Blake Lively Drops New Bombshell Against Justin Baldoni Involving 'Scorched Earth' Tactics
37-year-old actress is doubling down in her ongoing legal war against "It Ends With Us" director and co-star , accusing him of using aggressive litigation tactics to silence her sexual harassment claims.
On Thursday, Blake Lively and her legal team issued a fiery new statement, condemning Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit as a retaliatory attack on her right to speak out.
The courtroom clash began in December 2024 after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of their film and claimed he orchestrated a smear campaign against her.
In response, Baldoni filed a sweeping defamation suit not only against Lively, but also her husband and longtime publicist Leslie Sloane. He also took legal aim at The New York Times, filing a separate $250 million libel suit over its reporting on the case.
All parties named in Baldoni's lawsuits have denied the allegations.
Now, as Lively and Reynolds attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed, her legal team is launching new accusations, claiming Baldoni is actively working to dismantle California laws designed to protect sexual harassment victims from legal retaliation.
In a statement to Us Weekly, Lively's attorneys wrote:
'Mr. Baldoni has gone from monetizing a brand devoted to believing and supporting women, to leading the charge to tear down the very law that protects women who come forward about sexual assault, harassment and discrimination.'
They cited California's AB 933 statute, a sexual harassment privilege law meant to prevent perpetrators from using defamation suits to silence victims. 'The chilling message scorched earth litigation sends to victims is stay silent or be destroyed,' Lively's team stated.
The remarks accompanied a new reply brief filed on Lively's behalf, which contends that Baldoni's claims are not only meritless but also legally time-barred.
'The Wayfarer Parties' attempt to slap Ms. Lively with a retaliatory lawsuit… has not only failed miserably but exposes them to substantial economic damages,' the brief read. 'Ms. Lively will continue to show all victims that they are not alone, that they do not have to stay silent, and that the law is on their side.'
This latest volley comes just a week after Baldoni accused Lively of staging a public relations stunt to undermine his career. He argued that her attempt to dismiss the defamation suit, filed March 20, was a calculated effort to 'ruin the reputations and careers of the Wayfarer parties.'
In his own filing, Baldoni defended his lawsuit as an exercise of his First Amendment right to petition the court.
Lively's attorneys, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, responded forcefully to Baldoni's framing, telling TMZ:
'Justin Baldoni, the man who has built his brand on supposedly speaking up for victims, believes that the First Amendment rights of victims of sexual assault and harassment to speak out should give way to the rights of perpetrators to sue their victims 'into oblivion.''
Her legal team accused Baldoni and his attorney, Bryan Freedman, of attempting to dismantle protections for victims while discouraging others from speaking up.
In response, Freedman pushed back in a statement to Daily Mail, saying:
'This convoluted statement makes it abundantly clear that Ms. Lively and team are rattled and once again resorting to making inflammatory remarks to steer focus away from the actual facts.'
Freedman went on to criticize Lively's past media focus, saying it's 'surprising that Ms. Lively and her team are suddenly speaking so passionately about the hard-won rights of the survivor community, considering she sidestepped this topic for the entirety of the film campaign... focusing instead on her hair care and alcohol products.'
He added, 'She does not need discovery to find out who smeared her. Just a mirror will do.'
This tense back-and-forth continues to intensify, with a court showdown officially set for March 9, 2026.
Lively, Reynolds, and Sloane filed last month to dismiss Baldoni's 'vengeful and rambling' complaint. In his own sharp-edged statement, Reynolds described Baldoni as 'thin-skinned' and called himself a 'supportive spouse' standing beside Lively in her fight.
But Baldoni's legal team isn't backing down either.
Just last week, attorneys representing both the actor and Wayfarer Studios fired back, labeling Reynolds Lively's 'co-conspirator' and urging Judge Lewis J. Liman to deny the couple's dismissal request.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
Taylor Swift And Blake Lively Friendship Update In June
There's a new update on Taylor Swift and Blake Lively's friendship amidst Blake's ongoing legal woes with Justin Baldoni. In December, Blake sued Justin, her co-star and director on It Ends with Us, claiming he sexually harassed her on set. In addition to denying the claims, Justin launched a countersuit against Blake, alleging defamation, civil extortion, and false light invasion of privacy. Taylor was roped into the drama in May when Justin's legal team subpoenaed her, arguing that Blake had used "her megacelebrity friend to pressure [Justin]" into making changes on the film. A rep for Taylor immediately denied their claims. "Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie," her spokesperson said. "She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history." According to the rep, Taylor had only agreed to license her song "My Tears Ricochet" for use in the trailer and one scene. "Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case." Still, the drama continued when Justin's lawyers wrote a letter to a judge claiming that Blake had allegedly asked Taylor to delete their text messages and "that if Ms. Swift refused to do so, private text messages of a personal nature in Ms. Lively's possession would be released." Blake's lawyer called the claims "categorically false," and the next day, a judge struck the "improper" letter from the record. However, a source claimed that Blake and Taylor's friendship was still left "fractured" in the wake of it. "Their friendship has halted," a source purportedly close to Taylor told People last month. "Taylor wants no part in this drama," the source added, before clarifying it didn't mean they were "not no longer friends" — they were just "taking some space." Neither Taylor nor Blake addressed the report at the time, but now, almost a month on, a source has offered an update, telling People their friendship still "isn't the same." "[They] aren't as close and haven't been spending as much time together as they did in the past," the source said. However, they claimed Taylor and Blake are trying to get back "on good terms." I guess we'll see what happens. In the meantime, BuzzFeed has reached out to reps for Taylor, Blake, and Justin for comment on the latest report.


Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
Blake Lively Gets Org Support Amid Justin Baldoni Trial
A spokesperson for Blake Lively issued a statement as the number of organizations submitting amicus briefs in support of her amid her legal battle with Justin Baldoni hit 19. In December, Blake sued her It Ends With Us co-star and director, as well as the studio Wayfarer and other parties, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation. Justin subsequently sued Blake, alleging defamation and extortion, among other things. Both parties have denied the allegations of the other. Before we get into the update, you might be wondering what an amicus brief is. It stems from the Latin phrase "friend of the court," which allows people who aren't parties in the case to submit documents of support, arguing that the impact of the case will also affect them. So, why are all these orgs issuing amicus briefs? Let's take one that's been signed by 14 women's and anti-violence organizations. In it, they argue, "The retaliatory defamation lawsuit instigated by the Wayfarer parties against Blake Livelyis another example of 'DARVO' tactics (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) in the post-#MeToo era where perpetrators of 'sexual violence,' in particular sexual harassment, attempt to silence their victims into submission." After a new brief was filed this week by Child USA, a nonprofit against child abuse, a spokesperson for Blake issued a statement to BuzzFeed that read, "19 leading survivors and organizations devoted to women's rights, children's rights and domestic violence have now signed onto four separate amicus briefs. All are united in opposing Justin Baldoni's attempt to dismantle a law designed to protect women who speak up—simply to protect himself." Justin's attorney has been reached for comment. "The latest briefs, filed by Child USA and Sanctuary for Families, add the voices of renowned nonprofits, victim advocates, and experts from around the world who are dedicated to safeguarding the rights and well-being of people who speak up," they continued. Justin has never been accused of child abuse. "Rather than defend his case on the facts, Baldoni is now contradicting years of his own public persona—abandoning the message of his #MeToo YouTube's, podcasts, TED Talks, and interviews, where he once upon a time urged men 'to listen to the women in your life…to hold their anguish and actually believe them, even if what they're saying is against you.' These women and organizations are sounding the alarm about his DARVO tactics, and the chilling effect they could have well beyond this case," the statement concluded. BuzzFeed has reached out to a representative for Justin for comment.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Blake Lively Khaleesi Text' Trending Amid Justin Baldoni Lawsuit
Wondering why the phrase 'Blake Lively Khaleesi Text' is trending again? As the legal battle between Lively and Justin Baldoni continues to escalate, the curiosity about previous text exchanges between them is growing. Here are more details on the trend. The phrase 'Blake Lively Khaleesi text' has been making waves online, as her ongoing legal battle with Justin Baldoni grows increasingly tense. The message, sent during a behind-the-scenes dispute over the film adaptation of It Ends With Us, has yet again resurfaced. This follows a major update in their court case. On June 2, a federal judge ruled that Lively's emotional distress claims would not proceed after her legal team opted to drop them. The court also denied Baldoni's request to obtain her private medical and therapy records, since those claims were no longer part of the case. Meanwhile, on June 5, Lively publicly criticized Baldoni for distancing himself from the feminist ideals he once promoted. Lively's spokesperson told Us Weekly, '19 leading survivors and organizations devoted to women's rights, children's rights and domestic violence have now signed onto four separate amicus briefs. All are united in opposing Justin Baldoni's attempt to dismantle a law designed to protect women who speak up — simply to protect himself.' The tension first started during production on It Ends With Us, where Lively was cast as the lead. Later, she reportedly became heavily involved in shaping the script. According to Baldoni's legal complaint, she pushed for significant rewrites and tried to take creative control. While Baldoni acknowledged her enthusiasm, he chose to incorporate only parts of her suggestions. That decision reportedly upset Lively. She later brought up her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and friend Taylor Swift in a conversation. The situation took a dramatic turn with a final message, now known as the 'Khaleesi text.' Drawing a parallel to Game of Thrones, Lively wrote, 'If you ever get around to watching Game of Thrones, you'll appreciate that I'm Khaleesi, and like her, I happen to have a few dragons.' 'For better or worse, but usually for better. Because my dragons also protect those I fight for. So really, we all benefit from those gorgeous monsters of mine. You will too, I can promise you,' she added. (via Hola!) The trial of this legal battle is set to begin in March 2026. Originally reported by Disheeta Maheshwari on ComingSoon. The post 'Blake Lively Khaleesi Text' Trending Amid Justin Baldoni Lawsuit appeared first on Mandatory.