logo
Why holding companies are losing their grip on brands

Why holding companies are losing their grip on brands

Fast Company08-07-2025
Ever notice that companies making the most money rarely talk about just money?
Perennially successful companies are led by management obsessed with customer experience, product performance, talent, and culture. They focus on better, and healthy margins occur naturally from creating something so great that customers are willing to pay more.
Even investment bankers talk about the client's business before they start counting the cash.
A sure symptom of a company in trouble is when management meetings are consumed by margins, debates over timing for the next round of layoffs, or consensus on cutting back on bagels in the breakroom.
When an outbreak of financial fever infects the biggest players in the category, it's only a matter of time before everyone feels queasy.
This type of earnings epidemic is rampant across the marketing world, especially at the big advertising networks known for making brands famous. Old models are dying, legacy companies are being disrupted, and clients are desperately searching for something new.
Most iconic advertising agencies founded during the Mad Men era sold their Madison Avenue marquees to holding companies years ago. In the short term, that seemed like a good idea, as holding companies offered more choice to potential clients—and Wall Street always rewards size—but in the long run, it hasn't worked out so well, either for agencies or their clients.
Salaries have been flat or declining for almost a decade, margins are tighter than ever, and agency models are breaking faster than plates at a Greek wedding.
Clients are reevaluating where they spend time and money. Navigating an ever-changing media landscape requires an adaptable model rarely found at monolithic agency networks. Too many platforms, not enough content, and no silver bullets left in clients' media arsenals, which once only consisted of TV, radio, and print.
Holding companies are collapsing under their own weight, having bought too many redundant agencies during the boom years, only to find themselves with limited cash flow and no clear path toward reinventing themselves. Clients are finding big agency partners distracted or conflicted—unreliable navigators at a critical juncture.
WHERE THE AGENCY MODEL WENT WRONG
This malaise is a consequence of a flawed business model that's taken almost two decades to fail. The full catalogue of sins is too long to list here but includes splitting the media business from creative and production, charging for hours instead of services provided, cutting senior talent to make margins, and ultimately selling process over people.
Marketing isn't a process; it's a meeting of minds, a collision of creativity, collaboration, and craft.
Once you commoditize a category, it becomes a race to the bottom or a battle for scale, but now that a market reckoning has arrived, discerning clients are realizing that size isn't always an advantage.
Creative agencies should be valued for the size of their ideas, not the size of their organization.
Technology has levelled the playing field, so a chance for clients to work with experienced talent in close collaboration seems a better bet than paying for an army of eager but inexperienced foot soldiers at a global network.
A BETTER WAY FORWARD FOR CLIENTS AND CREATIVES
That's why there have been so many launches of smaller, independent agencies, as well as the arrival of VC firms onto the scene, investors looking to buy just the right pieces— no more and no less —required to build integrated campaigns for clients. Disruption means a chance to build something better, a model less familiar but more suited to solving modern marketing challenges.
These emerging models are reshaping client expectations by offering expertise in often-neglected but critical moments of the customer journey. A renewed focus on in-store displays, product design, and activations are driving retail. Audience-obsessed media partners are helping clients choreograph their campaigns to ensure each ad isn't just a disposable one-off moment. Savvy strategists are reinventing brands from the inside-out by mining the DNA of what made that company special in the first place.
That sort of introspection on what makes a company special is ironically what the agency business lacks right now, a reminder of the soul of the business—creative solutions to business challenges. Art as commerce. Media that matters, and content that people actually want in their feed.
Agencies are in the business of helping clients grow their business. Holding companies are in the business of making money. Two entirely different goals which naturally lead to contradictory decisions.
The consequence of almost two decades of compulsively buying agencies is that holding companies have run out of new sources of revenue, so two of the biggest players are now acquiring each other. Like two neutron stars colliding to create a black hole, it's unclear if anything good will escape this merger other than senior talent who don't fit below the bottom line.
This is the proverbial last straw, the juniorization of an industry. Experienced talent is dismissed when too expensive, and junior talent becomes so distracted by rolling layoffs that they can't focus on the work.
Clients responsible for big brands are unlikely to wait around for the dust to settle. They want a partner focused on their business, not one squinting at spreadsheets.
Dinosaurs had their day but didn't evolve as the landscape changed, and that's okay, because as they decomposed, they ultimately became the fuel that powers our modern world. Even now, the diaspora of talent from decaying networks is reenergizing the marketing industry, and it's only just begun.
FINAL THOUGHTS
There's never been a more exciting time to work in marketing. Clients are eagerly searching for 'other' models—alternative approaches that brings top talent together. New ways of working, more investment in innovation, and a welcome return to people over process.
If you take care of the people doing the work, usually the work takes care of itself. That's an easy investment that even the folks counting the money should want to make.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grassley Presses CFTC on Report of Prior Telework Violations
Grassley Presses CFTC on Report of Prior Telework Violations

Bloomberg

time2 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Grassley Presses CFTC on Report of Prior Telework Violations

Senator Chuck Grassley is pressing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to answer questions about an employee who allegedly worked remotely from foreign locales in violation of government policies, adding to acting Chairman Caroline Pham's earlier calls for more transparency. 'The American public deserves to know exactly how much of their taxpayer dollars were wasted,' Grassley wrote in a letter Wednesday to the CFTC's inspector general and Pham, who took the helm of the agency in January. Pham said earlier this year, when the CFTC published a one-page summary of the internal report, she was disturbed by the 'lengthy scheme to defraud the American taxpayer over many years that previous management failed to address appropriately.'

FBI Issues New Bitcoin And Crypto ‘Red Flag' Fraud Alert
FBI Issues New Bitcoin And Crypto ‘Red Flag' Fraud Alert

Forbes

time2 minutes ago

  • Forbes

FBI Issues New Bitcoin And Crypto ‘Red Flag' Fraud Alert

It's an easy lure. Attackers use 'social media and other messaging platforms,' to pose as lawyers, offering to help anyone who has lost crypto to scams recover their funds. These fake lawyers claim to have case files from the FBI and other agencies. Victims are then defrauded again, with more money lost to these malicious recovery schemes. The bureau first warned about this scam in 2023 and then again in 2024. Now there's a third public advisory, which 'provides additional red flag indicators and due diligence measures to help victims who have been in contact with fictitious law firms.' Unsurprisingly, these frauds target vulnerable citizens, 'particularly the elderly,' and 'exploit victims' emotional state and financial need to recover funds.' Some of the attacks impersonate legitimate law firms adding to their credibility. Specific red flags to watch for include stating affiliation or official partnership with government or regulatory agencies. 'There are no law firms which are officially authorized partners of U.S. Government agencies,' the FBI confirms. These frauds may also list 'fictitious government or regulatory entities,' albeit much of the documentation and references they use are real. More pointedly, scammers need to be paid and will 'request payment in cryptocurrency or prepaid gift cards' or ask victims to open new overseas bank accounts for the recovered funds. They will 'say that payment of bank fees is required to verify identity and ownership to withdraw funds' or 'send payment to a third-party entity (i.e., xyz trading company) for the supposed purposes of maintaining secrecy and safety.' Set out here in black and white, it's easy to see these scams for what they are. But for more vulnerable investors or for those emotionally affected by the original thefts, it's all too easy to jump at the chance of any form of recovery. The FBI suggests a "Zero Trust" model, which means trust no one and assume everything is a scam until proven otherwise. 'Every request should be verified.' There is other advice to confirm law licenses and to keep records of contacts. But you should never respond to unsolicited posts such as this, which means never getting that far. 'Be wary of advertisements for cryptocurrency recovery services,' the FBI says. And 'if an unknown individual contacts you and claims to be able to recover stolen crypto, do not release any financial or personal identifying information and do not send money.' With billions of dollars lost to online crypto hacks and scams, there are plenty of victims to target. The fact there have now been three FBI warnings on this highlights the risks.

Residents frustrated as Colorado city suffers frequent power outages
Residents frustrated as Colorado city suffers frequent power outages

CBS News

time2 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Residents frustrated as Colorado city suffers frequent power outages

Residents are voicing their frustration after a city in Colorado has suffered weeks of frequent and prolonged power outages. Since mid-June, residents in the Columbine Hills area of Littleton have experienced six outages, two of which lasted more than four hours. Many say they've received little explanation as to why. At Columbine Wines and Liquors, employee Peggy Welton is doing everything she can to keep the lights on, quite literally. "We have our handheld flashlights still handy dandy," Welton said. "If you have to go into the cooler or anything, it's dark. We've got our lanterns!" Welton has also taken on the responsibility of firing up the store's generator whenever the power cuts out. "If the power completely goes out, I can't take credit cards. I have nothing. Once this system goes down, I can't even get into the cash drawer," she said. Just one street over, Catherine VonMinden works from home. When the power goes out, she loses more than just lights. "If I'm out, my whole team has to pick up the slack. I lose hours, I lose money," she said. "My partner is on conference calls all day, doing things, so it's a big deal." According to Xcel Energy, the Columbine Hills neighborhood has experienced six outages since mid-June, ranging from about one hour to nearly five hours. The causes of the two most recent outages remain undetermined. In a statement, a spokesperson for the company says in part, "While most outages are out of our control, such as weather events, animal contact or damage due to lines being struck, we make every effort to investigate and remedy those causes that are related to our equipment. In this case, we are inspecting the lines using drones and other technology and determining next steps for ensuring reliability." These recent outages come just months after the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) placed Xcel on an improvement plan. The move followed an investigation launched last fall into widespread complaints about outages and customer service problems. That investigation revealed a significant spike in outages and major concerns about how customers were being treated. The chair of the commission, Erick Blank, was shocked by the findings. "This is a regulated monopoly operating in a legally defined service territory where competition is prohibited," the chair said. "And in return for that privilege of operating as a monopoly, they shouldn't be driving profit increases at the expense of customers. Aren't they obligated to act in the public interest; answer the phone, bill customers properly, and respond to outages?" he said during an April 30th meeting. Xcel is now required to submit quarterly updates to the state on both outages and customer service improvements. The first of those reports was submitted in July. According to Xcel, the company has made progress in both areas. But some customers remain skeptical. "Taking some responsibility would be really great," VonMinden said. "Just saying, 'I'm sorry this has happened several times, here's how we can help you in the future.'" The full investigation from the Colorado Public Utilities Commission is available online.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store