Middle-aged man takes six-year-old as bride leaving even Taliban 'horrified'
A 45-year-old man has married a six-year-old girl, in an act so unsettling that it even left the Taliban 'horrified'.
The man, who has already wed two other women, bought the child from her family.
The wedding took place in Marjah district, with both the young girl's father and the groom since detained but not formally charged, the Mirror reports.
The Taliban has instructed the groom to wait until the child reaches nine before he can take her home.
Child marriage is rampant in Afghanistan, often fuelled by poverty, forcing families to sell their daughters into matrimony in order to survive.
A local activist named Mahbob despaired while speaking to The Afghan Times: "There are many families in our village who have given away their daughters for money. No one helps them. People are desperate."
This bartering of girls for marriage, known as walwar, involves trading them for cash based on attributes like appearance, health, and education.
However, financial desperation isn't the sole motive; some girls are traded to settle blood feuds between enemies.
Amiri, 50 from Uruzgan, opened up about marrying off her 14-year-old daughter to a 27-year-old man for 300,000 Afghanis.
She admitted, "I knew she was too young, but we had nothing at home. I used the money to feed the rest of my family."
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
The practice had dwindled after the US-led invasion but has surged again since the Taliban's 2021 resurgence.
Under their rule, women's freedoms have been drastically curtailed, with full-body coverings and hushed voices in public mandated. They're also barred from travelling without a male relative.
A UN report last year indicated that such oppression has sparked a 25 per cent rise in child and forced marriages.
The International Criminal Court has slammed the treatment of Afghan women as a crime against humanity, issuing arrest warrants for two top Taliban officials.
The court cited"reasonable grounds" to believe Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani are culpable for the persecution of women and girls since the Taliban's comeback.
The Taliban rebuffed the accusations, deeming them "a clear act of hostility" and an affront to Muslims globally.
Afghanistan lacks a codified minimum marriage age, with the Taliban nullifying the previous age limit of 16 set after the 2001 Western invasion.
Presently, a girl's marriageable age is determined by Islamic law interpretation, with the Hanafi jurisprudence deeming puberty the threshold for readiness.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
No commitment to scrap two-child benefit cap until funding is clear
The Government will not commit to lifting the two-child benefit cap until it is clear how it will be paid for, a minister has told the Commons. Further calls to scrap the controversial policy were made by Labour backbenchers on Tuesday, during a Conservative-led debate focused on retaining the cap. There were more than 1.6 million children living in households in England, Wales and Scotland affected by the two-child benefit limit in April, according to figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions last week. Work and pensions minister Alison McGovern said the Child Poverty Task Force will look at 'all the levers across incomes, costs, debt and local support that we can pull to prevent poverty, including social security reform'. Speaking during the opposition day debate, she added: 'Our universal credit review is considering ways that the system can improve in order to stabilise family finances and provide routes into good work. 'And on the two-child limit, specifically, the consequences, as I've said in my speech, of the Conservative choices made over the past decade and a half are clear for all to see. 'We have rightly said many times we will not commit to any policy without knowing how we are going to pay for it.' Labour MP for Rochdale, Paul Waugh, said: '59% of families (who) have more than two children, on universal credit, are in work, and that's far from the feckless parent caricature that we've heard today from the Conservatives. 'And more importantly, does she agree with me that actually it's the children (who) should come first, and because the children should come first, we should urgently scrap the two-child cap as quickly as possible?' Ms McGovern declined to respond directly to Mr Waugh's question, instead arguing that the Conservative Party 'only wants to divide people'. Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth Brian Leishman also said 'the Government should lift it immediately', adding: 'Having a child is a blessing, not a blessing everyone receives, and the two-child cap is an inherently cruel policy that punishes the least advantaged. 'The idea that a third or a fourth or a fifth child is worth less than the first two is beyond wicked.' Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately had described the welfare bill as a 'ticking time bomb' as she opened the debate. She added: 'We have brought forward this debate today on the two-child limit, because somebody has to make the case for fiscal responsibility, for living within our means, for fairness, for making sure work pays, and for keeping the two-child cap.' MPs rejected the Conservatives' motion that the benefit cap should remain, with 106 voting in favour, 440 against, majority 334.
Daily Mirror
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
ROS WYNNE JONES: 'Every Afghan hero deserves a UK passport. This country has failed them'
Today, the super-injunction protecting the story behind thousands of Afghans' secret evacuation has ended. And it is time to thank them for their service We owed them our loyalty and their safety. Thousands of brave Afghans who fought alongside British troops, translated for our officials, and worked for Britain before the Taliban swept back into power. Instead – having abandoned their country in a dishonourable, chaotic retreat – it can now be revealed that we betrayed our Afghan allies once again. This time when a British military official accidentally disclosed the personal details of more than 33,000 people, putting them at risk of murderous reprisals. This scandal was covered up by the Conservative government while 18,500 Afghans whose data was compromised were flown to Britain as part of a peacetime evacuation mission. It was the right thing to do to avoid catastrophic loss of life. But, in the wake of disinformation following the Southport murders, men, women and children were then retraumatised by riots sweeping across the country where they had come to seek sanctuary. These are people whose sacrifice has more than earned them a British passport. But instead of a thank you – the communities they were now living in faced petrol bombs, screaming crowds and their accommodation being set on fire in last summer's riots. During the worst outbreak of racial violence in the UK for decades, we now know areas with larger Afghan resettlement numbers were targeted. Even now, there are fears of copycat rioting greeting the news of the covert operation to bring these people to safety. The smallest of the lessons we need to learn from this sorry tale is about keeping data safe. We need a new way forward for communities in our country, a properly funded, grown up political strategy that addresses the tensions and division the Tories encouraged to fester. The alternative is rule by a racist mob. Thousands of Afghans have been living quietly in our country unable to tell their neighbours they had to come to the UK because our government put them in danger. Today, the super-injunction protecting the story behind the Afghans' secret evacuation has ended – and it is time for Britain to say sorry. Not just sorry for disclosing their identity. Not just sorry for abandoning their country and prioritising flights of dogs and cats while ministers were on a sun lounger. But thank you for their courage and sacrifice – and sorry for the welcome we gave them.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taliban: We had the ‘kill list' all along – and are hunting them down
The Taliban claims the leaked list of Afghans who helped Britain has been in its possession since 2022, and it has been hunting down those named ever since. The so-called 'kill list' contains the names of 25,000 Afghans who were applying for asylum – soldiers who had worked with the British Army, and their family members. It became the subject of a legal cover-up after it was leaked in 2022, with successive governments spending billions over two years to secretly relocate thousands of Afghans to the UK to avoid Taliban reprisals. Now Taliban figures claim to have had the list all along, potentially rendering the secret plot pointless. A senior Taliban official told The Telegraph: 'We got the list from the internet during the very first days when it was leaked.' The official said many individuals on the list had fled Afghanistan or gone into hiding, but that the Taliban had hired groups to monitor their homes and relatives' houses around the clock. 'A special unit has been launched to find them and make sure they do not work with Britain,' the official added. 'We've been calling and visiting their family members to track them down. 'Senior figures in the establishment in Kandahar are pressuring officials in Kabul to find them. They believe these individuals are still working with the British, and say the problem must be dealt with.' A second Taliban official told The Telegraph that the hunt for individuals named in the document had intensified in recent months, with names handed over to border forces to stop them from leaving the country. Many only discovered they were on the list when they tried to cross Taliban-controlled borders. 'The border forces have had the list for the past few months and have orders not to let anyone leave,' the Taliban official said from Kabul. 'These people are seen as traitors, and the plan has been to find as many of them as possible. 'Whoever leaked that file is actually helping us. There may be a general amnesty in place, but spies cannot escape justice.' The Government has accepted that the court battle could have put the Afghans in even greater danger. Until Tuesday at noon, an unprecedented super-injunction obtained by the government in 2023 prevented the media, Parliament or anyone else revealing details of a £7 billion scheme to grant asylum to thousands of Afghans, which was instigated as a result of the data breach. The media was also banned from reporting the fact that the leak had happened. Ministers obtained the super-injunction – the first ever granted to a British government – on the basis that lives would be at risk if the public, and by extension the Taliban, knew that a list of nearly 25,000 names had briefly appeared online after it was accidentally shared by a Royal Marine in 2022. The injunction was kept in place for nearly two years despite grave misgivings from a judge about the public being misled. Mr Justice Chamberlain, the judge who lifted the injunction, said there was 'a significant chance that it was in fact endangering' some of the Afghans being relocated to the UK, and the effect on those who were not being brought to the UK was 'likely to be adverse overall'. He argued that by going to such lengths to keep the scheme a secret, the government could have 'added more value' to the leaked list in the eyes of the Taliban, who would be aware of people being flown to the UK. The British government responded to the data breach by launching Operation Rubific, a covert mission to contain the leak and prevent public disclosure of the breach. About £7 billion of taxpayers' money was allocated to handle the fallout, including what officials called the largest covert peacetime evacuation operation. Nearly 24,000 Afghans affected by the breach have been brought to the UK or will be relocated in the future. Because of the Taliban's tight restrictions on information in Afghanistan, many people do not know they are on the list. One of those affected fled to neighbouring Iran nearly two years ago, after the Taliban began searching for him in his home town in western Afghanistan. A relative told The Telegraph: 'He and his family escaped to Iran after hearing about the list. Since then, Taliban fighters have regularly come to my house and the homes of other relatives, asking about him.' 'They keep pressuring us to reveal his whereabouts. They once arrested me and beat me for a day. My uncle served with the special forces. The Taliban keep saying he must come with them for questioning. 'It's putting everyone in the family at risk – being related to someone on a Taliban kill list is a death sentence. They have all his details – his name, his wife's name, even his children's names. 'We were shocked when they listed them. If they can't find him, they've said they'll kill another family member instead. 'The blood of a spy is in your veins,' they told us.' The man remains in Iran, but the Islamic Republic is now forcing him – and hundreds of other Afghans – back into Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. 'He has nowhere to go,' the relative said. 'If he's deported, he'll be killed. They have everything on him.'
