
Kolkata Top Cop's Stern Directives: Focus On Pakistani Flag Surveillance, Waqf Law Protests
Last Updated:
Sources in Kolkata Police told News18 the commissioner has directed officers to identify any locations where Pakistani flags are being printed or manufactured
Kolkata Police Commissioner Manoj Verma, during a recent crime review meeting held on Saturday, issued a series of firm instructions to officers across all police stations, encompassing matters of national sensitivity, law and order, and public safety.
Sources in Kolkata Police told News18 that the commissioner directed all officers to closely monitor their respective jurisdictions to identify any locations where Pakistani flags are being printed or manufactured.
PAKISTANI FLAGS
In light of heightened Indo-Pakistan tensions, Verma emphasised the need to prevent the use of such flags to incite unrest. Officers have been asked to track printing presses or vendors involved in producing these flags and to identify buyers or groups linked to recent purchases.
The commissioner warned that anti-social elements may exploit the current atmosphere to provoke disturbances, and such threats must be neutralised at the earliest.
WAQF LAW PROTESTS
Addressing concerns over recent protests related to the Waqf Act in several areas under the jurisdiction of the Kolkata Police, the commissioner instructed all police stations concerned to remain vigilant and intensify source-based intelligence gathering. The aim is to prevent any further unrest or escalation over the issue.
The entire security system was reviewed, along with the working of police stations and the role of supervisory officers during their visits.
WOMEN'S SAFETY
Referring to recent incidents of harassment near Gariahat and Bypass areas, officers were directed to act immediately upon receiving any complaints. Emphasis was placed on enhanced patrolling to prevent such crimes and reassure public safety.
ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION AND ENCROACHMENT OF WATER BODIES
The Commissioner stressed strict action against illegal constructions and warned that any complaints regarding the filling of ponds or wetlands must be acted upon promptly.
These directives reflect a proactive law enforcement strategy aimed at preserving public order and ensuring the safety and security of all citizens in Kolkata.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India watching Pak federal budget closely, to flag any breach of IMF aid terms
New Delhi: When Pakistan's finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presents the country's FY26 federal budget on Tuesday, top officials sitting in New Delhi will scout for a key figure —defence spending —according to two persons privy to the situation. New Delhi's concern is about where the money is coming from – will international aid to Pakistan, given for specific, targeted projects actually go into the stated purpose of economic reforms and climate resilience or will it be diverted to the military? As part of a $2.4 billion financial aid approved last month by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Islamabad has committed to preparing its FY26 budget 'in close consultation with the Fund". This condition, said one of the persons quoted above, is usually reserved for bail-out packages for far more serious financial crises, but has been applied in the case of Pakistan despite the funding being tailored for specific projects. Coming against the backdrop of the recent India-Pakistan conflict, this enables greater multilateral oversight of the country's resource management, the person said requesting anonymity. IMF documents will show Pakistan's commitments and trajectory for major revenue receipts and spending targets, including defence. 'If we see any discrepancies, we can take it up with IMF,' said the second person, who also asked not to be named. Information available from the IMF, based on Pakistani authorities and IMF staff estimates and projections, showed Islamabad's defence spending is estimated to have risen from ₹ 1.2 trillion Pakistani rupees in FY20 to over ₹ 2.1 trillion in FY25 although as a share of GDP, it declined from 2.6% to 1.9% during the period. Queries emailed on Thursday to the IMF and to the finance and external affairs ministries on Friday seeking comments for the story remained unanswered at the time of publishing. Experts pointed to the need for close oversight of how Pakistan uses international aid. 'India has to work closely with the countries contributing to the resources of international and multilateral organizations to ensure that either funding is not extended to Pakistan or if done, stricter terms are attached to it and some kind of international monitoring is included. Ensuring usage of funds for stated objectives takes close oversight,' said Maj Gen (Dr) Ashok Kumar, VSM, Director General of Centre for Joint Warfare Studies, an autonomous think-tank. 'Pakistan tends to hype up its security needs as existential threats in order to justify significant defence allocations. China has a vested interest here as Pakistan imports about 80% of its military hardware from China, and is the largest importer of military equipment from China. I see the situation changing only when there is real democracy in Pakistan, which can drive its agenda towards economic development,' said Kumar. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Pakistan was the top arms importer from China in 2020-24, swallowing up 63% of Beijing's exports. 'We have never attacked Pakistan, we have only responded decisively,' added Kumar. Despite India's protests, the IMF on 9 May, cleared immediate disbursal of $1 billion to Pakistan for economic reforms under a package approved last year and another $1.4 billion to reduce vulnerabilities to natural disasters. It said the country has 'delivered significant progress in stabilizing the economy' and made 'important progress in restoring macroeconomic stability despite a challenging environment.' In a strongly worded statement on that day, India raised concerns over the efficacy of IMF programmes in Pakistan given the country's 'poor track record, and also on the possibility of misuse of debt financing funds for state sponsored cross-border terrorism.' Pakistan's finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, a former international banker and former chief executive of JP Morgan's Global Corporate Bank for the Asia Pacific region, has said the recent military escalation with India will not have a large fiscal impact on Pakistan and could be managed within the current fiscal space, Reuters reported on 12 May. India has also strongly objected to the Asian Development Bank's (ADB) decision to extend financial support to Pakistan, warning that the funds could be misused amid rising defence spending, Mint reported on 4 June, citing an official aware of the matter. ADB on 3 June approved an $800-million programme to strengthen fiscal sustainability and improve public financial management in Pakistan. Pakistan's economy is estimated to have grown at 2.6% in FY25.


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
If my voice brought India's issues to forefront, that's my service to nation: Priyanka Chaturvedi
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi has strongly defended India's recent global anti-terror outreach mission across Europe, calling it both timely and necessary to expose the global threat posed by Pakistan-backed terrorism. Chaturvedi was part of the high-level All-Party Parliamentary Delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad under 'Operation Sindoor Outreach,' which presented India's firm stance against cross-border terrorism and garnered international support. Reflecting on the trip, Chaturvedi said the delegation had a clear mission: 'That was my responsibility. And if my speeches have influenced people and brought the country's issues to the forefront, I consider it my service to the nation.' She added, 'I hope that in near future, the European nations, because my group toured six countries—will understand that the terrorism we have been enduring for decades is now reaching their homes.' The delegation visited France, Italy, Denmark, the UK, Belgium, and Germany. During the tour, Indian MPs met foreign lawmakers, think tanks, and diaspora groups to raise awareness about radicalization and safe havens for terror groups operating from Pakistan. Chaturvedi highlighted the growing threat of radicalisation abroad, saying: 'The way indoctrination and radicalization are taking place, and everyone's wires are connected to Pakistan, whether it's Al-Qaeda, Jaish-e-Mohammed, or Lashkar-e-Taiba, everyone lives in safe houses there. They are protected.' She emphasised that, 'It was a successful trip where we were able to keep the country's interests safe.' Responding to political criticism that sending delegations abroad was a waste of public money, Chaturvedi hit back: 'Many leaders are saying that sending foreign delegations was a waste of money and time. I hope they will take a debriefing from their own party members who were also part of these delegations, ask them what was discussed, how it was said, and what their role was.' When asked about her passionate speeches and even mimicry of Pakistani political figures like Hina Rabbani Khar or Bilawal Bhutto (referred to as "Minamal Bhutto" in some circles), Chaturvedi firmly rooted her motivation in personal experience. 'After 26/11, the terrorist attack in Mumbai, I was deeply affected and came into politics. I know how many homes are destroyed because of terrorism. How many women struggle to manage households. Terrorism tries to destroy businesses and the country's stability.' The Operation Sindoor Outreach initiative helped India draw sharper international attention to terrorism and its sources like Pakistan, and has provided a unified national narrative on the global stage.


Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
Pakistan Army Chief Rejects Indian Regional Dominance, Calls Water Treaty Suspension Unacceptable
Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir has declared that his country will never accept Indian dominance in South Asia, while strongly condemning India's decision to suspend the Indus Water Treaty as crossing a fundamental boundary for Pakistan. Speaking to university officials and educators, Munir emphasized Pakistan's unwavering stance against what he characterized as Indian regional hegemony. His remarks came just weeks after both nations agreed to a ceasefire following several days of military confrontation that had escalated tensions across the subcontinent. The Pakistani military leader expressed particular concern over India's suspension of the Indus Water Treaty, describing water rights as an inviolable principle that directly impacts the lives of Pakistan's 240 million citizens. According to statements released by Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations, Munir categorized any compromise on water-related issues as completely unacceptable to his nation. India's decision to suspend the decades-old water-sharing agreement marked the first time such action had been taken since the treaty's establishment in 1960. The suspension followed a terrorist attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam region that claimed 26 tourist lives, prompting India's Cabinet Committee on Security, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, to take this unprecedented step. The Indus Water Treaty governs the distribution and management of six major rivers flowing between India and Pakistan, including the Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. Under this agreement, India has not only shared water resources but also provided financial assistance to help Pakistan develop its water infrastructure systems over the decades. Anticipating Pakistan's reaction to the treaty suspension, India launched a comprehensive diplomatic initiative, deploying seven teams of parliamentarians from various political parties to different regions worldwide. This post-Operation Sindoor diplomatic campaign aimed to explain and justify India's position on the water treaty suspension to the international community. Beyond water disputes, Munir also addressed the escalating insurgency in Pakistan's Balochistan province, where rebel attacks have intensified against Pakistani security forces. The Army Chief alleged that Indian intelligence agencies were providing support to Baloch separatists, claiming that these insurgent groups were acting as proxies for foreign interests, particularly India. The situation in Balochistan has become increasingly volatile, with the provincial capital Quetta experiencing multiple attacks on Pakistani forces on May 8 alone. During the recent period of cross-border military action with India, Baloch rebels reportedly escalated their offensive operations, even replacing Pakistani flags with their own symbols in various locations. Munir disputed the authenticity of the Baloch insurgency, asserting that the individuals involved were not genuinely representing Baloch interests but were instead foreign-backed elements working against Pakistan's territorial integrity. The Pakistani military leader also made reference to divine intervention during the recent military conflict with India, expressing his belief that Pakistan had received spiritual assistance during the confrontation. This conflict began when India conducted precision strikes under Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting what it described as terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Pakistan responded with attempted strikes on Indian military installations over the following three days, prompting what India characterized as a firm and decisive response. The military engagement concluded with both nations announcing a ceasefire agreement on May 10, temporarily ending the immediate crisis. The Army Chief's statements reflect Pakistan's continued resistance to accepting what it perceives as India's growing influence in South Asian affairs, while highlighting the complex web of disputes involving water rights, territorial conflicts, and regional security concerns that continue to define the relationship between these nuclear-armed neighbors.