logo
Digital services tax sparks new trade dispute as US halts talks with Canada

Digital services tax sparks new trade dispute as US halts talks with Canada

US President Donald Trump on Friday halted all trade negotiations with Canada over Ottawa's new digital services tax, which will affect American tech giants. Trump described the tax as a 'blatant attack' on the United States, escalating political tensions amid his ambitions to potentially annex Canada.
'Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby ending all trade discussions with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'We will be notifying Canada of the tariffs they will be paying to do business with the United States within the next seven days.'
Trump has repeatedly expressed his opposition to digital services taxes during trade negotiations with other countries, viewing them as a 'non-tariff trade barrier.'
Canada's new digital tax is scheduled to take effect next Monday and will be applied retroactively from 2022.
In response, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Friday that he still wishes to continue negotiations with the United States. 'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians. These are negotiations,' he told reporters.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent commented on CNBC on Friday, stating, 'We knew it was coming, and we were hoping it would not be implemented.' He added, 'We think it's fundamentally unfair to make it retroactive. This is a Trudeau-era issue, so we were hoping as a sign of goodwill that the new Carney administration would at least hold off on this tax during trade negotiations. But apparently, they did not.'
Bessent indicated that if the Canadian government proceeds with the tax, Trump is prepared to impose higher tariffs on all Canadian goods, without specifying the rate.
Canada is the largest buyer of American goods, importing $349bn worth last year, according to US Department of Commerce data. In turn, Canada exported $413bn in goods to the US, making it the third-largest source of foreign goods for the American market. The imposition of higher tariffs could provoke retaliatory measures from Canada, which some estimates suggest would cause economic harm to both nations.
What is the Digital Services Tax?
The government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau passed Canada's Digital Services Tax Act in June 2024, with its rules coming into effect the same month.
The federal tax applies to large foreign and domestic companies that meet two specific criteria: total global revenues of €750m or more, and annual earnings exceeding $20m from Canadian sources.
The legislation imposes a 3% tax on digital services revenue exceeding $20m. It applies retroactively to January 1, 2022, which according to some estimates, means Ottawa could collect billions of dollars.
Taxable revenues include earnings from online marketplaces, digital advertising, social media, and user data, which will primarily affect US tech giants such as Amazon, Apple, and Meta Platforms.
Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, wrote in a social media post that he hoped both sides would return to the negotiating table: 'I am disappointed that trade talks have stalled. Hopefully they will resume soon.'
Several Canadian companies and groups have expressed concern about proceeding with the tax, fearing an escalation of trade tensions with the US
Why is Canada Imposing This Tax?
A primary reason is to increase revenue. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated last year that the tax would generate more than C$7bn over five years.
The Liberal Party of Canada, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, had promised to introduce the tax during the 2019 federal election. However, its implementation was delayed for several years as a number of countries hoped to reach a unified international digital tax plan. As delays continued, Canada decided to proceed with its own plan.
In addition to raising revenue, Ottawa is promoting the tax as a way to modernise its tax system to include profits generated within Canada by foreign companies that do not have a physical presence in the country, according to the Toronto Star.
What is the US Position on the Tax?
The United States has strongly opposed the tax from the outset because it primarily affects American tech giants.
US officials have argued that the tax discriminates against American companies. In a rare display of unity, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have rejected Canada's plan and have been united in their criticism.
Early in his second term, Trump had threatened to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian exports, with the possibility of raising it further for some products. To date, most Canadian goods remain exempt from these tariffs, provided they comply with the United-States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump negotiated during his first term.
The most notable exceptions have been a 25% tariff on all foreign cars and parts, steel, and aluminum. Trump later doubled the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. Canadian goods not compliant with the USMCA faced combined tariffs of 50%.
In response to the auto tariffs, Canada imposed a 25% tariff on non-compliant US cars. It also retaliated against Trump's original steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing a 25% tariff on nearly $43bn of US goods, including alcoholic beverages, sports equipment, and home appliances.
Despite Trump's latest tariff threats, US markets ended Friday on a high note. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq, which dipped slightly after Trump's post, rose 0.52% to close at record highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also climbed 432 points, or 1%.
Why is Canada Not Delaying the Tax Amid Trade Tensions?
Although Canadian and American business groups, organisations representing US tech giants, and several US lawmakers have signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be repealed or at least postponed, Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne has stated that the law has been approved by Parliament and that Canada will move forward with its implementation.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has argued that the tax could increase costs for consumers and risks 'damaging our mutually beneficial trading relationship with the United States.'
'In an effort to get trade talks back on track, Canada should immediately offer to repeal the Digital Services Tax in exchange for the removal of tariffs from the United States,' Goldy Hyder, the Chamber's President and CEO, told Bloomberg.
How Could the United States Respond?
Trump said he would withdraw from bilateral trade negotiations because Canada intends to proceed with the digital services tax, calling the move 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' This has cast doubt on whether a 30-day deadline to reach an agreement in the trade dispute can be met.
The previous administration of President Joe Biden also opposed the tax but sought to resolve the dispute differently. In August 2024, it requested dispute settlement consultations with Canada under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).
The US has said that American companies are obligated to pay Ottawa $2bn under the digital services tax. In a statement issued in February, Trump said, 'America alone should be allowed to tax American companies.'
In response to the Canadian rules, tech giant Google is imposing an additional 2.5% fee on advertisements shown in Canada, effective October 2024. Google stated that the surcharge, named the 'Canada DST Fee,' will cover 'a portion of the costs of complying with Canada's DST legislation.'
Do Other Countries Apply Similar Taxes?
Yes. France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, among others, all have such tax systems.
According to the Tax Foundation Europe, about half of the European OECD countries have announced, proposed, or implemented a digital services tax. The United States has met these proposals with threats of retaliatory tariffs.
France's Council of State, which advises the government on draft laws, has referred the country's digital services tax to the Constitutional Council for review, marking the first constitutional challenge to a DST since the legislation was passed in 2019.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After the Two-State Solution Conference: Diverging Western Visions Lay Bare the Depth of the Palestinian Predicament
After the Two-State Solution Conference: Diverging Western Visions Lay Bare the Depth of the Palestinian Predicament

Daily News Egypt

time3 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

After the Two-State Solution Conference: Diverging Western Visions Lay Bare the Depth of the Palestinian Predicament

The 'Two-State Solution' conference, held in New York on July 28–29 under Saudi-French co-sponsorship, concluded on Tuesday evening. While the agenda formally centered on humanitarian relief for Gaza, the core political question that underpinned the gathering was far more urgent and far-reaching: Is a Palestinian state still a viable political objective, or has it been relegated to the realm of conditional and delayed aspirations? The conference revealed stark divergences between key Western powers, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, and exposed a deeper schism in how the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is framed: Is Palestinian statehood a matter for negotiation—or an inherent right that must be internationally recognized as a prelude to any future resolution? Under the leadership of President Donald Trump—now in his second term since January 2025—the United States maintains an unwavering commitment to Israel, offering unconditional military and political support while firmly rejecting unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. The administration continues to promote a so-called 'final settlement' built around regional realignments, with reports surfacing of unofficial proposals to relocate Gaza's population to neighboring countries and rebrand the Strip as a future investment hub. Though not officially adopted, such notions signal a broader American strategy to entrench Palestinian statehood within Israeli strategic thinking, deferring its realization to current power dynamics overwhelmingly tilted in Israel's favor. This approach significantly undermines the position of those who advocate postponing recognition of Palestine under the pretext of waiting for a negotiated settlement—especially when Israel has consistently denied the very existence of a Palestinian entity or any rights beyond fragmented, subordinated pockets under its military dominance. By contrast, the United Kingdom, under Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has attempted to strike a more balanced tone. London voiced concern over the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza, called for secure aid corridors, and announced a freeze on certain arms exports to Israel. Yet Starmer reaffirmed that recognition of a Palestinian state would only come within the framework of a negotiated peace deal—despite the fact that his party's electoral manifesto had committed to supporting recognition. This reticence has drawn criticism from within his own party, with many accusing him of hiding behind procedural constraints while conditions on the ground continue to deteriorate. Meanwhile, France's announcement of its intention to recognize the State of Palestine by September represents a political shockwave in Europe. Notably, this position reportedly germinated during President Emmanuel Macron's recent visit to Cairo, reflecting a growing French–Egyptian alignment on the core tenets of a just peace: rejecting population displacement, affirming the Arab Peace Initiative, and emphasizing the centrality of international law. Equally significant has been Egypt's sustained diplomatic engagement since the onset of the Gaza war. Cairo was the first to reject any demographic engineering or forced transfer of Palestinians. It has since played a pivotal role in ceasefire efforts, humanitarian coordination, and advocating for a two-state solution based on relevant UN resolutions. Saudi Arabia, for its part, emerged as a transformative actor, not only co-chairing the New York conference but also driving the political momentum behind reintroducing state recognition as a credible diplomatic tool. Indeed, what the conference began to crystallize is a strategic shift: recognition of Palestine is no longer merely symbolic—it is becoming a mechanism for recalibrating the diplomatic balance and exerting pressure on Israel and its principal backer, the United States. The idea is to internationalize Palestinian statehood as a recognized right, rather than a concession granted by Israel. In doing so, the issue is decoupled from Israel's veto power and inserted instead into the realm of global legitimacy—acknowledged by both major and minor powers alike. The European Union's voice at the conference reinforced this trajectory. EU Commissioner Dubravka Šuica stated unequivocally: 'We are not merely participants in this process—we are shaping the region's agenda. We are not simply calling for peace; we are investing in it.' She further emphasized the EU's dual commitment to 'an Israel that is secure and a Palestine that is free.' In this shifting landscape, the UK finds itself at a moral and strategic crossroads. Remaining in diplomatic limbo—neither fully aligned with the American hardline nor integrated into the emerging European consensus—could erode Britain's credibility in the region and within its own political institutions. The question looms: will the UK remain cautious to preserve its transatlantic ties, or take a principled leap to join a growing chorus of nations recognizing Palestine? The United States, meanwhile, appears determined to stay the course. Its refusal to endorse France's recognition initiative and its silence on EU proposals for immediate diplomatic steps highlight Washington's continued prioritization of Israeli security over Palestinian sovereignty. Amid this transatlantic rift, Palestinians once again find themselves caught in an unjust equation: one side ties their right to statehood to the will of those who deny it; the other expresses rhetorical solidarity but hesitates to act. In truth, the aftermath of the New York conference marks not an endpoint but a beginning. As preparations proceed for a potential follow-up summit in Paris during the UN General Assembly in September, pressure will mount on undecided nations to take a definitive stance. The world must now choose: either recognize the Palestinian state as an inalienable political reality—or retreat once again into cycles of negotiation, where peace remains deferred, justice diluted, and rights suspended between maps and promises. Dr. Marwa El-Shinawy: Academic and Writer

Benin Grants Citizenship to African Diaspora Descendants, Including US Singer Ciara
Benin Grants Citizenship to African Diaspora Descendants, Including US Singer Ciara

Daily News Egypt

time8 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

Benin Grants Citizenship to African Diaspora Descendants, Including US Singer Ciara

In a historic move to reconnect with its diaspora, Benin has granted citizenship to three individuals of African descent, including American music star Ciara, during a ceremony held in the capital Cotonou on Saturday, July 26. The event marked the implementation of Benin's Diaspora Citizenship Law, enacted in September 2024, which formally recognizes descendants of Africans affected by the transatlantic slave trade as part of the national identity. President Patrice Talon personally handed over naturalization certificates to the honorees, in what was described as a symbolic and emotional gesture aimed at restoring a broken connection with ancestral roots. In a heartfelt speech, Ciara expressed deep gratitude to the people of Benin, stating: 'Today, I am not just an artist… I am Beninese, and that means more than words can express.' However, she did not clarify whether she would retain her US citizenship alongside her new Beninese nationality. President Talon emphasized that the granted citizenship is not merely symbolic. Recipients will enjoy full constitutional rights and are required to reside in Benin for at least three years from the date of naturalization. The recipients also took a formal oath of allegiance, pledging to uphold the Constitution and defend the dignity of the republic. Digital Roots Revival As part of this cultural and political initiative, Benin's government launched a multilingual digital platform to allow members of the African diaspora—particularly those in the Americas and the Caribbean—to apply for citizenship. The platform is a key feature of Benin's new cultural diplomacy strategy, designed to strengthen spiritual and historical ties between the nation and its dispersed descendants across the globe.

Russia to face new US sanctions unless ends Ukraine war in 10 days: Trump - War in Ukraine
Russia to face new US sanctions unless ends Ukraine war in 10 days: Trump - War in Ukraine

Al-Ahram Weekly

time9 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Russia to face new US sanctions unless ends Ukraine war in 10 days: Trump - War in Ukraine

US President Donald Trump said his deadline for Russia to end the fighting in Ukraine or face new sanctions will be in 10 days from Tuesday. "Ten days from today," Trump told reporters when asked what the exact deadline would be. Trump, flying back from Britain to Washington, had already said on Monday that he was reducing a previous ultimatum of 50 days to between 10 and 12 days, but his latest comments indicated an apparently firm date at the end of next week. Trump said that he had not heard from Putin on his threat. "I haven't had any response. It's a shame," he said. And the Republican appeared to play down the effect of his planned actions. "We're going to put on tariffs and stuff," he said, but "I don't know if it's going to effect Russia because obviously he wants to keep the war going." Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store