why they are clinging on to the idea that there needs to be a temporary but not permanent truce — and then in the meantime [Ukrainian] elections can be conducted.' The Kremlin has long sought to dominate Ukraine through the election of a friendly president and parliament in Kyiv. Ukrainians have repeatedly taken to the streets to demand a free and democratic future in the European Union. Ukrainian and European officials met with Vice President JD Vance on Saturday in an attempt to agree on a response to a Russian ceasefire proposal. Details of the proposal were unclear. One person briefed on the talks said Russia had proposed that Kyiv relinquish Donbas in eastern Ukraine, which includes the Luhansk and Donetsk regions, in exchange for a ceasefire. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations. The Kremlin is not willing to give back territory in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian military gains have secured Moscow's prized land bridge to Crimea, the person said. European leaders issued a statement following the talks with Vance, saying a ceasefire should be a precondition for negotiations, not a Russian bargaining chip. Trump told reporters Friday that the Kremlin proposal involved 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both' countries. Russian analysts said Putin would not agree to withdraw forces from Kherson or Zaporizhzhia, regions Russia illegally annexed in 2022 but still does not fully control. 'Russian troops are not going to make any step backward,' said Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst. The only compromise Russia would make, he said, would be to halt its military campaign to seize the Odesa and Kharkiv regions and the cities of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, which remain under Ukrainian control. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated Saturday that he would not accept any deal that involved giving territory to Russia, which he said was forbidden by Ukraine's constitution. It's not clear whether the Russian proposal included any guarantee Moscow wouldn't simply resume fighting. The Kremlin has insisted that any agreement address what it calls the 'root causes' of the conflict by demilitarizing Ukraine and changing its government. 'There are no guarantees,' said Markov, the pro-Kremlin analyst. 'But there are also no guarantees that Ukraine won't begin the war again.' Russia's main interest in the summit, he said, was to cast Ukraine and Europe as obstacles to Trump's dream of brokering peace. 'Russia hopes that Trump will finally become sensible and see that Zelensky is the main reason for the war that is happening now, and that the second reason for the war is European leaders … and that they are his enemies too,' Markov said. Trump will see that 'Putin is one of his few good political friends.' Janis Kluge, deputy head of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Putin's proposal was 'itself part of the war.' 'It's just a temporary ceasefire in exchange for land,' Kluge said. 'It is meant to give Putin an advantage in the longer run against Ukraine and the West.'