If Pakistan is kept away from the Asia Cup, a public outcry is unlikely
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has clarified that a decision has not yet been taken on the Asia Cup to be played here in September. But it's difficult to see either Pakistan coming to India or India accommodating Pakistan by playing in the UAE or Sri Lanka. It is too soon, and, as the government has said, Operation Sindoor is ongoing. The current cessation of hostilities is only a 'strategic pause.'
For so long has cricket borrowed metaphors from the military that to see the traffic in the opposite direction (the IPL's 'strategic timeout') is startling. It might not be a bad idea to give cricket between the two countries a break from the jingoistic reactions either side of the border. In the current atmosphere, a public outcry is unlikely.
Politics vs. commerce
An Asia Cup without an India-Pakistan match is like Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark. It will be interesting to see the politics versus commerce argument unfold, since Sony has paid $170 million —for media rights for all Asian Cricket Council (ACC) tournaments till 2031. This includes men's and women's tournaments in the Asia Cup, Under-19 and Emerging Nations competitions, the last of which is scheduled to be held in Sri Lanka next month. So it is a question, as Rizwan might have realised by now, of mixing sport, politics and commerce.
There is too the question of the ACC itself, currently headed by Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi who is the Chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board. The ACC, founded in 1983, was a useful body when Asia didn't have much of a voice in the International Cricket Council. But it might have overstayed its welcome. None of the full members seem to have the inclination of 'spreading the game' in the region with the kind of missionary zeal that was initially apparent.
Fifteen per cent of the broadcasting income from the Asia Cup goes to each of the full members India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan. India apart, none can afford to let that amount go. If India refuse visas to the Pakistan team – other countries are unlikely to complain to the International Cricket Council now headed by the son of India's Home Minister — the television rights amount might have to be readjusted.
Indians keen to send the message to other countries that you support the enemy at your own peril, have made it a patriotic duty to stop visiting Türkiye or Azerbaijan, with a popular booking website saying 'In solidarity with our nation, we have discontinued all promotions and offers for travel to Azerbaijan and Turkey.' In the same spirit, it is possible that the BCCI might cancel India's tour of Bangladesh in August. A retired army official there was quoted as saying, 'If India attacks Pakistan, Bangladesh should occupy the seven states of North-East India. I think it is necessary to start a discussion on a joint-military system with China.' Competitive patriotism is a major sport in South Asia.
Pull outs
The Asia Cup has been buffeted by political winds before. In 1986, India pulled out of the tournament in Sri Lanka as relations with that country were at a low ebb. Pakistan pulled out in 1990-91 when it was held in India as political relations between the two were strained. In 1993, the tournament itself was cancelled for the same reason.
Cricket has a knack of muddling through violence, wrote Gideon Haigh recently, recalling political assassinations or terrorist attacks that have left ongoing cricket unaffected. But this feels different. India hold all the cards, and as recent events have shown, they are not shy of playing them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How PM's ‘Demographic Mission' promise aligns with BJP, RSS narratives
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement on Friday that his government will set up a 'demographic mission' to study population changes has brought into sharp focus the long-held concerns of the BJP and its ideological parent, the RSS, over demographic shifts in the country. 'When demographic change happens, especially in border areas, it creates a crisis for national security… a challenge for unity, integrity and progress… So today, from the ramparts of the Red Fort, I want to say that we have decided to start a high-powered demographic mission… Yeh mission tay samay mein, suvicharit, nischit roop se, apne karya ko karega. Us disha mein hum aage bad rahe hain (This mission will accomplish its task in a fixed time, in a well-planned, decisive way. We are working towards this),' the PM said on Friday. For years, the BJP and RSS have linked the issue to infiltration from neighbouring countries, religious conversion, and differential fertility rates among communities — framing it as a challenge with national security, political, and socio-cultural dimensions. For the BJP, illegal immigration from Bangladesh and Myanmar is tied to concerns over voter rolls, resource allocation, and communal tensions. For the RSS, conversions and infiltration threaten to alter the balance between communities, potentially redrawing political boundaries. On August 18, 2022, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, while speaking at the concluding session of the National Security Strategies Conference, told Directors General of Police of border states to keep a 'watchful eye on the demographic changes taking place in border areas', describing it as a priority in the fight for the country's future. He said the issue had been formally deliberated at the conference under the topic 'Demographic changes and growing radicalisation in border areas', alongside counter-terrorism, Maoist overground networks, cyber surveillance, and drug trafficking. Shah's warning came amid political sparring over the entry of Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar and continuing concerns about illegal immigration from Bangladesh. At the time, the Border Security Force (BSF) had raised the issue with the Border Guard Bangladesh, only for the latter to deny that its citizens needed to cross over, citing economic progress at home. The Home Minister has long articulated a hard line on infiltration. In September 2018, as national BJP president, Shah described illegal Bangladeshi migrants as 'termites' who would be removed from electoral rolls. 'They are eating the grain that should go to the poor, taking our jobs… They will be struck off the voter list,' he said at a rally. The BJP had then repeatedly demanded the extension of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise beyond Assam to other states, including Jharkhand, and raised the issue in the context of state elections. In 2019, ahead of the Jharkhand polls, senior BJP leaders again warned about 'Bangladeshi infiltrators', linking them to crime and security problems. For the RSS, the issue has been framed as a civilisational challenge that could alter India's socio-political fabric. In his 2022 Vijayadashmi speech, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said 'population imbalance' had led to the creation of new countries such as East Timor, South Sudan, and Kosovo, and warned that 'when there is population imbalance, new countries are created'. He also cited the Partition of India in 1947 and the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 as examples of how shifts in population composition, when aligned with political movements, could alter the map itself. He called for a 'comprehensive population control policy' applicable to all, without exception, and said it must be brought 'with determination' so that society accepts it. While acknowledging that birth rate is only 'one part of this imbalance', Bhagwat pointed to 'conversion by force and allurement' as the 'biggest factor', alongside cross-border infiltration. He underlined that India's large young population could be a demographic dividend, but the country needed to plan now for when that population grows old in 50 years. In October 2024, this theme resurfaced in political discourse when Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu and Tamil Nadu CM M K Stalin — from opposing political camps — voiced concern over falling fertility in southern states and its potential impact on parliamentary representation after delimitation. Stalin joked about 'aiming for 16 children' to preserve seats, echoing, in a different context, earlier Sangh Parivar calls for Hindus to have more children to counter a 'rising Muslim population'. Past RSS chiefs and leaders have openly urged bigger Hindu families. Former RSS chief K S Sudarshan said in 2005 that families should have 'not less than three children', current general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale argued in 2013 for larger Hindu families to prevent minorities from gaining demographic advantage in certain areas, and the Vishva Hindu Parishad's (VHP) Champat Rai said in 2015 that family planning was no longer a purely personal matter for Hindus. The RSS's position has evolved to also recognise 'regional imbalance' — the fear among southern and western states, which have lower fertility rates, that they will lose parliamentary seats if delimitation is based on the latest population figures. In July this year, RSS-linked weekly Organiser backed calls for a policy that prevents population trends from disproportionately affecting any community or region. Editor Prafulla Ketkar warned that ignoring these imbalances could lead to 'socio-economic disparities and political conflicts'. Within the BJP, the push for legislation has had mixed outcomes. Assam's 2017 'Population and Women's Empowerment Policy' was amended in 2021 to bar those with more than two children from government jobs. Uttar Pradesh's law commission has proposed denying government subsidies to families with over two children, though the measure is still under consideration. In BJP and RSS narratives, demographic change is not only a matter of numbers but also of political and security implications. For the BJP, illegal immigration from Bangladesh and Myanmar is tied to concerns over voter rolls, resource allocation, and communal tensions. For the RSS, conversions and infiltration threaten to alter the balance between communities, potentially redrawing political boundaries. With PM Modi now proposing a formal demographic mission, the government appears to be moving towards institutionalising the study and monitoring of these shifts. The mission's remit — whether confined to statistical analysis or extended to recommending policy interventions — will determine how far the BJP translates its and the RSS's ideological concerns into administrative measures.
NDTV
4 minutes ago
- NDTV
Steve Smith Reveals Why He May Not Be Part Of Australia Team In Olympics 2028: "Tricky..."
Australia's talismanic batter Steve Smith admitted that breaking into the T20I squad for the Los Angeles 2028 Olympics won't be a walk in the park but a "tricky" affair. Despite the odds stacked against Smith realising his goal, the seasoned star isn't willing to go down without putting up a fight, reported Sky Sports. Cricket's return to the Olympics had been a long time coming. Last featured in the Games in 1900, the sport is set to make its long-awaited comeback after 128 years at the Los Angeles 2028 Olympics. Since cricket's return to the Summer Games, Smith has been vocal about representing Australia in one of the world's biggest sporting tournaments. Smith, who will be 39 by the time the next edition of the Olympics unfolds, yearns for a chance to compete for one of the three spots at the podium. "I mean, it is a goal of mine to try and make that Olympic team in 28. I think, you know, the team's doing pretty well at the moment, the Australian T20 team. So it's going to be tricky to get in there, but you know, just got to keep putting my best foot forward, and we'll never know," Smith told Sky Sports. "Yeah, I mean, I've watched a lot of Olympics since I was a young kid and really enjoyed watching the Australian athletes go about it. So, you know, when I heard that cricket was going to be a part of it, I was like, that would be really cool to be involved," he added. During his illustrious stint, Smith has been a part of World Cups, Champions Trophy, World Test Championship finals and the biggest cricketing rivalries. However, the idea of being a part of something known on the world stage excites him. "So, you know, I've obviously played in, you know, lots of World Cups and Ashes and uh Border Gavaskar Trophy and things like that, but um yeah, when this popped up, it was something new and another opportunity to, you know, represent your country on a world stage. So, yeah, it was like I'd love to be involved in that, but it's still a fair way away. So, we'll see," he said. Smith, who retired from the ODIs after enduring a heartbreak in the Champions Trophy, isn't a familiar face in Australia's T20I fold. His last appearance in the format dates back to February 2024, when he made the cut for the final XI against New Zealand. With the T20 World Cup set to take place in India and Sri Lanka next year, it is yet to be seen if Smith remains in Australia's plans for the marquee event.
NDTV
4 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Tired Today, Retired Tomorrow": Opposition's Jab At PM Over RSS Praise
New Delhi: The opposition has reacted with 'retirement benefits' jibes after Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's praise of the RSS - the ruling BJP' ideological mentor - in his Independence Day speech Friday. The Prime Minister's reference and praise infuriated the Congress, which pointed out the RSS, or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, had refused to hoist the national flag for the 52 years. The party also declared Mr Modi's RSS remarks 'overtures' to an organisation seen as controlling the ruling party and playing a key role in appointments to senior posts in the government, including PM. "The PM was tired today. Soon, he will be retired," Congress comms chief Jairam Ramesh said on X, and criticised the Prime Minister's speech as "stale, hypocritical, insipid". "It is nothing but a desperate attempt to appease the organisation in the run-up to his 75th birthday next month," he said, referring to RSS boss Mohan Bhagwat's remarks - that veteran leaders should step back when they turn 75 and give the younger generation a chance. Many took that remark to be aimed at Mr Modi, who will turn 75 in September. लाल किले की प्राचीर से आज प्रधानमंत्री का भाषण बासी, पाखंडी, नीरस और चिंताजनक था। विकसित भारत, आत्मनिर्भर भारत और "सबका साथ, सबका विकास" जैसे वही दोहराए गए नारे साल-दर-साल सुने जा रहे हैं, लेकिन इनका कोई ठोस नतीजा नहीं निकला है। 'मेड-इन-इंडिया' सेमीकंडक्टर चिप का वादा अनगिनत बार… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 15, 2025 The BJP has said no such rule exists; in March Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis pointed out one member of the union cabinet is over 'limit' - 80-year-old Bihar leader Jitan Ram Manjhi, who is the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Minister. Others, including Mr Modi are within a year or two. Buzz about Mr Modi's 'future' - flagged by AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal last year - broke after the PM's March visit to Nagpur, which is where the RSS headquarters is located. That was Mr Modi's first visit since becoming Prime Minister. Meanwhile, Mr Ramesh also claimed the PM's I-Day speech lacked "any honest mention of the country's deep economic distress, unemployment crisis, and rapidly growing economic inequality". The Congress' Salman Khurshid also hit out over the RSS remark. "There are two views about the RSS. One is our view... and the other is that of PM Modi and his allies. There is a huge difference between the two... so I believe we should not touch that issue on such an auspicious day (i.e., Independence Day) ..." he said. "They didn't hoist the flag for 52 years. They didn't contribute to the freedom movement. They opposed Mahatma Gandhi's Quit India Movement. They urged people to join the British Army to fight the Azad Hind Fauj. So, they had no contribution to the freedom movement..." Mr Modi's praise of the RSS was also vigorously condemned by AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who accused the Prime Minister of dishonouring the freedom struggle and politicising the day. "The ideology of Hindutva believes in exclusion and is antithetical to the values of our Constitution. Modi could have gone to Nagpur to praise the RSS as a ' swayamsevak ', or worker. Why did he have to do it from the Red Fort as the Prime Minister?" he asked on X. Glorifying the RSS in an Independence Day speech is an insult to the freedom struggle. The RSS and its ideological allies served as British foot soldiers. They never joined the fight for independence and hated Gandhi more than they ever opposed the British. Happy… — Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) August 15, 2025 The CPI(M) also hit out. Party General Secretary MA Baby said, "It is deeply regrettable that PM Modi, in his Independence Day address from the Red Fort, chose to praise the RSS - an organisation with a dubious historical record and an organisation that had no role whatsoever in freedom struggles... consistently sought to undermine national unity along religious lines..." Mr Modi had called the RSS 'the world's biggest non-governmental organisation' in his 103-minute I-Day address. That was his first ever reference to the RSS in any formal Independence Day talk. The RSS marks its 100th anniversary this year. "Today I want to mention one thing with great pride. 100 years ago an organisation was born - the RSS. Its 100 years of national service has been a very proud and glorious page (in India's history)," Mr Modi, who has been an RSS pracharak, or worker, in the past, declared. "For the past 100 years, RSS workers have dedicated their lives to fulfil the resolve of 'vyakti nirman' (character development) and 'rashtra nirman' (nation-building) ..." he declared.
