
Caste census: Adapting to times, puncturing Opposition politics, BJP ready for numbers
On July 20, 2021, responding to a Parliament question, Minister of State (Home Affairs), Nityanand Rai said, 'The Government of India decided it as a matter of policy not to enumerate caste-wise population other than SCs and STs in Census'.
In public, the BJP and its leaders more or less chose to remain quiet, often parrying questions or being non-committal on the need for a caste census. They, however, regularly targeted the Congress, accusing it of using caste to divide the society.
Its ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), however, had a more nuanced view. In September last year, it cautioned against using caste census as a political tool, but noted that the government needs numbers for all welfare activities, particularly those targeting such communities or castes which are lagging behind.
The party's stance has remained ambivalent. Just less than a week ago on April 23, the Chhattisgarh BJP X handle put out the pic of the Indian Navy lieutenant killed in Pahalgam, with his wife sitting beside his body, and put a caption, 'Dharm poochha, jaati nahin (the religion was asked, not the caste).' The post seemed intended to send a message that caste can be divisive.
Clearly, the tide has turned now, with the BJP-led NDA government, in a surprise move, deciding to cross the rubicon in an effort to puncture the main plank of the Congress and claim ownership on an issue repeatedly pressed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.
Union Minister for Information and Broadcasting Ashwini Vaishnaw sought to frame it as a reversal of the policy of the Congress, which he said, never conducted a caste census since independence and all the years it was in power. He charged the UPA government of conducting a Socio Economic Caste Census and using it as a 'political tool' instead of undertaking a caste census as assured by then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the Lok Sabha in 2010.
Sources in the BJP view this as a thought out and calibrated response, a move that would snuff out the politics of the Opposition parties ahead of the Bihar elections. It could 'steal the thunder' from the opposition which is planning to make the caste census a key issue in Bihar elections, a source said.
'(Chief Minister) Nitish Kumar has already conducted a caste survey, but we had criticised it. In the election campaign, the RJD and the Congress would have tried to make the election around it. Now, they don't have much to say,' a BJP MP, who did not wish to be named, told The Indian Express.
BJP sources said going forward, the party spokespersons will project the difference between 'a survey and a census' and how the opposition parties in the INDIA bloc, which are claiming victory now, have been using 'caste surveys' as a 'political tool'.
'Opposition-ruled states like Telangana have created doubts in the minds of the people with a caste survey. A proper enumeration along with the census — what the Central government has announced now — would give a clear picture. There will not be any space for ambiguity then,' another source in the BJP said.
In fact, there may be some realisation post the 2024 Lok Sabha election outcome too. The Congress and other Opposition parties pushed for caste census in their campaigns, and the BJP suffered in two big states — Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra.
The move also reflects the party's urge to force its way ahead in politics of caste, and ability to adapt to change realities, to maximise political gains. Way back in the late 1980s, the BJP was a Hindutva party, and Ram temple was one of its key priorities. It was then that the then Prime Minister VP Singh implemented the Mandal Commission recommendations in December 1990, reserving 27 per cent for the OBCs (Other Backward Classes) in government jobs.
The BJP shifted gears soon enough, pushed ahead with social engineering, roping in OBC leaders like Kalyan Singh and Uma Bharti, both OBC Lodhs. Over the next decade, a fresh OBC leadership rung emerged in key BJP states – Modi in Gujarat, Shivraj Singh Chouhan in MP, and Sushil Modi in Bihar.
While the rise of Modi to power at the Centre made the BJP shed its image of a 'Bania-Brahmin party', the Opposition decided to revive the Mandal discourse in 2023, with the Congress bringing to spotlight its demand for a caste census and larger representation of OBCs, SCs and STs – something never associated with Congress politics. The Congress had, in fact, not adapted to the Mandal wave well, losing out in UP and Bihar, and had tried to make up for the delay when Arjun Singh in 2006 as HRD minister announced Mandal 2 – the extension of OBC quotas to higher educational institutions.
'In one stroke today, the BJP has taken the sting out of the opposition charge, and made it clear to the OBCs that it cares for their issues,' said a BJP leader who did not wish to be identified. The leader said this would not damage the BJP's standing among the 'upper castes', as these sections were aware that the Congress, once a party favoured by the 'upper castes', was the one to have built the caste census and reservation narrative, thus completely abandoning them. Further, they know that it was the BJP that gave the 10 per cent quota for the Economically Weaker Section, the BJP leader said.
Another BJP leader said this move would also end up undoing the north-south divide that INDIA-constituent DMK was trying to whip up sentiments by making delimitation a key political rallying point. 'Once the caste census is done, and numbers are compared with the last caste census of 1931, it will be found that OBC populations in states like UP and Bihar have grown by leaps and bounds, but representation has not kept pace with these. This will change the tone and tenor of the debate on delimitation, making it not merely a concern of southern states but also of OBCs in populous northern states,' the BJP leader, not wishing to be identified, said.
However, the RSS had expressed support for a caste census in September 2024, while cautioning that it should not be used as a political tool. 'The RSS thinks that definitely, for all welfare activities, particularly those targeting such communities or castes which are lagging behind…, if sometimes the government needs the numbers, it is a well-established practice. Earlier also, it (the government) has taken (such data), and so it can do it again. But it should be done only for the welfare of those communities and castes. It should not be used as a political tool for elections. So we put this forth with a line of caution for everyone,' RSS publicity in-charge Sunil Ambekar had said at a press conference.
Reluctance to give away the entire agenda of caste and caste census to the opposition, repeated demands from the smaller allies and the upcoming Bihar elections seem to have prompted the BJP led Union Government to announce the enumeration of castes along with the next census, whenever it happens.
Although the BJP, which with its mobilising strategies and its inclusive Hindutva message had bagged a significant portion of the lower caste groups especially in the Hindi heartlands in the last few elections, was hesitant to go for a caste census, the party has publicly took a stand in support of it and had announced that it would do it at the appropriate time. Its ideological parent RSS also has last year hinted its support to a nationwide caste census as the government needs the numbers for 'all welfare activities, particularly those targeting such communities or castes which are lagging behind – for whom special attention is needed.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
'I Cannot Defeat DMK But...': Amit Shah's BIG Remarks On Tamil Nadu Polls
Union Home Minister Amit Shah, during a rally in Madurai, praised the success of Operation Sindoor and warned Pakistan against any misadventures. He accused the DMK government in Tamil Nadu of 'massive corruption' and poor governance. Shah confidently declared that the BJP-NDA alliance will form governments in both Tamil Nadu and West Bengal in 2026. Earlier, he chaired a key BJP core committee meeting to discuss the party's state strategy. Shah also offered prayers at the Meenakshi Amman Temple.#amitshah #operationsindoor #pakistan #tamilnadubjp #tamilnadu #aiadmk #congress #bjp #mkstalin #dmk #2026elections #westbengal #madurai #meenakshiammantemple #bjp #ndagovernment #indiangovt #indianpolitics #southindianpolitics #templevisit #electioncampaign #toi #toibharat Read More


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
U.P. plans hi-tech shield against CBRN threats
Drawing lessons from Parliament security protocols, the Uttar Pradesh government is working closely with agencies like the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Electronics Corporation of India Ltd (ECIL) to design a multi-layered safety mechanism for safeguarding key installations, the state assembly, and VIPs from chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) threats, according to senior officials aware of the development. The state government initiated the process when senior officials visited the recently-held three-day 'AeroDef India Manufacturing Expo', a major aerospace and defence manufacturing exhibition, in New Delhi from May 1 to 3. The state authorities also had an interaction with the U.S. department of homeland security, and recent security technology exchanges during a visit by U.S. senator JD Vance to the Taj Mahal in Agra. These robots, based on French technology, will offer day and night surveillance capabilities and can be deployed in high-risk zones such as assembly premises, airports, or during major public events. The state felt a sense of urgency in adopting the advanced technologies after the recent conflict with Pakistan leading to international tensions following the Pahalgam terror attack. Senior government officials requesting anonymity said that the proposed CBRN setup is part of a broader effort to strengthen internal security in light of recent geopolitical tensions, particularly with Pakistan. The initiative also builds on recent steps taken by the state government to secure the U.P. assembly complex. Notably, CBRN threats pose a significant risk due to their potential for widespread harm, long-term health effects, and psychological impact. These threats are characterised by their low probability but high impact, often manifesting in accidental releases or intentional attacks. The CBRN incidents can be airborne, waterborne, foodborne, or through contaminated soil, making detection and response challenging. Under the envisioned CBRN safety net, multiple technologies will be integrated to detect and neutralise threats like viruses, spores, and toxins. A single setup may cost up to ₹10 crore, according to initial estimates. 'Consultations are ongoing with the DRDO, ECIL, U.P. Police, paramilitary forces, and both state and national disaster management authorities. An evaluation by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) is also being considered as part of the plan,' they said, adding the system will be used for VIP and VVIP security, and during high-profile visits and events at strategic sites across the state. 'It will be based on technology from foreign countries, either the U.S. or France,' officials said. Earlier this year, the traditional vehicle stickers for MLAs, MLCs and other visitors were replaced with RFID tags after reports of fraudulent access using tampered passes emerged. During a state assembly session on March 5, speaker Satish Mahana highlighted the security concerns, saying: 'It has come to our notice that fake vehicle passes are being created by tampering with those issued by the assembly secretariat. This is a serious security concern, and the matter has been referred to the state's purchasing department for investigation.' The advanced robotic surveillance devices can be deployed in high-risk zones such as assembly premises, airports, or during major public events. Each robot, costing around ₹80 lakh, is designed to access hard-to-reach and hazardous zones without endangering human lives. With a range of up to 90 metres, these wheeled devices can scan vehicles -- even go underneath them -- for potential explosives, and are equipped to traverse stairs, rough terrains, and confined spaces. 'Robot-based threat assessments can significantly reduce the need for human intervention in danger zones,' a senior official said. 'Conventional wars and threats are a thing of the past now. We have to move past those trends and be future-ready,' the official added. If implemented, Uttar Pradesh will become the first state police force in India to adopt a Parliament-style integrated security model against CBRN and explosive threats, the senior official noted. With inputs from PTI


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India's strategic culture and how it uses force
Does a tradition of risk aversion continue to define India's strategic culture and its use of force? Does this aversion embolden adversaries to consider the use of force more easily, threaten its use more effectively, and use it more readily? Has our self-professed 'peace-loving' identity become a self-fulfilling prophecy, constraining our military doctrines and warfighting impulses? A quick review of the historical record will demonstrate that, despite being a conventionally weaker power, Pakistan has consistently engaged in war initiation vis-à-vis India. Pakistan initiated the 1947-48 war, seizing a large part of Jammu and Kashmir. It also initiated the 1965 war. In 1971, Pakistan attacked Indian airfields, technically initiating the war. And in 1999, India was merely responding to Pakistan's infiltration into the Kargil sector in large numbers. In each case, Pakistan initiated the conflict, and India responded. Let me expand the definition of initiation of hostilities to make a larger point. Pakistan's sponsorship of terrorism against India also falls within the broad definition of conflict initiation. This includes the 2001 Parliament attack (killing nine people), the 2008 Mumbai massacre (over 160 fatalities), the 2016 Uri attack (19 soldiers killed), the Pulwama attack (40 CRPF personnel dead), and the recent Pahalgam killings (26 civilians). In each of these cases, the Pakistani side initiated the hostilities, if you view the use of sub-conventional force as initiation of hostilities. India's response to these sub-conventional attacks from Pakistan has evolved over the past 25 years. Initially, threats were made but not carried out (2001 and 2008), followed by demonstration strikes with minimal effect (2016), and finally, a more selective and measured application of force was adopted in 2019 and 2025. In each instance, Pakistan initiated hostilities, with India either reluctant to respond by using force or being constrained in its use. Let me come to a third aspect regarding the use of force. Despite credibly overcoming its long-held reluctance to use force, India's application of it remains suboptimal, perhaps indicative of a risk-averse strategic culture. Consider, for instance, the recent India-Pakistan standoff. India's use of force, even when it decides to use it, is puzzling in at least three ways, each stemming from a hesitant strategic culture that, while waning from 2001 to 2025, continues to have a profound influence on our conceptions of 'appropriate and acceptable' use of force. First, India's decisions regarding the use of force are still largely driven by a reputational imperative — a deep-seated desire to demonstrate to the international community that it is a responsible actor. But in a military conflict, what ultimately matters are the material outcomes, not reputational considerations. Are our reputational urges constraining our military objectives? Second, India is a hesitant user of force. There appears to be a politico-cultural intent to define the limits of force even before it begins — to ensure that it doesn't spread — and we seek to stick to that.. This creates an inherent paradox: India demonstrates an inexplicable preference for using force in ways that minimise impact, rather than maximise its effectiveness. The logic of military force must be to maximise impact with minimal force, as opposed to minimal impact with either maximum or minimal force. Third, by publicly limiting the scope of military outcomes, we seem to prioritise sending a political message over achieving decisive military outcomes. Here's the problem with that approach. While India seeks to drive home a political point, Pakistan seeks to drive home a military point. While India seeks to limit the scope, impact, targets, and scale of the operation, Pakistan seeks to expand those very variables in its response before the contest is called off. While India approaches the use of force through a political lens, Pakistan prioritises purely military considerations. While India's approach to war reflects Clausewitz's dictum that it is politics by other means, Pakistan appears to use force for military outcomes alone. India's political signaling appears to have little impact on Pakistani military thinking. Thus, the two sides operate with fundamentally different frameworks and India's desire to drive home a political point is lost on Rawalpindi. India's political approach to war isn't fundamentally flawed, but it appears ineffective in the context of India-Pakistan relations. India's risk-averse approach to using force is suboptimal in the India-Pakistan context for two key reasons. First, in Indo-Pak conflicts, history tells us that early gains are not just important, they also are often decisive. An Indian strategy prioritising political messaging, minimum military gains, and delayed third-party intervention is unlikely to produce early gains unlike Pakistan's strategy that prioritises early military gains, little political messaging and quick third-party intervention. India's doctrinal evolution on the use of force over the past 25 years has been remarkable, but serious introspection after each military conflict is a must to improve future preparedness, as such conflicts are unlikely to disappear. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is editor, INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal