
New investment options may be coming to 401(k)s—here's what it means for your money
More options may soon be coming to the menu of investments you can choose in your 401(k) plan. And depending on who you ask, that may not be a good thing.
Last month, the Labor Department rescinded Biden-era guidance that cautioned employers to take "extreme care" before making digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, available in company plans.
In and of itself, the crypto rollback is "not necessarily controversial," Philip Chao, a certified financial planner and retirement plan investment consultant, recently told CNBC. "In reality, it's saying we should treat crypto like any other asset."
But it may be a signal to companies that they can begin offering crypto in workplace plans without consequence, he said.
Similarly, President Donald Trump is reportedly considering an executive order that would direct federal agencies to explore allowing private equity investments — funds that invest in non-publicly traded businesses — into plans as well.
Such a move would be a big win for the world's largest money managers, who stand to profit from expansion of access to an asset class that has historically been available only to wealthy investors.
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink in particular has been an advocate for opening the doors to private equity, arguing in his most recent annual shareholder letter that "democratizing" private markets could provide market-beating long-term returns for American workers.
But while these new investments can offer tantalizing returns, they also pose a major risk for long-term retirement savers, some investor advocates say.
"The objective for the average person is to have a safe, secure retirement plan," says Jerry Schlichter, founding partner of Schlichter Bogard, a firm known for lawsuits on behalf of employees over excessive fees in 401(k) plans. "When you talk about new areas like cryptocurrency or private equity, these are fraught with danger for investors for a variety of reasons."
To be clear, Schlichter and other financial pros don't deny these assets' potential to make investors money. They just may not be appropriate for everyday investors' retirement accounts, they say.
"It's a square peg in a round hole," Schlichter says.
Investing experts generally advise parking your core, long-term portfolio in a diversified mix of assets that have delivered proven, consistent returns over the long-term — decades, at least. Given the stock market's historical upward trajectory, a broad stock market index mutual fund would fit the bill of an appropriate 401(k) investment option, Schlichter says.
Under this framework, the argument against crypto's inclusion in workplace plans is clear. Although certain cryptocurrencies have delivered impressive returns, the asset class hasn't been around long enough to have proven itself as a safe option for investors.
"There's no long-term performance history for cryptocurrency, and the short- to intermediate-term has been all over the place," says Schlichter. "This is not the kind of investment that people want and deserve when they need to have something that's protected for their years in retirement."
The case against private equity is a little more complicated. As the name implies, private equity funds invest in a manner similar to mutual funds, but instead of holding shares in publicly-traded companies, they hold stakes in firms that aren't yet on the market.
It's not hard to imagine how investors in such funds can earn impressive returns. Just think how well you could have done if you owned a piece of Tesla or Nvidia before the firms went public.
For now, investment in such funds is typically reserved for accredited investors — generally those with annual incomes above $200,000 or a net worth north of $1 million.
The argument from Fink and others is that opening 401(k) plans to these investments would allow everyday investors to get in on the same return potential that the only the wealthy currently enjoy. Fink says in his letter that pension funds, many of which invest in private equity, tend to outperform 401(k)s, but experts debate whether private funds actually outperform market indexes on a long-term basis.
"There's nothing wrong with [nontraditional 401(k) investments], but you have to know what you own," says Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA. "What is it that you're buying? What are your expectations for this investment? And if it goes through a slump, what are you going to do then?"
For regular investors, who may not be familiar with how private equity works, there are a few key pitfalls to consider before buying.
Investment fees eat into returns you earn from them. And while private equity advocates argue that their returns are worth it, they have a very high hurdle to clear. Under one popular model, a private equity fund may charge a 2% annual fee, plus 20% of the fund's profits over a certain threshold.
Compare that with an index fund, which mirrors the return of the market while charging fractions of a percent in fees. "They're almost free these days," says Schlichter.
Let's say a group of employees want to pull money out of their 401(k) plan. If they own a stock or bond fund, that's generally an easy ask. Stocks or funds that you ostensibly own are sold and you get your cash.
That's not so easy with private equity, which often has set holding periods and limits on how much investors can redeem.
"If there's a desire to pull out of private equity, there isn't a way to actually sell that company or sell shares — there's just no market for it," says Charles Rotblut, vice president of the American Association of Individual Investors.
That could mean that owners of private equity funds in 401(k)s could have trouble selling shares quickly, either to raise cash or to buy another investment. Or, Schlichter posits, such funds could choose to keep some cash on hand for redemptions, instead of investing it, which could dampen returns.
Private equity funds aren't as heavily regulated as exchange-traded funds and mutual funds and are therefore generally less transparent about their investment strategies. That may leave everyday investors at sea as they try to understand complex strategies, which may include investing with leverage, trading derivatives or taking highly concentrated positions in private companies.
None of that is to say that, over a period of decades, a particular private equity fund won't outperform the market. But when it comes to your 401(k), the message is simple, says Schlichter: "If you don't understand the investment, you shouldn't depend on it for your retirement assets."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Wall Street economist who ripped Trump admits prez may have ‘outsmarted all of us' on tariffs
A prominent Wall Street economist who had slammed President Trump's tariffs earlier this year now says that the president may have 'outsmarted all of us' with his controversial trade policies. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at investment giant Apollo Global Management, said that while the uncertainty surrounding trade policy has already started to weigh on the economy, Trump could lower tariffs on most of the US trading partners while using the levies to boost federal revenue. Sløk suggested in a recently posted analysis that the administration's approach may be more strategic than previously thought. The optimistic outlook stands in stark contrast to his earlier position. 3 President Trump may have 'outsmarted all of us' with his tariff policies, according to a senior Wall Street analyst. AP In April, Sløk warned that Trump's tariffs could trigger a recession by summer, particularly harming American small businesses and potentially halting the flow of goods from China to the US, leading to layoffs and a broader economic slowdown. This time around, Sløk suggested that one potential move could be to keep 30% tariffs on Chinese imports while imposing 10% tariffs on all other countries — offering them a 12-month window to reduce non-tariff barriers and liberalize trade access. 'Extending the deadline one year would give countries and US domestic businesses time to adjust to the new world with permanently higher tariffs,' Sløk wrote. 'It would also result in an immediate decline in uncertainty, which would be positive for business planning, employment, and financial markets.' Beyond calming volatile markets, Sløk notes that such a move could deliver a sizable boost to US government revenue. He estimates the plan could generate $400 billion in annual tax revenue — a figure that could help offset budget deficits without raising domestic taxes. 3 Torsten Sløk, chief economist at investment giant Apollo Global Management, suggested there may be a method to Trump's madness. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers,' he wrote. 'Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.' Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, told The Post via email: 'President Trump was right all along? Many such cases!' Trump announced on Friday that the US has signed a new trade agreement with China. The full text of the agreement has not been made public, and details remain limited. 3 Trump said on Friday that the US and China have signed an agreement on trade — though details were scant. AFP via Getty Images At the same time, the Trump administration faces a looming July deadline as its 90-day pause on tariffs with several global trading partners nears expiration. Talks are ongoing with 18 nations, including the European Union, Japan, India, Vietnam and Malaysia. Some progress has been reported, such as a framework deal with the UK and early-stage agreements with Vietnam and India, though most deals are not finalized. If negotiations fall through, the US is prepared to reimpose or raise tariffs. Analysts are skeptical that meaningful deals can be completed on such an aggressive timeline, warning that most trade pacts typically require years of negotiation. With uncertainty mounting, the administration may push discussions beyond the July cutoff — possibly into early September — while attempting to stabilize global trade relationships.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's Announces Big Change to 'McValue Meal Deal' With New Item
Earlier this week McDonald's announced its partnership with Krispy Kreme was coming to an end just a few months after its started - with the removal of the doughnut chain's offerings set for July 2. 'We were excited and pleased to partner with Krispy Kreme,' Alyssa Buetikofer, McDonald's USA's Chief Marketing and Customer Experience Officer said in a statement at the time. 'We had strong collaboration with Krispy Kreme and they delivered a great, high-quality product for us, and while the partnership met our expectations for McDonald's and Owner/Operators, this needed to be a profitable business model for Krispy Kreme as well.' Just a few days after the disappointing news, McDonald's had some good news its customers. The Daily Double, a fan-favorite burger offered in local markets like Chicago, Miami, and Seattle, is officially available nationwide through the end of 2025. The offering made with two 100% beef patties and topped with American cheese, shredded lettuce, slivered onions, mayo and two juicy slices of tomato, will also sit center stage as the new entree option for the McValue Meal Deal bundle starting on July 22. The bundle includes the customer's choice of select entrees plus a 4-piece chicken nuggets, small fries and a small soft drink. "McValue is all about flexibility and giving you even more ways to save on the food you love. So whether you keep it classic with a McChicken® or McDouble® Meal Deal, or decide to dial up your order with the Daily getting more, for less," the company said in a statement. "The best part? Fans will continue to find a $5 Meal Deal option at restaurants across the country." The Daily Double comes in at 490 calories with 31 grams of fat, 31 grams of carbohydrates and 21 grams of Announces Big Change to 'McValue Meal Deal' With New Item first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 27, 2025

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Germany seeks to block Chinese DeepSeek AI over privacy
June 27 (UPI) -- German officials on Friday raised the alarm over the spying capabilities of Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Basic Technology Research Company, calling on Apple and Google to consider blocking access to the app. Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information Meike Kamp said in a statement, the watchdog believes DeepSeek is illegally sending user data to China. Germany is the latest country to raise concerns over DeepSeek's data practices, after Italian officials earlier this year called on that country's government to block the Chinese AI company's access to Italy. Italy opened an investigation after DeepSeek officials did not supply required documentation to regulators. In February, South Korea took similar steps, banning downloads of DeepSkeek over data privacy concerns. "DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful. DeepSeek has not been able to convincingly demonstrate to my authority that German users' data in China is protected to a level equivalent to that of the European Union." Kamp said in the agency's statement Friday. "Chinese authorities have far-reaching rights of access to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies. Furthermore, DeepSeek users in China do not have the enforceable rights and effective legal remedies guaranteed in the European Union. I have therefore informed Google and Apple, as operators of the largest app platforms, of the violations and expect a timely consideration of a blocking." DeepSeek does not have an office located inside the European Union, while the app itself is available for download from the Google Play Store and Apple's App Store. The watchdog said the company is required to abide by the European General Data Protection Regulation, adding Google and Apple "must now promptly review the report and decide whether to block it." Kamp said after notifying Google and Apple, he expects "a timely consideration of a blocking" of DeepSeek from both of the American tech giants. DeepSeek gained prominence when it began using less-advanced microprocessing chips produced by American tech firm Nvidia to produce its AI platform at a much cheaper price point than competitors. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.