logo
Why history might hold the answer for stricken Liberals

Why history might hold the answer for stricken Liberals

West Australian16-05-2025
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, as the aphorism goes.
For the Liberal Party, the lessons to be learned after a historic election defeat eerily resemble a re-run of a schooling the party received decades earlier.
Women and young people abandoned the conservatives, multicultural communities lost faith and there was a prominent drop in support among metropolitan voters.
Those findings from a 1983 review into the blistering election defeat of then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser mirror problems raised by party members after the party's 2025 loss.
Fresh thinking was needed, the talents of women should be better utilised and there had to be better communication with young people, then-Liberal president John Valder found, noting parties that ignored change didn't survive.
One of those points has been addressed after the most recent electoral defeat with the appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the federal Liberals.
But she still faces a monumental challenge with a loss of frontbench talent and the need to re-establish what the Liberals stand for with voters, experts and party insiders say.
The wipeout under Peter Dutton on May 3 was proportionally worse than Mr Fraser's defeat, reducing the Liberals to just 30 per cent of lower house seats - its worst position in the post-war era.
In addition to their greater parliamentary presence, the 1983 Liberals also retained a lot more experience on their front bench, political historian Josh Black said.
There was "an obvious dearth of apparent talent" this time around, meaning the path forward would need to be different, he told AAP.
Outgoing Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison was criticised in the aftermath of his 2022 defeat - at that time the party's worst in 70 years - for abandoning inner-city seats that were won by teal independents and instead targeting the outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton has been accused of unsuccessfully trying the same playbook that backfired three years earlier.
But the outer suburbs targeted by the coalition were no longer the working-class areas successfully won over by former Liberal prime minister John Howard, pollster Kos Samaras said.
They were now incredibly diverse, often populated by young, immigrant families.
Liberals who thought Howard-era thinking still prevailed were "quite ignorant of the Australia they live in", Mr Samaras said.
The party needed to become more empathetic and tolerant, including by abandoning its perceived anti-immigration sentiments, he said.
Young, working-class men of Indian heritage in their 20s and 30s, who on the face of it might vote Liberal, did not rally behind the party.
When asked why, they would reply, "Oh, they don't like us", Mr Samaras added.
"(The Liberals are) going to have to grab that dog whistle, dig a big hole and bury it and never dig it up again," he said.
Some among the Liberals question how the party of Robert Menzies, which was formed in conjunction with the Australian Women's National League, also failed to appeal to the female demographic so badly.
There was no clear start to the Liberals' women problem but rather decades of incremental decisions, Dr Black said.
Challenges started emerging by the 1970s, when that generation of Liberal politicians were less comfortable sharing power with women compared to those in the Menzies era, he said.
By the 1990s, the Liberals were adamant about not moving to a quota system for pre-selecting women despite the Labor Party making the change.
Senior conservative Liberals also came out in the 2000s against issues like easier access to abortions, he said.
"There are key milestones like this that meant by the 2010s, a real women problem had emerged," Dr Black added.
Western Sydney MP Melissa McIntosh, one of the few Liberals to hold their outer-suburban seats, said her party had already heeded the message from the election by electing its first female leader.
But it still needed to do a better job communicating what it stood for, she said.
"We have beliefs that women would resonate with talking about equality for all, that's a core belief of the Liberal Party," she said.
The Liberals also face a cultural shift, with support for the party plummeting among millennial and Gen Z voters, many of whom have turned to minor parties or independents.
They included people who can't afford a house and the first generation facing a future in which they would be worse off than their parents, Mr Samaras said.
That cohort of voters did not share the same views as baby boomers had when they were younger, he said, changing the Liberals path back to government compared to the post-Fraser years.
The last time the Liberals were down as low, they were consigned to 13 years in opposition and five consecutive election defeats before Mr Howard's 1996 victory.
Ms Ley has already made history once by becoming leader and she will need to do it again if she wants to avoid a repeat of the party's last stint in the wilderness.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier
'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier

Perth Now

time14 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

'Get on with the job' after failed bid to turf premier

Tasmania's returned minority Liberal premier has declared he wants to get on the with job after a snap election and weeks of political uncertainty. Jeremy Rockliff received parliament's green light to continue governing on Tuesday afternoon when a Labor bid to seize power via a no-confidence motion fell spectacularly flat. Neither the Liberals (14 seats) or Labor (10) reached the required 18 seats needed for majority at the July 19 election. Labor, which has been in opposition for 11 years, tried to unseat Mr Rockliff as premier and install its leader Dean Winter in the role on parliament's first day back. But none of the cross bench, which includes five Greens, five independents and one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP, backed Mr Winter's motion. Several crossbenchers lashed Mr Winter for a lack of compromise during negotiations and for still moving a motion that was doomed to fail after the Greens ruled out support on Monday. The Greens and several independents noted they lacked faith in the Liberals, but has less faith that Labor could form a workable government. First-term independent and former journalist Peter George said Labor had undermined the very notion of collaboration by not shifting on any of its policies. "In my years of reporting politics, which stretch back to the Whitlam years, never have I come across an opposition party less ready for government," he said. Labor received its worst primary vote in more than a century at the election and suffered a 3.1 per cent swing against it. Mr Rockliff, who has presided over a minority government since 2023, said MPs had learnt a lot in recent weeks. "The time to get on with the job, to work together in the best interests of Tasmania, starts right now," he said. The Liberals made several policy concessions to a largely progressive cross bench, including a ban on greyhound racing and a review examining the state's salmon industry. Mr Winter accused Mr Rockliff of selling out jobs and doing anything to stay in power. Mr Rockliff defended the concessions as an acknowledgement of the minority situation. The snap election, Tasmania's fourth in seven years, was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in June criticising the state's ballooning budget debt. The Greens offered at that point to work with Labor to form government, but Mr Winter refused.

Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'
Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'

Perth Now

time44 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Disability funding reforms trigger 'so many questions'

Long-term concerns about an overhaul of the NDIS are still unanswered, disability advocates say, as they wait for a major update on the multibillion-dollar scheme from the man in charge. Disability Minister Mark Butler will deliver an address at the National Press Club on Wednesday on the future of the NDIS, a year after major reforms to curb spiralling spending passed federal parliament. The scheme is the budget's third-largest expense and is set to cost taxpayers more than $52 billion in 2025/26. The NDIS reforms include a cap of eight per cent growth in spending per year. But the changes had not fully hit the mark, People with Disability Australia deputy chief executive Megan Spindler-Smith said. "There's still so many questions unanswered about what the reform will look like long-term," she told AAP. "Is it on people with disability and their needs, or other things that are not necessarily focusing on what we need?" Of the estimated 5.5 million people in Australia living with disability, the NDIS covers fewer than 700,000. "We would love to see consistency across how people are able to access their support needs, regardless of whether or not they're able to be a participant with the NDIS or not," Ms Spindler-Smith said. Commitments to funding individual advocacy and foundational supports should be important points of discussion for the minister, Disability Advocacy Network Australia chief executive David Petherington said. "They're really desperately needed by people with disabilities," he told AAP. Every Australian Counts chair and NDIS participant George Taleporos said participants and their families must be included to co-design reforms. "Too often we face bureaucratic barriers and decisions that do not reflect our needs or our voices," he told AAP. Foundational supports include information and advice, disability employment supports, peer support and self-advocacy. Mr Butler's speech at the National Press Club follows the federal government's announcement of an NDIS Reform Advisory Committee on Tuesday to oversee how the laws are implemented. NDIS Minister Jenny McAllister said the committee would ensure changes to the scheme were implemented with "transparency, integrity and accountability". "Australians with disability, and those who care for them, deserve no less," she said.

Lehrmann in new bid to clear name after defamation loss
Lehrmann in new bid to clear name after defamation loss

Perth Now

time44 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Lehrmann in new bid to clear name after defamation loss

Bruce Lehrmann will have three days to convince an appeals court to toss out findings he likely raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in parliament house. The former federal political staffer is seeking to overturn a Federal Court judgment he was not defamed by Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson during an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021. Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins' claims she had been raped in parliament house in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024. But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors and launched an appeal which will be ventilated over three days, beginning on Wednesday in Sydney. The ex-Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were "starkly different" from the case run by Ten. He points to the allegation Ms Higgins had repeatedly said "no on a loop" during the alleged incident, which Justice Lee was not satisfied had occurred. The case as found by Justice Lee wasn't put to him during cross-examination for his response, Lehrmann argues. He says because of deficiencies in Ms Higgins' evidence, the judge should not have found he engaged in rape. The judge found Lehrmann had been "hell-bent" on having sex with Ms Higgins and had a mindset of "non-advertent recklessness" which showed he knew she was not consenting. But that definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it's inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person. Justice Lee is also accused of erring by finding Lehrmann would only be entitled to damages of $20,000 if he had succeeded in his defamation suit against Ten. Lehrmann's lawyer Zali Burrows has previously said he should be awarded a seven-figure sum for the "false charge of rape". Lehrmann continues to deny he sexually assaulted Ms Higgins and a criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him. "Having escaped the lions' den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat," Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store