New rules to help renters including bans on shock evictions delayed again
We reveal what help you can get if you're struggling with rent below
HOUSE THAT New rules to help renters including bans on shock evictions delayed again
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
NEW rules giving more power to renters including a ban on shock evictions have been delayed again.
The Renters' Reform Bill will reportedly not come into force in autumn as planned due to delays in Parliament.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
The Renters' Reform Bill has been held up in Parliament
Credit: Alamy
The far-reaching bill will ban Section 21, also known as "no fault" evictions, as well as prevent landlords from increasing rents to deliberately squeeze hard-up renters out of their homes.
The delay to the ban on Section 21 notices, as first reported by The Financial Times, is the first in a string of push backs.
Fears have been raised by campaign group the Renters Reform Coalition that the latest delay could mean the bill not coming into effect until the spring of 2026.
Tom Darling, director, said: "Renters will feel let down yet again on hearing that Section 21 no fault evictions are now unlikely to be scrapped until 2026 - a year and a half since the government was elected on a manifesto pledge to 'immediately abolish' them.
"Now we find out renters will be facing a second no-fault eviction nightmare at Christmas since this promise was made.
"Everyone needs a decent, secure home, but with every month that passes thousands more renters are faced with a no-fault eviction.
"The Government must show a renewed impetus to get this over the line."
Estimates from Shelter suggest around 25,000 households have been threatened with homelessness following a Section 21 notice since the Labour Party was elected.
The charity said this means for each day the Government delays a ban, 70 households will be threatened with homelessness.
The Sun spoke to one couple who were forced out of their home before Christmas, leaving them scrambling to find a new place to live with their four kids.
Landlord Responsibilities
Trevor and Tnaesha Twohig described receiving the no-fault eviction as "devastating and anxiety-inducing".
The Sun asked the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to comment.
What else is included in the Renters' Reform Bill?
It's not just a ban on Section 21 evictions covered in the Renters' Reform Bill.
A host of other changes are included in the legislation. These are just a few of the major ones:
Ensuring possession grounds are fair to both parties - this will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable".
- this will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable". Providing stronger protections against backdoor eviction - this will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out.
- this will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out. Introduce a new Private Rented Sector Landlord Ombudsman - this will mean renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord.
- this will mean renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord. Give tenants strengthened rights to request a pet in the property - a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably.
- a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably. Apply "Awaab's Law" to the sector - this will set clear legal expectations about the timeframes within which landlords in the private rented sector have to take action to make homes safe where they contain serious hazards.
Help you can get to pay rent
You might be able to get help via the Household Support Fund, which is worth £742million to councils in England.
What to do if you've been served a Section 21 notice
Here is what you can do, according to the Renters' Reform Coalition...
Check the form - A section 21 notice must be on an official form, known as a 6a form. Your landlord can't issue an eviction notice just by telling you in person or by text/email.
Check if the form is valid - you must be given at least two months notice to vacate a property. You also can't be given a section 21 if your tenancy started less than four months prior. If you are on a fixed term contract you can't receive a section 21 unless there is a break clause in it.
These things can also make a section 21 notice invalid: The council have given your landlord an improvement notice to fix things, or an emergency works notice, in the last 6 months.
Your deposit isn't in a deposit protection scheme. In that case the landlord must return it to you before they can issue a section 21.
The property is a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) but it doesn't have a HMO licence from the council. In some areas all rented properties need a licence - check with your council.
The landlord has charged you illegal fees - such as a deposit worth more than 5 weeks rent, or admin fees. In this case they must return the money to you before serving a section 21.
You never received key paperwork for the property - the Energy Performance Certificate, the 'How to rent' guide, and a gas safety certificate (if there is gas).
What to do if the section 21 is valid:
You don't have to leave the property at the end of your section 21 notice. Your landlord still has to apply to court for a possession order and a warrant for eviction, to use court bailiffs to evict you.
If you are remaining in your property after the end of a section 21 notice, make sure you inform your landlord and continue to pay rent while you look for another place to live.
If you can't find somewhere to rent and are facing homelessness, tell your council immediately. They should be able to advise you on what to do and provide emergency temporary accommodation or other support.
Local authorities have until March 31, 2026, to allocate their share of the fund and can set their own eligibility criteria.
But you might be able to get free money through the fund which can be used to pay for rent.
Speak to your local council about what help is on offer. You can find your local council via www.gov.uk/find-local-council.
You might also be able to apply for a Discretionary Housing Payment to cover the cost of rent.
You can apply for a DHP if you get Housing Benefit or receive the housing element of Universal Credit.
Some charities offer grants to those struggle to make ends meet as well.
Use the Turn2Us grants search checker to see if you're eligible for anything - grants-search.turn2us.org.uk.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
DWP Universal Credit and PIP cuts U-turn by Government
The announcement comes after crisis talks with backbenchers, with some 126 MPs within the party signing an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. Sir Keir Starmer's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. A spokesperson for Number 10 said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. I've made it clear: I won't vote for any cuts to PIP. We should be building a system that lifts people up — not taking vital support away from those who need it most. — Imran Hussain MP (@Imran_HussainMP) June 26, 2025 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. The PIP Cuts DWP Welfare Bill must be pulled. I've signed an amendment to the Bill alongside 100+ calling for a pause and rethink. The Government must #PullTheBill and #StopTheCuts to #PIP#York — 💙Rachael Maskell MP (@RachaelMaskell) June 25, 2025 What's changed? Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. This U-turn could protect 370,000 existing claimants The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement. The Disability Benefit Cuts Bill has been published. On average PIP recipients will lose £4,500 a year. These are the deepest cuts to disability benefits since George Osborne - impacting 3 million people. This won't create jobs, it will create poverty. MPs must vote against. — Neil Duncan-Jordan MP (@NeilForPoole) June 18, 2025 Have all the MPs backed this concession? Speaking before the concessions were revealed, Rachel Maskell said: 'As the Government is seeking to reform the system, they should protect all disabled people until they have completed their co-produced consultation and co-produced implementation. 'I cannot vote for something that will have such a significant impact … as disabled people are not involved, it is just a backroom deal.' One MP said that ministers would need to 'go back to the drawing board' to make the Bill acceptable. Another said they expected the legislation would get through second reading if the Government conceded the key sticking points relating to existing Pip claimants, the health element of universal credit and a policy consultation. 'It would need to be in the Bill, not just a commitment,' they said. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to reflect 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He insisted there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' What have campaigners said about the concessions? There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' Recommended reading: What about opposition MPs? The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
John Swinney in funding threat to councils over flagship education policy
EXCLUSIVE: An exasperated First Minister has written to COSLA and accused councils of stalling on a deal to cut class contact time for teachers. An angry John Swinney has threatened to withhold funding from councils unless they fulfill a promise to free up time for teachers. In a letter obtained by the Record, the First Minister has accused town hall chiefs of stalling on a deal to cut class contact time for teachers. He said he could 'withhold or recover relevant monies' if councils backslide on the agreement. A senior council source hit back by saying the policy is 'simply unaffordable and potentially undeliverable'. The row stems from a £186.5m Budget deal on restoring teacher numbers to 2023 levels and making meaningful progress on reducing class contact time for teachers. Ministers want class contact time reduced by an hour and a half a week to help teachers prepare for lessons, raise standards and undertake professional development. In his letter to council umbrella group, Swinney accused councils of not coming good on the deal: 'I am concerned about the lack of progress on delivery of the commitment to make meaningful progress on reducing class contact time. 'We simply cannot afford to stall on this any longer, particularly when we are facing a dispute and ballot on industrial action from the teacher unions on this issue, as part of their concerns over workload.' He added: 'The agreement to provide increased funding of £186.5 million was made in good faith by the Scottish Government. It is essential that meaningful progress on reducing class contact time is now made, with a credible proposal to the unions ready for August, in order to fulfil the requirements of our agreement.. 'Ultimately, where we do not consider that satisfactory progress is being made on delivery of the agreement, the Scottish Government reserves the right to adjust, withhold or recover relevant monies allocated to individual councils for these purposes.' His threat came ahead of a meeting of COSLA today where the class contact time commitment will be discussed. A COSLA paper makes clear council chiefs do not believe they have enough money to deliver the policy: 'There is a strong consensus that councils would not be able to deliver the policy from the existing funding envelope available to Local Government.' COSLA also claimed a phased reduction of class contact time cannot be achieved if councils revert to 2023 levels of teachers. They also cited modelling which suggested over 3800 additional teachers would be required for a reduction in class contact time by 1.5 hours. COSLA's proposed position is to seek extra funding for reducing class contact time if the Government confirms it as a priority. A council insider said: "A 1.5 hour reduction in class contact time for teachers is simply unaffordable and potentially undeliverable in many areas due to a shortage of teachers, even if the Scottish Government came up with extra funding, which they say they don't have. 'If the Scottish Government tries to force this policy through it will require cuts to other aspects of education, which would impact detrimentally on children and young people. This policy has not been fully thought through by Ministers. They are desperate to appease the teaching unions and avoid industrial action."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How Trump took us to the brink of World War 3 and back again
How Trump took us to the brink of World War 3 and back again Was this the art of the deal or the brink of disaster?
