Pro-Trump nationalist becomes Poland's new president
Nawrocki, 42, a supporter of US President Donald Trump, won a June 1 election in a major blow for the pro-EU government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a former European Council president.
"I will be the voice of those who want a sovereign Poland that is in the EU, but a Poland that is not the EU," he told lawmakers after taking his oath of office.
"We must fight those who are pushing the nation towards decline and degradation," he said, citing Ignacy Paderewski, a Polish prime minister from the early 20th century.
Nawrocki, a historian and political novice, has branded Tusk's government the "worst" in the history of post-communist Poland.
- 'He doesn't grovel' -
Outside the parliament, thousands of people came to show their support for Nawrocki.
"He doesn't grovel before Brussels," Jan Smolinski, 75, a retired miner, told AFP, adding: "He's a true Pole, flesh and blood".
Marietta Borcz, a 57-year-old dental assistant, said it was "important" to her that Nawrocki "is Catholic and will uphold Christian values".
During the election campaign, Nawrocki ruled out easing Poland's near total abortion ban or allowing same-sex civil partnerships.
A small group of around 20 protesters held up black roses, saying Nawrocki's inauguration was "a black day for Poland".
Stanislawa Sklodowska, 72, a retired economist said his election "reflects poorly on us Poles".
Nawrocki, who travelled to Washington to seek Trump's backing during the campaign, won a narrow victory against liberal candidate Rafal Trzaskowski.
The result showed the high degree of political polarisation in the EU and NATO member state, a key supporter of neighbouring Ukraine.
Presidents in Poland can initiate as well as veto legislation, and have some influence over the country's foreign and defence policies.
- 'Annoy us' -
Relations between government and president are likely to be tense ahead of parliamentary elections planned for 2027.
"I have no doubt that Mr Nawrocki will do everything to annoy us," said Tusk, who warned that he would not let Nawrocki "demolish" his government.
But in a message on social media on Wednesday, Tusk said he had already worked with three presidents in the past.
"What will it be like with the fourth? We'll manage," he wrote.
Nawrocki has promised to be "an active president" from the start and has said he wants to "stimulate" the government with various bills.
The government holds a parliamentary majority and analysts say the two sides may be forced to make some compromises.
"Both parties should realise that engaging in intense confrontation is obviously not the way forward," said Piotr Trudnowski, a member of Klub Jagiellonski, a Christian-Democrat think tank.
- 'Poland First, Poles First' -
Ewa Marciniak, a political scientist at the University of Warsaw, said that Nawrocki would have to work with the government on foreign policy -- in which he has "no experience".
During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump.
"It is precisely from this that he will build his foreign policy, at least initially," Marciniak said.
One major difference could be relations with Ukraine.
Trudnowski said Nawrocki would "not be as enthusiastic" as his predecessor Andrzej Duda on Ukraine.
During his campaign, Nawrocki opposed the idea of NATO membership for Ukraine and criticised Kyiv for not having "shown gratitude for what the Poles have done".
Under his slogan "Poland First, Poles First", he was critical of some of the benefits received by the more than one million Ukrainians who have fled to the country.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has congratulated Nawrocki and emphasised the importance of close ties with Poland -- a vital transit country for military and humanitarian supplies to his country as it fights off Russia's invasion.
After speaking to Nawrocki by phone last week, Zelensky said the two had agreed to visit each other and seek forms of cooperation "that will bring real results for both our countries and our people".
Zelensky said he was "thankful for the readiness to work together and for the assurance of continued support for Ukraine".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Why UK police arrested 466 people at protest for banned Palestine Action group
Police have arrested 466 people in London for supporting Palestine Action at the most recent protest backing the group since the UK government banned it under anti-terrorism laws. The Met Police said the protesters were arrested for supporting a proscribed organisation, and the number of arrests was the largest it had made on a single day in the past decade. There were also eight arrests for other offences, including five for assaults on officers, although no one was seriously injured, police said. Politicians in the UK banned Palestine Action under anti-terrorism legislation in July after some of its members broke into a Royal Air Force base and damaged planes as part of a series of protests. The group accuses Britain's government of complicity in what it says are Israeli war crimes in Gaza. Its co-founder, Huda Ammori, won a bid to bring a legal challenge against the ban last week. Critics, including the United Nations and groups such as Amnesty International and Greenpeace, have condemned the move as a legal overreach and a threat to free speech. The ban makes it a crime to be a member of Palestine Action, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. It comes under the UK's Terrorism Act 2000, and it states a person commits an offence if the person "expresses an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation". It goes on to state: "A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable if: In a post on X, the Met Police said, "anyone who came to Parliament Square today to hold a placard expressing support for Palestinian Action was either arrested or in the process of being arrested". Psychotherapist Craig Bell, 39, was among those holding a placard at the latest event. He said the ban was "absolutely ridiculous". "When you compare Palestine Action with an actual terrorist group who are killing civilians and taking lives, it's just a joke that they're being prescribed a terrorist group," he told AFP. Protesters, some wearing black and white scarves and waving Palestinian flags, chanted "hands off Gaza" and held placards with the message "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" at the event. The crowd chanted "shame on you" at the police. A group called Defend Our Juries, which organised Saturday's protests and previous demonstrations against the ban, said "unprecedented numbers" had risked "arrest and possible imprisonment" to "defend this country's ancient liberties". "We will keep going. Our numbers are already growing for the next wave of action in September," it added. Police forces across the UK have made scores of similar arrests since the government outlawed Palestine Action on July 5. UN Human Rights chief Volker Türk said the ban was "disproportionate and unnecessary". "It appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that is at odds with the UK's obligations under international human rights law," he said. Police announced this week that the first three people had been charged in the English and Welsh criminal justice system with supporting Palestine Action following their arrests at a July 5 demonstration. Seven people have so far been charged in Scotland, which has a separate legal system. Amnesty International UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh wrote to Met Police chief Mark Rowley this week, urging restraint to be exercised when policing people expressing support for Palestine Action. "The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence, and it is entirely disproportionate to the point of absurdity to be treating them as terrorists," he said. "We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. "The arrest of otherwise peaceful protesters is a violation of the UK's international obligations to protect the rights of freedom of expression and assembly." A UK court challenge against the decision to proscribe Palestine Action will be heard in November. Wires


SBS Australia
6 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Trump-Putin summit: What to expect as Zelenskyy rejects 'giving land to the occupier'
There was no mention of Ukraine's participation in the meeting, despite multiple calls from Kyiv and Europe that the war-torn country must be part of the negotiations. This has sparked fury in Ukraine, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy saying his country "won't give land to the occupier" and that "any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace". Trump has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace — after boasting he could end the war in 24 hours — but multiple rounds of peace talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Here's what we know about the summit so far: When and where On his Truth Social site on Saturday, Trump announced that his meeting with Putin would be held in the far-north US state of Alaska on 15 August, which was later confirmed by the Kremlin. The announcement came after days of both sides indicating the two leaders would hold a summit next week. The Kremlin confirmed the summit in Alaska, calling it "quite logical." "They would like to meet with me, I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing," Trump said on Friday, ahead of the announcement, speaking of both Putin and Zelenskyy. At the White House on Saturday, Trump said "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Ukraine and Russia, without providing further details. Why Alaska? The meeting will be held in Alaska, which Russia sold to the United States in 1867. The western tip of the state is not far — just across the Bering Strait — from the easternmost part of Russia. "Alaska and the Arctic are also where our countries' economic interests intersect, and there are prospects for large-scale, mutually beneficial projects," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said in a statement on Telegram. "But, of course, the presidents themselves will undoubtedly focus on discussing options for achieving a long-term peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis," he added. Ushakov also expressed hope that next time the two presidents would meet on Russian territory. "A corresponding invitation has already been sent to the US president," he added. An International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Putin — which obliges members to detain the Russian leader if he visits their country — had been thought to narrow the potential number of venues. Putin had previously mentioned the United Arab Emirates as a possible host for the talks, while media speculated Turkey, China or India could be probable venues. Why is Ukraine not involved? Zelenskyy has been pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. In his address hours after Moscow and Washington confirmed the meeting, Zelenskyy called any decisions made without Ukraine "stillborn". Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting when he held talks with Putin earlier this week, but the Russian leader has appeared to rule out meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. At talks in Istanbul in June, Russian negotiators said a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting could only take place at the "final phase" of negotiations, once the two sides had agreed on terms for peace. Asked if Putin had to meet Zelenskyy as a prerequisite for their summit, Trump said on Saturday: "No, he doesn't." National security advisors from Kyiv's allies — including the United States, EU nations and the UK — gathered in Britain Saturday to align their views ahead of the Putin-Trump summit. French President Emmanuel Macron, following phone calls with Zelenskyy, Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said "the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukrainians" and that Europe also had to be involved in the negotiations. On Saturday, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy received US Vice President JD Vance, Ukraine's Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, top Zelenskyy aide Andriy Yermak and European national security advisors at Chevening House, a country mansion southeast of London, to discuss Trump's push for peace. On Saturday, Lammy posted on X: "The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace." In his evening address on Saturday, Zelenskyy stressed: "There must be an honest end to this war, and it is up to Russia to end the war it started." When did they last meet? Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January. The last time Putin met a US president in the United States was during talks with Barack Obama at a UN General Assembly in 2015. Negotiating positions Despite the flurry of diplomacy and multiple rounds of peace talks, Russia and Ukraine appear no closer to agreeing on an end to the fighting. Putin has rejected calls by the United States, Ukraine and Europe for an immediate ceasefire. At talks in June, Russia demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, demanded Ukraine commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said it will never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory -- though it acknowledged securing the return of land captured by Russia would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Kyiv is also seeking security guarantees from Western backers, including the deployment of foreign troops as peacekeepers to enforce any ceasefire. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes. Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire.

ABC News
9 hours ago
- ABC News
Zelenskyy calls for 'lasting peace', not 'pause in the killings', after officials meet in UK
Ukrainian and European security officials have met with US Vice-President JD Vance in the UK to discuss the ongoing war with Russia, ahead of a summit between the US and Russian presidents next week. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the meeting was constructive and that Kyiv's arguments were heard. "What is needed is not a pause in the killings, but a real, lasting peace," he said. "Not a ceasefire sometime in the future — months from now — but immediately. President Trump told me so, and I fully support it." The Ukrainian leader had earlier put out a statement re-affirming that Ukraine would not cede land to Russia as part of a ceasefire deal, despite Washington signalling that it might be necessary to end the war. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Alaska next week to discuss the war and a prospective peace deal. Russia has repeatedly demanded Ukraine cede its territory, agree to demilitarise, and be excluded from NATO membership. European officials were reported to have presented their own Ukraine peace proposals to the US ahead of the meeting between the US and Russian presidents. Mr Trump announced on Friday that he would meet Mr Putin in Alaska on August 15, saying the parties, including Mr Zelenskyy, were close to a deal. Details of the potential deal have yet to be announced, but Mr Trump said it would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". It could require Ukraine to surrender significant parts of its territory — an outcome Kyiv and its European allies say would only encourage Russian aggression. The Wall Street Journal said European officials had presented a counter-proposal, including demands that a ceasefire must take place before any other steps are taken and that any territory exchange must be reciprocal. "You can't start a process by ceding territory in the middle of fighting," it quoted one European negotiator as saying. Mr Zelenskyy said the meeting was constructive. "All our arguments were heard," he said in his evening address to Ukrainians. "The path to peace for Ukraine should be determined together and only together with Ukraine, this is a key principle." He had earlier rejected any territorial concessions, saying "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier". French President Emmanuel Macron also said Ukraine must play a role in any negotiations. "Ukraine's future cannot be decided without the Ukrainians, who have been fighting for their freedom and security for over three years now," he wrote on X. "Europeans will also necessarily be part of the solution, as their own security is at stake." Mr Zelenskyy has made a flurry of calls with Ukraine's allies since a visit to Moscow on Wednesday by Mr Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff. "Clear steps are needed, as well as maximum coordination between us and our partners," Mr Zelenskyy said. Ukraine and the European Union have pushed back on proposals they view as ceding too much to Mr Putin, whose troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab. Moscow has previously claimed four Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which was annexed in 2014. Russian forces do not fully control all the territory in the four regions and Russia has demanded that Ukraine pull out its troops from the parts of all four of them that they still control. Ukraine says its troops still have a small foothold in Russia's Kursk region a year after they crossed the border to try to gain leverage in any negotiations. Russia said it had expelled Ukrainian troops from Kursk in April. Fierce fighting is raging along the more than 1,000-kilometre front line along eastern and southern Ukraine, where Russian forces hold about a fifth of the country's territory. Russian troops are slowly advancing in Ukraine's east, but their summer offensive has so far failed to achieve a major breakthrough, Ukrainian military analysts say. Reuters/AP