
Living, not working, longer — Haslina Muhamad
From a psychological perspective, the answer depends on more than just economics. Retirement is not merely a financial decision; it is a deeply personal transition that affects identity, purpose, and mental well-being. As a psychologist, I believe that whether working longer is 'better' depends not only on health and economics but also on the quality of work and how it aligns with the principles of cognitive psychology and positive psychology.
Cognitive psychology teaches us that the brain thrives on stimulation. Just like muscles, our cognitive abilities stay sharper when regularly exercised. Work that involves decision-making, problem-solving, and meaningful social interaction can help preserve memory, focus, and mental agility well into later life. The opposite is also true; monotonous, highly stressful, or physically exhausting work can diminish mental well-being and accelerate burnout.
From a psychological perspective, the answer depends on more than just economics. Retirement is not merely a financial decision; it is a deeply personal transition that affects identity, purpose, and mental well-being. — Unsplash pic
Malaysian data backs this up. Findings from the Malaysia Ageing & Retirement Survey (MARS) show that one in five Malaysians aged 60 and above are still working, and that occupational engagement is linked to better cognitive scores in numeracy and verbal fluency. Notably, cognitively stimulating work appears to offer the greatest benefits, while physically stressful or low-control jobs may have the opposite effect, raising the risk of both physical and mental decline.
A separate MARS analysis of over 5,500 adults revealed that a strong sense of purpose in life, a core concept in positive psychology, is independently associated with better memory, verbal fluency, and overall cognitive performance. This relationship holds true for both men and women, whether employed or retired, and is only partly explained by lifestyle or social factors. In other words, roles that preserve purpose, whether through paid work, mentoring, volunteering, or community leadership, may help sustain brain health as we age.
But here is the cautionary note: the benefits of working longer depend heavily on the nature of the work. The landmark Whitehall Studies in the UK, which tracked thousands of civil servants over decades, found that those in lower-grade, lower-control jobs had significantly higher rates of heart disease, depression, and premature death, even though all participants had the same access to healthcare. Whitehall I showed that men in the lowest grades faced up to three times the mortality risk of those in the highest grades. Whitehall II expanded the scope to include women and revealed that low job control, lack of social support, and chronic work-related stress were strong predictors of poor health outcomes.
The lesson for Malaysia is clear: extending working life without addressing job quality could harm, rather than help, older workers — especially those in high-demand, low-control roles. It's not enough to raise the retirement age; we must ensure that later-life jobs are designed to promote health, autonomy, and engagement.
Positive psychology provides a framework for doing this. It emphasises three elements that keep people thriving: mastery, meaning, and connection. For some, working longer in a job they enjoy and excel at can be energising and fulfilling. For others, especially those whose jobs have become physically or mentally taxing, flexible pathways into less intense but still purposeful roles may be far more sustainable. These could include consultancy work, part-time roles, mentoring younger employees, or transitioning into community-based projects.
We also have to recognise that ageing is not one-size-fits-all. A 65-year-old may be running marathons or recovering from major surgery. Some individuals may wish to continue contributing through work, while others may prefer to focus on family, health, or personal pursuits. This diversity means that the effects of later-life employment can differ significantly from one person to another.
Ultimately, the question of whether to raise the retirement age in Malaysia involves multiple considerations, including health, job quality, personal preferences, and economic factors.
Evidence suggests that the impact of working longer can vary widely depending on individual circumstances and the nature of the work. Any approach to this issue would need to account for the diversity of ageing experiences and the complex relationship between employment, well-being, and purpose in later life.
*Associate Prof Dr Haslina Muhamad is an Associate Professor at the Department ofAnthropology and Sociology, Universiti Malaya, and may be reached at [email protected]
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Petroleum Development Act can't supersede relevant Sarawak laws, says senator
Senator Ahmad Ibrahim disputed law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said's statement that Petronas's rights on O&G resources in Sarawak remain protected under the PDA. (Petronas pic) PETALING JAYA : The Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 cannot supersede the relevant laws in Sarawak, especially the Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958, a senator said in disputing a statement by a federal minister. Ahmad Ibrahim said Sarawak had been producing oil and gas since the discovery of oil in Miri in 1910, some 53 years before Malaysia was formed, the Sarawak Public Communications Unit reported. Ahmad said Sarawak had developed the industry under the state's own laws way before the PDA was enacted. Apart from the PDA, he said, the other relevant laws were the Distribution of Gas Ordinance (DGO) 2016, the Sarawak Land Code, and the State Sales Tax regime. He said Section 73 of the Malaysia Act 1963 preserved all state laws in force before Malaysia was formed, which included the OMO. Moreover, the ordinance, following its amendment in 2018, granted the state full authority over petroleum licensing onshore and on its continental shelf. 'The PDA (only) applies fully in states that do not have their own petroleum laws like the OMO, and therefore, in those states, Petronas is the sole aggregator of oil and gas,' he was quoted as saying. On Tuesday, law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said the national oil company's rights on oil and gas resources in Sarawak remained protected under the PDA. In a written parliamentary reply, Azalina said the PDA would remain in force, in accordance with existing legal provisions. 'Petronas is vested with the ownership of petroleum, and the rights, powers, freedoms, and exclusive privileges to explore, exploit, obtain, and acquire petroleum, whether onshore or offshore Malaysia, as provided for under the Act,' she was quoted as saying. Ahmad said that under the DGO, Sarawak has exclusive authority to license and regulate domestic gas distribution, with state-owned Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) having been formally recognised by the federal government as the sole gas aggregator for Sarawak's domestic market, excluding liquefied natural gas. As for the State Sales Tax, he said, a 2020 High Court ruling upheld Sarawak's right to impose such a tax on petroleum products, noting that Petronas withdrew its appeal and settled the dues. On Feb 5, Azalina said Sarawak had accepted that the PDA, not the state ordinances, dictated the operation of Malaysia's petroleum sector. She said Sarawak's concession was among key matters agreed upon by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg during a meeting on Jan 7. On Feb 7, Anwar said the federal and Sarawak governments had agreed to Petronas and its subsidiaries retaining all existing contractual obligations, domestic and international. However, to fulfil Sarawak's aspirations in the oil and gas sector, it was agreed that the DGO will come into force on March 1, he said. 'The DGO will be read together with the PDA, and therefore Petros will act as Sarawak's aggregator,' he had said. Anwar said this after Abang Johari reiterated the state's contention that it had regulatory authority over oil and gas activities within its territory.


Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Public feedback still required for key projects, says DBKL
DBKL said it is committed to public engagement, transparency, and inclusive decision-making in urban planning. PETALING JAYA : New planning regulations for Kuala Lumpur will continue to require stakeholder consultation, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) said today. DBKL said although formal objections to the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (PTKL 2040) no longer apply following its gazettement on June 11, it remains committed to best planning practices through the implementation of Rule 3 of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which mandates stakeholder consultations. It explained that such consultation is required for specific types of proposed developments, such as high-density projects or temporary developments, which require public feedback before approval is granted. 'Additionally, every approved development project in Kuala Lumpur is required to implement a communication strategy covering the pre-construction, construction, and post-construction phases,' it said in a statement. 'This ensures that developers engage with nearby residents to clearly explain the planned development and the benefits it will bring to the local community.' DBKL said these measures reflect its ongoing commitment to public engagement, transparency, and inclusive decision-making in urban planning. It was responding to criticism by Seputeh MP Teresa Kok over the 'secret' gazettement of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which took place on June 13 and became effective three days later. Kok said the rules, which replace decades-old planning laws, weaken transparency and limit public objections to development projects. In its statement, DBKL said it remains dedicated to ensuring that the city is developed in an organised, inclusive, and liveable manner, with public input serving as a key foundation of its planning process. It also stressed that PTKL 2040's preparation was carried out transparently and in full compliance with legal provisions, with all stakeholders given the opportunity to provide input. It said it implemented a variety of publicity and public engagement methods to ensure broad community participation in line with Sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982. The public participation period began on Jan 31, 2024, was extended twice, and ended on April 15, 2024, it said. During this time, DBKL said it hosted permanent and mobile exhibitions across Kuala Lumpur and conducted 13 public briefing sessions, including ones involving Kuala Lumpur MPs. It also said it went beyond the legal requirements by conducting more engagement sessions than required under the Federal Territory (Planning) Act. Fifty-one engagement sessions involving more than 1,500 individuals and groups were organised. The participants included academics, MPs, professionals, residents' associations, government bodies, and local authorities. These engagement efforts spanned several years and formats, and included early pre-consultation sessions in 2019, informal meetings with MPs in 2020, and technical meetings with 32 government bodies. DBKL also said it gathered feedback through online surveys from 300 residents' associations, hosted focus group discussions with 521 participants, held consultation sessions with MPs in 2023, and organised an open day for the draft amendment in May.


Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Number of Malaysians with at least RM1.2mil to double over 10 years, says HSBC
HSBC Bank said affluent Malaysians are increasingly seeking investment solutions that not only accelerate wealth accumulation but also safeguard their health and lifestyle. (Reuters pic) PETALING JAYA : HSBC Bank expects the number of Malaysians with at least US$250,000 (RM1.18 million) in assets to double over the next 10 years. HSBC's head of international wealth and premier banking Asia, Kai Zhang, said Malaysia's growing economy is creating more opportunities to build and sustain wealth. 'We estimate that the percentage of adults in Malaysia with at least US$250,000 in financial wealth will double over the next decade,' she said in a statement to mark the launch of HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd's revamped HSBC Premier for its affluent and high-net-worth customers today. Linda Yip, HSBC Malaysia's country head of international wealth and premier banking, said affluent Malaysians are increasingly seeking investment solutions that not only accelerate wealth accumulation but also safeguard their health and lifestyle. In 2023, a report from property consultancy Knight Frank stated that the number of Malaysians with at least US$1 million (RM4.6 million) in wealth will nearly double from over 85,000 in 2022 to more than 164,000 in 2027.