Poland elects nationalist Karol Nawrocki as next president
SBS News Podcasts.
Poland's Electoral Commission has named nationalist historian, Karol Nawrocki the country's new President.
A second round of voting yesterday saw a massive voter turnout, the count coming down to the wire.
Earlier Pro-Europe mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski claimed victory after an early exit poll had him in a slim-majority position.
"My dears! We won! I will unite. I will build. I will truly be the president of all Polish women and men. I will be your president."
The 53-year-old pro-European mayor of Warsaw promised to deliver an inclusive Poland for all citizens.
"We will make Poland great, prosperous, for everyone, for everyone to embark on this journey to the future. I promise you that. And this slogan really had a deep, deep meaning — all of Poland will win and has won."
However, just hours later, exit polls had swung away from him, in favour of his political rival Karol Nawrocki.
While Poland's parliament - led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk from Rafał Trzaskowski's Civic Platform party - holds most power in the country, the president can veto legislation.
Mr Nawrocki, a 42-year-old historian and former amateur boxer, took the second exit poll as a sure sign of victory.
"We will win and we will save Poland. We won't allow Donald Tusk's power to be all-encompassing, so that the monopoly of power, the evil power, that does not care about public money, a government that takes away our great dreams and robs us of our aspirations - for this monopoly not to happen, we need to win tonight. And we all know that will happen. These are unique elections, the only ones like this after 1989 and that's why I want to thank you all. From the bottom of my heart I want to thank the citizens of Poland."
Mr Nawrocki's supporters were also confident he would take the presidency.
SUPPORTER 1: "Our predictions are too close to call, but I feel that we will win. I'm perfectly sure that we will win."
SUPPORTER 2: "It will be a huge victory for Europe and a huge victory for Christianity. The Polish people didn't believe in the biggest campaign I ever saw of fake news. Karol Nawrocki is a fighter and he will fight for the Polish people and we are very proud to stand alongside him.."
Meanwhile, Rafał Trzaskowski's supporters were shattered by the plot-twist after they had begun to celebrate an election win.
SUPPORTER 1: "We're shocked."
SUPPORTER 2: "Yes, we are. We are both supporting Rafal Trzaskowski. And yeah, the first exit polls looked very favorable. Now it's a major change, and we are worried, honestly."
SUPPORTER 3: "So yeah, it's surprising. However, I hope that perhaps it will change through the night and on Monday morning we will learn who will officially become the president."
The election campaign was rocky with Mr Nawrocki facing a slew of negative media reports about his acquisition of a flat from a pensioner and participation in mass organised fights among football hooligans.
But Mr Nawrocki's lead in the polls was confirmed by the Electoral Commission, winning the presidency with 50.89 per cent of the vote.
32-year-old I-T Specialist Patryk Marek says the close race shows how much division there is in Poland.
"Everything was on the knife-edge. We will see what this time brings us. Feelings are for sure mixed at the moment. But how small this margin was, it tells us how divided we are, almost in half as voters. This is very interesting and also gives food for thought."
The election was seen as a test of the nation's support for a pro-European course versus Karol Nawrocki's Donald Trump-style nationalism.
The former boxer campaigned on a promise to ensure government economic and social policies favour Poles over other nations, including refugees from neighbouring Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Russia says European talks on Ukraine security an escalation and 'road to nowhere'
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says attempts to resolve Ukraine's security without Moscow's involvement are a "road to nowhere", after another meeting of European allies to discuss security guarantees. Mr Lavrov particularly criticised the role of European leaders who met US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine that could help to end the war. He said those leaders, which included UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, were involved in "a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation". "We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work," Lavrov told a joint news conference after meeting the foreign minister of Jordan. US and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, American officials and sources told Reuters on Tuesday. Mr Lavrov said such discussions without Russia were pointless. Mr Trump said on Monday the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but the US might provide air support as part of a deal to end the hostilities. Moscow this week also restated its categorical rejection of "any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine". Mr Lavrov's comments came on the same day NATO military leaders held a video conference on Wednesday, local time, to discuss. "Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace," Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone wrote in a post on X following the meeting. On Wednesday, Poland accused Russia of provoking NATO after a likely Russian drone crashed into a field overnight. "Once again, we are dealing with a provocation by the Russian Federation, with a Russian drone. We are dealing in a crucial moment, when discussions about peace [in Ukraine] are underway," Polish Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said. Reuters
SBS Australia
16 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Key obstacles still leave peace in Ukraine out of reach
The diplomatic process pushing for an end to Europe's bloodiest war since World War Two is picking up steam after talks between United States President Donald Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But with key obstacles - including the control of Ukraine's eastern territories and post-war security guarantees - left up in the air, the path towards a peace deal remains unclear. Associate Professor Matthew Sussex, of ANU's Centre for European Studies, says the meeting between the US and Ukrainian leaders was a marked improvement over their stand-off in the White House back in February. "It was very, very different to what happened when Zelenskyy was effectively ambushed by Trump and by Vance, and told that he wasn't grateful enough and effectively that he was a dictator. This time you had a phalanx of Europe's most powerful leaders ringed around Trump's desk to show that Ukraine this time was bringing friends and has lots of them. Whether or not this amounts to something that advances the peace process is something we're really going to have to wait and see." President Zelenskyy says he was told during the meetings that the United States will be part of a post-war peacekeeping effort to deter further Russian attacks. "We spoke about security guarantees, this is a key topic, as we start to end the war. That is, about what defence has to be there in the end, and we have begun to work on the issue. It is important that the United States make a clear signal, namely that they will be among the countries that will help to coordinate and also will participate in security guarantees for Ukraine. I believe this is a big step forward. I cannot say yet how it will go or disclose all the details, but it is important that there is a political will and there are political decisions." In an effort to sweeten the deal, the Ukrainian leader has offered to commit to purchase almost AU$140 billion in US weapons in exchange for help with deterring further Russian aggression. The Trump administration says the President has directed his national security team to work with European allies on these security guarantees. The President says the US may offer air support but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says the US has ruled out sending troops to Ukraine. "The president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies. The president understands security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace, and he has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well." This effort forms part of a new so-called 'Coalition of the Willing' which is expected to be a combined peace-keeping force negotiated in an upcoming peace deal. But Dr Sussex says this is likely to be something Russia won't consider during negotiations. "Zelenskyy has said that there are 30 countries participating. Some would provide troops, some would provide materiel assistance, some would provide intelligence sharing. But the bigger question there, of course, is whether Vladimir Putin goes for it, because a very consistent line from the Kremlin has been that there should be absolutely no European forces on the ground in Ukraine. And without that, that reminds us of the very flimsy assurances that were given to Ukraine in 1994 when Ukraine was persuaded to give up its nuclear weapons. And of course, that's something that they regret to this day." The other key issue that remains to be addressed is the possibility of a land swap, or the ceding of Ukraine's eastern regions to Russian control. Ukraine has firmly rejected surrendering any of their territory to Russia and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says they cannot be forced to make such a concession. "The Russian demand that Kyiv should give up the free parts of the Donbas is comparable, to put it in perspective, to a proposal that the US should have to give up Florida. A sovereign state cannot simply make such a decision. This is a decision that Ukraine must make itself during the course of negotiations." Dr Jessica Genauer, a foreign affairs expert at Flinders University, says it is incredibly unlikely that President Putin will budge on handing back territory captured throughout the war. "They've managed to take military control over up to about 20 per cent of Ukrainian land and they've actually passed something into Russian law. The territory that they've captured, and even beyond the territories that have actually been captured by Russia, they've put into Russian law that certain provinces in Ukraine are actually legally now part of Russia. Of course that's not internationally recognised. For President Putin, he's not going to withdraw Russian troops from territory that they've already captured unless it's very small parts and it would only be in exchange for additional territory in, for example, Luhansk and Donetsk." Another major obstacle is Mr Zelenskyy's call for Russia to return tens of thousands of children that have been abducted from Ukraine by Russian forces. "The second point is returning the children. The first lady of the United States, as well as the team of the US, understand that they will participate in such an important, painful, and very complicated task of how to return Ukrainian children. There are different situations, different cases, that's why there are different approaches." Experts at Yale University have estimated as many as 35,000 Ukrainian children may be held in Russia and its occupied territories. Matthew Sussex says Russia is unlikely to return the children as part of a peace deal. "It certainly will be a key demand of Ukraine. I certainly don't think the Russians will go for it. I mean, this is effectively a stolen generation of Ukrainians that have been taken away from their families, away from their parents, and are literally being advertised in magazines for adoption in Russia. It's an absolute humanitarian outrage. But the question unfortunately with these types of things is, well, what ultimately are you going to do about it? How do you force the powers that be to change course? And to be honest, at the moment, I don't really see a solution to it which is just further example of how hideous this war is." While questions remain, US President Trump says he is now working to set up a bi- or trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war as quickly as possible. "I'll set up a meeting with President Putin. And if you'd like, I will go to that meeting. And not that I want to do that, but I will do that because we want to save a lot people from dying. A lot of people are dying and we've got to save them."
News.com.au
17 hours ago
- News.com.au
Vienna chosen to host Eurovision 2026
Vienna was chosen on Wednesday to host the Eurovision Song Contest 2026, the world's biggest live televised music event, Austria's public broadcaster announced, with the final set for May 16. Austria's JJ won this year's competition, held in Basel in Switzerland, with his hit "Wasted Love", which blends techno beats with operatic vocals -- making his home country the 2026 host. Vienna, which previously hosted the glitzy TV extravaganza in 1967 and 2015, edged out its competitor Innsbruck, the capital of western Tyrol province, to stage next year's contest, public broadcaster ORF announced. The final of Eurovision's 70th edition will be held on May 16, 2026 at the Wiener Stadthalle, Austria's largest indoor arena, with semi-finals set for May 12 and 14, Eurovision said. - Israel controversy - Since its launch in 1955, Eurovision has become the ultimate pop platform, catapulting Swedish icons ABBA to worldwide fame, as well as boosting the likes of Celine Dion, Cliff Richard and Olivia Newton-John. Some 166 million viewers in 37 countries watched this year's contest, with a record 60 percent of viewers aged 15 to 24 tuning in. The competition got even more views on Instagram and TikTok. The show has often drawn controversy, with pro-Palestinian activists staging protests during the extravaganza in Switzerland in May after Eurovision allowed Israel -- who came runner-up -- to participate in the contest despite the devastating Gaza war. Just after his win, JJ, whose real name is Johannes Pietsch, in an interview called for Israel to be excluded from next year's competition, sparking a storm of criticism in Austria, a staunch supporter of Israel. JJ, 24, has since sought to defuse the controversy, saying via his record label Warner that he was "sorry if his comments had been misinterpreted". Austria's far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which topped elections for the first time ever last year but failed to form a government, has described Eurovision as a "queer, left-wing, woke spectacle" and criticised Vienna for wanting to stage it despite the high costs. Basel put up nearly $40 million to host the contest. - 'Europe, shall we dance?' - Under the slogan "Europe, shall we dance?", Vienna -- more commonly known for classical music and the baroque splendour of its architecture -- pushed to host the contest, citing its experience with big events. It also touted its "enormous" accommodation capacities, its "excellent" transport links, and its "cosmopolitanism", with two million people living in the Austrian capital. The chosen venue, the Wiener Stadthalle, also hosted Eurovision in 2015, after the previous year's edition was won by bearded drag performer Conchita Wurst. Located in central Vienna, it opened in 1958 and seats 16,000 people in its main hall. When Vienna hosted the Eurovision contest last time, the city installed traffic lights showing same-sex and heterosexual couples instead of a single figure -- which proved so popular that authorities decided to keep them for good. jza/jhb
