&w=3840&q=100)
SC defers hearing on 'Udaipur Files', tells makers to await govt decision
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi observed that if the film is released and later found to be problematic, no compensation would be available to the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case in terms of restoring their reputation. In contrast, the filmmakers, if the release is delayed or blocked, can be compensated monetarily.
Why did Delhi High Court stay film's release?
The film's release, originally scheduled for July 11, was stayed by the Delhi High Court on July 10. The court directed the petitioners, who had filed pleas seeking a permanent ban on the movie, to approach the Centre within two days, stating that the film had the potential to "promote disharmony" in society.
The high court bench noted that the petitioners had not first approached the Union government, as required, and asked the govt panel to grant the accused in the murder case an opportunity to be heard.
Kanhaiya Lal's murder and controversy around the film
'Udaipur Files' is based on the killing of tailor Kanhaiya Lal in Udaipur, Rajasthan, in June 2022. Lal was allegedly murdered by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous, who later released a video claiming responsibility. In the video, they said the attack was in retaliation for an alleged social media post by Lal supporting former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, who had made controversial remarks about Prophet Muhammad.
The incident triggered nationwide outrage, and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the probe. The accused were booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and various sections of the Indian Penal Code. Their trial is ongoing in a special NIA court in Jaipur.
Petitioners flag trailer, allege risk of communal tension
The legal challenge against the film was led by petitioners including Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind president and Darul Uloom Deoband principal Maulana Arshad Madani. Their petition cited the film's trailer, released on June 26, which they claim contains provocative dialogues and instances that led to communal disharmony in 2022. They argue that releasing the film could rekindle those tensions and disrupt public order.
The petitioners have demanded that the release of 'Udaipur Files' be stayed to prevent the judicial process from being compromised and to avoid societal prejudice. They have also objected to the trailer and the film's promotion campaign. (With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Street vendors demand action against zonal officials for demolishing 41 authorised shops near Ripon Buildings
The Chennai Street Vendors Federation and the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) submitted a petition to the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) requesting disciplinary action against officials of Royapuram zone responsible for the demolition of more than 40 authorised shops near Central railway station and Ripon Buildings and allot space for the vendors who were evicted from the spot recently. According to the petitioners, 41 vendors had been legally authorised by the GCC to run shops at the spot. They had received a written approval in December 2024. During the eviction drive, carried out in the early morning of July 12, the GCC and police officials demolished the shops without prior notice or presenting any official order, the CITU alleged. The union members cited sections under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which outlined the procedures and safeguards against eviction and urged the GCC to take action against the officials responsible for the 'wrongful eviction'. Street vendors have planned further protests if the GCC takes no action, said G. Selva, Chennai Central secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Katta Ravi Teja, Regional Deputy Commissioner (North), said an inspection would carried out soon to ascertain the reason for the eviction, and if the vendors were authorised by the GCC.
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Prostitution racket running under the garb of spa service busted in Palam Vihar, 1 held: Police
An alleged prostitution racket — running under the garb of a spa service at Palam Vihar — was busted on Wednesday with the help of decoy customers, said the Gurugram Police. The operation led to the arrest of a spa manager. A special team, led by Inspector Vijender, sent decoy customers to the two spa centres, where managers allegedly agreed to provide prostitution services. At one of the two spas, police said, a woman at the reception allegedly admitted to facilitating prostitution. During questioning, police claimed, the manager and the woman admitted to running an alleged sex racket. Cases have been registered against the spa owners and operators under relevant sections of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act at Palam Vihar police station. Further investigation is underway, police said. This latest development comes a day after the police cracked down on another similar alleged prostitution racket operating under the guise of a spa. Three accused were arrested and subsequently remanded to two weeks of judicial custody. The Gurugram Police have busted similar rackets in the past as well. Last year, in May, the city police arrested 10 people, including foreign women, from a hotel in Sector 57. Among the six women arrested, two each were from Bangladesh and Uzbekistan, who allegedly admitted to having engaged in prostitution. In January 2023, 11 people were arrested, including owners and managers of two spa centres in Gurgaon, for allegedly running a similar operation in the garb of a massage parlour.
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
NGT takes suo motu cognisance of Express report on garbage crisis in Southeast Delhi
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has taken suo motu cognisance of a report by The Indian Express on uncollected garbage choking parts of Southeast Delhi, observing that localities such as Shaheen Bagh and Sarita Vihar are facing a 'serious garbage problem' that's affecting the daily lives of residents. A three-member bench led by Chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava Wednesday registered the case based on the June 12 report, titled, 'We can smell it even inside our homes: Southeast Delhi localities choke on garbage'. In its order uploaded Thursday, the Tribunal quoted extensively from the news report, which highlighted how delays in municipal decisions have left garbage piling up for days across several colonies. 'The article states that garbage has been left uncollected for many days, causing bad smells and health problems. In Shaheen Bagh, streets that usually have food stalls now smell like rotten trash. The article also mentions that on High Tension Road, also called 40-futta, big garbage piles near homes have many flies around them,' the Tribunal noted in its order. Citing resident complaints, the NGT recorded: 'People say they can't walk outside without covering their faces, and the bad smell comes inside their houses too.' The order attributed the garbage crisis to delays in renewing the Rs 900-crore contract with Dakshin Dilli Swachh Initiatives Limited (DDSIL), the private firm handling waste collection. The contract ended in November 2023 and has only been extended temporarily. The delay, as per the report and noted by the Tribunal, was due to the stalled formation of the MCD Standing Committee, which is needed to approve large financial decisions. The committee — an 18-member body without whose approval no proposals exceeding Rs 5 crore can be cleared — was recently constituted after a delay of two-and-a-half years. 'The article explains that the delay in forming the MCD Standing Committee… is stopping the contract from being renewed or payments being made. Because of this, DDSIL and MCD have stopped collecting garbage,' the NGT said, adding that councillors and officials quoted in the report had pointed to a shortage of working trucks and no viable solution until the Standing Committee is constituted. The Tribunal said the matter 'raises substantial issues relating to compliance with environmental norms and implementation of the provisions of scheduled enactment,' and may attract provisions of The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. The Tribunal has issued notices to the Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi Pollution Control Committee, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, and the District Magistrate of Southeast Delhi, directing them to submit their responses by October 1.
