logo
How the sequel '28 Years Later' shows a 'compassionate' side of horror

How the sequel '28 Years Later' shows a 'compassionate' side of horror

USA Today5 hours ago

How the sequel '28 Years Later' shows a 'compassionate' side of horror
Show Caption
Hide Caption
'28 Years Later' trailer: The horror is infectious in movie sequel
Survivors try to maintain a semblance of life among those infected by a rage virus in Danny Boyle's horror sequel "28 Years Later."
In 2002, the British horror hit '28 Days Later' helped repopularize the zombie subgenre, leading to post-apocalyptic entertainment like 'The Walking Dead' and 'The Last of Us.'
Ever since, director Danny Boyle has been saying to anyone who'll listen that the people infected with a rage virus aren't zombies. They're just like us but sick, not undead. And in the new sequel '28 Years Later' (in theaters June 20), the infected have changed a lot, even showing qualities that hint they're much more than mindless, flesh-eating machines.
'Obviously, 28 years is quite a compressed amount of time for evolution to really establish itself. But they are evolving just like humans evolve,' Boyle says.
Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox
With '28 Years Later,' Boyle and original writer Alex Garland have returned to this post-apocalyptic world with something akin to the recent 'Halloween' revamp. The new film is a direct follow-up to '28 Days,' pretty much ignoring the events of 2007's '28 Weeks Later,' and begins a planned trilogy that will continue with director Nia DaCosta's '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple' (in theaters Jan. 16).
Garland sees 'Days' and 'Years' as coming-of-age stories of a sort with 'a young person in a state of innocence who's then having that innocence robbed,' the writer says. In the original film, it's bicycle courier Jim (Cillian Murphy), who wakes up in a hospital after an accident finding a London devoid of people. He learns the hard way how much the world has changed since the rage virus started, with the infected running and biting at him, and Jim in a sense 'becomes an infected' by giving in to his own rage to save people important to him.
'28 Years Later' fast-forwards nearly 30 years, with the rage virus contained to the borders of the United Kingdom. Twelve-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) lives with his parents, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Isla (Jodie Comer), in a small, heavily defended community on Holy Island. In an old-fashioned society where everyone has a job to do, children are taught what life used to be like and 'the infected play a role in their mind. They're being told that they will one day meet them,' Boyle says. "So they mythologize them a little bit.'
Jamie takes Spike on a rite of passage to the mainland for the first time to kill an infected. Father and son barely make it back alive, but when Spike learns of a mysterious doctor who could help his sick mom with her undiagnosed ailment, he returns to a dangerous landscape on a journey more about protecting life than taking it.
'He chooses not to follow in his father's footsteps,' Boyle says of Spike. "That's one of the things that always gives us hope with teenagers. Even though they might drive you mad, they want their own challenges."
Spike ultimately meets the man he's searching for, Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes). He's built a Bone Temple of skulls as a memorial to victims of the infected, and Kelson sees survivors and infected people as alike.
'A key thing about how we approached the zombie genre was we didn't make them supernatural. They're not reanimated dead people. If you were a doctor, that would be the correct way to look at it," Garland says. One of themes of the movie is "how much should a sick person be differentiated from a healthy person? And why is that differentiation fair?'
Over three decades, the infected of '28 Days Later' – the fast-running "zombies" that freaked moviegoers out in 2002 – have evolved and organized. Most of them are still scary quick, skinny and now naked. Bigger, stronger Alphas have emerged like the leader Samson, while 'Slow-Lows' are fat, bloated and 'closer to the ground,' Boyle says. 'They expend a lot less energy but they're nevertheless very dangerous if they're provoked or disturbed or stimulated.'
And like the original film, the '28 Years Later' trilogy explores humanity in inhuman times among its pockets of survivors.
Whereas Christopher Eccleston's Major Henry West in the original film "28 Days" is a soldier "who has gone crazy and collapsed into a more violent, degenerative state than the infected have,' Garland explains, Kelson is the inverse to him and creates "a different kind of commentary on people, which has something to do with being reasonable and compassionate in the face of an incredibly difficult situation."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘28 Days Later' franchise: Box-office success on modest budgets for the zombie apocalypse film series
‘28 Days Later' franchise: Box-office success on modest budgets for the zombie apocalypse film series

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

‘28 Days Later' franchise: Box-office success on modest budgets for the zombie apocalypse film series

More than two decades after the release of 28 Days Later, the third installment in the zombie-apocalypse film franchise has been released. 28 Years Later picks up almost three decades after the release of a dangerous virus that turned humans into zombie-like creatures that plagued the streets of London. 28 Years Later tells the post-apocalyptic story of a group of survivors on a small island from which a father and his son leave and discover what has happened to the outside world. Here's how much the first two films in the iconic British zombie franchise have made at the box office. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Eamonn M. McCormack/Getty Images Each movie in the 28 Days Later franchise has its own storyline, and the main characters are different in each film. Here's a synopsis of each film in the trilogy, which spans more than two decades. 28 Days Later The series' first film, released in 2002, centers around a few survivors. Jim is a bicycle courier played by Cillian Murphy (who won the Best Actor award at the Oscars for the titular role in Oppenheimer in 2023). Naomie Harris (who played Eve Moneypenny in the James Bond films opposite Daniel Craig's 007) portrays Selena, who saves Jim from the infected before the two travel together. The film focuses on the aftermath of the Rage virus that was accidentally released by a group of animal-rights activists from a medical research laboratory testing monkeys. After nearly a month of the initial infection, this group encounters other survivors whose outlook on survival differs from theirs. 28 Weeks Later The second film, released in 2007, takes place more than half a year after the initial release of the virus and is a follow-up to the events of 28 Days Later, but with different characters and a different story. In the U.K., survivors are rounded up to live in an area in central London controlled by the U.S. military. One infected person infiltrates the compound, and a group of survivors attempts to flee the city on foot. 28 Years Later The third film focuses on survivors who live on a small island in the 28 years after the virus infected the general population of the U.K. Related: 'How to Train Your Dragon': Which film made the most money? 28 Days Later can be viewed without a paid subscription on Pluto TV and on paid streaming services, including Amazon Prime. 28 Weeks Later is available on Hulu, which requires a subscription plan, but it can also be streamed for free on Tubi. The budget for 28 Years Later is modest compared to other much-anticipated movies of 2025, such as Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning. The reported budget for 28 Years Later is $75 million, the highest among the movies in the trilogy. More on Hollywood and money: Gerard Butler's net worth: The A-list actor's wealth & incomeRalph Macchio's net worth: A revived career for the Karate Kid starTom Cruise's net worth: The 'Mission: Impossible' star's wealth in 2025 Each of the 28 Days Later movies in the trilogy has made more than $100 million, in inflation-adjusted 2025 dollars. The first two films have made a combined total of $234 million on modest budgets. Here's how each 28 Days Later film has performed at the box office based on data compiled by Box Office Mojo, which tracks movie revenue at theaters. Box office revenues in parentheses are adjusted for inflation. Yui Mok -28 Days Later Global box office gross receipts: $74 million ($134 million in 2025)Budget: $8 millionRelease Date: February 29, 2002Director: Danny Boyle28 Weeks Later Global box office gross receipts: $65 million ($100 million in 2025)Budget: $15 millionRelease Date: May 9, 2007Director: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo Europa28 Years Later Global box office gross receipts: ?Budget: $75 millionRelease Date: June 20, 2025Director: Danny Boyle The first two films featured actors who weren't widely known at the time - including Murphy, Harris, Rose Byrne, and Jeremy Renner - and who later went on to take leading roles in popular films. In 28 Years Later, the film features established stars, including Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and Ralph Fiennes. Related: Which "Mission: Impossible" film made the most money? A retrospective of the Tom Cruise action franchise Danny Boyle returns to direct the third installment of the 28 Days Later franchise, after helming the first film. After 28 Days Later, Boyle became an in-demand director, heading up notable films including Slumdog Millionaire (2008), a film about an economically struggling teenager trying to answer trivia questions on the Indian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. He also directed 127 Hours (2010), a true story about a stranded hiker's fight for survival, and Yesterday (2019), a movie about a musician's shift to an alternative life in a world without the Beatles. 28 Years Later also marks the return of Alex Garland, who was the writer of the first film. Columbia Pictures is one of the big companies that produced 28 Years Later. Sony Pictures Releasing is distributing the film. 28 Days Later helped to revive interest in a genre that first started decades earlier. George A. Romeo was among the first filmmakers about zombies, putting out Night of the Living Dead in 1968 and follow-up films over the next 40 years. Boyle helped to bring back interest in the genre with 28 Days Later, which featured fast-moving zombies, in an engaging, dramatic storyline. The film has been highly influential on subsequent zombie media, and its themes have permeated countless other movies and TV shows. In one of the opening scenes of the first movie, Cillian Murphy's character wakes up to a deserted London at the dawn of the zombie apocalypse. It's a scene that's been replicated by other characters on other movies and television shows, including Rick Grimes, played by Andrew Lincoln, in the popular The Walking Dead series, which first aired in 2010. Other zombie-related films, ranging from horror and drama to comedy, included World War Z (2013), Zombieland (2009), and Train to Busan (2016). Popular TV shows included Black Summer (2019), Z Nation (2014), and Ash vs Evil Dead (2015). Related: Jackie Chan's net worth: The 'Karate Kid: Legends' star's wealth & income The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

'I Was Broke': Gary Oldman Gets Honest About Starring In 1 Of The Most Hated Films Ever
'I Was Broke': Gary Oldman Gets Honest About Starring In 1 Of The Most Hated Films Ever

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

'I Was Broke': Gary Oldman Gets Honest About Starring In 1 Of The Most Hated Films Ever

Sir Gary Oldman has opened up about how he came to star in a film that's widely considered one of the worst in history. Back in 2003, the newly-knighted British actor starred alongside Matthew McConaughey, Patricia Arquette and Kate Beckinsale in Tiptoes (two of whom have gone on to win Academy Awards, as has Sir Gary). The film centred around a young man, played by Matthew, who gets his girlfriend pregnant, having concealed from her that every member of his family, including his twin brother, has a form of dwarfism. Sir Gary played Matthew's brother in the movie, for which he donned prosthetics and spent much of the shoot on his knees. During a new interview with the Happy Sad Confused podcast, Sir Gary admitted that he's never actually seen Tiptoes, and revealed that it came along at a difficult time in both his personal and professional life. 'I'll be very honest with you,' Sir Gary began. 'I had gone through a divorce and a nasty thing with a contractor.' He continued 'I ended up in California, in LA, at 42 years old, a single dad, and I was broke. And, ironically, I was living under the Hollywood sign, living in this rental. We had no furniture – thank God for Ikea.' Sir Gary said that when the offer for Tiptoes came along, he'd not worked for just shy of two years, and had been affected by an actors' strike. 'It was a bit of a rough time, and I needed to pay some bills, and I needed some money, and it was an actors' strike ontop of it all, which was a double whammy,' he admitted, noting the situation was a 'terrible time' for everyone in Hollywood. 'And then this film came along, this crazy idea, from this director, that I would play a little person. And I would play Matthew McConaughey's brother. 'There were several [issues]. First of all, I got locked in to doing a voice like that, because I had to sound like Matthew. We were brothers, so somehow, I had to sound like Matthew. So that was that. And then, I'm on my knees… desperate measures, desperate times.' 'I needed to work,' he insisted. 'And it was a crazy idea. But, would I do it now? No.' He said that if one good thing came out of the film, it's that several actors with dwarfism – including a pre- Game Of Thrones Peter Dinklage – were able to get work at a time when many performers were struggling. 'It was a good thing in that regard, because they were all going through the same thing I was going through, with no work,' Sir Gary said, insisting: 'But it's a misfire, to be sure. Not one I talk about, I'm so glad you brought it up.' Elsewhere in the interview, Sir Gary was also asked about another of the films he hasn't held in an especially high regard, The Fifth Element. He explained that his wife of eight years, Gisele Schmidt, has helped to 'convince me that it's a better film than I think it is'. Sir Gary explained: 'I'm contaminated, because I was the one who had that haircut. And I was the one who was wearing rubber. So, others can experience it in a different way. I get a little triggered when I see it, and I go back to that place of Jean-Paul Gaultier and rubber.' He added: 'Bruce [Willis] didn't like [that] either – you know that orange vest that he wears? He hated it.' A year after Tiptoes hit cinemas, Sir Gary made his debut as Sirius Black in the third Harry Potter film – a role with which he's still synonymous to many today. Since then, he also won an Oscar for his portrayal of Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour. Over the weekend, it was announced that Sir Gary had been bestowed with a knighthood by King Charles for his services to drama.

Judge: Justin Baldoni can see texts between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively
Judge: Justin Baldoni can see texts between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Judge: Justin Baldoni can see texts between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively

Judge: Justin Baldoni can see texts between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively Show Caption Hide Caption Blake Lively's team slams Baldoni's over Taylor Swift subpoena Blake Lively's team has condemned Justin Baldoni's team's decision to subpoena Taylor Swift, calling it a blatant attempt to exploit Lively's friendship for tabloid attention. unbranded - Entertainment Justin Baldoni can obtain private text messages between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift that pertain to the filming of 'It Ends With Us,' a court ruled on Wednesday, June 18. It's the latest development in an ongoing legal feud between co-stars Lively and Baldoni, over what occurred on the set of the film, released in 2024. Baldoni, who also directed the film, first sued Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times in late 2024 after the actress went public with claims that Baldoni sexually harassed her and helped orchestrate a smear campaign against her. The lawsuit was filed in response to Lively's sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit in late 2024, and the Times article about it. Lively previously sought a protective order to prevent sharing the text messages requested by Baldoni's lawyers, arguing that the communications were irrelevant to the case, and could instead be used "to prop up a public relations narrative outside of court." However, Judge Lewis Liman ruled on Wednesday that the information is pertinent because Lively identified Swift as someone who would know about complaints or discussions regarding the working environment on the set of the film. "Given that Lively has represented that Swift had knowledge of complaints or discussions about the working environment on the film, among other issues, the requests for messages with Swift regarding the film and this action are reasonably tailored to discover information that would prove or disprove Lively's harassment and retaliation claims," the judge wrote. Baldoni's legal team will only have access to messages about 'It Ends With Us' and the co-stars ongoing legal battle. USA TODAY has reached out to Baldoni and Lively's representatives for comment on the development. Baldoni's $400M extortion lawsuit against Lively, the Times dismissed Liman previously dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million countersuit against Lively, Reynolds and the Times on June 9. However, the judge gave Baldoni's team a second chance to address specific claims by filing a second amended complaint – for breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with contract – by June 23. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," Lively's lawyers said on June 9 in a statement to USA TODAY. "We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." In a statement obtained by USA TODAY on June 10, Baldoni's lawyers slammed the Lively team's "predictable declaration of victory" in the case, suggesting they intend to refile four of their claims, as Liman has recommended. Contributing: Taijuan Moorman and Brendan Morrow

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store