
Gen Z Is Significantly More Afraid of This Trend Than Older Generations
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
When it comes to their shopping habits, Generation Z is a far different generation than baby boomers, Gen X and even millennials.
A survey from Lightspeed Commerce has revealed that 32 percent of Gen Z (born roughly between 1997 and 2012) shoppers are afraid of being judged or "canceled" for supporting the wrong brands—over five times more than boomers (born 1946-1964), at 6 percent.
Why It Matters
In the aftermath of President Donald Trump's executive order to end "radical and wasteful" government DEI programs, some companies have followed suit, getting rid of DEI initiatives and emphasis on inclusivity in their workplace and in their brands.
At the same time, cancel culture is making a pervasive impact on corporations, in the entertainment industry and in consumer behavior. Choosing brands that do not align with a shopper's morals could have an effect in their social circle, especially if they're younger, the research suggests.
People carry shopping bags during Black Friday sales at American Dream Mall on November 29, 2024, in East Rutherford City.
People carry shopping bags during Black Friday sales at American Dream Mall on November 29, 2024, in East Rutherford City.What To Know
Gen Z is adjusting shopping habits to make room for the possibility of cancel culture, according to the Lightspeed Commerce report, which surveyed more than 2,000 North American consumers.
Nearly all participants in this age group, or 96 percent, said they buy with intention, and 66 percent said their purchases should reflect their personal values.
Many values can guide them in supporting specific brands and products, with 37 percent saying they make their brand decisions based on sustainability and environmental impact. Another 29 percent said local pride and nationalism plays a role, while 26 percent said they shop based on cultural or religious alignment.
These values could shift power away from corporations and toward the consumer, experts said.
"Companies will have to meet higher standards," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "They'll be held accountable for how they operate, what they sell and how it's made. That kind of pressure could usher in a new wave of conscious capitalism, where profit and responsibility align."
A solid chunk of Gen Z consumers, 15 percent, consider a brand CEO's political views when deciding what to buy.
Still, price and quality were key priorities as well, at 78 and 67 percent respectively.
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek that Gen Z's brand anxiety comes down to their age, as ages 18 to 35 are peak social performance years.
Additionally, this generation faces zero tolerance from some of their peers for "mistake buys" and potentially the digital permanence of their every purchase.
"Every tagged photo. Every unboxing video. Every 'like' is peer surveillance," Ryan said. "Company ethics can boost your clout, or get you canceled. Gen Z doesn't just boycott bad brands. They live in fear of being boycotted."
However, HR consultant Bryan Driscoll said that Gen Z was "done separating the company from the product" and this age group was "afraid of being complicit" in issues including the exploitation of workers, rather than fearing being canceled.
What People Are Saying
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Gen Z is more socially conscious than past generations, but not just in how they dress, in what they eat and who they support. Growing up in the social media age, your online persona has to match your real-life values. If there's a disconnect, you'll be called out. Authenticity isn't optional; it's a requirement."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "When you're younger and more consistently on social media, you're more than likely to care more about your image and the perceptions that come with it. Whether it's an outfit, vehicle, or vacation spot, Gen Z is going to take into account recent social and political viewpoints before purchasing or—if they've already clicked 'Buy'—posting on the sale."
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: "Will this fade? Yes. Mortgages, family budgets and career climbs force a shift from brand activism to basic needs. Gen Z will learn that sometimes the easiest choice is the most affordable shirt. No ethics audit required."
Bryan Driscoll, an HR consultant who specializes in generational differences, told Newsweek: "I don't think Gen Z is afraid of being canceled. I think they're afraid of being complicit. They know corporations exploit workers, dodge taxes and greenwash their way through scandals while boomers cheer them on for turning a profit. This generation is done separating the product from the company behind it. They're not buying your coffee if it comes with union busting. They're not shopping your sale if your CEO's on a yacht while your employees need GoFundMe for medical bills."
What Happens Next
As Gen Zers are more likely to demand more from the brands they shop from, the shift could mean more corporations are forced to cater more toward the values and morals of their younger consumers.
"This is about accountability," Driscoll said. "And that scares older generations because it shifts power away from corporations and toward the collective voice of younger consumers and workers."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CNBC
9 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Not even fire extinguishers can escape the Trump administration's tariffs
Even as tariff-related ruction appears to be settling down for the summer, U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is still reshaping global trade and industry. After the Trump administration hinted it could be open to Nvidia exporting more powerful chips to China after their revenue-sharing agreement, the semiconductor darling was reported to be developing a new chip for Beijing. And Intel's bounty from the CHIPS Act, formalized by the previous administration under Joe Biden, might come with a price tag of giving the current U.S. government a stake in the company. Meanwhile, the effects of tariffs continue to creep into everyday life. The costs incurred by fires in the U.S. — think of the tragic Los Angeles wildfires in January or the one near the Grand Canyon just last month — are already growing, not just in terms of the physical damage but also the price of insurance premiums. And now that Trump has added fire extinguishers to a list of steel products that will face a 50% import tariff, even the price of relatively more benign and contained fires, such as those you start to burn photographs of your ex-partner, will be more expensive to put out. That's a truly protest-worthy tariff. Trump expands reach of steel and aluminum tariffs. The duties, which impose a 50% charge on imports, will include more than 400 additional product categories, such as fire extinguishers, machinery and construction materials. Nvidia says it is evaluating 'a variety of products.' The chipmaker is working on a new artificial intelligence chip for China that will be based on its Blackwell architecture, making it more powerful than the currently available H20, reported Reuters. Intel equity in return for U.S. government funding. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that the White House will provide the chipmaker with cash, which was promised under the CHIPS Act, in exchange for "an equity stake for our money." Technology stocks weigh down U.S. markets. The Nasdaq Composite fell 1.46% on Tuesday as shares of Palantir sank more than 9%. The Stoxx Europe 600 rose 0.69% even though European defense stocks tumbled. The U.K.'s FTSE 100 hit a record close. [PRO] UBS raises its forecast for gold — again. Despite the rally for gold stalling since the middle of the year, the Swiss banking giant hiked its 2025 and 2026 target for gold prices. Trump promised Ukraine 'security guarantees': Here's what they could look like The most significant development from Monday's talks between U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders was Trump's statement that security guarantees for Ukraine would be "provided" by European countries in "coordination with the U.S." French President Emmanuel Macron hinted Tuesday that the "first security guarantee we are working on — and it is the most important — is a strong Ukrainian army, composed of several hundred thousand men, well equipped, with defense systems and higher standards."

The Verge
9 minutes ago
- The Verge
The White House just joined TikTok
While it was President Joe Biden who signed the law that would force ByteDance to sell its stake in TikTok or face a ban, it's his successor, Donald Trump, who has yet to fulfill his promise of arranging a deal to keep TikTok running, legally, in the United States. The current deadline for a deal is September 17th. Still, it hasn't stopped Trump's administration from creating @WhiteHouse on TikTok, which published its first post on Tuesday night: a video celebrating Trump's accomplishments. The ban has only seen TikTok shut down in the US for one day, and its impact has been delayed three times. The first time was in January, when Trump took office and signed an executive order delaying enforcement of the ban for 75 days; then there was another delay in April, after a potential deal fell through due to Trump's harsh tariffs against China, and then in June, when he stated that he believed Chinese President Xi Jinping was open to a deal if a buyer emerged. While Trump tried to ban TikTok in 2020, his stance softened during his re-election campaign once his team learned how many supporters Trump had on the platform. In 2024, the Trump campaign launched its own official account, @TeamTrump, and quickly dominated the platform, getting more followers and views on their content than former Vice President Kamala Harris's now-dormant campaign account — 2.8 billion to 2.2 billion, according to journalist Kyle Tharp. A Republican digital operative close to the campaign heavily credited Trump, a former reality TV star, for his ability to generate attention-grabbing moments that could be transformed into viral content. 'TikTok is primarily an entertainment app,' he previously told The Verge, 'and our usage of it was just significantly more savvy than [the Democrats].' Although the legality of and ulterior motives behind a TikTok ban remain a serious question, the Trump administration, for now, appears to find utility in maintaining an account on the platform. 'Why would I want to get rid of TikTok?' Trump said on Truth Social in January, sharing a post about the billions of views his campaign account continued to rack up. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt repeated this stance after the government account was launched. 'President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign,' she said in a statement to The Verge, 'and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Tina Nguyen Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Social Media Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law
The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday amid uncertainty about the app's future, as another deadline approaches for its parent company, Bytedance, to sell to a US buyer or be banned in the United States. President Donald Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline of a sale-or-ban law passed under former President Joe Biden's administration, with the new deadline less than a month away on September 17. The latest delay in June kept the app accessible for its 170 million American users, despite the legislation that passed last year with bipartisan support over concerns that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a US national security risk. And it came as both the United States and China sought leverage in tense trade talks. TikTok's ultimate fate in the US remains unclear, but the official White House account is a signal the app could be here to stay. The first post on the official White House TikTok account features video of Trump as he says, 'Every day, I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation. I am your voice.' The post's caption reads, 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' As of 8 p.m. on Tuesday, shortly after launching, the account had garnered more than 20,000 followers. This is the administration's first official TikTok account. Both Trump and Biden launched accounts during the 2024 presidential campaign, drawing scrutiny as the leaders had previously raised national security concerns with the app. TikTok doesn't operate in China, but the Chinese government enjoys significant leverage over businesses under its jurisdiction. The US government has said it's worried China could use its national security laws to access the significant amount of personal information that TikTok, like most social media applications, collects from its US users. The TikTok sale-or-ban law went into effect on January 19 after Biden signed it last year. TikTok briefly took itself offline, sparking outcry from creators, but quickly came back after Trump signed an order delaying the ban's enforcement by 75 days in one of the first acts of his second term. The president's June delay marked his third extension of the ban.



