logo
Want more growth? Welcome more immigrants.

Want more growth? Welcome more immigrants.

Boston Globe07-07-2025
Which means the only way to ensure the population base needed to keep the economy growing is to increase the number of immigrants entering the United States.
Much of the public supports President Trump's ferocious crackdown on illegal immigration. The administration is obsessed with rounding up and deporting foreigners who have been living in the country without proper documents. Whatever the wisdom of that policy, it ignores the fact that the vast majority of unlawful migrants who enter the country come here to work in peace. The US economy in recent decades has fueled an unprecedented demand for labor, but there aren't nearly enough legal channels to accommodate that demand. The result has been an influx of migrants crossing the border unlawfully. And that in turn eventually triggered the political backlash that helped send Trump to the White House.
Advertisement
All the while, however, millions of jobs are going unfilled in this country, because there aren't enough working-age Americans to fill them all.
Clearly the best way to solve the problem of illegal immigration is to make it easier for foreigners to immigrate to America
legally
. That, in turn, is the only way the United States can have the expanding labor force necessary to achieve economic growth and higher living standards in the decades ahead.
In
The authors show that nearly half of the net growth in the US labor force over the past decade has come from immigrants. That might seem surprising since only about 1 in 7 Americans are foreign born. But immigrants are more likely to work than native-born Americans of working age. In 2023, just under 60 percent of US-born natives age 16 and older were working. Among immigrants, the percentage was almost 65 percent.
'Over the past decade, immigrants have filled nearly 40 percent of the new jobs in America,' Vedder, Moore, and Denhart write. And for most of that time, the unemployment rate has remained at historically low levels — evidence that immigrants are not displacing US-born citizens from jobs that would otherwise have gone to them.
With roughly
Advertisement
But what makes immigrants so valuable to the US economy goes beyond their propensity to work. There is also their extraordinary performance as innovators and entrepreneurs.
More than 45 percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children, and immigrants are more than twice as likely as US natives to start a business. In 2023, according to
Such statistics are striking, but they also stand to reason. Almost by definition, immigrants have a higher than normal willingness to take chances, to relinquish the familiar, and to try new things. It shouldn't come as a surprise that newcomers from abroad are fired with a passion to dream the American Dream, or that
Immigration increases both the labor supply and labor demand, which helps explain why states with the highest immigration inflows, such as Texas and Florida, are associated with lower unemployment than other states. Because immigrants are more likely to work and to start businesses, their presence leads to higher rates of economic growth. 'The parts of the United States with the highest proportion of population coming from other nations have higher levels of total output per capita,' the Unleash Prosperity authors show. Thus, in the 10 states with the highest percentage of immigrants, output per capita is nearly 40 percent higher than in the 10 least immigrant-intensive states. To be sure, correlation may not prove causation, and immigration is not the only factor affecting economic output. But it is hard to dispute that immigration and growth go together.
Advertisement
What is true nationally is true locally. At a presentation I attended in 2012, Boston's then-mayor Thomas Menino rattled off a slew of numbers that underscored how much foreigners added to the city's prosperity. There were 8,800 immigrant-owned small businesses in Boston, Menino said, producing nearly $3.7 billion in annual sales and employing more than 18,000 people. At the time, immigrants living in Boston were spending $4 billion per year, generating $1.3 billion in state and federal taxes.
Since 2012, the
To fully understand why robust immigration boosts American prosperity, it is crucial to take into account the contributions of their
children
. The United States would never have become the world's foremost economic powerhouse if not for the innovations of first-generation Americans — men and women whose parents were immigrants. Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, was the son of an immigrant from Syria. Larry Ellison, creator of the software firm Oracle, was born to a single mother from Ukraine. Jeff Bezos was raised by Miguel Bezos, who immigrated from Cuba. Henry Ford's father came to America from Ireland.
Advertisement
Needless to say, millions of other first-generation Americans, though not as famous or as rich as the megabillionaires, have contributed to every American industry and field of endeavor. And in the process they have typically risen to greater heights than their foreign-born parents.
'Since immigrants arriving in America are typically poor (particularly these days because of the large recent inflow of relatively unskilled illegal aliens), immigrant poverty rates are higher than that of native-born Americans,' the three authors observe. 'But poverty among their adult children is typically
below
that of the native born. Moreover, while immigrants themselves are more likely than native-born Americans to receive graduate or professional degrees, their education is modest relative to their own children, who exceed native-born Americans in terms of high-level educational attainment.'
In short, without immigrants and their children, the United States would be a poorer, duller, less influential, less desirable nation. That is especially true given the crisis of America's 'birth dearth,' since immigrants tend, on average, to be younger and to have more children than natives. According to Census Bureau calculations, the number of working-age US-born Americans is projected to fall by 5.3 million between now and 2040. Over the same span, the population of working-age immigrants is expected to
grow
by 1.9 million.
Immigration has always been the great growth hormone of American history. More immigrants have always meant more economic development, more innovation, more cultural richness. That is as true today as it has ever been — and it is compounded by the fact that the US economy desperately needs more workers. Border control is not incompatible with a policy of welcoming immigrants with open arms. And the surest way to dissuade illegal immigration is to create more opportunities for would-be Americans to immigrate lawfully.
Advertisement
Anti-immigrant demagoguery may excite some in the MAGA camp; there has always been an appetite for
Expanding legal immigration is a pro-growth, pro-worker, and pro-sovereignty agenda. It is the best way to strengthen the rule of law, suppress mayhem at the border, and maintain America's role as a safe haven for the oppressed — all while attracting the young and dynamic workforce on which US growth depends. We have always needed more immigrants. Now, as the United States is about to enter its second quarter-millennium, we need them more than ever.
To open our gates to striving would-be Americans is to turbocharge the economy and enrich the American way of life. Much has changed since
This is adapted from the current
, Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit
.
Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls
California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls

CNN

time5 minutes ago

  • CNN

California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls

GOP Rep. Doug LaMalfa drew taunts and jeers at two raucous town hall meetings Monday over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' LaMalfa, whose district spans much of the state's northern interior, is the latest Republican to face harsh in-person criticism, as members of the party attempt to sell Trump's sweeping agenda back home during Congress' August break from Washington. Last week, Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood – who also heeded the guidance of the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, to focus the district work period on the president's massive domestic policy bill – met a largely hostile crowd as he was pressed on a range of issues, including the agenda bill that Trump signed into law July 4. LaMalfa calmly address audience members throughout both town halls, even as some attendees cursed at him and railed against his support of the president, shouting 'Liar!' While the morning crowd in Chico had been much louder, the audience in Red Bluff later in the evening was at times just as vocal, especially when LaMalfa expressed skepticism about the role of carbon dioxide in climate change. At both town halls, LaMalfa was pressed over how Trump's agenda, which includes historic cuts to federal support for the social safety net, would affect rural hospitals, particularly those in his district. Other attendees asked questions about transparency around the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files. At the morning event, LaMalfa called it a 'bad look' to have Epstein-related information continue to be 'suppressed.' Still other attendees warned the president's tariffs would harm farmers in California and attacked the congressman's credibility. 'If you're not here to either announce your resignation, why aren't you here to apologize to the farmers of the north state because of your support for the Trump tariffs?' one audience members said at the Chico town hall. 'I'm not gonna do either. Thanks,' LaMalfa replied. 'Do you actually want to talk about something productive?' LaMalfa defended Trump's tariffs, insisting that the United States had been taken advantage of and that the tariffs were being used to negotiate better deals for American farmers. 'And you know, is it the ideal, perfect way to go? No, I hope these tariffs can end soon,' he said Monday evening. 'I want to believe at some point we'lll end up with very low or zero tariffs with all these countries.' LaMalfa also addressed Texas' redistricting effort, warning it is going to start 'a grass fire all across the country.' His comments come as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map, as CNN previously reported, could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative and could potentially target LaMalfa's seat. For his part, LaMalfa said he didn't support either redistricting push. 'It's really ugly and no matter which side of the aisle you're on, it doesn't look good. It doesn't give you more faith in the political process if legislators draw the lines merely to have an outcome for a partisan win,' the congressman said.

Pete Hegseth Responds to Claims That He and Trump Want 'Martial Law'
Pete Hegseth Responds to Claims That He and Trump Want 'Martial Law'

Newsweek

time5 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Pete Hegseth Responds to Claims That He and Trump Want 'Martial Law'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has pushed back against critics who say President Donald Trump's administration seeks to impose martial law, following the president's announcement of sweeping federal intervention in Washington, D.C. Speaking on Fox News' eponymous The Ingraham Angle, with host Laura Ingraham, Hegseth defended the deployment of up to 1,000 National Guard troops and federal takeover of the nation's capital police department as lawful measures to restore order. Why It Matters Trump's invocation of emergency powers to federalize D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department represents one of the most aggressive federal interventions in local law enforcement in recent history. The move sets a precedent that could extend to other cities, with Trump specifically naming Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Baltimore as potential targets for similar federal deployments. Martial law is a term that references the military seizing control of a civilian area during an emergency. What To Know Trump invoked Section 740 of the 1973 D.C. Home Rule Act, allowing federal control for 30 days, with congressional approval required for extensions. The intervention was triggered following the August assault on Edward "Big Balls" Coristine, a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, in a Logan Circle carjacking attempt. During the Fox News interview, Ingraham pressed Hegseth on martial law concerns: "The question of martial law keeps getting raised by the left that Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth want to impose martial law, as authoritarians would." The defense secretary responded by pointing to Los Angeles as an example, noting the deployment of 4,000 California National Guard troops and Marines during immigration protests. "They were the troops available to ensure that we de-escalated the situation and didn't allow other lawbreakers to say, 'Look, it's wide-open. We can do whatever we want in these sanctuary cities,'" he said. Hegseth directly addressed critics' concerns about targeting political opponents: "I was told, 'Oh, you're going to lock up political opponents. You're going to go after Democrat, yada, yada. It's the same stuff every time. Mischaracterizing our intentions." He said that Trump's approach involves using "legal and lawful and constitutional means," including federalizing police departments, deploying National Guard units and bringing in federal marshals when local law enforcement proves inadequate. But the federal takeover in the nation's capital accompanies contradictory crime data. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime in D.C. has dropped to a 30-year low, with violent offenses falling 35 percent in 2024 and declining another 26 percent this year. Trump called Monday "liberation day," announcing plans for a broader "beautification" campaign including abolishing homeless encampments, launching street repairs and adding amenities like a White House ballroom. Ingraham: The left says Trump and Hegseth, they want to impose martial law as authoritarians… to that you say? Hegseth: To that I say look at Los Angeles… — Acyn (@Acyn) August 11, 2025 What People Are Saying Hegseth also said on The Ingraham Angle Monday: "The intentions of this president is to establish law and order using legal and lawful and constitutional means, which he completely has, and you know why they don't like him? He's got the guts to do it. He's got the guts to say, I'm gonna federalize the police that don't work. I'm gonna bring in the National Guard. I'm gonna bring in federal marshals." Trump, during a Monday news conference at the White House: "This is liberation day in D.C., and we're going to take our capital back." Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, in a statement sent to Newsweek on Monday: "This is the latest effort by the president to distract from the issues he should be focused on—including the roller coaster of the U.S. economy thanks to his policies. When it comes to public safety in Baltimore, he should turn off the right-wing propaganda and look at the facts. Baltimore is the safest it's been in over 50 years. Homicides are down 28% this year alone, reaching the lowest level of any year on record. We still have real work to do to build on this progress—but that work starts and ends here in Baltimore, with the local, state, and federal partners who have gotten us this far." Muriel Bowser, mayor of Washington, D.C., told MSNBC: "It is true that we had a terrible spike in crime in 2023, but this is not 2023—this is 2025. We've achieved that by working with the community, the police, our prosecutors, and, in fact, the federal government." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, accompanied by President Donald Trump, right, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, center, speaks at a news conference in the White House on August 11 in Washington, D.C. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, accompanied by President Donald Trump, right, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, center, speaks at a news conference in the White House on August 11 in Washington, Happens Next? The 30-day federal control period will test the administration's approach to urban crime management. Trump's threats to extend similar measures to other Democratic-led cities will likely face legal challenges and political opposition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store